 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2008urologist with website
Quoting SafireAllele-net.com penned: > Cauliflower like Leaky assisted in the murder of 500 innocent, > unarmed Vietnamese villagers, women and children, 40 years ago > in the My Lai massacre, and got away with this war crime. Both > have been rewarded with free state-provided health care. Well, that's the 5th post containing your libelous material re: 'Nam and murder. Guess it's time to forward it to the D.A. and A.G. Want to join me, I.P.? Do slander (spoken) and libel (written) laws exist where you reside? ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 > Want to join me, I.P.? Do slander (spoken) and libel > (written) laws exist where you reside? > > ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 May I suggest, Cauliflower, some sauce ignorante on your bald head? Please take a look in Jurisdiction for Dummies. You might eventually understand that your question to Leaky is totally irrelevant. Or ask LOL Heather LOL. She LOL claims LOL to have a background in law LOL LOL LOL. I believe LOL she was a coffee lady LOL 80 years ago LOL in a law office in Backwater, Ontario. _____ Black Wave/XRT v.32156.14 >> Want to join me, I.P.? Do slander (spoken) and libel >> (written) laws exist where you reside? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >_____ Black Wave/XRT v.32156.14 Your approach is totally unacceptable! PLONK! Non Illegitimi Carborundum > Quoting SafireAllele-net.com penned: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Want to join me, I.P.? Do slander (spoken) and libel > (written) laws exist where you reside? Probably an empty threat. An investigation would show that he started with me (never in the military) and then went onto I.P. (never outside the U.S.) and onto you. I'm not sure, but I'd bet the laws in your state require that the libeler is not considered a nut-job by a preponderance of the audience, including the libellees. > I'd bet the laws in your state require that > the libeler is not considered a nut-job by a preponderance of the audience, > including the libellees. The victim must also prove financial damage, which trolls seldom achieve. The mess left behind by their online masturbation is easily cleaned up. I.P. > Quoting SafireAllele-net.com penned: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Want to join me, I.P.? Do slander (spoken) and libel > (written) laws exist where you reside? WA has all sorts of laws against libel and slander, but not against lunacy. One on one the problem's solvable in any of several ways, but since he's just one of a few million illiterates who spout the same nonsense, why bother? I just PLONK his ilk; haven't seen a sign of him for months, and have seen the last of his Star Trek McCoy clone. Life's too short to spend it feeding trolls or fighting diseases so easily curable. Any lowlife who denigrates our military with blanket statements like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserves at least a bad case of BPH. They're just validation of the concept of karma. I say "illiterate" because, in fact, Calley was convicted by the Army and sentenced to life in prison, and it was for 33 villagers, not 500. A close friend of mine served side by side with Calley for years, and was not surprised when he went off the deep end after what they went through at the hands of "innocent villagers" with grenades and AK-47s. I.P. >> Quoting SafireAllele-net.com penned: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserve >I.P. How am I a clone when I am an army vet and I told safire how stupid his My Lai statement was. Attack dog?? Just because I point out how pompous and full of yourself you are? You may be a bad man here but stay out of other newsgroups if you think the little I pointed to you about yourself is a major flame, it isn't. As far as libel goes you are both clueless. First of all you can't libel a nym. If he used your real names and addresses in a post you would still need to show damages. I doubt being libeled in a newsgroup would do any damage to your real lives. Then again neither of you seem to have real lives by the amounts of posts you put up here. > Any lowlife who denigrates our military with blanket statements >like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserves >at least a bad case of BPH. Wow there's the pinnacle of your obnoxiousness. No one deserves prostate cancer or even BPH by whatever is said in a silly newsgroup even you I.P. >> Any lowlife who denigrates our military with blanket statements >>like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserves [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >prostate cancer or even BPH by whatever is said in a silly newsgroup >even you I.P. Too right!, IP and his henchman seem to have lost all sense of proportion. Always better to exercise the killfilter rather than spitting rage. Perhaps it's just a lapse, a temporary chemical imbalance.....let's hope. >>> Any lowlife who denigrates our military with blanket statements >>>like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserves [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Perhaps it's just a lapse, a temporary chemical imbalance.....let's >hope. Actually IP is a typical usenet bully. There's quite a few of them. They're usually meek little guys in real life who when they can be anonymous turn into obnoxious blowhards. Many also have extreme political and/or dogmatic religious beliefs that if anyone disagrees with, brings down their wrath. What's odd here is to find such people in of all places a cancer support newsgroup. They usually attract a few underlings like Cali here. Now between the two wishing people cancer makes it difficult to pick who's the more immature. For now I'll say it's too close to call. Now as far as kill filters go. IP is the type who announces he's kf'd someone but never does, his online ego wouldn't allow him to miss anything said about him. Even if he actually does kf someone what does that say? He has so little self control he must make someone disappear from his view or be influenced unwillingly by it. I never kf anyone through all my years on usenet. If I don't care to read someone I just don't. I don't need to click on a filter to do that. > Actually IP is a typical usenet bully. There's quite a few of them. > They're usually meek little guys in real life who when they can be [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > cancer makes it difficult to pick who's the more immature. For now > I'll say it's too close to call. The dogmatic beliefs aren't limited to politics and religion. From time to time posters suggest that watchful waiting may be a better option in a particular case of low grade cancer than surgery or radiation, in particular out of concern about side effects. Almost immediately IP and his underlings violently attack such people as ignorant, irresponsible etc. The idea that you just accept the cancer you have and see whether it grows is totally unacceptable to them; "the beast inside" must be destroyed (Heather's words) is their dogma. Similarly, in the face of broad-based research, they believe annual PSA testing is an absolute must. > Now as far as kill filters go. IP is the type who announces he's kf'd > someone but never does, his online ego wouldn't allow him to miss [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > through all my years on usenet. If I don't care to read someone I just > don't. I don't need to click on a filter to do that. >> Actually IP is a typical usenet bully. There's quite a few of them. >> They're usually meek little guys in real life who when they can be [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >destroyed (Heather's words) is their dogma. Similarly, in the face of >broad-based research, they believe annual PSA testing is an absolute must. Oh well at least they're on topic then unlike the nutty political rants. If they violently attack someone then of course that's wrong. If they're maybe too strident in their opinons. That may not be all that polite but giving opinions here is viable. I've read others at forums who insist that others have the same treatment they did because to them it was the best. Usually those are people who are insecure they chose right and react thusly. That's a natural somewhat and not worth getting upset about. There's nothing wrong with annual PSA testing although mine was never higher than 2.3. So I don't put as much stock in it than some. Still after my cryosurgery Tuesday I did agree to quarterly PSA tests. I also have to filter anything you say safire by remembering your assinine My Lai posts. They were ridiculous and sh.t happens in war. Usually the responsibility stops at the enlisted level or a lowly Lt may be charged. It's like Abu Gharib you can't tell me only national guardsmen on the night shift were responsible or knew what was going on, but I digress. Neither that or My Lai belongs in this newsgroup. . The idea that you just accept the cancer you have and see whether >>it grows is totally unacceptable to them; "the beast inside" must be >>destroyed (Heather's words) is their dogma. > >>>> I also have to filter anything you say safire by remembering your >>>> assinine My Lai posts. <<< Good idea Jim. Particularly as I have never ONCE said anything to anyone here or in real life on how their Pca should be treated. Safire is a Class A jerk and is lying as usual. I have never used that expression "the beast inside". FWIW, my husband had radiation and then hormone therapy and we have been doing *watchful waiting for over 2 years now. If you are as new here as your nom de plume would suggest, then perhaps you better listen to the older posters who know that Safire and Marcel are respectively a liar and a certifiable wingnut. But both terms would apply to Safire, I suppose. Heather > Particularly as I have never ONCE said anything to > anyone here or in real life on how their Pca should be treated. Beverly actually was the intolerant, prejudiced bitch that told a certain Sy that he was an idiot to consider watchful waiting. Heather fully agreed with her: http://tinyurl.com/6bc43s >> Particularly as I have never ONCE said anything to >> anyone here or in real life on how their Pca should be treated. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://tinyurl.com/6bc43s Bloody Liar!! I just checked and the only post by me was as follows and it was agreeing with Steve K and Ron about SY being an obnoxious boor......and you are certainly following in his footsteps.......perhaps another sock puppet?? quote......Oct. 2007 roughly..... Steve K and Ron.....thank you. I was totally irate at the rudeness of SY towards Bev and was thisclose to letting fly, but you guys did it for me. Obviously this jerk is a troll and an arrogant ba**ard to boot. He has only one other post to a different group and you two had his substance abuse pegged correctly. Seems that about once a year we get some obnoxious type on here and they rile up the regulars. But as *Little Stevie Wonder* said, use your killfile. Cheers.....Heather unquote...... And I will now use my killfile on you because you are an obnoxious bastard and I have better things to do with my time than read your crap!! HF > Bloody Liar!! I just checked and the only post by me was as follows and > it was agreeing with Steve K and Ron about SY being an obnoxious > boor...... Which clearly proves the point. Anyone having an opinion about his own treatment that differs from that of obsessive ueberposter IP and his underlings is immediately attacked by these bigots. > And I will now use my killfile on you because you are an obnoxious bastard > and I have better things to do with my time than read your crap!! That must be like caviar to a troll. >> And I will now use my killfile on you because you are an obnoxious >> bastard and I have better things to do with my time than read your >> crap!! > > That must be like caviar to a troll. Trust you.......point taken. 8-))) >. The idea that you just accept the cancer you have and see whether >>>it grows is totally unacceptable to them; "the beast inside" must be [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > >Heather There's a number of wingnuts in this newsgroup. I still think IP is the worse and a bully too. I've actually looked in here since last November. There's more ego here than assitance IMHO. That's why except for one earlier post I never bothered to post here until I saw IP's wacky right wing heath care manifesto for the umpteenth time did I post anything. safire is just a consequential reaction to a usenet bully. I've seen it before in newsgroups. Although as I keep saying to see such characters in a cancer support newsgroup is somewhat reprehensible. How can anyone be so immature as to wish cancer on people? I wish you and your husband well Heather. May the beast not return. Now I'm off to play golf the day before my cryosurgery. Who knows when I'll be able to play again.I'm hoping for the best even though IP isn't. > Now I'm off to play golf the day before my cryosurgery. Who knows >when I'll be able to play again.I'm hoping for the best even though IP >isn't. The quality of support here resembles the curate's egg. All the best for your procedure HDJ, and please remember for the benefit of patients-in-waiting to come back here and let everyone know how it went, short and longer term if poss. That will put all this recent nonsense in its proper perspective. Good luck! >> Now I'm off to play golf the day before my cryosurgery. Who knows >>when I'll be able to play again.I'm hoping for the best even though IP [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >recent nonsense in its proper perspective. >Good luck! Well said, Rosbif! Best wishes to you, HDJ! And, please do report on your procedure and progress afterward. Burney RP in 1995 (age 52) RT in 2000 ADT (Casodex) 10/06 - 8/07 Latest PSA - 0.18 > There's more ego here than assitance IMHO. Unfortunately, there certainly has been of late. I think we may have gone days and maybe 100 posts without helping a solitary soul. > Now I'm off to play golf the day before my cryosurgery. Good luck with that. May you break par. > I never kf anyone > through all my years on usenet. If I don't care to read someone I just > don't. I don't need to click on a filter to do that. I do killfile, because I do not to waste my time on Nigerians trying to drain the bank accounts of the unsuspecting; Chinese selling me pornographic wares; nutraeuticals trying to sell me on their male enhancers; trolls trying to piss me off; or even know-it-alls drolling on about their own problems as their husbands deal with cancer. I came here at first to get help. I come here now to pay it back. Those that I kf do not fit either of those categories. I can't fathom why anyone would want to do otherwise in a cancer support group. > > I never kf anyone > > through all my years on usenet. If I don't care to read someone I just [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > that I kf do not fit either of those categories. I can't fathom why anyone > would want to do otherwise in a cancer support group. Prior Graduates of Cornell Urology Program 2007 Year Graduates: Daniel Barocas, M.D. Graduate of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Michael Ohebshalom, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Jay Raman, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College 2006 Year Graduates: Lee Richstone, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Eric Smith, M.D. Graduate of University of Texas-Soutwestern School of Medicine Stephan Boorjian, M.D. Graduate of Harvard University School of Medicine 2005 Year Graduates: Ricardo Gonzalez, M.D. Graduate of Stanford University School of Medicine Currently, Fellow in Voiding Dysfunction, Weill Cornell Medical Center Scott David, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Clinical Instructor in Urology, Weill Medical College (private practice) Jonathan Schiff, M.D. Graduate of Mt. Sinai School of Medicine Clinical Instructor in Urology, Weill Medical College (private practice) 2004 Year Graduates: Craig Nobert, M.D. Graduate of Tufts School of Medicine Currently Staff member, Roosevelt Hospital New York, NY Jaspreet Sandhu, M.D. Graduate of Bowman Gray University School of Medicine Currently Staff Member, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY Kinloch Nelson, M.D. Graduate of Medical College of Virginia Private practice, Richmond, Virginia 2003 Year Graduates: David Y.T. Chen, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Staff member, Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, PA Jennifer A. Tash, M.D. Graduate of UCLA School of Medicine Currently, Fellow in Urology Outcomes Research, UCLA Konstantin Walmsley, M.D. Graduate of Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Private Practice 2002 Year Graduates: Jonathan Coleman, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Fellow, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland Glenn Gmyrek, M.D. Graduate of Columbia School of Medicine Private Practice, Summitt, New Jersey Michael Hyman, M.D. Graduate of Cornell Medical College Private Practice, Santa Monica, California 2001 Year Graduates Kambiz Dardashti, M.D. Private Practice, Los Angeles, California Bino Rucker, M.D. Private Practice Tampa, Florida Daniel Yao, M.D. Assistant Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto, California http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html mclovin it. Keeerist.......yet another nutcase!! http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html > mclovin it. > > "He'sDeadJim" <Hesdeadj...@nienspamhotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > practice) > also known as george bino rucker dr george rucker urology www.urology-partners.com dr bino rucker g. bino rucker urologist > 2004 Year Graduates: > [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > - Show quoted text - http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html > I came here at first to get help. I come here now to pay it back. Those > that I kf do not fit either of those categories. I can't fathom why anyone > would want to do otherwise in a cancer support group. Prior Graduates of Cornell Urology Program Bino Rucker, M.D. Private Practice Tampa, Florida ==> I'm curious at your reply to my post. I've not involved myself in this argument and will not until his legal problems are ended. > WA has all sorts of laws against libel and slander, Leaky, the recalcitrant and obsessive ueberposter of this board, fails to understand that the state of Washington has no jurisdiction. "Jurisdiction, what the hell is that?", asks Leaky. Leaky is - as usual is - clueless. > Any lowlife who denigrates our military with blanket statements > like that deserves his cancer, and attack dogs like He'sDeadJim deserves [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I say "illiterate" because, in fact, Calley was convicted by the Army > and sentenced to life in prison, and it was for 33 villagers, not 500. Who's the illiterate here? As to the number of villagers: Cambridge University Press says "over 400": http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?aid=175133 The Army does not convict criminals. Courts do. Calley was pardoned by Leaky's friend Richard Nixon and paroled after 3 years of house arrest. And what happened to the others? Here's what The Toledo Blade reported: "The Blade goes on to state that in 1971 the Army began a four and a half year investigation of the alleged torture of prisoners, rapes of civilian women, the mutilation of bodies and killing of anywhere from nine to well over one hundred unarmed civilians, among other acts. The articles further report that the Army's inquiry concluded that eighteen U.S. soldiers committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of duty. However, not one of the soldiers, even of those still on active duty at the time of the investigation, was ever court martialed in connection with the heinous crimes. Moreover, six suspected war criminals were allowed to resign from military service during the criminal investigations specifically to avoid prosecution." http://hnn.us/articles/1802.html But Leaky believes that these war crimes are justified: A > close friend of mine served side by side with Calley for years, and was > not surprised when he went off the deep end after what they went through > at the hands of "innocent villagers" with grenades and AK-47s. > > I.P. He enjoys looking at pictures like these: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8339 Leaky's friends confirmed to the N.Y. Times that the Blade story is accurate. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/28/national/28TIGE.html In his own words: Leaky - king of ad hominem attacks - deserves all the illnesses he can get. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.