Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: OT: Humor

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Califchief - 07 Jan 2008 07:00 GMT
Sy wrote:

> Leah,
> As I had mentioned to you in a personal email of several weeks ago,
> I happen to think this type of post coming from a woman is plain
> weird and crosses an "unspoken" boundary of sorts.  I think it's
> inappropriate on numerous levels but would like to hear what
> others think.

I enjoy her postings, and think you're too damn sensitive
and/or totally lack a sense of humor.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 07 Jan 2008 07:00 GMT
Safire wrote:

> Steve  Kramer who is proud to have aided and abetted the killing
> of innocent  Vietnamese children seems to appreciate her jokes.

You're crossing the boundries of decency and could be
heading to a 2nd libel/slander lawsuit.

When are you going to learn to shut your f.cking mouth?

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 07 Jan 2008 09:00 GMT
Burney wrote:

> Sy, I thought we already went through this drill of commenting
> on Leah's humor, at your request, several weeks ago.  Maybe I
> just dreamed that.

No, it wasn't a dream.  Sy has a very short memory.
And an even shorter fuse on his temper.  That may
account for "I am scientifically trained and am a
skeptic by nature."   October 24, 2007

Or "Yes I can be abrasive...." October 24, 2007

Or "I am certainly not 'lashing out at the world'
only a few people who don't have the understanding
and common sense....."   October 31, 2007

Every trait of a troll or warmonger.

> Leah has been a valuable contributor to this group for a long
> time. As far as I'm concerned she can say whatever she wants.
> If you, or anyone else, doesn't like the humor she offers,
> maybe you could just ignore it and keep your thoughts to
> yourself.

I couldn't have written a better piece, Burney.

Thanks for your concise and truthful contribution to the group.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Sy - 07 Jan 2008 12:21 GMT
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
  the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]

I guess you don't understand things unless they hit you right over the
head.  Let me try to explain:

It's obvious that Leah is trying to inject some humor into a very
serious subject matter and that can be a good thing.  

However for a woman to engage in what's basically "locker room humor"
(that's 'men's locker rooms') is weird and intrusive. It would be like
me posting "boob" jokes on alt.support.breast.cancer.  

Does your mind comprehend the incongruity ofthat?  Do you get that?
Can you grasp that concept?

Are you related to Leah?  I note the email name "calichief" whereas
hers is "calilily".  Is he/she really "Leah" or maybe "Leon"?  Makes
one wonder.

And as long as I have a few more minutes to waste your's is the first
post I've seen invoking the "F" word.  Cute.

Sy

>  Sy wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Steve Kramer - 07 Jan 2008 23:27 GMT
You know what, Sy?  I understand.

No, I really do.

I think there is a less abrasive way of saying it, but, if I may put words
in your mouth, you personally find it offensive that a woman would come to
this group and joke about male genetalia.

Personnally, I think that is a valid opinion and worthy of mentioning.
Knowing  just a little about Leah, I think she might have apologized and
ceased posting them, at least while you're a member, if you had been more
civil about it.
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 07:37 GMT
> You know what, Sy?  I understand.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> ceased posting them, at least while you're a member, if you had been more
> civil about it.

Except that this horse was flogged many weeks ago. Sy doesn't understand
that the whole concept of a do-over is to do it *differently* the second
time.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 08 Jan 2008 11:00 GMT
>> Personnally, I think that is a valid opinion and worthy of mentioning.
>> Knowing  just a little about Leah, I think she might have apologized and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> that the whole concept of a do-over is to do it *differently* the second
> time.

And now he does.  Aint life grand?

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  <.1  <.1  <.1  .27  .37  .75            PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32                       PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145       PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04, <0.04 10/11/07
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Sy - 08 Jan 2008 11:07 GMT
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
  the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]

Hi Steve,

I appreciate that you "get" this.

Leah is free to post whatever she wants and doesn't have to apologize.
I'm nobody's censor.

By the same token I expect to be able to render my opinions also.

Sy

> You know what, Sy?  I understand.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> ceased posting them, at least while you're a member, if you had been more
> civil about it.
ronju99 - 08 Jan 2008 13:00 GMT
Sy,
   You are absolutely right in that you have the right to express your
opinions also on this forum. Pardon me if I'm not as eloquent as others
when I say that discretion is the better part of valor. Yes we should be
more tolerant of you at this time in your journey through this cancer
process as most of us have traveled much further down the road. In time
should you choose to be treated for your disease, especially if you choose
RP but Radiation will also result in the same perspective, you probably
will lighten up a whole lot when it comes to your genitalia. Most of us
never realized or even expected to be discussing such private matters in a
public forum such as this. Because you are new, you may not have read the
past archives when we have discussed how to deal with our erectile
disfunction in graphic detail and how to deal with sex with your partner.

So yes, I agree that we have become somewhat insensitive to others and
should do a better job of informing rather than criticizing. We sometimes
forget where we came from and how we initially felt as newcomers. Having
said that, I can also understand some of the responses being harsh because
of many of your past characterizations of posters that have sincerely tried
to be of some help and supportive. It works both ways but sugar will result
in a sweeter discourse.

Ron S.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 18:44 GMT
> So yes, I agree that we have become somewhat insensitive to others and
> should do a better job of informing rather than criticizing. We sometimes
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to be of some help and supportive. It works both ways but sugar will result
> in a sweeter discourse.

Who let Sean Hannity in here?  ;-)

I.P.
ronju99 - 08 Jan 2008 19:42 GMT
I.P.,
 You lost me when you said; "I can understand some of the responses being
harsh because of many of your past characterizations of posters that have
sincerely tried to be of some help and supportive." Who are you referring
to in this quote?

Ron S.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 20:02 GMT
> I.P.,
>   You lost me when you said; "I can understand some of the responses being
> harsh because of many of your past characterizations of posters that have
> sincerely tried to be of some help and supportive." Who are you referring
> to in this quote?

You, not I, said that. I simply quoted it in my response.

I.P.
ronju99 - 08 Jan 2008 20:08 GMT
Sorry. I'm slowly loosing it as my dementia is getting worse as I age.

Ron S.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 21:10 GMT
> Sorry. I'm slowly loosing it as my dementia is getting worse as I age.

I presume that's a joke, but it is completely obvious to me that my word
recall has been declining for a few years for real despite a great deal
of mental and physical exercise. I just hope I can keep 12 simple words
on the tip of my tongue: "OK, doc; it's time. Please pull that plug. I
love you, honey."

I.P.
ronju99 - 08 Jan 2008 20:16 GMT
Sorry. I'm slowly loosing it as my dementia is getting worse as I age.

Ron S.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
safire - 08 Jan 2008 20:57 GMT
> Sorry. I'm slowly loosing it as my dementia is getting worse as I age.

Loosing it?
Losing it?
You mean you're incontinent?
That is a well known side effect.
Surely, you've read about in in on Medscape.
But it's no excuse for all these double posts or for not properly
quoting the message that you're responding to.

> Ron S.
>
> --
> Message posted using http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
> More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
Slobodon - 08 Jan 2008 21:04 GMT
Ron...  Time for restraint!   Don't answer any more messages...

>> Sorry. I'm slowly loosing it as my dementia is getting worse as I age.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
>> More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 22:45 GMT
> Ron...  Time for restraint!   Don't answer any more messages...

Yes, Ron ... by feeding the troll, you're contributing to its pollution
of the forum.

Are you aware that "troll" is not a randomly selected pejorative term,
but rather a specific internet term for people who sprinkle the internet
with deliberately inflammatory statements specifically intended  to
inflame, thus eliciting responses, i.e., more troll food? Then when a
sucker takes the bait, he strikes with both barrels and stays in that
forum until it stops feeding him. Trolls are basically arsonists, and
you're doing exactly what Safire wants: feeding his sick desire for
conflagration. The result is a forum which may repel people. Do you
leave your home and car doors open overnight, leave raccoon or skunk or
rat food on your porch, paint gang graffiti on the side of your house,
or kick mean drunks in the shin? That's what I thought. So don't stroke
the troll. If he really has PC (many trolls learn the lingo very well),
let him get help at someone else's expense, not ours. Like Jill Bello,
he has the option of behaving if he wants advice rather than flame wars.

I.P.
Sy - 08 Jan 2008 20:09 GMT
Ron,

I think you are quite as eloquent as anyone else.

My treatment choice had nothing to do with my comments re: Leah's post
though and I think this IS the place to discuss erectile dysfunction
etc.  in detail.

Thanks for your comments.

Sy

In article
<df60d2e879528264b38d1d26d70517cb@localhost.talkaboutsupport.com>,

> Sy,
>     You are absolutely right in that you have the right to express your
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group/alt.support.cancer.prostate/
> More information at http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/faq.html
callalily - 08 Jan 2008 22:19 GMT
Dear Steve (and All),

I take your comments very seriously.  Just so you know, I'm not a
pervert, I don't have a preference for dirty jokes.  I get them from
various groups (mostly prostate pointers' humor (HAH), joke eruption,
aus.jokes), and from friends.  Then I let my husband pick his favorite
ones.  Also asked him about the propriety of posting the joke in
question.  He approved it, might as well have pressed the "Send"
button.  His opinion was colored by the fact that the jokes we get
from the grandpas in indiana who contribute to  the prostate joke list
are often far, far, bawdier, than anything I've every posted.  Check
it out.

I do reject a lot of jokes -- the runner-up this time was about a doc
laughing at a guy with a small penis.  My husband howled with laughter
when he heard it, but you did not see it here.  I did post it on HAH,
along with a few others, because I have never seen a "protest" letter
from anybody on that list (have to repost them because of a technical
kink).  Just so you know, there is a woman who is highly respected in
the online PC world who often posts on the HAH list. You also have to
factor int that I stay away from posting ethnic, religious and even
regional jokes.  So there's not much left to laugh about.  And my
jokes are never intended to disparage men in a serious way -- I
disparage women equally, if I do at all.  I don't know how many "dumb
blonde" jokes I've posted.

The fact is, I'm glad for the chance to write this.  It's painful for
me to be thought of as some kind of deviant.  In truth, I lead a
pretty conservative life: For example, I'm not interested in porn,
rarely cuss and have engaged in little else but "plain vanilla
sex" (found that out in these forums!).  But, because I have been
dragged into the PC world, I have no choice but to discuss things many
people consider "dirty", such as genitalia, sexual intercourse, ED,
penile rehabilitation, and a specialty of mine, priapism.  (My husband
won't do any research on any of this.)  When you become inured to
talking about all this, the "boundaries" between good and bad taste
sometimes do get blurred.

Take my membership card -- Please!

A man wrote me recently: "I just discovered your blog, really like
it.  Do you always talk about sex?  Hope so!"  I felt so bad about
this that I wrote to my friend Don Y. in Mo. and asked him, "Hey Don,
do you think I'm a slut?"  Always a sweetheart, he replied, "No.  More
like a cross between Dear Abby and Dr. Ruth."  I would give anything
to strike the "Dr. Ruth" part -- I always thought she needed to have
her mouth washed out with soap.

I write my own jokes and repeat those of others to cheer people up,
the way they do me.  I did work for a number of years as a prof'l
writer.  But the only literary interest I have now is to one day write
a joke book about PC (there is a very successful one for BC), even tho
Ted says there's not a big enough market for it.  (Bunk!)  On my blog,
I often make jokes at my own expense.  I have written about our own
sexual adventures and misadventures, among other things.  Believe me,
I had reservations about turning my own love life into a "reality
show".  But I thought it was worth it.  And I was right, because I got
some good feedback.  But Ted is not happy about it.  He just asked me
to please remove his name from the postings -- just refer to him as
DH.

Steve, the real problem I have with this is your dignifying comments
from someone who has repeatedly harassed people in this group -- and
used them, in the sense that he really doesn't pay attn to what
anybody says.  And I would not give the time of day to any person who
sends hate mail to cancer patients.  I received a nasty. nonsensical
letter from Sy a few weeks ago, and yes, my husband read it, too.  I
have never received anything like this before.

I ignored Sy's letter, and I'm not going to talk about the substance
of it now, but I am going to post it in a separate message.  Why don't
you all read the letter for yourselves and decide whether the writer
is a reasonable, decent, truthful person, worthy of attention and
respect.  (As far as necessary medical info, *nobody* should be denied
that, no matter how bad their behavior.)

Having said that, I know I have said many very stupid things here, and
I apologize for that.   Maybe this joke is one of them.  I wish I had
heeded my father's advice to always keep your mouth shut.  I actually
post very little these days.  But do keep in mind that it's not always
easy to say the right thing when, like me, you have a huge sword
hanging over you (his srt results).

Take care.

Leah

PS: I just received this note from a guy in the HAH group: "I rarely
see jokes of this quality here.  Thanks very much, W."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------:------------------------------------
Shakespeare said:

"Be not afraid of greatness; some are born great, some achieve
greatness, and others have greatness thrust upon them."

My version: "Some are born lewd, some achieve lewdness, and others
have lewdness thrust upon them."  I put myself in the last category.
Who knows, maybe it will one day lead to greatness.
callalily - 08 Jan 2008 22:28 GMT
Part II: Sy's letter to me. (12/9)  Will just say that my only comment
to Sy about Jersey was that there are great hospitals there.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leah,

At first I was going to post this to the "group" but decided to send
it only to you in the service of ruffling as few feathers as possible
given the extraordinary sensitivity and mental fragility of several
members of the "group".

I just happened to stumble over this bit of "humor" this morning. As I
mentioned a while back, there's something quite weird about a woman
posting this kind of stuff. Weird and annoying.

Why annoying? To comment about Prostate Cancer and to even offer free
DREs if fully within the purview of a discussion group such as this.
However,the material you post is of such a highly, highly, highly
personal nature (which in fact physically defines "man")to a Man that
you may be unaware that you are crossing a boundary of sorts and
entering a place where you aren't really welcome so to speak. Sort of
like me posting to alt.menopause.douching.techinques and sounding off
about approaches to women's genital hygiene if you catch my drift.

With the Internet though one never knows who's behind the post. You
could be a backup NFL quarterback for one of the NYC teams I suppose.
Maybe even a starter.

I say "NYC" because some your previous comments contained the
characteristic NY-Centric mindset I hear frequently living here in
lowly Central, New Jersey. So, working on that assumption and fully
aware that I have nowhere near the sophistication (note the prefix
"sophist") of the average Manhattanite you sound like you've absorbed
enough rants from Andrea Dworkin, Naomi Wolf and other radical
feminists that the line between "male" and "female" had been
obliterated in your mind long ago.

Just an hypothesis on my part and as I mentioned earlier, you could
have no familiarity with Dworkin and Wolfe and be interested only in
the writings of Belichick. Note the suffix "chick" in this Kafkaesque
matter.

Finally, and to pre-empt the characteristic tantrum you might want to
have about your "right" to post anything you want just let me
reiterate what I said at the outset and that is that I find it more
than a little strange that a woman (and I do actually believe you are
a woman) would post this type of stuff. I also notice that no one
replied or commented on your posting. Maybe others feel the same way I
do but are hesitant to say anything.

Has that thought occurred to you?

Sy
limey - 09 Jan 2008 00:35 GMT
> Part II: Sy's letter to me. (12/9)  Will just say that my only comment
> to Sy about Jersey was that there are great hospitals there.

           <remainder snipped for brevity>

It took me a while but Sy now happily resides in my killfile.  Also in
there is Safire, even though he has recently posted using a slightly
different address.   The peace is wonderful.

Dora
I.P. Freely - 08 Jan 2008 22:51 GMT
> I ignored Sy's letter, and I'm not going to talk about the substance
> of it now, but I am going to post it in a separate message.  Why don't
> you all read the letter for yourselves and decide whether the writer
> is a reasonable, decent, truthful person, worthy of attention and
> respect.  

Some goon was in my face for weeks until I posted his e-mail on the
forum, revealing his public lies. Never heard from him again via e-mail
or the forum.

I.P.
Sy - 09 Jan 2008 13:16 GMT
YouPee,

Goon"?, "in your face"?  You are a real tough guy, but before you start
landing blows consider that you'll end up breaking your monitor.

Sy

> > I ignored Sy's letter, and I'm not going to talk about the substance
> > of it now, but I am going to post it in a separate message.  Why don't
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I.P.
BH - 09 Jan 2008 00:33 GMT
>Dear Steve (and All),
>
>I take your comments very seriously.  Just so you know, I'm not a
>pervert, I don't have a preference for dirty jokes.  

Leah, for what little it may be worth, I never thought of you as a
pervert.  I sincerely appreciate that you have a good sense of humor
and welcome your sharing with this group.

>I do reject a lot of jokes -- the runner-up this time was about a doc
>laughing at a guy with a small penis.  

Damn, I'm sorry you didn't post that one.  I saw it a month or so ago.
If I still had it, I'd post it here now just for kicks.  I howled at
it, too, even though I, like many men here, have to put up with a
shortened member since surgery.

>The fact is, I'm glad for the chance to write this.  It's painful for
>me to be thought of as some kind of deviant.  

No pain should be felt over this!  I'll offer a thought for your
consideration.  You could possibly get worse references than being
spoken of in an unkind manner by someone like Sy.  We all should, and
I think we do, consider the source.

Unfortunately, this group has had a few unpleasant people recently.
Safire is simply a troll and should be treated accordingly by all who
value this group - filter him (or it) out and, by all means, don't
feed him.

Sy, on the other hand, is a different sort of character.  I don't
think he is really trying to be a "bastard".  I think it's just a
genetic problem.  He has shown a bit of improvement at times; but, he
has a ways to go. Thanks for posting his letter.  Maybe that will help
the group handle him more appropriately.

Hang in there with us, Leah.  We appreciate you - and your sense of
humor.  If you still have that joke about the Doc laughing about the
small penis, I'd appreciate getting it by email if you don't want to
post it.

Burney

>Take my membership card -- Please!

No WAY!  You're in for the duration.
RP in 1995 (age 52)
RT in 2000
ADT (Casodex) 10/06 - 8/07

burney dot huff at mindspring dot com
Sy - 09 Jan 2008 13:16 GMT
Leah,

Just to be clear, I don't consider you to be a "pervert", or a "slut"
or any other such.

I just think you don't get what I'm saying.  See Steve's response of a
few days ago.  He "gets it" perfectly.

Sy

In article
<d79162df-628b-4eee-874a-137d9b21fe08@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> Dear Steve (and All),
>
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
> have lewdness thrust upon them."  I put myself in the last category.
> Who knows, maybe it will one day lead to greatness.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.