Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2004
Also New to the Group
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Philski - 21 Dec 2003 22:10 GMT Hello All, I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or so. I have also read Walsh's book (given to me to read by my urologist). I had a PSA of 5.3 and after taking Cipro for a month the repeat PSA was again 5.2. I have been getting annual DRE's and this is the first year my PSA has been "above normal". A biopsy of 8 samples returned two core samples and graded at 3+3=6 for my Gleason. Like an idiot, I did not ask for a copy of my pathology reports, but the urologist says he wants to perform a Radical Prostatectomy and have scheduled for the operation Jan. 22nd. I am somewhat scared. This is my first experience with cancer and since my dad died when I was a young boy, I don't know if there is a history of familial prostate problems. I have done a lot of reading but still have a certain amount of fear and unexpectancy. I hope I get through this without falling apart. I guess I'll keep trying to educate myself and ask a lot of questions.
Phil Lewis (aka Philski)
c palmer - 21 Dec 2003 22:44 GMT hi phil - we all feel scared when we get this bad news, so what you are going through is normal.
the key is research, research, research. i need to be comfortable with your choice of treatment.
each choice of treatment has good sides and bad sides. it isn't a one size fits all.
given the basic facts that you have given, the RP is a good choice because it is early and your chance for recovery is excellent.
you didn't say how old you are, but since the doctor is opting for the RP, i was venture to say mid 50's to 60.
i hardest part of all of this is the waiting game. but you'll do fine.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
Philski - 22 Dec 2003 03:16 GMT I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57.
Phil
> hi phil - we all feel scared when we get this bad news, so what you are > going through is normal. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional Wakeley Purple - 22 Dec 2003 03:33 GMT > I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57. > > Phil Welcome, Phil. I'm new here, too, and about the same age. I was mostly in denial when I was told my PSA was 3.8. But the biopsy came back positive.
It's a real wake-up call, the view out the front window looks different now. I've got some scared feelings, but because my numbers are good, I've got a good doctor, supportive wife, and am in pretty good shape physically, I've also got a good feeling that things will work out well.
Your "case" looks similar to mine, which means you should consider yourself lucky and look forward to a satisfactory recovery from whichever treatment you choose.
 Signature Wake
Age 58 PSA 3.8 Biopsy positive 5% in 1 of 10 cores Gleason 3+3 T1c RP scheduled 1/12/04
jimhoney - 22 Dec 2003 09:01 GMT Welcome, Phil.
My numbers were similar to yours. I told the doctor during the phone call in which he gave me the diagnosis that I was going to make a routine challenge to the diagnosis. He took that completely in stride, and in fact he immediately arranged for a second reading of the biopsy slides. (Same result, Gleason 6.)
That put my mind at ease (not the best way to put it) that there was no mistake, and then I could proceed with considering the options.
So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides. It may cost you $200 to $400 if you are in the States. Insurance might cover it.
With your numbers, you have every expectation of a good outcome like I had.
jimhoney standard RRP age 52, cured, no significant side effects
> I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57. > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > > > knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional Robert Austin - 22 Dec 2003 14:29 GMT <Snip>
>So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides. It may cost >you $200 to $400 if you are in the States. Insurance might cover it. <Snip>
After my doctor went over the results of my biopsies that said I had Pca and the Gleason was 9, I didn't doubt the 9 part but I wanted to make sure it had not spread.
I called my insurance company to see if they would pay for a second opinion. They said they would pay for a second opinion and if I was not satisfied they would pay for a third opinion.
That was one of the most refreshing phone calls I've had in this day and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking at.
Bob Austin
Age 74 PSA 7 Free PSA 12 1st round of biopsies clear, 2nd. 2 positives Gleason 9 Cryosurgery 03/11/03 Post Op PSA's .04 & .01 RobertBob.Austin@NoSpam.Att.Net
olfart - 22 Dec 2003 15:58 GMT > <Snip> > >So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides. It may cost [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking > at. I know that Medicare will pay for a second opinion and a third if there is any dissagreement between the first two. If Medicare will pay, most any other insurance co is bound to pay too.
olfart - 22 Dec 2003 16:01 GMT > <Snip> > >So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides. It may cost [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking > at. I should add that the payment for the second and third doctor's fee is covered - the second and third lab fee may not be covered 100 %
olfart - 21 Dec 2003 22:58 GMT > Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) Hi Phil; My father and grandfather both passed away when I was 7 yrs old so I appreciate your concern for no family history of Cancer. Was wondering how old you are. I'm not going to attempt to give any advice since I'm new here too. I did get 3 opinions before deciding on my course of treatment (urologist, oncologist and radiation oncologist). They all suggested the same thing with not even a mention of surgery and all seem to think the prognosis is good. Good Luck and stay in touch.
Bob Oaks - 21 Dec 2003 23:02 GMT > Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) Hi Phil,
You don't say how old you are, and that can make a difference. It seems that the younger you are the more likely the urologists will recommend surgery. You also didn't say (and maybe don't know) what your PSA was a year ago. A rapidly increasing PSA will also increase the likelihood that surgery will be recommended. Everyone is scared to some degree, but it's better to be scared by what you know than by what you don't know. Did you ask the urologist why he didn't recommend radiation as opposed to surgery? I'm having brachytherapy in early January, primarily because it seemed to have less side affects and short term "annoyances" (others here might quibble with that term). My PSA is 4.0 and my Gleason is also 6. And I'll be 62 soon. I would think that whether you have a family history or not is moot at this point. You know you have PCa with our without a family history of it. Keep reading this group. You'll learn a lot. I certainly have!
Steve Kramer - 21 Dec 2003 23:36 GMT Welcome to the newsgroup, Phil. As for the club, I am sure you did not wish to join us.
Your Gleason score of 6 is the lowest you'll find of anyone here, save one. And only ? of us were diagnosed with a PSA below 5. So, comparatively, you're one of those that the rest of us get jealous about.
It is only important to know about prostate problems in the family when deciding when you are going to start getting your PSA tested. That is moot, of course, because you have already been getting it tested and you are already diagnosed.
It is only normal to fear the unknown. But, let this be known.... an RRP is much less of a trail for the patient than it is for his loved ones. Since you've been reading the newsgroup, you already know that we struggle with the aftermath sometimes, but the operation is easy. It'll be over before you know it.
So, how old are you? Where do you live? and tell us about your family. You are among friends.
 Signature MERRY CHRISTMAS Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .1
> Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) Philski - 22 Dec 2003 03:26 GMT Steve, I am 57, have 5 children all of whom have finished college. I am an electrical engineer in the area of field service. ( I currently maintain CT Scanners and have a background in the Nuclear Medicine Imaging field). I currently live in the Boise area - Meridian, Idaho to be more specific. This group looks to me to be a very comprehensive and caring. I am duly impressed.
I have a lot of questions with some answers. I will pose these after reading a bit more. I do understand the need to study and learn. And I thank everyone for their patience, kindness and help. I is surely appreciated by me.
By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has her pretty much disabled. My view of the future is for me to stick around and take care of her and don't expect it to be the other way around. Cancer is "new" to me and I hope I can cope. I want to stay positive and from what I have read here, I too think I can adopt some of your collective suggestions.
My DRE's have all said to be smooth without nodules or roughness but I do not know my earlier PSA numbers. They were told to me but I never thought I should be recording them. I will return to the clinic and get some background, if nothing else, just for my edification.
Thanks for your concern and caring.
Phil
> Welcome to the newsgroup, Phil. As for the club, I am sure you did not wish > to join us. [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Phil Lewis > > (aka Philski) Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2003 23:28 GMT > Steve, > I am 57, have 5 children all of whom have finished college. Fantastic! I have three and and can barely keep them in college. But, two will graduate during 2004.
> I am an > electrical engineer in the area of field service. ( I currently maintain > CT Scanners and have a background in the Nuclear Medicine Imaging > field). That's good, too. We have a radiologist or a radiology technician (I forget, but he's been a wealth of knowledge) but no nuclear med guys. Maybe, when you get settled in, you can give us a good description of how the Prostatscint Scan works.
> By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has > her pretty much disabled. My view of the future is for me to stick > around and take care of her and don't expect it to be the other way > around. Cancer is "new" to me and I hope I can cope. I want to stay > positive and from what I have read here, I too think I can adopt some of > your collective suggestions. Yeah, that's a tough nut to crack. And, there are several here that can empathize with you on that topic as well. My wife, for instance, suffers from depression and was very nearly catatonic for two of the last three months, but she' coming out of it. Joisey's wife had a few problems when he was diagnosed. Curtis Palmer's wife is pretty sick with heart problems. And David S. has a dog that keeps his wife in stitches, casts, and wheel chairs most of the time.
> My DRE's have all said to be smooth without nodules or roughness but I > do not know my earlier PSA numbers. They were told to me but I never > thought I should be recording them. I will return to the clinic and get > some background, if nothing else, just for my edification. Once you are diagnosed, it is amazing how many things suddenly seem more important.
 Signature MERRY CHRISTMAS Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .1
Rebecca Ford - 23 Dec 2003 02:18 GMT It's interesting how this seems to happen. I've had rheumatoid arthritis and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis for almost five years (I'm 35). Hubby and I are both used to me being the sick one. It was quite a shock to have the tables turned. He has a whole new appreciation for what I go through with my illnesses. The plus side of prostate cancer for us is a whole new depth of inderstanding and empathy for one another. He also realized I'm damn good in a time of crisis. In most ways our lives are better for having gone through this.
Good luck. I'm sure you'll both get through this just fine. If you or your wife have any questions, or if she just wants a wife's point of view, feel free to contact me directly.
 Signature Rebecca Ford
> > > By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > And David S. has a dog that keeps his wife in stitches, casts, and wheel > chairs most of the time. Tee Doubleyou - 22 Dec 2003 03:36 GMT >Hello All, >I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >Phil Lewis >(aka Philski) Below is a copy of my previous post, you might find of some use. Tee
Greetings To All, Some time ago I sent a post asking for an advice and received a lot of very professional and useful information. Now, after the surgery, I would like to share my experiences, which could eventually benefit people contemplating surgery and curious how recuperation goes. Here is some background:
I am 57 years old, white, born in Europe. PSA before biopsy 4.6, Declined Proscar! Biopsy 5% positive on one side and 10% on the other, Gleason 3+3, Staging T1c, Volume 45 g, Biopsy results received on October 4th, Surgery (RPR, nerve sparing) took place on November 24, 2003
Surgery was done under general anesthesia and lasted for 1 h 20". After operation I was hooked up to a morphine pump and used total of two syringes 50 ml each. It helped me a lot because I did not feel any pain or very minimal. Incision was around 5 inches long and I had 14 metal clips to hold both sides in place. I was discharged from the hospital on Thanksgiving morning. Foley catheter was a real pain, you know where, and it was removed last Monday (full three weeks!). The procedure of the catheter removal was almost painless. Urination now is painless as well and a bit more frequent than before surgery, but I still drink a lot. After I am done peeing, sometimes I feel increased bladder pressure but after 10 seconds it goes a way. Before surgery, I was doing Kegel exercises and am still doing them now. I am happy to report that it probably helped me a lot bc I am almost 100% dry. Just in a case, I am wearing a small pad and before I go to bed I check it and it is dry like a bone. In bed I wear only boxer shorts without any additional protection. When I move really fast or cough or sneeze I may dribble a few drops but that's all. My follow-up visit is scheduled for January 5 and before that I will go to have PSA done. The last thing is the recuperation time. In my case I could go back to work even today - three weeks and three days after surgery. But I will take more time off, most likely 7 weeks total. I saved a lot of sick days and I feel that now it is good time to use them. In conclusion, I highly recommend this particular type of surgery, but I do realize that it is not the best method for all.
Happy Holidays to all, Tee Doubleyou
PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had first spontaneous erection. It lasted only for a few minutes but I am sure that the nerve sparing surgery was really nerve sparing. Tee.
-- Miser, qui nunquam miser!
Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2003 23:32 GMT > PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had > first spontaneous erection. T.W., U lucky S.O.B. !
 Signature MERRY CHRISTMAS Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .1
JohnG - 23 Dec 2003 04:03 GMT > > PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had > > first spontaneous erection. > > T.W., U lucky S.O.B. ! You're supposed to say, "You lucky stiff!"
I'm glad it happens like that for some folks. Some of us were a lot slower.
JohnG
Steve Kramer - 23 Dec 2003 04:21 GMT I was was going with the 'initials' theme.
> > > PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had > > > first spontaneous erection. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > JohnG ron - 22 Dec 2003 04:56 GMT Hi Phil...Sorry to hear about your diagnosis. I remember mine about a year ago, just like a kick to the gut. Take some deep breaths and realize that things could be a lot worse. It's late so I just want to make a few quick points. Read and learn so that you can make an informed decision about treatment. Pushing your surgery out another month or two isn't likely to change things for the worse, so take what time you need; just tell your doc to reschedule if that's what you want, he should be supportive of this. Second, get an expert to reread your biopsy slides. They are notoriously difficult to grade and you don't want to plan treatment for a GS 6 if you have something else. Experts have better skill at reading the slides. You can find a list of experts (and a lot of other useful info) at http://www.prostate-help.org/cagleex.htm If you do select surgery (BTW I did), be sure to read M. Han, A. W. Partin, M. Zahurak, S. Piantadosi, J. Epstein and P. C. Walsh; J. Urol., 169, 517-523, 2003 to get an idea of what the 10 year statistics look like...Best wishes and good health, Ron
> Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) Alan Meyer - 22 Dec 2003 19:22 GMT Phil,
Many people here have recommended a second opinion. I would also like to recommend that. There are at least two reasons for doing it. One is that the pathology report you were given may be wrong. Mine was underdiagnosed (cancer worse than reported by the first pathologist), and apparently this happens to very many people. Secondly, it is useful to meet another specialist and get his or her recommendations, both as a check on the first doctor, and so that you'll have another practitioner against whom you can compare the first doctor to see if you think he is as helpful/competent/concerned as you would like him to be. I personally think the choice of doctor is as important as the choice of treatment.
Other things to think about:
1. You might want a second opinion from a radiation oncologist. Radiation can have fewer side effects and faster recovery. Radiation oncologists I have met say it's just as good as prostatectomy. Surgeons often say it is not. The truth is --- what do I know? But I have chosen radiation myself.
2. If you choose surgery, there are several kinds, including retropubic that cuts an incision from the navel down, laparoscopic that cuts a hole and tunnels in, and one that goes in through the perineum from the bottom. Then there are "nerve sparing" and non-sparing varieties. I would ask your Uro for the full details of which operation he would perform and, if you can find out, how many he's done and how successful they've been. Of course all doctors believe their work is good, but not all of them really are specialists, or good specialists. Even urologists may specialize mainly in things very different from prostate cancer and not do very many RP procedures per year.
You're in a battle here, but it's winnable. Keep your spirits up.
Best of luck.
Alan
> Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) jk - 23 Dec 2003 03:12 GMT >> for a copy of my pathology reports, but the urologist says he wants to > perform a Radical Prostatectomy and have scheduled for the operation [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) It sucks to be sick. Think of it like a thorn that needs to be pulled to make it go away forever. Take a deep breath... read alot... ask questions.... and you'll be OK. We're all the same boat, and we are still here. Good luck!
 Signature JK Sinrod NY Sinrod Stained Glass www.sinrodstudios.com Coney Island Memories www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
gourd_dancer - 23 Dec 2003 22:36 GMT Phil, whatever method you choose, it will be the right one....Best of luck and quit worrying....
I made my decision before reading this NG. My decsion was based on research. I found myself researching on-line until 3 and 4 every morning. I persdaonnly talked with 13 people who had PC. 6 had RRP, 3 had seeds, 1 had seeds and ER, and 3 had seeds and IMRT. I opted for seeds and IMRT. Gleason was 4+3.
Mike
> Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski) MH - 01 Jan 2004 15:03 GMT Hi, Philski....
I can still remember when I got the news on the phone from my doctor's nurse after the second biopsy. I felt as if I had been kicked in the gut. I imagined the worst. It was not a good time.
But I read and read and read.... and I asked lots of questions... www.phoenix5.org is a great site for information.... and I chose to have a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on Nov. 21, 2002... nerve sparing. I did very well. It was the first surgery I had ever had at age 51. It was much less difficult than I had imagined. I had surgery early one morning..... went home the next morning. Cath came out several weeks later. I was continent about 6 weeks after the cath came out... still waiting to see some signs of erectile function. But I feel great.... and PSAs have been undetectable!!
So it's not a death sentence! Just spend the time researching all you can.... be your own advocate with the docs... I'd even suggest a second or third opinion about other treatment options. Then, make your choice and don't look back. You have a lot of years to look forward to!!
Take care.... MikeH
> Hello All, > I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Phil Lewis > (aka Philski)
|
|
|