Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

new test for bladder cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
zwalanga@yahoo.com - 10 Feb 2005 17:51 GMT
New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer

CHICAGO -- Testing for a certain protein in urine was found to increase
the accuracy for diagnosis of bladder cancer, according to a study in
the February 16 issue of JAMA, a theme issue on medical applications of
biotechnology.

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the United
States, according to background information in the article. Early
detection improves prognosis, treatment options, and quality of life.
Although the 5-year survival rate is 95 percent when tumors are
detected while they are confined to the mucosa (membrane), up to 25
percent of the approximately 60,000 bladder tumors predicted to be
diagnosed this year will be detected after they have become invasive or
metastatic, which lowers 5-year survival to approximately 48 percent
and 10 percent, respectively. As a result, 13,000 Americans will die of
bladder cancer this year.

A combination of methods is used for diagnosis of bladder cancer
because no single procedure detects all malignancies. Urine tests are
frequently part of an evaluation, but have either been nonspecific for
cancer or required specialized analysis at a laboratory.

H. Barton Grossman, M.D., of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and
colleagues investigated whether a new, point-of-care, noninvasive
urine-based test for the protein NMP22 proteomic marker could improve
detection of bladder cancer.  The researchers compared the ability of
this test to detect cancer with that of urine cytology (cells), which
must be analyzed in a clinical laboratory.  The study included 23
academic, private practice, and veterans' facilities in 10 states which
enrolled 1,331 patients at elevated risk for bladder cancer (history of
smoking and certain symptoms) from September 2001 to May 2002.
Patients at risk for malignancy of the urinary tract provided a urine
sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology prior to cystoscopy
(visual examination of the bladder using a special instrument that is
passed through the urethra).

Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 79 patients.  "We found that the NMP22
test is a useful adjunctive tool in the evaluation of patients at risk
for bladder cancer and that it identified several malignancies missed
by initial cystoscopy. Specificity of the NMP22 test was lower than for
cytology (85.7 percent vs. 99.2 percent), but sensitivity was
significantly greater (55.7 percent vs. 15.8 percent), with test
results available during the patient visit," the authors write. "The
proteomic marker detected 4 cancers that were not visualized during
initial cystoscopy, including 3 that were muscle invasive and 1
carcinoma in situ."

According to the article, the average Medicare reimbursement for voided
cytology is approximately $56, compared with $24 for the NMP22
point-of-care assay.

"In conclusion, the NMP22 assay may be a useful adjunct to cystoscopy
for diagnosing bladder cancer. Studies in different patient populations
are necessary to further define the role of this assay in patients with
risk factors and symptoms suggestive of possible bladder cancer," the
researchers write.
J - 10 Feb 2005 17:59 GMT
> New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer
>
> CHICAGO -- Testing for a certain protein in urine was found to increase
> the accuracy for diagnosis of bladder cancer, according to a study in
> the February 16 issue of JAMA, a theme issue on medical applications of
> biotechnology.

<snip>

> According to the article, the average Medicare reimbursement for voided
> cytology is approximately $56, compared with $24 for the NMP22
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> risk factors and symptoms suggestive of possible bladder cancer," the
> researchers write.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
1204258&dopt=Abstract


"The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary
cytology in detecting bladder cancer. "
Steph - 11 Feb 2005 03:17 GMT
>> New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> "The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary
> cytology in detecting bladder cancer. "

But neither are as good as a cystoscopy!
zwalanga@yahoo.com - 11 Feb 2005 03:34 GMT
> >> New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >> risk factors and symptoms suggestive of possible bladder cancer," the
> >> researchers write.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
1204258&dopt=Abstract


> > "The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary
> > cytology in detecting bladder cancer. "
>
> But neither are as good as a cystoscopy!

The press release clearly states "...the NMP22 assay may be a useful
adjunct to cystoscopy for diagnosing bladder cancer."

Zee
J - 11 Feb 2005 09:44 GMT
> >> New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >> risk factors and symptoms suggestive of possible bladder cancer," the
> >> researchers write.

I don't see the point in doing both.
I was reading a stock broker web page yesterday (dated 2003), where the claim was that there's a new
treatment for prostate cancer and I wondered if these "new treatments" or "new tests" news items, are ways
to manipulate the stock market and prices of shares.
And if doctors in the US are allowed to invest in such. (since the webpage had statements from doctors
about the new treatment).
I guess that will remain a question unanswered, since Dr. "R" is no longer here.

> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
1204258&dopt=Abstract

> >
> > "The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary
> > cytology in detecting bladder cancer. "
> >
> But neither are as good as a cystoscopy!

Thanks Steph,
I thought that's what it said. (got mixed up in the "cy's")
In other words, I saw the word cystology in what I posted and visualized a cystoscope.
J
zwalanga@yahoo.com - 11 Feb 2005 15:49 GMT
> > >> New Test Improves Detection of Bladder Cancer
> > >>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> about the new treatment).
> I guess that will remain a question unanswered, since Dr. "R" is no longer here.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
1204258&dopt=Abstract


> > > "The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary
> > > cytology in detecting bladder cancer. "
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In other words, I saw the word cystology in what I posted and visualized a cystoscope.
> J

Try to see beyond your frantic protection of your "ownership" of this
newsgroup and how you have suberted it to be anything BUT support;
except for your ego.

www.nofreelunch.org

Zee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.