Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2004
PSA 865. anyone else out there start out so high?? (turns slightly into a rant. sorry)
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Lorelei - 18 Jan 2004 22:13 GMT My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his body. His PSA is 865. On Friday he received a 15 min infusion of Zometa (to be done monthly) a shot of Lupron (every 3 months) and started on daily Casodex. Man, he was so sick yesterday and I had to work 12 hours. I was so worried about him and my 3 yr old who was home with him. We find out in 6 weeks if he is responsive to conventional therapy. and if he isn't?? they don't tell me anything. just that we would have to try more "aggressive therapy" whatever that means. We find out tomorrow what his Gleason score is. I am having a hard time finding PSAs that high. I did see a 36 year old man in Italy whose was 500 and his PAP was 203.). this was in Sept of 2000 and he was still alive 18 months after diagnosis. that is all I know. My husband's PAP is 235 (i think, I know it is double of the high end of normal limits) I think Curt's cancer is really far advanced and prognosis is poor but no one will say anything like that. they just act like this is routine, but I can tell it isn't because I see people who had their prostate removed with a PSA of less than 10. and he blew by that a long time ago. So I am trying to find someone with similar circumstances. even it the age is off 10 yrs or so. Please help me understand. Thank you Lori
c palmer - 18 Jan 2004 22:40 GMT hi lori - in answer to some of your concerns. first, yes, we have had some folks that started out high. berky was one of them. someone said, i think, around 2600 +, but i'm not sure.
the prognosis is along the lines of what you already suspect but, with that said, there has been different treatments that have some remarkable results. the problem is, it doesn't work the same on everyone, so that is the joker in the deck.
you appear to have done your homework is so a short time.
may i offer this as a suggestion. there are some studies that have been ran on PC SPES that clearly show that there is a reduction of the size of the tumors. about 5 years ago, there was a big push that PC SPES was the answer. it is made up mainly of various herbs, and then the gov't stepped in and i don't know what the status of it is now. but i didn't hear any negative feedback other than it didn't do what they wanted it to do, while others responded quite favorable to it.
if you can get him into a clinical study and he may be able to get treatment there that isn't available to the general public yet.
i hope this information has helped.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
JohnG - 19 Jan 2004 00:48 GMT
> I think Curt's cancer is really far advanced and prognosis is poor but > no one will say anything like that. they just act like this is > routine, but I can tell it isn't because I see people who had their > prostate removed with a PSA of less than 10. and he blew by that a > long time ago. Lorelei,
I have some theories about this that may or not help you communicate with your doctors. If it seems useless, please ignore.
Doctors don't like to deal in bad news any more than anyone else. That's part of the problem, but it's really more than that. They don't want to admit defeat any more than you do. Their motivations are professional as well as personal, but they don't like to give up. And we should be glad for that.
A college basketball coach whose team is behind by 20 points with only 5 minutes to play isn't going to talk to his team about the long odds against them. He isn't going to be as dispassionately informative and analytical as those sitting on the sidelines. He's going to talk to his players about what they can do to pull this game out yet. He has to be that way, both for his own state of mind and his team's. That's what they all need to focus on. And sometimes it works. And sometimes it's like that with doctors.
Now I'm like you, or at least I think I am. I want to know what the score is and what the odds are. I found a surgeon who would talk more numbers with me. But a lot of doctors have found that for the most part, they've had better experiences dealing with their patients in terms of what you and they are going to do than in terms of objective analysis. Sometimes, though, that leads them not to give you information that you might be able to use. Some doctors are able to switch gears, and find ways to communicate better with those patients who they find like to deal with information. But some might also be a bit gunshy about it, based on past experience.
Maybe my assessment is accurate, and maybe it isn't. I'm not really 100% sure. But maybe it'll give you some ideas of how to try to establish better communication.
JohnG
Alan Meyer - 19 Jan 2004 01:52 GMT > My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has > stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Thank you > Lori Lori,
I feel deeply for what you and Curt are going through. You are all much too young for this to have happened.
I don't know what to say that will be of help to you, so I'll just speak my thoughts honestly and hope that you will find something of use in them.
As you know, his prognosis is poor. There are experimental treatments but none of them are known to work. That is why they are experimental. You and Curt may feel that you would like to try some of them. If you do, you may get some satisfaction in knowing that, one way or another, what you do will be of definite benefit to other families who are facing this illness. And it is always possible that one of the treatments will prolong Curt's life or lead to a remission. Sometimes one of the experimental treatments will lead to extraordinary benefit for a few lucky individuals whose cancer happens to be sensitive to the specific agents they are experimenting with.
If you want to search for clinical trials, one place to search is at the National Cancer Institute website at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/. There is good information there about what to expect, a search form for finding trials (mostly in the U.S.) and some information about each trial.
I myself have been treated via clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute. The quality of care was very, very high, and there was no cost whatsoever. They paid for the treatment, my hospital stays, my drugs, and all my tests and visits. The money all came out of their research funds. I think this may be true at other cancer centers too, not just the NCI center in Maryland.
Another thing you might want to consider is to borrow a video camera from someone. Perhaps Curt would like to record some things for you and your child before he gets too deeply into the difficulties of advanced disease and aggressive treatment. Maybe you would like to make some photos or videos of the family all together.
All of us on this group wish you the best.
Warmest regards,
Alan
Steve Kramer - 19 Jan 2004 02:10 GMT Lorelei,
The hormone treatment (HT) they are trying first, which will probably be somewhat successful for awhile, is intended to repress the androgen necessary to feed the prostate cancer. That's terribly simplified, but until you read up on the disease some more, it will have to do. The treatment can reduce the size of the tumors and reduce the PSA accordingly.
The "more aggressive" treatment will be chemo therapy. Maybe, if there is study available to him, some really aggressive stuff that might kill the a lot of the PCa, but is very toxic to Curt.
You are correct in trying to find someone of his age and PSA level, but the fact is, you will not find someone of your husband's age in prostate cancer groups. You will have to look at others and understand that PCa grows faster the younger you are.
William243 william243@aol.com started with 4900 and was down to 3.5 after HT. In OCT 2000 he was 50. I haven't heard from him in awhile.
There was a BobKat mrwilson1@sio.midco.net here who at 52 was dx's in OCT 2002 with 2540. By July 2003, it was down to 445. Haven't heard from him either.
Berky, at 68, was1614 on 3/1/98 and died today. Robert Young, at 61, was 1000 on 11/23/99 and died 6/15/2003.
John Preston, johnpreston_welwood@lineone.net at 48, was 640 APR 2003 and he went down to the low double-digits, but now is back up to 44.
Curt, at 40, with 865, is in a real fix. HT will probably work for awhile, but there is no cure for Prostate Cancer. They will in the future. We all hope we live long enough to see it.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .1 Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03
> My husband, Curt, is just 40 last month. Long story-short. He has > stage 4 prostate cancer mets to lymph and nearly every bone in his [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Thank you > Lori Steve Kramer - 19 Jan 2004 02:34 GMT I'm very sorry for my staccato typing. John Preston, Berky, and Curt have hit me kind of hard tonight. I think I need to go to bed.
> Lorelei, > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Thank you > > Lori Lorelei - 25 Jan 2004 21:45 GMT again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in 2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain. We find out Feb 27th how his PSA reacts. We are hoping that he will be able to cycle off and on the HT to prolong his life. He is planning on packing a lot of things into this year. Fishing trips, golf trips, elk hunting, and a cruise with his lovely wife. besides working and trying to set me up financially. I ask him if he knows something he isn't telling me, but I know that he read how he could become resistant in 2-3 yrs. I am trying to be upbeat at home and to enjoy as much of him as I can. so far so good. take care guys. I will update occasionally. especially when we get results back. BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at least it isn't 10 :) ] Lori
Steve Kramer - 25 Jan 2004 23:39 GMT > He is planning on > packing a lot of things into this year. Fishing trips, golf trips, elk > hunting, and a cruise with his lovely wife. Hopefully, he cuts back a little on the man stuff and adds a littel to the man & wife stuff.
> besides working and trying > to set me up financially. Good man! Very good man!
> BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at > least it isn't 10 :) ] I am surprised. And very pleasantly so. That alone could add a significant amount of time to his race against a cure.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .1 Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03
johng - 26 Jan 2004 01:33 GMT > > BTW his Gleason score was 3+4=7. but I bet that is not surprise [at > > least it isn't 10 :) ] > > I am surprised. And very pleasantly so. That alone could add a significant > amount of time to his race against a cure. That is very interesting. I was somehow under the impression that it was those grade 5 cells that would be the ones metastasizing out to the bones, etc., and not the 4s or 3s. Does anyone have information that could explain this?
JohnG
Heather - 26 Jan 2004 06:49 GMT Hi Lori.....
I am amazed at how well you 'appear' to be handling this. That is a bitch at your age. Our daughter is 40 and that is WAY too young!!
You just keep that lovely attitude and you will be the better for it. My Ron had the HDR treatment up here in Canada last summer and is doing fine.....but he sure got a wake up call as well. We are off to the UK for 3 weeks in June.
The Gleason score is quite low, considering. Ron's was also 7.....but the 'worser' one......4 + 3. You can take some comfort in knowing it was that low.......sounds good to me.
I am so sorry for you and Curt......and if you ever want to just let it all out, feel free to write. There are quite a few wives who lurk on this group.....so know that we understand what you are going through....and wish you all the best.
Cheers.....Heather (in Toronto)
> again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in > 2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > least it isn't 10 :) ] > Lori Sandy - 26 Jan 2004 11:35 GMT Lorelei,
I must say I as well was quite amazed and impressed with just how well you are dealing with all the this. I think I cried almost nonstop for a month after my husband was diagnosed and we found out that it was much worse than we originally thought. I agree, 3+4 is good news. My husband as well was a gleason 7 but he was 4+3.
All I can say is that although you are ok today, your emotions will take you for a roller coaster ride. Mine fluctuate up and down all the time. I've been told that the first yr. after diagnosis is the hardest emotionally. I think that must be true - I'm still trying to come to terms with everything - my anger, denial, saddness, apprehension about the future, etc. I'm 43 and I have a 7 year old. When you have children, you have no choice but to maintain as much normalcy as possible and carry on. My daughter prays to god everynight that he will make daddy all better and I must say, it breaks my heart.
Its also hard to see how the treatments affect your husband. My husband had surgery and now has been on hormones for over a month and will be starting radiation soon. We also hope that we can do the hormones intermittently down the road should he need it to give his body a much needed break.
All the best to you and your husband. He is very lucky to have you by his side and be so supportive. Please don't ever hesitate to email me should you need to vent.
Sandi
All I can say is surround yourself with supportive people, don't hold your emotions in and encourage your husband to talk about his emotions as well.
> > again, thanks to all for responding. Curt feels better than he has in > > 2 yrs. it is amazing how you guys can suppress things like pain. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > least it isn't 10 :) ] > > Lori Heather - 27 Jan 2004 00:18 GMT Meant this to go to Lori via email......but what the heck!! Wives face a different set of problems with this bitch of a disease, and a shoulder to lean or cry on is a good thing.
Heather (email address is heatherfig at rogers dot com.......rearrange the obvious)
> Hi Lori..... > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > least it isn't 10 :) ] > > Lori
|
|
|