Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / November 2007
After RP, then what? (kind of a rambling question....sorry)
|
|
Thread rating:  |
skeptic - 22 Nov 2007 15:36 GMT I've dealt with all the mind blowing issues to consider and have decided on a RP, via robotic. I've done much research and I'm "comfortable" (hah!) with my choice of surgeon and method. But I've decided no further treatments for me...none....absolutely no HT or RT even though one of the uros I saw made it clear that was the recommendation (he's not the one i'm using). 1)Have any of you gone that route? 2)If I do, will I be negating the advantage of an RP in the first palce? Ok, the way I'm thinking is, there's no denying I have a high psa (14) and high gleason (7-8), so I have to get the RP. But... if I'm determined to stop after that, will I quickly progress back to where I was before the RP or can I expect, say, 4-5 years of relatively no progression? (as of this writing I don't know the results of the bone scan, cat scan, etc., but this assumes it hasn't spread...or I wouldn't be writing this) I'm prone to depression and if I can get through this RP, it will take all my will power to "think" myself into recovery....I just can't face the SE of additional treatments after such a traumatic experience. I know, it's somewhat of a ridiculous question (cos there's no real answer) but I'm more interested in anecdotes and opinions then what my biased docs have to say....in general.
David&Joan - 22 Nov 2007 16:06 GMT Skeptic:
You say you are interested in anecdotal evidence and not the opinions of your "biased" docs.
Why not investigate the large body of statistical research on this topic and then make your decision. Google prostate + gleason and then prosate + partin and read the articles. Make sure that you have the full picture of you current state: PSA, Gleason score, clinical stage, DRE positive or not, etc.
I supect that you will find that you have a high probability of the PCa having gone beyond the prostate gland and the seminal vesicles which are the only thing that gets removed by surgery. Radiatation therapy has a decent chance of killing anything outside of these two glands if done at a reasonably early stage. If you wait your options get smaller.
Yes, your SEs are likely to be worse if you do surgery plus RT. The SEs of the potential future therapy if you don't do RT now, ie RT + HT are much worse IMHO. In other words the probablility is high that you will ultimately have to do RT, so why not do it now while it has a better chance of success.
David
dr2354 - 22 Nov 2007 17:08 GMT skeptic, consider the following approach- do the LRP - assuming your scans come back clean. THEN decide what to do - worrying about what to do, or not do, next does nothing but add additonal stress. Options are actually several (would like to say many, but...) Do nothing - that's what you suggest - is that fair to your family, loved ones - ask them what they want - they are in this too. RT - ok, that's an option now - even if the scans come back with bad results. There is some research that RP patients with rising PSA that have RT actually have better long term survival than those that don't have immediate rise. [might be something about the cancer still being in the prostate bed, and not having metastesized?] Trials - there are over 400 trials on the cancer.gov site alone.
There are essentially two ways to look at what we have - and those perspectives impact our quality of life. One - we have cancer, woe to us, and all around us, be miserable, make those around us miserable. Two - we have cancer - it is SLOW growing [almost spelled it groin...that's another issue] - if we choose to make the most of every day, live postive lives, try to laugh [at ourselves, if necessary], help others, we will gain the most out of the time we have left.
Said another way, if we wallow in misery and don't take advantage of life, how is that different from being dead?
Make it the best Thanksgiving YOU can!
DanR
Alan Meyer - 24 Nov 2007 04:29 GMT > ... > Said another way, if we wallow in misery and don't take advantage of > life, how is that different from being dead? > > Make it the best Thanksgiving YOU can! > ... Excellent advice.
Alan
I.P. Freely - 22 Nov 2007 17:51 GMT > I've dealt with all the mind blowing issues to consider and have > decided on a RP, via robotic. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > answer) but I'm more interested in anecdotes and opinions then what my > biased docs have to say....in general. PRESUMING YOUR PSA IS ALL FROM CANCER, not from some incidental infection, there's not much need for even the RP, lap OR open, and certainly no need for prostate radiation, if your scans show mets. Many doctors won't even remove the prostate if they find mere cancerous lymph nodes, let alone ribs or vertebrae. But your short doubling time and your PSA rising rate of more than 2 per year very dramatically increase the likelihood that no treatment will cure you. That, plus your clear fear of treatments, plus HT's almost certain dramatic exacerbation of depression, gives me no reason to argue with your decision against adjuvant (secondary) treatment. I wouldn't even start shaving your crotch or buying Depends before the scan results are in, though, in case they render surgery moot. If your scans a discrete met or two, radiation of those spots may "cure" those apots, giving you relief until the next spots occur. Ultimately, you may welcome HT if and when your met symptoms become intolerable and too widespread for "chasing spots".
Now, about that depression. Some newer anti-depression drugs are far more successful and far less obnoxious than the old meds. Make sure your choose your depression doc as carefully as you choose our surgeon. My mother-in-law's docs wrote her off as untreatable and near death when they couldn't relieve her deep depression following a stroke. Her neice, a geriatric psychologist, flew across the country, taught those docs a thing or two, treated Mom with newer drugs, and the depression was gone within a couple of days. Perhaps if you can defeat this depression thing, you may be more willing to take your PC by the horns. A two-pronged approach like that just may give you not only EXTRA years but far HAPPIER ones.
I.P.
ronju99 - 22 Nov 2007 21:10 GMT skeptic, My brother was PSA6.3 Gleason (3+5)=8. He chose openRP in 1999 before LRP & Robotic. They found extracapsular penetration but nothing else. They then gave him 36 radiation treatments as a precaution. He then went almost 8 years before he had recurrence. He is now considering hormone therapy as his doubling time is now about three months. He is 68 years old.
He tells me he wished that he hadn't had the radiation because of the side effects that he experienced at the time. Don't remember now what they were. But I'm wondering if in fact the combination therapy didn't actually give him more time before recurrence than if he had done without the radiation.
Ron S.
Steve Kramer - 23 Nov 2007 00:22 GMT > I've dealt with all the mind blowing issues to consider and have > decided on a RP, via robotic. That's fantastic, Skeptic! It may not seem like such a big deal now, but you'll find that it is the most important step you'll make. It's time now to sit back and relax, knowing the hard part of this is behind you. I forget your exercise regime, but if there is none, I would start walking and getting yourself ready for surgery. Please let us know the date.
> But I've decided no further treatments for me...none....absolutely no > HT or RT even though one of the uros I saw made it clear that was the > recommendation (he's not the one i'm using).
> 1)Have any of you gone that route? I think you'll be the 2nd among us. Martin Howard made that decision and continued with his urine therapy until is death. Even I.P., probably our most boisterous ADT opponent has never said, "none.... absolutely no HT."
> I know, it's somewhat of a ridiculous question (cos there's no real > answer) but I'm more interested in anecdotes and opinions then what my > biased docs have to say....in general. I think you've heard all the anecdotes, Skeptic. I would highly recommend putting off RT and ADT decision until after you see if you're cured with the RLRP.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04, <0.04 10/11/07 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
I.P. Freely - 23 Nov 2007 01:54 GMT > Even I.P., probably our > most boisterous ADT opponent has never said, "none.... absolutely no HT." Heck, no! When my status reaches the point -- and that's likely -- that ADT (or SRT or chemo or voodoo or drinking my own urine) is likely to improve my overall picture in some way or ways, let me at it. One step at a time.
"Boisterous", huh? After throwing out the high and low extremes of its definitions, I'd have to say I can't argue with that ... which in itself says a lot for your choice of words. '-)
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 23 Nov 2007 13:59 GMT > "Boisterous", huh? After throwing out the high and low extremes of its > definitions, I'd have to say I can't argue with that ... which in itself > says a lot for your choice of words. '-) Words mean things and I try to use them appropriately. Every once in awhile, I find that I've used one in accordance to a paradigm the was not quite accurate. I'm glad you found a definition that you found appropriate. But, having looked it up myself, none that I found were intended.
I.P. Freely - 24 Nov 2007 00:59 GMT >> "Boisterous", huh? After throwing out the high and low extremes of its >> definitions, I'd have to say I can't argue with that ... which in itself [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > quite accurate. I'm glad you found a definition that you found appropriate. > But, having looked it up myself ... I looked it up, too, in several sources (any word is just a few keystrokes away in Google, at <dictionary WORD> or <thesaurus WORD>), to see whether I should huff and puff and ruffle my feathers (NOT). My responses to various definitions included a variety of chuckles, nods of agreement, winces, self-recognition, and mild objections ... followed by the realization that even the harshest definition -- "Violently agitated" -- was, IMO, appropriate a couple of times (and certainly not exclusive to me).
> none that I found were intended. I won't ask whether your sights were high or low. ;-)
I.P. as boisterously as a race horse
Steve Kramer - 24 Nov 2007 02:07 GMT > > none that I found were intended. > > I won't ask whether your sights were high or low. ;-) I said, "intended". Not, "inaccurate." :-)
Alan Meyer - 24 Nov 2007 04:40 GMT ...
> But I've decided no further treatments for me...none....absolutely no > HT or RT even though one of the uros I saw made it clear that was the > recommendation (he's not the one i'm using). > 1)Have any of you gone that route? Many here have had RP without radiation or HT. Probably most of the RP patients are in that category.
Most of those who have had RT or HT did so only after finding that the RP did not, by itself, solve the problem.
> 2)If I do, will I be negating the advantage of an RP in the first > palce? No you won't. Adjuvant radiation or HT will improve your odds of success. How much they will improve them still seems to be a matter of scientific debate.
Your doctor is suggesting the most effective possible treatment, i.e., the treatment that will maximize your chance of not dying of PCa. It's not an unreasonable thing for him to recommend. However the decision is yours.
As others have said, it would not be unreasonable to get the RP, wait a month or two, and start getting PSA tests. If the tests show you still have cancer, go for additional treatment. If not, then hold off on additional treatments.
That is an intermediate course between whatt your doc is recommending and what you want to do. It will still give you a fighting chance if the RP doesn't solve the problem, while avoiding extra treatment if the RP does solve the problem.
> ....I just can't face > the SE of additional treatments after such a traumatic experience. Maybe not so traumatic. It's partly a matter of luck as to how traumatic it is, and partly a matter of attitude.
> I know, it's somewhat of a ridiculous question (cos there's no real > answer) but I'm more interested in anecdotes and opinions then what my > biased docs have to say....in general. I guess you've heard from us. I don't know your docs. Some docs are dyed in the wool heap-the-treatments-on-em types. Others are not. I guess you have to make your own judgment about whether the doctors' recommendation is informed judgment or bias.
Alan
Peter - 25 Nov 2007 00:23 GMT Hello Skeptic,
You have made the trip so far. Knowledge of reality, search for information and then choice to influence destiny. Good going!!! May you have the best of luck as your choice plays through to it's conclusion. I will hope for your best outcome and will follow your path if you choose to share.
You seem to be strong in this path so far. Stronger than you might have thought you could be. You also seem to have grown from this dilemma. I too have been made stronger and have grown more resilient by the realization of my predicament and my attempt to do the best for myself. Each has the obligation to themselves to the same. Your statements that you want no further treatment if this fails because of the dreaded SE is understandable and yours to make. Lack of choice for further treatment is a choice in itself and has the dreaded effect of further side effects. I hope you can still choose a path of least resistance, whatever that may be.
As far as the traumatic experience of your RLRP, you might be and hopefully will be pleasantly surprised that you can get through it as easily as you do. Hang on, take the bumps, the road may be smoother than you expect. I hope you don't mind my philosophy here...I have tried to embrace this as a way to make my experience with this predicament as meaningful and purposeful as it can be.
You can respond via the NG or by personal e mail if you want. I will be here... Peter
> I've dealt with all the mind blowing issues to consider and have > decided on a RP, via robotic. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > answer) but I'm more interested in anecdotes and opinions then what my > biased docs have to say....in general.
|
|
|