Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Also New to the Group

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Philski - 21 Dec 2003 22:10 GMT
Hello All,
I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
so. I have also read Walsh's book (given to me to read by my urologist).
I had a PSA of 5.3 and after taking Cipro for a month the repeat PSA was
again 5.2. I have been getting annual DRE's and this is the first year
my PSA has been "above normal". A biopsy of 8 samples returned two core
samples and graded at 3+3=6 for my Gleason. Like an idiot, I did not ask
for a copy of my pathology reports, but the urologist says he wants to
perform a Radical Prostatectomy and have scheduled for the operation
Jan. 22nd. I am somewhat scared. This is my first experience with cancer
and since my dad died when I was a young boy, I don't know if there is a
history of familial prostate problems. I have done a lot of reading but
still have a certain amount of fear and unexpectancy. I hope I get
through this without falling apart. I guess I'll keep trying to educate
myself and ask a lot of questions.

Phil Lewis
(aka Philski)
c palmer - 21 Dec 2003 22:44 GMT
hi phil - we all feel scared when we get this bad news, so what you are
going through is normal.  

the key is research, research, research.  i need to be comfortable with
your choice of treatment.  

each choice of treatment has good sides and bad sides.  it isn't a one
size fits all.

given the basic facts that you have given, the RP is a good choice
because it is early and your chance for recovery is excellent.  

you didn't say how old you are, but since the doctor is opting for the
RP, i was venture to say mid 50's to 60.

i hardest part of all of this is the waiting game.  but you'll do fine.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
Philski - 22 Dec 2003 03:16 GMT
I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57.

Phil

> hi phil - we all feel scared when we get this bad news, so what you are
> going through is normal.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
Wakeley Purple - 22 Dec 2003 03:33 GMT
> I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57.
>
> Phil

Welcome, Phil. I'm new here, too, and about the same age. I was mostly in
denial when I was told my PSA was 3.8. But the biopsy came back positive.

It's a real wake-up call, the view out the front window looks different now.
I've got some scared feelings, but because my numbers are good, I've got a
good doctor, supportive wife, and am in pretty good shape physically, I've
also got a good feeling that things will work out well.

Your "case" looks similar to mine, which means you should consider yourself
lucky and look forward to a satisfactory recovery from whichever treatment
you choose.

Signature

Wake

Age 58
PSA 3.8
Biopsy positive 5% in 1 of 10 cores
Gleason 3+3
T1c
RP scheduled 1/12/04

jimhoney - 22 Dec 2003 09:01 GMT
Welcome, Phil.

My numbers were similar to yours.  I told the doctor during the phone
call in which he gave me the diagnosis that I was going to make a
routine challenge to the diagnosis.  He took that completely in
stride, and in fact he immediately arranged for a second reading of
the biopsy slides.  (Same result, Gleason 6.)

That put my mind at ease (not the best way to put it) that there was
no mistake, and then I could proceed with considering the options.

So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides.  It may cost
you $200 to $400 if you are in the States.  Insurance might cover it.

With your numbers, you have every expectation of a good outcome like I
had.

jimhoney
standard RRP age 52, cured, no significant side effects

> I am sorry I didn't mention my age. I am 57.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> >
> > knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
Robert Austin - 22 Dec 2003 14:29 GMT
<Snip>
>So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides.  It may cost
>you $200 to $400 if you are in the States.  Insurance might cover it.
<Snip>

After my doctor went over the results of my biopsies that said I had
Pca and the Gleason was 9, I didn't doubt the 9 part but I wanted to
make sure it had not spread.  

I called my insurance company to see if they would pay for a second
opinion.  They said they would pay for a second opinion and if I was
not satisfied they would pay for a third opinion.

That was one of the most refreshing phone calls I've had in this day
and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking
at.

Bob Austin

Age 74
PSA 7 Free PSA 12
1st round of biopsies clear, 2nd. 2 positives
Gleason 9
Cryosurgery 03/11/03
Post Op PSA's .04 & .01
RobertBob.Austin@NoSpam.Att.Net
olfart - 22 Dec 2003 15:58 GMT
> <Snip>
> >So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides.  It may cost
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking
> at.

I know that Medicare will pay for a second opinion and a third if
there is any dissagreement between the first two. If Medicare will
pay, most any other insurance co is bound to pay too.
olfart - 22 Dec 2003 16:01 GMT
> <Snip>
> >So my suggestion would be a second opinion on the slides.  It may cost
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> and age when it is the bottom line most of the companies are looking
> at.

I should add that the payment for the second and third doctor's fee is
covered - the second and third lab fee may not be covered 100 %
olfart - 21 Dec 2003 22:58 GMT
> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)

Hi Phil;
My father and grandfather both passed away when I was 7 yrs old so I
appreciate your concern for no family history of Cancer.
Was wondering how old you are. I'm not going to attempt to give any
advice since I'm new here too. I did get 3 opinions before deciding on
my course of treatment (urologist, oncologist and radiation
oncologist). They all suggested the same thing with not even a mention
of surgery and all seem to think the prognosis is good.
Good Luck and stay in touch.
Bob Oaks - 21 Dec 2003 23:02 GMT
> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)

Hi Phil,

You don't say how old you are, and that can make a difference.  It seems
that the younger you are the more likely the urologists will recommend
surgery.  You also didn't say (and maybe don't know) what your PSA was a
year ago.  A rapidly increasing PSA will also increase the likelihood that
surgery will be recommended.  Everyone is scared to some degree, but it's
better to be scared by what you know than by what you don't know.  Did you
ask the urologist why he didn't recommend radiation as opposed to surgery?
I'm having brachytherapy in early January, primarily because it seemed to
have less side affects and short term "annoyances" (others here might
quibble with that term).  My PSA is 4.0 and my Gleason is also 6.  And I'll
be 62 soon.  I would think that whether you have a family history or not is
moot at this point.  You know you have PCa with our without a family history
of it.  Keep reading this group.  You'll learn a lot.  I certainly have!
Steve Kramer - 21 Dec 2003 23:36 GMT
Welcome to the newsgroup, Phil.  As for the club, I am sure you did not wish
to join us.

Your Gleason score of 6 is the lowest you'll find of anyone here, save one.
And only ? of us were diagnosed with a PSA below 5.  So, comparatively,
you're one of those that the rest of us get jealous about.

It is only important to know about prostate problems in the family when
deciding when you are going to start getting your PSA tested.  That is moot,
of course, because you have already been getting it tested and you are
already diagnosed.

It is only normal to fear the unknown.  But, let this be known.... an RRP is
much less of a trail for the patient than it is for his loved ones.  Since
you've been reading the newsgroup, you already know that we struggle with
the aftermath sometimes, but the operation is easy.  It'll be over before
you know it.

So, how old are you?  Where do you live?  and tell us about your family.
You are among friends.

Signature

MERRY CHRISTMAS
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .3  .4  .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .3 .2  .2  .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .1

> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)
Philski - 22 Dec 2003 03:26 GMT
Steve,
I am 57, have 5 children all of whom have finished college. I am an
electrical engineer in the area of field service. ( I currently maintain
CT Scanners and have a background in the Nuclear Medicine Imaging
field).
I currently live in the Boise area - Meridian, Idaho to be more
specific.
This group looks to me to be a very comprehensive and caring. I am duly
impressed.

I have a lot of questions with some answers. I will pose these after
reading a bit more. I do understand the need to study and learn. And I
thank everyone for their patience, kindness and help. I is surely
appreciated by me.

By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has
her pretty much disabled. My view of the future is for me to stick
around and take care of her and don't expect it to be the other way
around. Cancer is "new" to me and I hope I can cope. I want to stay
positive and from what I have read here, I too think I can adopt some of
your collective suggestions.

My DRE's have all said to be smooth without nodules or roughness but I
do not know my earlier PSA numbers. They were told to me but I never
thought I should be recording them. I will return to the clinic and get
some background, if nothing else, just for my edification.

Thanks for your concern and caring.

Phil

> Welcome to the newsgroup, Phil.  As for the club, I am sure you did not wish
> to join us.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> > Phil Lewis
> > (aka Philski)
Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2003 23:28 GMT
> Steve,
> I am 57, have 5 children all of whom have finished college.

Fantastic!  I have three and and can barely keep them in college.  But, two
will graduate during 2004.

> I am an
> electrical engineer in the area of field service. ( I currently maintain
> CT Scanners and have a background in the Nuclear Medicine Imaging
> field).

That's good, too.  We have a radiologist or a radiology technician (I
forget, but he's been a wealth of knowledge) but no nuclear med guys.
Maybe, when you get settled in, you can give us a good description of how
the Prostatscint Scan works.

> By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has
> her pretty much disabled. My view of the future is for me to stick
> around and take care of her and don't expect it to be the other way
> around. Cancer is "new" to me and I hope I can cope. I want to stay
> positive and from what I have read here, I too think I can adopt some of
> your collective suggestions.

Yeah, that's a tough nut to crack.  And, there are several here that can
empathize with you on that topic as well.  My wife, for instance, suffers
from depression and was very nearly catatonic for two of the last three
months, but she' coming out of it.  Joisey's wife had a few problems when he
was diagnosed.  Curtis Palmer's wife is pretty sick with heart problems.
And David S. has a dog that keeps his wife in stitches, casts, and wheel
chairs most of the time.

> My DRE's have all said to be smooth without nodules or roughness but I
> do not know my earlier PSA numbers. They were told to me but I never
> thought I should be recording them. I will return to the clinic and get
> some background, if nothing else, just for my edification.

Once you are diagnosed, it is amazing how many things suddenly seem more
important.

Signature

MERRY CHRISTMAS
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .3  .4  .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .3 .2  .2  .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .1

Rebecca Ford - 23 Dec 2003 02:18 GMT
It's interesting how this seems to happen. I've had rheumatoid arthritis and
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis for almost five years (I'm 35). Hubby and I are both
used to me being the sick one. It was quite a shock to have the tables
turned. He has a whole new appreciation for what I go through with my
illnesses. The plus side of prostate cancer for us is a whole new depth of
inderstanding and empathy for one another. He also realized I'm damn good in
a time of crisis. In most ways our lives are better for having gone through
this.

Good luck. I'm sure you'll both get through this just fine. If you or your
wife have any questions, or if she just wants a wife's point of view, feel
free to contact me directly.

Signature

Rebecca Ford

>
> > By-the-way, my wife has Crone's disease and a form of arthritis that has
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> And David S. has a dog that keeps his wife in stitches, casts, and wheel
> chairs most of the time.
Tee  Doubleyou - 22 Dec 2003 03:36 GMT
>Hello All,
>I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Phil Lewis
>(aka Philski)

Below is a copy of my previous post, you might find of some use.
Tee

Greetings To All,
Some time ago I sent a post asking for an advice and received a lot of
very professional and useful information. Now, after the surgery, I would
like to share my experiences, which could eventually benefit people
contemplating surgery and curious how recuperation goes. Here is some
background:

I am 57 years old, white, born in Europe.
PSA before biopsy 4.6, Declined Proscar!
Biopsy 5% positive on one side and 10% on the other,
Gleason 3+3, Staging T1c, Volume 45 g,
Biopsy results received on October 4th,
Surgery (RPR, nerve sparing) took place on November 24, 2003

Surgery was done under general anesthesia and lasted for 1 h 20".
After operation I was hooked up to a morphine pump and used total of two
syringes 50 ml each. It helped me a lot because I did not feel any pain
or very minimal. Incision was around 5 inches long and I had 14 metal
clips to hold both sides in place. I was discharged from the hospital on
Thanksgiving morning.
Foley catheter was a real pain, you know where, and it was removed last
Monday (full three weeks!). The procedure of the catheter removal was
almost painless. Urination now is painless as well and a bit more
frequent than before surgery, but I still drink a lot. After I am done
peeing, sometimes I feel increased bladder pressure but after 10 seconds
it goes a way.
Before surgery, I was doing Kegel exercises and am still doing them now.
I am happy to report that it probably helped me a lot bc I am almost 100%
dry. Just in a case, I am wearing a small pad and before I go to bed I
check it and it is dry like a bone. In bed I wear only boxer shorts
without any additional protection. When I move really fast or cough or
sneeze I may dribble a few drops but that's all.
My follow-up visit is scheduled for January 5 and before that I will go
to have PSA done.
The last thing is the recuperation time. In my case I could go back to
work even today - three weeks and three days after surgery. But I will
take more time off, most likely 7 weeks total. I saved a lot of sick days
and I feel that now it is good time to use them.
In conclusion, I highly recommend this particular type of surgery, but I
do realize that it is not the best method for all.

Happy Holidays to all,
Tee Doubleyou

PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had
first spontaneous erection. It lasted only for a few minutes but I am
sure that the nerve sparing surgery was really nerve sparing.
Tee.

--
Miser, qui nunquam miser!
Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2003 23:32 GMT
> PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had
> first spontaneous erection.

T.W., U lucky S.O.B. !

Signature

MERRY CHRISTMAS
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .3  .4  .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .3 .2  .2  .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .1

JohnG - 23 Dec 2003 04:03 GMT
> > PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had
> > first spontaneous erection.
>
> T.W., U lucky S.O.B. !

You're supposed to say, "You lucky stiff!"

I'm glad it happens like that for some folks.  Some of us were a lot
slower.

JohnG
Steve Kramer - 23 Dec 2003 04:21 GMT
I was was going with the 'initials' theme.

> > > PS Tomorrow will be four weeks after surgery and today morning I had
> > > first spontaneous erection.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> JohnG
ron - 22 Dec 2003 04:56 GMT
Hi Phil...Sorry to hear about your diagnosis.  I remember mine about a
year ago, just like a kick to the gut.  Take some deep breaths and
realize that things could be a lot worse.  It's late so I just want to
make a few quick points.  Read and learn so that you can make an
informed decision about treatment.  Pushing your surgery out another
month or two isn't likely to change things for the worse, so take what
time you need; just tell your doc to reschedule if that's what you
want, he should be supportive of this.  Second, get an expert to
reread your biopsy slides.  They are notoriously difficult to grade
and you don't want to plan treatment for a GS 6 if you have something
else.  Experts have better skill at reading the slides.  You can find
a list of experts (and a lot of other useful info) at
http://www.prostate-help.org/cagleex.htm
If you do select surgery (BTW I did), be sure to read M. Han, A. W.
Partin, M. Zahurak, S. Piantadosi, J. Epstein and P. C. Walsh; J.
Urol., 169, 517-523, 2003 to get an idea of what the 10 year
statistics look like...Best wishes and good health, Ron

> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)
Alan Meyer - 22 Dec 2003 19:22 GMT
Phil,

Many people here have recommended a second opinion.  I would
also like to recommend that.  There are at least two reasons for doing
it.  One is that the pathology report you were given may be wrong.  Mine
was underdiagnosed (cancer worse than reported by the first pathologist),
and apparently this happens to very many people.  Secondly, it is useful
to meet another specialist and get his or her recommendations, both as
a check on the first doctor, and so that you'll have another practitioner
against whom you can compare the first doctor to see if you think he is
as helpful/competent/concerned as you would like him to be.  I personally
think the choice of doctor is as important as the choice of treatment.

Other things to think about:

1. You might want a second opinion from a radiation oncologist.
Radiation can have fewer side effects and faster recovery.  Radiation
oncologists I have met say it's just as good as prostatectomy.  Surgeons
often say it is not.  The truth is --- what do I know?  But I have chosen
radiation myself.

2. If you choose surgery, there are several kinds, including retropubic
that cuts an incision from the navel down, laparoscopic that cuts a hole
and tunnels in, and one that goes in through the perineum from the bottom.
Then there are "nerve sparing" and non-sparing varieties.  I would ask
your Uro for the full details of which operation he would perform and,
if you can find out, how many he's done and how successful they've
been.  Of course all doctors believe their work is good, but not all of
them really are specialists, or good specialists.  Even urologists may
specialize mainly in things very different from prostate cancer and not
do very many RP procedures per year.

You're in a battle here, but it's winnable.  Keep your spirits up.

Best of luck.

   Alan

> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)
jk - 23 Dec 2003 03:12 GMT
>> for a copy of my pathology reports, but the urologist says he wants to
> perform a Radical Prostatectomy and have scheduled for the operation
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)

   It sucks to be sick. Think of it like a thorn that needs to be pulled to
make it go away forever. Take a deep breath... read alot... ask
questions.... and you'll be OK. We're all the same boat, and we are still
here. Good luck!
Signature

JK Sinrod NY
Sinrod Stained Glass
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

gourd_dancer - 23 Dec 2003 22:36 GMT
Phil, whatever method you choose, it will be the right one....Best of luck
and quit worrying....

I made my decision before reading this NG. My decsion was based on research.
I found myself researching on-line until 3 and 4 every morning. I
persdaonnly talked with 13 people who had PC. 6 had RRP, 3 had seeds, 1 had
seeds and ER, and 3 had seeds and IMRT. I opted for seeds and IMRT. Gleason
was 4+3.

Mike

> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)
MH - 01 Jan 2004 15:03 GMT
Hi, Philski....

I can still remember when I got the news on the phone from my doctor's nurse
after the second biopsy.  I felt as if I had been kicked in the gut.  I
imagined the worst.  It was not a good time.

But I read and read and read.... and I asked lots of questions...
www.phoenix5.org is a great site for information.... and I chose to have a
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on Nov. 21, 2002... nerve sparing.  I did
very well.  It was the first surgery I had ever had at age 51.  It was much
less difficult than I had imagined.  I had surgery early one morning.....
went home the next morning.  Cath came out several weeks later.  I was
continent about 6 weeks after the cath came out... still waiting to see some
signs of erectile function.  But I feel great.... and PSAs have been
undetectable!!

So it's not a death sentence!  Just spend the time researching all you
can.... be your own advocate with the docs... I'd even suggest a second or
third opinion about other treatment options.  Then, make your choice and
don't look back.  You have a lot of years to look forward to!!

Take care....
MikeH

> Hello All,
> I have been looking over the postings in this group for the past hour or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Phil Lewis
> (aka Philski)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.