Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PSA 865. anyone else out there start out so high?? (turns slightly into a rant. sorry)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lorelei - 18 Jan 2004 22:13 GMT
My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has
stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his
body. His PSA is 865. On Friday he received a 15 min infusion of
Zometa (to be done monthly) a shot of Lupron (every 3 months) and
started on daily Casodex. Man, he was so sick yesterday and I had to
work 12 hours. I was so worried about him and my 3 yr old who was home
with him.  We find out in 6 weeks if he is responsive to conventional
therapy. and if he isn't?? they don't tell me anything. just that we
would have to try more "aggressive therapy" whatever that means. We
find out tomorrow what his Gleason score is.
I am having a hard time finding PSAs that high. I did see a 36 year
old man in Italy whose was 500 and his PAP was 203.). this was in Sept
of 2000 and he was still alive 18 months after diagnosis. that is all
I know.
My husband's PAP is 235 (i think, I know it is double of the high end
of normal limits)
I think Curt's cancer is really far advanced and prognosis is poor but
no one will say anything like that. they just act like this is
routine, but I can tell it isn't because I see people who had their
prostate removed with a PSA of less than 10. and he blew by that a
long time ago.
So I am trying to find someone with similar circumstances. even it the
age is off 10 yrs or so. Please help me understand.
Thank you
Lori
c palmer - 18 Jan 2004 22:40 GMT
hi lori - in answer to some of your concerns.  first, yes, we have had
some folks that started out high.  berky was one of them.  someone said,
i think, around 2600 +, but i'm not sure.  

the prognosis is along the lines of what you already suspect but, with
that said, there has been different treatments that have some remarkable
results.  the problem is, it doesn't work the same on everyone, so that
is the joker in the deck.

you appear to have done your homework is so a short time.

may i offer this as a suggestion.  there are some studies that have been
ran on PC SPES that clearly show that there is a reduction of the size
of the tumors.  about 5 years ago, there was a big push that PC SPES was
the answer.  it is made up mainly of various herbs, and then the gov't
stepped in and i don't know what the status of it is now.  but i didn't
hear any negative feedback other than it didn't do what they wanted it
to do, while others responded quite favorable to it.  

if you can get him into a clinical study and he may be able to get
treatment there that isn't available to the general public yet.  

i hope this information has helped.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
JohnG - 19 Jan 2004 00:48 GMT

> I think Curt's cancer is really far advanced and prognosis is poor but
> no one will say anything like that. they just act like this is
> routine, but I can tell it isn't because I see people who had their
> prostate removed with a PSA of less than 10. and he blew by that a
> long time ago.

Lorelei,

I have some theories about this that may or not help you communicate
with your doctors.   If it seems useless, please ignore.

Doctors don't like to deal in bad news any more than anyone else.
That's part of the problem, but it's really more than that.   They don't
want to admit defeat any more than you do.   Their motivations are
professional as well as personal, but they don't like to give up.   And
we should be glad for that.  

A college basketball coach whose team is behind by 20 points with only 5
minutes to play isn't going to talk to his team about the long odds
against them.  He isn't going to be as dispassionately informative and
analytical as those sitting on the sidelines.  He's going to talk to his
players about what they can do to pull this game out yet.  He has to be
that way, both for his own state of mind and his team's.  That's what
they all need to focus on.   And sometimes it works.   And sometimes
it's like that with doctors.  

Now I'm like you, or at least I think I am.   I want to know what the
score is and what the odds are.   I found a surgeon who would talk more
numbers with me.   But a lot of doctors have found that for the most
part, they've had better experiences dealing with their patients in
terms of what you and they are going to do than in terms of objective
analysis.    Sometimes, though, that leads them not to give you
information that you might be able to use.   Some doctors are able to
switch gears, and find ways to communicate better with those patients
who they find like to deal with information.  But some might also be a
bit gunshy about it, based on past experience.

Maybe my assessment is accurate, and maybe it isn't.  I'm not really
100% sure.   But maybe it'll give you some ideas of how to try to
establish better communication.

JohnG
Alan Meyer - 19 Jan 2004 01:52 GMT
> My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has
> stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thank you
> Lori

Lori,

I feel deeply for what you and Curt are going through.  You are all
much too young for this to have happened.

I don't know what to say that will be of help to you, so I'll just speak
my thoughts honestly and hope that you will find something of use
in them.

As you know, his prognosis is poor.  There are experimental treatments
but none of them are known to work.  That is why they are experimental.
You and Curt may feel that you would like to try some of them.  If you
do, you may get some satisfaction in knowing that, one way or another,
what you do will be of definite benefit to other families who are facing
this illness.  And it is always possible that one of the treatments will
prolong Curt's life or lead to a remission.  Sometimes one of the
experimental treatments will lead to extraordinary benefit for a few
lucky individuals whose cancer happens to be sensitive to the specific
agents they are experimenting with.

If you want to search for clinical trials, one place to search is at the
National Cancer Institute website at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/.
There is good information there about what to expect, a search form
for finding trials (mostly in the U.S.) and some information about each
trial.

I myself have been treated via clinical trials at the National Cancer
Institute.  The quality of care was very, very high, and there was no
cost whatsoever.  They paid for the treatment, my hospital stays, my
drugs, and all my tests and visits.  The money all came out of their
research funds.  I think this may be true at other cancer centers too,
not just the NCI center in Maryland.

Another thing you might want to consider is to borrow a video camera
from someone.  Perhaps Curt would like to record some things for
you and your child before he gets too deeply into the difficulties of
advanced disease and aggressive treatment.  Maybe you would like
to make some photos or videos of the family all together.

All of us on this group wish you the best.

Warmest regards,

   Alan
Steve Kramer - 19 Jan 2004 02:10 GMT
Lorelei,

The hormone treatment (HT) they are trying first, which will probably be
somewhat successful for awhile, is intended to repress the androgen
necessary to feed the prostate cancer.  That's terribly simplified, but
until you read up on the disease some more, it will have to do.  The
treatment can reduce the size of the tumors and reduce the PSA accordingly.

The "more aggressive" treatment will be chemo therapy.  Maybe, if there is
study available to him, some really aggressive stuff that might kill the a
lot of the PCa, but is very toxic to Curt.

You are correct in trying to find someone of his age and PSA level, but the
fact is, you will not find someone of your husband's age in prostate cancer
groups.  You will have to look at others and understand that PCa grows
faster the younger you are.

William243 william243@aol.com started with 4900 and was down to 3.5 after
HT.  In OCT 2000 he was 50.  I haven't heard from him in awhile.

There was a BobKat mrwilson1@sio.midco.net here who at 52 was dx's in OCT
2002 with 2540.  By July 2003, it was down to 445.  Haven't heard from him
either.

Berky, at 68, was1614 on 3/1/98 and died today.  Robert Young, at 61, was
1000 on 11/23/99 and died 6/15/2003.

John Preston, johnpreston_welwood@lineone.net at 48, was 640 APR 2003 and he
went down to the low double-digits, but now is back up to 44.

Curt, at 40, with 865, is in a real fix.  HT will probably work for awhile,
but there is no cure for Prostate Cancer.  They will in the future.  We all
hope we live long enough to see it.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .3  .4  .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .3 .2  .2  .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .1
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03

> My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has
> stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thank you
> Lori
Steve Kramer - 19 Jan 2004 02:34 GMT
I'm very sorry for my staccato typing.  John Preston, Berky, and Curt have
hit me kind of hard tonight.  I think I need to go to bed.

> Lorelei,
>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> > Thank you
> > Lori
Lorelei - 25 Jan 2004 21:45 GMT
again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in
2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain.
We find out Feb 27th how his PSA reacts. We are hoping that he will be
able to cycle off and on the HT to prolong his life. He is planning on
packing a lot of things into this year. Fishing trips, golf trips, elk
hunting, and a cruise with his lovely wife. besides working and trying
to set me up financially. I ask him if he knows something he isn't
telling me, but I know that he read how he could become resistant in
2-3 yrs. I am trying to be upbeat at home and to enjoy as much of him
as I can. so far so good.
take care guys. I will update occasionally. especially when we get
results back.
BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at
least it isn't 10 :)  ]
Lori
Steve Kramer - 25 Jan 2004 23:39 GMT
> He is planning on
> packing a lot of things into this year. Fishing trips, golf trips, elk
> hunting, and a cruise with his lovely wife.

Hopefully, he cuts back a little on the man stuff and adds a littel to the
man & wife stuff.

> besides working and trying
> to set me up financially.

Good man!  Very good man!

> BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at
> least it isn't 10 :)  ]

I am surprised.  And very pleasantly so.  That alone could add a significant
amount of time to his race against a cure.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .3  .4  .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .3 .2  .2  .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .1
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03

johng - 26 Jan 2004 01:33 GMT
> > BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at
> > least it isn't 10 :)  ]
>
> I am surprised.  And very pleasantly so.  That alone could add a significant
> amount of time to his race against a cure.

That is very interesting.   I was somehow under the impression that it was those
grade 5 cells that would be the ones metastasizing out to the bones, etc., and
not the 4s or 3s.   Does anyone have information that could explain this?

JohnG
Heather - 26 Jan 2004 06:49 GMT
Hi Lori.....

I am amazed at how well you 'appear' to be handling this.  That is a
bitch at your age.  Our daughter is 40 and that is WAY too young!!

You just keep that lovely attitude and you will be the better for it.
My Ron had the HDR treatment up here in Canada last summer and is doing
fine.....but he sure got a wake up call as well.  We are off to the UK
for 3 weeks in June.

The Gleason score is quite low, considering.  Ron's was also 7.....but
the 'worser' one......4 + 3.  You can take some comfort in knowing it
was that low.......sounds good to me.

I am so sorry for you and Curt......and if you ever want to just let it
all out, feel free to write.  There are quite a few wives who lurk on
this group.....so know that we understand what you are going
through....and wish you all the best.

Cheers.....Heather (in Toronto)
> again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in
> 2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> least it isn't 10 :)  ]
> Lori
Sandy - 26 Jan 2004 11:35 GMT
Lorelei,

I must say I as well was quite amazed and impressed with just how well
you are dealing with all the this.  I think I cried almost nonstop for
a month after my husband was diagnosed and we found out that it was
much worse than we originally thought.  I agree, 3+4 is good news.  My
husband as well was a gleason 7 but he was 4+3.

All I can say is that although you are ok today, your emotions will
take you for a roller coaster ride.  Mine fluctuate up and down all
the time.  I've been told that the first yr. after diagnosis is the
hardest emotionally.  I think that must be true - I'm still trying to
come to terms with everything - my anger, denial, saddness,
apprehension about the future, etc.  I'm 43 and I have a 7 year old.
When you have children, you have no choice but to maintain as much
normalcy as possible and carry on.  My daughter prays to god
everynight that he will make daddy all better and I must say, it
breaks my heart.

Its also hard to see how the treatments affect your husband.  My
husband had surgery and now has been on hormones for over a month and
will be starting radiation soon.  We also hope that we can do the
hormones intermittently down the road should he need it to give his
body a much needed break.

All the best to you and your husband.  He is very lucky to have you by
his side and be so supportive.  Please don't ever hesitate to email me
should you need to vent.

Sandi

All I can say is surround yourself with supportive people, don't hold
your emotions in and encourage your husband to talk about his emotions
as well.
> > again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in
> > 2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > least it isn't 10 :)  ]
> > Lori
Heather - 27 Jan 2004 00:18 GMT
Meant this to go to Lori via email......but what the heck!!  Wives face
a different set of problems with this bitch of a disease, and a shoulder
to lean or cry on is a good thing.

Heather (email address is heatherfig at rogers dot com.......rearrange
the obvious)

> Hi Lori.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > least it isn't 10 :)  ]
> > Lori
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.