UPDATE:  I posted a little while ago under guidance and info needed.  My
father has a PSA 10, Gleason 6, T1c and two cancer samples found 1 -1mm and
1-3mm.
The specialist surgeon gave my father no indication which way to treat
rather said it was up to him and come back in a week after reading up.  Week
later father returns and says he wants it removed as others had and are now
fine.  The specialist informed him that many thought they have had the full
removal (big procedure)but were confused and most, more than likely had
merely received blockages.  He told father to go on his intended holiday and
told him to consider other options as the cancer found was so small again
without giving preferred option.   My father now totally confused and upset
told specialist he wwas seeing his GP that day and asked to have results
sent to him.
At the meeting with the gp, the Gp was great and showed my father all the
results and info. that had been sent and Bingo on the the letter the
specialist wrote this patient would make an ideal candidate for
Brachytherapy.  Why he didn't tell him this i don't know.  The GP also said
that seeing the specialist was more inclined towards surgery then this
recommendation sounds good.
My father will now getting a second opinion from a specialist March 4,at the
Peter Maccallum which is the number one cancer hospital  in Australia. They
have a multi discipline team there. He is currently leaning towards
Brachytherapy. My concern is if he goes ths way then he cannot have the
prostate removed later on.  I read that Brachytherapy has advanced so much,
but i also read with interest from this goup that results are supposedly
better when coupled with external radiation depending on PSA etc.  which
category do you think my father into and waht are your opinions ??