Gentlemen-
I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
http://www.theralogix.com/prostate2.shtml
Prostate 2.2 was created by an advisory board of university physicians
and scientists, and its formulation incorporates the most recently
published research findings . The daily dosage (2 capsules) of Prostate
2.2 provides 5 nutritional components, each of which appears to provide
a protective effect on the prostate.*
100 IU
vitamin E (as mixed tocopherols)
1600 IU
vitamin D3 (as cholecalciferol)
200 mcg
selenium (as selenomethionine)
30 mg
lycopene (as Lyc-O-Mato®)
50 mg
soy isoflavones (as Novasoy)

Signature
PSA 19 07/2004 @ 55
12 needle Biopsy 07/2004 G7 T2c
RRP 09/2004 @ Johns Hopkins by Dr. Pat Walsh positive margins
G8 in most lymph nodes sampled
Post Op PSA 19
30 mg Lupron began 12/2004 and every 4 mo after
PSA .069 -.079- 1.15-1.35- 2.23-4-7.18-13.70
50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
Steve Jordan - 19 Feb 2008 02:49 GMT
> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product
>
> http://www.theralogix.
(snip)
For what purpose?
Carl has a Gleason 7 to 8 cancer.
I believe that there is no reason to expect that some pills will cure
his case.
Sorry. There are no miracle cures.
I wish there were.
Regards,
Steve J
"What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts?
Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget 'what the stars
foretell,' avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind
the unguessable 'verdict of history' -- what are the facts, and to how
many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are
your single clue. Get the facts!"
--Lazarus Long
Carl Hunt Hays III - 19 Feb 2008 05:40 GMT
>> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> your single clue. Get the facts!"
> --Lazarus Long

Signature
PSA 19 07/2004 @ 55
12 needle Biopsy 07/2004 G7 T2c
RRP 09/2004 @ Johns Hopkins by Dr. Pat Walsh positive margins
G8 in most lymph nodes sampled
Post Op PSA 19
30 mg Lupron began 12/2004 and every 4 mo after
PSA .069 -.079- 1.15-1.35- 2.23-4-7.18-13.70
50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
--------
I'm not expecting a cure in a bottle, I just wondered if in my case
there was a possibility of any efficacy. Why waste you money, huh?
Thanks for your imput Steve.
Cheers- Carl
I.P. Freely - 19 Feb 2008 06:00 GMT
> Gentlemen-
> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and scientists, and its formulation incorporates the most recently
> published research findings
Oh, yeah? How about the failure of lycopene to do squat for us in
trials? How about the less distinct but still disappointing failure of
soy in particular and isoflavones in general to live up to expectations?
How about the ever-increasing failures of ever-increasing numbers of
man-isolated chemicals to provide the same benefits as Mother Nature's
home cooking? The antioxidant trainwrecks comes to mind, as does the
recent revelation that soy probably *enhances* existing prostate cancer,
if I recall correctly.
. The daily dosage (2 capsules) of Prostate
> 2.2 provides 5 nutritional components, each of which appears to provide
> a protective effect on the prostate.*
Theralogix's spiel opens with "Our safe, scientifically formulated
nutritional supplement designed to support healthy prostate tissue."
You're overlooking one thing: if you have any prostate tissue, it ain't
healthy.
Last but not least, I don't base decisions to BUY anything significant
based on what I read on a website that SELLS it. And although a bottle
of this innocuous mix isn't in itself "significant", the fact that
unless you cancel your permanent subscription, this stuff's the
Energizer Bunny -- it just keeps on coming -- at $75 every month until
you remove its batteries altogether.
You'll notice my knee-jerk "opinion" isn't too scientifically worded,
what with "squat", "ain't", etc. That's because it ain't scientific;
it's just off-the-cuff and worth what it cost you and probably less than
what I put into it. But my gut tells me you would be far better off
consuming whichever of those micronutrients may be of some use (I'll
leave that selection up to the small handful of folks here who follow
the supplement research far more closely than I do) as *food*, where
possible, rather than from little pellets out of a factory. The
exceptions such as D3 probably warrant pills, but D3/calcium pills cost
pennies, not tens of dollars, and almost everyone needs more D3/calcium.
Oops; my two cents just expired.
I.P.
Carl Hunt Hays III - 19 Feb 2008 06:48 GMT
>> Gentlemen-
>> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> I.P.
----------------------
I always appreciate your input I.P. ! Makes sense to me! My
urologist in Macon, Ga reccommended this to me 2 years ago. I took it
for while.... Cheers- Carl.

Signature
PSA 19 07/2004 @ 55
12 needle Biopsy 07/2004 G7 T2c
RRP 09/2004 @ Johns Hopkins by Dr. Pat Walsh positive margins
G8 in most lymph nodes sampled
Post Op PSA 19
30 mg Lupron began 12/2004 and every 4 mo after
PSA .069 -.079- 1.15-1.35- 2.23-4-7.18-13.70
50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
I.P. Freely - 19 Feb 2008 16:31 GMT
> I.P. opined
<snip>
>> Oops; my two cents just expired.
> I always appreciate your input I.P. ! Makes sense to me!
"Sense" and medical reality often clash. Beware of even the most logical
layman's musing, especially when it's based on impressions and
observations like mine here rather than a broad base of cited references.
I.P.
Carl Hunt Hays III - 20 Feb 2008 04:48 GMT
>> I.P. opined
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> I.P.
-------
Roger that I.P.

Signature
PSA 19 07/2004 @ 55
12 needle Biopsy 07/2004 G7 T2c
RRP 09/2004 @ Johns Hopkins by Dr. Pat Walsh positive margins
G8 in most lymph nodes sampled
Post Op PSA 19
30 mg Lupron began 12/2004 and every 4 mo after
PSA .069 -.079- 1.15-1.35- 2.23-4-7.18-13.70
50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
Alan Meyer - 19 Feb 2008 19:37 GMT
> Gentlemen-
> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 2.2 provides 5 nutritional components, each of which appears to provide
> a protective effect on the prostate.*
I agree with Steve and I.P.
I expect that the stuff won't hurt you, but the unnamed
"advisory board" of unnamed "university physicians and
scientists" are pretty good clues that the company is
selling pills for $75 that retail for $15 elsewhere.
As for the supplements themselves, I think it is not
unreasonable to use supplements if they're cheap and
safe. The evidence for them is slender, to the say the
least, but I'd be inclined to try pomegranate extract and
maybe vitamin C.
Your PSA is no longer responding as strongly to ADT.
Are you seeing a medical oncologist who specializes
in prostate cancer? If not, I think you should. A friend of
mine in your situation is seeing Dr. Charles "Snuffy"
Myers in Virginia who has tried a bunch of other drugs
after my friend became hormone refractory. They included
estradiol patches, I think ketoconazole (I'm not sure about
that), pomegranate extract, and now revlimid, which seems
to be bringing his PSA back down again.
My friend's first doctor gave him Lupron and, when it
stopped working, kissed him goodbye. But sometimes
an aggressive doctor can keep a patient alive significantly
longer.
Best of luck to you.
Alan
Carl Hunt Hays III - 20 Feb 2008 04:55 GMT
>> Gentlemen-
>> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Alan
Thank you Alan. I have seen a med onc and I'm soliciting opinions fron
two others. I understand the urgency. My routine call to Dr. Walsh is
Monday. I am always interested in what he has to say.
Thanks for the good wishes- Cheers- Carl

Signature
PSA 19 07/2004 @ 55
12 needle Biopsy 07/2004 G7 T2c
RRP 09/2004 @ Johns Hopkins by Dr. Pat Walsh positive margins
G8 in most lymph nodes sampled
Post Op PSA 19
30 mg Lupron began 12/2004 and every 4 mo after
PSA .069 -.079- 1.15-1.35- 2.23-4-7.18-13.70
50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
brainyblogger@gmail.com - 19 Feb 2008 22:11 GMT
> Gentlemen-
> I would like to solicit some opinions on this product - Cheers- Carl
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> 50 mg Casodex added daily 12/07
> PSA 02/07 13.70 @age 58
============> I once investigated this and it seems like an excellent
product made by an excellent company. And you don't have to take 10
vitamins. And have a look at those doc's credentials -- a lot of
potential nobel prize winners.
One thing: in today's NYT there was an article in the Personal Health
section about the benefits of Vitamin D. I would consider taking
megadoses, based on what I have heard. At least I am going to give
that to my husband. *Then, he will be checked every week by a
doctor. You can ask me for his program, per Dr. Myers. Or some
people here may know more about this.
I tried to post above article, but I'm not sure it went thru.
Good luck.
Leah
prostatecancerblog.net
I.P. Freely - 19 Feb 2008 22:28 GMT
> have a look at those doc's credentials -- a lot of
> potential nobel prize winners.
Yep. Just like Yasser Arafat, Al Gore, Linus Pauling, and Jimmy Carter.
Sorry, but I'd look at the data, not the names.
I.P.
Alan Meyer - 20 Feb 2008 01:18 GMT
> brainyblog...@gmail.com wrote:
> > have a look at those doc's credentials -- a lot of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I.P.
Actually, although those other guys were all politicians, you
can't get better scientific credentials than Linus Pauling's. He's
one of my heroes. He discovered some of the most important
properties of atoms and molecules and was the first to provide
a mathematical and physical explanation of the nature of the
chemical bond.
I tried to read his _General Chemistry_. I fear that I wasn't
fully up to it. But even I could recognize its brilliance.
Now as to vitamin C ...
Alan
I.P. Freely - 20 Feb 2008 02:29 GMT
>> brainyblog...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> have a look at those doc's credentials -- a lot of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> a mathematical and physical explanation of the nature of the
> chemical bond.
Yup. That's why his Vit C misfire surprised the world and us at my
school (FSU, where he taught).
I.P.
Alan Meyer - 20 Feb 2008 01:11 GMT
On Feb 19, 5:11 pm, "brainyblog...@gmail.com"
<brainyblog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... And you don't have to take 10
> vitamins. And have a look at those doc's credentials -- a lot of
> potential nobel prize winners.
I see that I didn't read far enough when I carped about an
unnamed university physicians and scientists.
I agree that they do have impressive credentials.
Unfortunately perhaps, my inner cynic can't help being curious
about how much money these men are paid and how much
work they do for Theralogix.
It also appears that the price of the supplement is high
relative to the price of similar pills from other sources. See
for example the Schiff "Prostate Health" pills that sell for
$12.99 for 60 at Walgreens. Schiff is a high end pharmaceutical
house, not a web based company selling trash from China.
Are the Theralogix selection and doses better? Maybe. Or
maybe not. Your other post under " Study: Supplements
Not Helpful -- Except for PC?" casts doubt on all of them.
It's hard for me to believe that there is enough good data to
enable any board of urologists to recommend precise doses
of any of this stuff.
Alan