Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Your experience with ADT

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 01:11 GMT
Guys:

As I get closer to qualifying for a clinical trial (either chemo  &
ADH  or just ADH ...link to study = http://tinyurl.com/34cev5 ).  I
wonder how the hormone therapy is going to effect my quality of life
(and work).

I realize that clinical studies and any medical treatment usually
comes with a myriad of potential side effects and those side effects
vary by individual. Nonetheless I am curious about your experience and
what you found most effective to mitigate and side effects. I have
read publications from PCRI on preventing and treating side effects
but I am curious what your personal experience is?

Thanks in advance for sharing. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.

CURRENT AGE = 51, Overall good health (need to lose weight).
6/03 - PSA 2.0,  6/04 - PSA 2.5,  8/05 - PSA 4.2, 11/05 - PSA 5.89
BIOPSY 8/16/05, T2A, 3+5 = 8
RP  @ MSKCC 12/13/05
PATHOLOGY GLEASON 3+5=8
TERTIARY 4, SEMINAL & LYMPH - NEG
EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION TO MARGIN
POSITIVE MARGIN - RIGHT APEX
PSA POST RP 1/26/06 = 0.5, 2/1/06 = 0.55
PSA on 3/27/06 = 0.95
START SRT ON 3/27/06
FINISHED SRT 5/19/06
06-20-06   - PSA 0.24
07-08-06   - PSA 0.15
09-14-06   - PSA 0.10
12-19-06   - PSA 0.08
02-07-07   - PSA 0.09
08-17-07   - PSA 0.31
10/02/07   - PSA 0.48
11/05/07   - PSA 0.61
I.P. Freely - 18 Nov 2007 01:53 GMT
> Guys:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> read publications from PCRI on preventing and treating side effects
> but I am curious what your personal experience is?

The short answer: ADT is a bitch, but your only choices are a) do it now
or b) do it later when mets become noticeable or bad. Both decisions are
defensible, as benefits and side effects are highly variable.

Considerations abound in the long answer, beginning with my rough notes
from a very similar poll I initiated here on Nov 19, 2004. If you search
the group's archives on key words HT or ADT or Hormone back to then
you'll find hundreds of pages of ADT SE discussions. If you don't know
how to search the archives, let us know; it's a few keystrokes away.
(Put on your asbestos gloves and eyeshades; the discussions got hot
because it's an alarming topic.) It all started with

http://tinyurl.com/2bzhg5

titled "Hormone therapy side effects".

Tip: if you think this topic gets too long or heated or complicated,
realize your future, starting within weeks, may be dramatically affected
for better or worse by your decision.

From my notes:

Lud wrote:
I am in the same boat of SEs that you have - drugs seem to affect me
more than normal and smallest doses are to much. Being on treatment
for over 8 years now, I have been through several cycles as follows:
2 years ADT with Zoladex, 1 year off, 1 year of HDC (high dose Casodex
= 150 mg), 2 years ADT with Zoladex + IMRT radiation, 1 year TDE
(transdermal estradiol patches 100mcg x 6), 1 year partially off and 3
cycles of Taxotere and now LDK + HC (low dose Ketoconazole 200 mg x 3
with Hydrocortisone 20 mg + 10 mg).

My worst side effects were from the Zoladex Txs - in the sequence that
encountered them:

1-  Before starting Zoladex I had been on a vegan diet for 3 months
and felt really great - 3 months after starting Zoladex, I was totally
depressed and feeling very suicidal. I dug out that hole buy having
some protein every 2 hours ( I tried several anti-depressants and they
only made me groggy.

2- Luckily I did not have any major hot flashes - I believe they are
caused by declining estradiol levels but not everyone is susceptible.

3- Mental impairment was a major problem for me - short term memory,
ability to multi-task or keep track of more than 1 idea were all gone
over time. Only years later I found how to manage these to some degree
by using a 50 mcg estradiol patch, having more protein and higher fat
diet.

4- Emotional and psychological impairment also kicks in and seems to
be affected by diet - but after 18 months I found it totally down,
crying, fear etc. Estrogen patches do help.

5- Bone loss starts with the estradiol decline, I was on Fosamax for
4.5 years and then on Zometa - it kept the bone density from
declining.

6- Muscle tone loss - turned soft from lack of testosterone - exercise
would have helped but the mental will was not there.

6- The side effects became worse after 18 months and at 2 years of
treatment, I felt like a vegetable - I existed but was not able to do
much - I was so desperate that I had to stop Zoladex.

7- Must comment on the sexual SEs - yes libido was totally gone but
with manual stimulation and greater effort it was still possible to
have an orgasm, dry of course and not the sensation.

8- HDC had minimal side effects, only problem was that PSA control did
not last long. Looking back, my testosterone was high normal range, my
serum estradiol level was above men's high range and my DHT was way
above normal range despite being on Proscar and probably the cause of
PSA failure.

7- Estradiol patch therapy was a JOY - most debilitating SEs of
Zoladex were not there and I could out-argue my wife for the first
time. The emotional and mental changes due to the high testosterone
and zero testosterone were very interesting - I found I was thinking
and feeling differently than as a man or a eunuch. It was not a bad
experience. Unfortunately it did nothing for HRPC control.

8- Must add the SEs from the Keto Tx- 3 weeks on and the SEs are more
tolerable than Zoladex, it remains to be seen how it progresses. Great
news is that it is working against HRPC.

Over the years I have asked many patients about their side effects and
found that very few men admitted to having mental and emotional
problems from ADT, yet their wifes all said they had some. I hope men
would come forward to tell about their SEs and more importantly that
we all work at finding ways to counter these side effects. I hope this
helps someone.

Lud

On Jun 15, 10:10 am, "Bob C." <B...@Bob.org> wrote:

> > I believe you are right about the link between "T" and hot flashes and
> > some of the other SE's,  but these were just my own personal
experiences
> > while going on and off Lupron. I am one of the ones who got pretty
major
> > SE's while on Lupron, but then all my life I have been sensitive to the
> > effects of any drug and minimal dosages of a drug, such as aspirin,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > car keys" problems we all have at times. I'm talking about sitting down
> > to make a spreadsheet and an hour into the project, accidentally
finding
> > it already built and saved somewhere. The list is longer, but it's not
> > certain which of these attributes are directly or indirectly  due to
> > Lupron and "T".  Stress and anxiety can have major effects on how the
> > brain works and they say are likely factors in some of this. When you
> > spend minutes trying to remember the word you wanted to use, who
can say
> > which of the above caused it.  I was amazed at how  these tests pulled
> > information from my mind, how much they revealed to the clinical
> > neurologist, and I sat on the edge of the seat of my chair intent on
> > answering questions, doing the task, completing the picture, and so on.
> >
> > Sorry for rambling on, and this does not answer your question or
clarify
> > anything. We all are pretty much aware of the possible SE's including
> > hot flashes, weight gain, muscle loss, night sweats, mood glitches,
loss
> > of body hair, high cholesterol, and the list goes on and on. Most of
> > these are visible and fairly obvious. It appears to me that the mental
> > and not so obvious  effects of these drugs are largely unknown to most
> > doctors. I think it was kh who mentioned something about losing
creative
> > ability and organizational ability, and others have said similar
things,
> > and I have seen this in myself. I am pretty sure you will not find that
> > in any text book yet.
> >
> > I have to ramble again. New thought. I recall, the first time on
Lupron,
> > how I could see how my thought process had changed. Maybe it was the
> > first time ever lack of sexual undertones, maybe it was the lack of
male
> > aggressiveness, or depression, who knows, but I definitely looked at
> > most things in a different light. Now I am done.  I hope this helps a
> > little,  rather than hinders!!

√Slug wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
...
> > Well, this is still a long post and forgive me!   Just if you are on
> > Lupron and epect to be on it for life, how do you feel about that life?
> >
> > Thanks  George.

They gave me 2 four month lupron shots.  The first few months wasn't
bad and I even managed to have erections and emissions.   I wouldn't
want to be on lupron long term and not be able to be with a woman.

The problem was in the 5th or 6th month.   I had incredible fatigue,
was thirsty, pee'ing all the time.  My fasting blood sugar hit 300 and
my triglycerides went whack-o too.

The joint pain didn't bother me.  Neither did the hot flashes.  I had
both but that was minor compared to the outa control blood sugar.

For me, this wasn't a matter of "tolerating" the Lupron or "sucking it
up and toughing it out".  A 300 blood sugar is dangerous.

Not because it can cause long term injury such as kidney failure,
blindness, and so forth but because a 300 means that your brain isn't
working.   You're in a sugar fog all the time.

I'm amazed that I was able to drive.  At the worse, I wasn't able to do
any detail work, like type on the keyboard.

Before taking Lupron, I'd advise having a full up blood chemistry,
Testosterone, sugars, all the metabolics, cell counts, everything.
And get another done every two months at a minimum.

Then plot them on graph paper so you can see the trends.   If your
chemistries stay within your normal range, then great.  You can handle
the rest of it, joint pain, hot flashes, those are easy.

13 people graciously responded (a 14th was discarded because his T was
not low) to the HT SE poll I initiated on Nov 19. The very subjective
“score”, obviously biased by my personal criteria, is 2 with minimal
SEs, 5 with serious SEs (some with even more serious implications, such
as the potential for devastation from diabetes or osteoporosis), and 6
who were very hard hit or even devastated by their SEs. Here are
summaries of their comments, in increasing subjective order of
“seriosity”. I hope I haven’t conceded too much accuracy to brevity in
these condensations; feel free to correct any misconceptions I’ve
introduced, but since this isn’t scientific, details aren’t vital. I’ve
left out the references to impotence and loss of libido, because they’re
a given with no T. [And I’ve added a few editorial comments in
brackets.] The field is still open to, and I invite, more responses.

THE LUCKY ONES

Steve Kramer experienced minimal side effects over 16 months of HT [but
what are your T and PSA? Some say no SEs => no benefit.]

Tom C’s worst effects are hot flashes and some anemia that was corrected
with B-12. But he added later that he also had fatigue.

THESE SOUND MORE MAINSTREAM.

Casey Stengel
My side effects are hot flashes, loss of bone density, and elevated
glucose level [which his doc hasn’t mentioned is a common HT SE.]

For Tony, SEs were acceptable, mainly hot sweats, lack of energy and
some weight gain. The hot sweats were the most uncomfortable, as you
have to watch what you wear, short sleeve shirts are a must, and you
also have to choose cool seats in restaurants. [I HATE heat anyway, and
get either very irritable or very drowsy in temps most people prefer.
Don’t sleep much at temps over mid 60s, for example, preferring 50s. And
how bad’s a hot flush when one’s a mile out in the ocean in a full wet
suit and exercising extremely hard?]

THE SE’S AND THEIR IMPACTS WEIGHED MORE HEAVILY ON THE FAR SIDE OF THE
BELL CURVE:

Marshall Schuon: Sometimes it is like the hard drive in my head has just
been wiped. This memory loss is REALLY annoying! Zoladex also knocked me
flat, leaving me with no strength or energy. I really have never been so
weak in my life.  And I sleep at the drop of a hat. The hot flashes are
a pain.

The sexual side effects go without saying.  But I also have put on
weight and developed what I have heard referred to as "a Lupron
donut."  Arghh.

Oh yes, I also now have a problem with blanking on things -- a
short-term memory loss  which I understand is not uncommon

Bill Fla: the expected SEs – mainly fatigue and low energy.

John Loomis: w/HT, everything went north. I got achy, hot flashes, no
nuttin, and did not feel good. It hung around like a cloudy day. Lupron
or whatever is very hard on a man.
Hopefully you do not need that.

Mike: With four months of Lupron and Eulexin I had some hot flashes,
breast enlargement, and weight gain, and discovered a loss of bone
density four years later [his doc apparently never mentioned that
prospect]. I would avoid more HT unless it was absolutely necessary.

Banter: Lurpon/Casodex for 4 years now ... and feeling it. I relate to
much of what was discussed in terms of loss of emotions. It is a hard
thing to live with. I am irritable, but have redirected my 'emotions'
through writing poems. I remember as if in a dream what it use to be
like filled with passion, and to feel calm. I feel emotionless when it
comes to women.

Alan Meyer: My doctor recommended against HT, but I insisted when a
trial showed 88% 5 year disease-free rate vs 63% without it for
radiation patients with Gleason 7 – even though other trials show less
or no advantage. I had no depression or loss of concentration, but had
hot flashes and fatigue. Exercise got me through daily living adequately
but with no energy reserves. Arthritis symptoms in my hands and fingers,
SEs addressed on the Lupron website, started after the end of HT and
seem permanent. I also got dangerously elevated liver enzymes while on
Lupron. It took about six months after my last 3-month HT period for my
T to return fully.

Clarence Crow’s been on ADT2 for 7 weeks. “At 3 weeks waves of tiredness
struck, with fits of frustration, mood swings, undue stress,
intolerance, loss of purpose, no interest in my work and some fits of
depression with emotional outbursts. I had to cut my work week back to 3
days MAX. All my pre-existing ailments were exacerbated, especially my
OA and bowel problems. I stopped my Androcur [a UK antiandrogen], but
increased hot flashes drove me back to it. ADT sux!”

Dale P: Gleason 9, seminal vesicles destroyed, nodes involved -- big
incentives for post-RP HT. 20 months HT, then quit because I was sick of
the side effects, all of the normal ones you hear about. Terrible hot
flashes got worse with time. The weight gain was not too bad, as I kept
as active as I could. The mood swings and depression were a major pain
in the a.s. The worst and final straw for me was fatigue. It got worse
after the first year, and then got worse and worse as the months went
by. I could NOT do ANYTHING without getting extremely tired. If we went
out for dinner or a weekend trip, it would take me two days to recover.
No way to live. Many doctors I saw are against IAD, preferring proven
treatments until refraction, but I found one who lets pts do IAD if they
insist. I will likely go with him [the implication is that Dale demands
a break from the HT despite the risks, with which I strongly identify].

Sandi: My 60-yo husband had gleason 7 with seminal vesicle involvement
and positive margins. Oncologist recommended 2 years HT, but 9 months of
Lupron was enough. Debilitating SEs made it almost impossible to
function. He had no energy at all, making it quite difficult to work.
Continuous hot flashes seemed to get worse the longer he was on HT. My
positive husband suddenly became very withdrawal and depressed. I also
noticed "significant" changes in his cognitive abilities which really
was out of character for him. There was no QOL anymore - we felt like we
were just surviving. My husband spent more time in bed napping than
anything else because he didn't have the energy and he was too depressed
to want to do anything. After a month off HT, the hot flashes are less
frequent, fatigue still is an issue for him as well as the lack of
libido. I'm hopeful that in a few more months he will start feeling more
like himself. It seems the longer you are on the hormones, the longer it
takes to shake off all the side effects.

“NoSpam”
Shooting pains in some toe joints and right fingers, and several
physiological changes after 5-6 months on Lupron. The hot flashes don't
bother me; the major surprise is the extreme fatigue; four flights of
stairs exhausts me. I also have disorientation that affects detailed
mental work. Urination stings a bit.

Chuck:
Extreme, crushing, hammering bone and often-crippling joint pain; often
feeling like broken bones. Hot sweats. And that’s months after he gave
up Lupron because of its SEs.

George had devastating SEs. Two 4-mo Lupron shots followed by a one year
Viadur
implant. Extreme fatigue, hot flashes and now more joint and fracture-level
bone pain with my arthritis. QOL nose dive. Removed implant and withdrew
from ADT; hot flashes getting more intense.

Steve Jordan:
> Hot flashes: yes. Mildly annoying, but not unbearable. Maybe they'll
> improve, maybe not. I don't care.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Arthritis and diabetes exacerbation: please define.

And ad infinitum

I.P.
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 01:59 GMT
> > Guys:
>
[quoted text clipped - 208 lines]
>
> read more >>

IP thanks for the quick reply perhaps I should have done a quick
search beforehand. This is a enough to scare the crap out of me.
I.P. Freely - 18 Nov 2007 06:11 GMT
> IP thanks for the quick reply perhaps I should have done a quick
> search beforehand. This is a enough to scare the crap out of me.

I can understand that, but you are likely to have little choice within a
few years. You're wise to start the research because many doctors,
including some medical oncologists, dismiss the side effects, especially
when it's the only option because met symptoms are getting serious. You
have plenty of time, if so inclined, to:
1. Do lots of research (probably starting with Strum simply because he
has compiled the most impressive treatise on ADT SEs).
2. List the potential SEs.
3. List their likelihoods; certain ones are almost guaranteed, with the
primary uncertainty being their severity.
4. List each likely SE's treatments.

Fortunately, Strum lists all that to shorten your research.

5. Determine in advance the SE's symptoms so you'll recognize them if
and when they start to occur (unless you tend to be hypochondriac). Some
can be pre-empted; a few even *require* pre-emptive treatment.
6. Once ADT is under way, observe its benefits, downsides, and threats,
and re-address its overall desirability according to your personal
criteria. Even when you ultimately really have little choice, your
knowledge of its effects may give you some control over it.

Don't stop with Strum. There are many other useful resources, often
found under topics such as testosterone deprivation, male menopause,
etc. I don't think one can be too informed about ADT's pros and cons
until they have no other choice, and even knowledge can provide some power.

I notice that Heather's Ron didn't encounter his SEs for half a year,
whereas my med onc told me a 28-day trial would reveal most of my SEs. I
suspect neither is the norm, that onset ranges from a couple of weeks to
over a year for various SEs in various people.

I.P.
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 13:56 GMT
> > IP thanks for the quick reply perhaps I should have done a quick
> > search beforehand. This is a enough to scare the crap out of me.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> I.P.

THANKS I.P.  I don't think I have much recourse but to attack this
beast. I am a big proponent of taking initiative and doing
research.When I get started with my treatment I'll establish a log so
that I can try to monitor and mitigate SE's.

Now I wonder if I want the double whammy of ADH and Taxotere if I get
selected for that arm of the clinical study?
Lud - 19 Nov 2007 04:49 GMT
> THANKS I.P.  I don't think I have much recourse but to attack this
> beast. I am a big proponent of taking initiative and doing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Now I wonder if I want the double whammy of ADH and Taxotere if I get
> selected for that arm of the clinical study?

Dominic

The key issue is to be aware that many of the side-effects can be
countered, unfortunately most doctors are not aware or interested in
making life easier for us. Our goal should be to be aware of possible
adverse-effects (my preferred term.) and never accept that there are
no countermeasures that will help - it took me 7 years to learn this.
I have been thru 7 years of ADT of various forms (Zoladez, estradiol
patches, Keto), radiation and Taxotere and there is always something
that can be done to make life enjoyable. We all react differently so
keep a close watch of your reactions and hope you have a pleasant
surprise that most of the side effects will miss you.

Lud
Alan Meyer - 19 Nov 2007 05:39 GMT
...
> The key issue is to be aware that many of the side-effects can be
> countered, unfortunately most doctors are not aware or interested in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> keep a close watch of your reactions and hope you have a pleasant
> surprise that most of the side effects will miss you.

Seven years!  And you've maintained your efforts and your
positive outlook on life!

You are an inspiration to us all.  My hat is off to you.

I hope you get some more years and enjoy them to the fullest.

Best of luck.

   Alan
Lud - 20 Nov 2007 00:15 GMT
> Seven years!  And you've maintained your efforts and your
> positive outlook on life!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>     Alan

Thanks Alan
It is amazing what knowing and pursuing good treatments will achieve.
Today I got my last PSA result of 1.63 which is the same level as 2
years except it is falling now instead of going up - starting at 16
PSA, 6 months ago. I had to push and bring in studies to my medical
oncologist to get Ketoconazole prescribed, finally she relented, I had
some toxicity which had to be managed but it is dropping the PSA
faster than any treatment I have had before - PSAht (halving time) is
4 weeks - this is what really makes me happy.

I hope you have great success too!!!
Lud
Steve Kramer - 20 Nov 2007 00:37 GMT
> Today I got my last PSA result of 1.63 which is the same level as 2
> years except it is falling now instead of going up - starting at 16
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> faster than any treatment I have had before - PSAht (halving time) is
> 4 weeks - this is what really makes me happy.

8½ years and almost as many treatments and PSA is going down.  WOW!!
Alan Meyer - 21 Nov 2007 04:50 GMT
...
> It is amazing what knowing and pursuing good treatments will achieve.
> Today I got my last PSA result of 1.63 which is the same level as 2
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> faster than any treatment I have had before - PSAht (halving time) is
> 4 weeks - this is what really makes me happy.

That is tremendous.  I read an article some time ago that said
second line hormone therapy, e.g., ketoconazole and some
other drugs, really works.  And yet I bet a significant percentage
of doctors treating PCa patients don't know about it.

> I hope you have great success too!!!

Thank you.

Keep the good news coming.

   Alan
Alan Meyer - 21 Nov 2007 17:43 GMT
> ... I had to push and bring in studies to my medical
> oncologist to get Ketoconazole prescribed, finally she relented,...

I have a friend who is being treated for advanced, metastatic
prostate cancer.  His last PSA before starting hormone therapy
was 500.

His urologist was fairly useless.  The guy gave him Lupron and,
when that failed, basically kissed him goodbye.

So he went to see Dr. Charles "Snuffy" Myers.  I believe that
Myers headed prostate cancer research at the University of
Virginia Medical School before going into private practice.
Myers also has PCa himself.

Myers put him on second line hormone therapy.  I know he
used a bunch of estradiol patches and something else.  It might
have been ketoconazole (my friend is the kind of guy that takes
the pills given to him without paying much attention to their name).
They helped for a while.

Now Myers is having him take 5 pomegranate extract pills every
day, 3 in the morning and 2 in the evening.  He's using the ones
from Life Extension Inc., but I don't know if there's anything special
about that brand.  Surprisingly, his PSA has come down a little.

It might be worth your investigating supplements - pomegranate,
Vitamins C and D, Lycopene, I don't know what else.

Keep battling.  Keep pushing your doctor.

Good luck.
Lud - 21 Nov 2007 18:47 GMT
> I have a friend who is being treated for advanced, metastatic
> prostate cancer.  His last PSA before starting hormone therapy
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Good luck.

I consulted Snuffy in 2002 and went to his 2 day seminar on food and
supplements so I am up to date with his work as I also receive his
ProstateForum newsletter. Then I consulted Oliver Sartor last December
so I have his thinking. As with my discussion this morning with my
oncologist, it is hard to tell what will work for an individual
person. Her experience with Keto has worked for very few patients and
not much, whereas my experience has been amazingly effective in
dropping the PSA with some toxicity that I have to manage.

The big difficulty, after standard hormonal therapy failure, is
finding the right treatment that will work for me. It takes a lot of
knowing about ourselves and understanding what is medically possible,
knowing how to deal with adverse effects and taking the risk. A lot of
responsibility that not many patients are willing to take on.

I am fighting on.
Gourd Dancer - 21 Nov 2007 19:20 GMT
Lud, Part of my six month chemo regimen included Keto -

Each course of chemotherapy lasts for 8 weeks. Patients were treated in
weeks 1, 3, and 5 with doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous
infusion on the first day of every week in combination with ketoconazole 400
mg orally 3 times a day daily for 7 days. In weeks 2, 4, and 6, treatment
consisted of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously on the first day of every
week in combination with estramustine 280 mg orally 3 times a day for 7
days. Three courses of chemo were completed.

For me, so far so good as mets are complletely gone and PSA is undetectible.

I included the dosage that I took as they were pretty heavy. Kinda curious
as to what dosage you are taking.

Congratulations and we wish you many, many more years.

GD

>> Seven years!  And you've maintained your efforts and your
>> positive outlook on life!
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I hope you have great success too!!!
> Lud
Lud - 22 Nov 2007 17:53 GMT
GD - I really appreciate hearing about your treatment - it really
looks like it would have a heavy toll in adverse effects - how did you
manage?

I did TAX q21 last year for only 3 doses - started at 75mg/M2 and down
to 60 mg/M2 for the last 2 - problems of zero neutrophils on the 1st
dose, added Neulasta for the later doses and had to add Aranesp for
the last one - it took months to overcome the side effects - it did
drop the PSA from 8.6 to 3 in 12 weeks then back up again. My current
Keto is 200mg TID - LDK and more effective than TAX - has been halving
my PSA every 4 weeks - my onco is amazed as her experience is that
very few respond at all - PSA down from16.4 to 1.63 now. I have to
work hard to manage the adverse effects.

Glad to hear how effective your regime was - who is the oncologist
that prescribes such strong treatment?

Wishing you continued success in keeping it below chronic.
Lud

On Nov 21, 2:20 pm, "Gourd Dancer" <!!!msheets!!!@!!!sbcglobal!!!.net>
wrote:
> Lud, Part of my six month chemo regimen included Keto -
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> GD
Gourd Dancer - 22 Nov 2007 19:27 GMT
Lud, here is the link:

http://www.methodisthealth.com/tmhs/basic.do?channelId=-1073830766&contentId=107
3905631&contentType=SERVICE_CONTENT_TYPE


Dr. Amato has researched Kidney and prostate cancer for about 28 years. He
has remained in an academic or research environment.

Either one tolerates the TAX or not. I guess that is the luck of the draw.
My neutrofils and otehr markers stayed in an acceptable range - thank God.

Surprisingly I tolerated the regime very well. Keto would cause a little
nausea, but Zofran took care of that. Dr. A told me that all medicines that
I took in each on little way had cancer killing attributes; hence the trial
that I was on. The results were undetectibles ranging from 3 months to 9
minths except for me..... In talking to the otehrs, most stopped taking the
Keto because it made them too sick. I did not and took an attitude that Dr.
A knew what he was talking about.......... I kinda believe that is why my
results have been remarkable.

Remarkable in that the two mets to the spine have been complete gone and
replaced by new bone growth. However, every quarter when it is time for PSA
draw and bone scans, I get a little nervous....

One thing that Dr A told me, we have known since 1980 how to kill the
cancer. The trick was how to kill the cancer and not kill the patient. What
he meant was that most trials deal with how much of a drug to give, tracking
the SE, and the results. I kinda figured that I had a three year death
sentence, so what the hell......

The only thing that he promised me was that he could buy me ten years. Now,
when the cancer rises up again, again I am sure that it will, he has many
more "silver bullets" with which to treat. It's a waiting game.

Lud, I know longer think about adverse effects or SE's. Why, either one
accepts and lives linger, or they do not accept and die sooner. I think too
much is written about SEs and QofL. However, each has to be the captain of
their own journey.....

Glad to see that the Keto is working. The longer the PSA is surpressed, the
longer we can be active.

One last comment, when I was being treated so aggressively, I simply did not
care about how I felt. The cancer was found by my cardiologist when I had a
double by-pass..... no blocked arteries, no heart attack - simply an
aneuryism with a blood clot attached on the LAD before the 1st Distal. In
otherwords I was the walking dead. Probably and the condition 10 plus
years..... Maybe, just maybe, attitude plays a string role in treatment
success.

Have a great Thanksgiving, we all have a lot to be grateful for.

GD
> GD - I really appreciate hearing about your treatment - it really
> looks like it would have a heavy toll in adverse effects - how did you
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>>
>> GD
WhiteSoxFan - 19 Nov 2007 16:44 GMT
> > Guys:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > read publications from PCRI on preventing and treating side effects
> > but I am curious what your personal experience is?
DominicM wrote:
> Guys:

> As I get closer to qualifying for a clinical trial (either chemo  &
> ADH  or just ADH ...link to study = http://tinyurl.com/34cev5 ).  I
> wonder how the hormone therapy is going to effect my quality of life
> (and work).

> I realize that clinical studies and any medical treatment usually
> comes with a myriad of potential side effects and those side effects
> vary by individual. Nonetheless I am curious about your experience and
> what you found most effective to mitigate and side effects. I have
> read publications from PCRI on preventing and treating side effects
> but I am curious what your personal experience is?

Hey Dom,

I was presented with the choice to participate in a clinical trial out
of SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group) that compared casodex and zoladex
to casodex and zoladex with chemo. I qualified when my first PSA test
3 months after RP came back <0.1. The other factors qualifying me was
a Gleason 4+4, no lymph involvement or other apparent mets. This was a
purely preemptive approach to treatment.  ADT before recurrence. My
mind at the time was all for going all out to once and for all kill
the bastard. I was hoping I'd be placed in the chemo arm. I wasn't.
The SEs were downplayed and casually presented by my onc. A Zola dex
shot in the stomach, every three months and one daily pill, the 50mg.
casodex. Hot flash SEs started after about a month. They peaked and
subsided at about 3 or 4 months but by then all the other SEs kicked
in. General lethargy, weight gain, (I went from high 160s to high
170s, low 180s. I was losing things, forgetting where stuff was, short
term memory was as good as gone. Body hair other than pubes, pits,
head and face disappeared. My glucose level rose, and my bone density
dropped to osteopenia levels. And most alarming, I developed trigger
finger in a couple of my joints. That's when your digits lock in a
closed or open position and you cannot move that digit smoothly, it
snaps and it hurts. I stayed on the drugs, from May until January and
then I decided to stop. It was supposed to be a 24 month regimen. Two
weeks after I told my Onc I was stopping participation, he phoned to
tell me that the patients in the chemo arm (not the group I was in)
were told to stop because two patients had died of heart related
issues. That was one more than they figured was an acceptable
percentage.
The 9 months I was on the drugs was spent seeking info about the drugs
I was now taking. There is so much info and so many studies all over
the world. I seemed to discover that for every study, there was
another study that directly contradicted the first one. I also
educated myself regarding diet, exercise and supplements. I felt that
diet and exercise is as important as pharmaceuticals. I came to feel
that my Onc that presented me with the option to participate in the
study was more interested in the results, than in my well being. I was
seriously believing the medical/drug company conspiracy theory. Bottom
line, I felt I was placing myself in too much a risk of a heart
attack, or diabetes or a bone break and other medical problems by
taking the drugs. And I didn't want to add more drugs to my body in
order to fight the SEs. Just as I was presented with a choice to have
seeds or surgery to remove my prostate, I had another choice to
"control" my condition with drugs or lifestyle. I chose to not do it
with drugs. My life still revolves around the three month cycle of PSA
blood tests. So far, since my RP in January of 06, my PSA has behaved
itself.

May you have strength and trust in your future decisions,

Todd <WhiteSoxFan>
DominicM - 20 Nov 2007 02:42 GMT
> > > Guys:
>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Todd....Thanks for sharing.You were only a month or two behind me.  I
guess I was doing the SRT route and you were on ADT. I pondered that
and hoped for that the radiation would knock out what RP missed but
the damned beast resurfaced.

I hope you have a nice Thanksgiving. My regards to the Windy City. A
place I always regard as home.
Steve Jordan - 18 Nov 2007 02:06 GMT
(snip)

> I am curious about your experience and what you found most effective
> to mitigate and side effects. I have read publications from PCRI on
> preventing and treating side effects but I am curious what your
> personal experience is?

I cannot fault Dominic for asking that question.

But I must caution that my experience with ADT, as well as that of
anyone else, is absolutely no measure of what he might experience.
Notwithstanding undocumented arguments to the contrary, what helps me
might harm Dom, and vice versa.

He, if he has studied the documents on PCRI, must know what is possible.
What *he* might experience is pure guesswork.

Sorry, but that is the unvarnished fact.

Regards,

Steve J

"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but (to) be aware of the
lack of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with
nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies."
-- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005
Thank you, Brian.

> Thanks in advance for sharing. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 12-19-06   - PSA 0.08 02-07-07   - PSA 0.09 08-17-07   - PSA 0.31
> 10/02/07   - PSA 0.48 11/05/07   - PSA 0.61
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 02:28 GMT
> (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

You are right Steve ...effects vary.

I am obsessing too damned much about this. "It is what is is" . I have
to deal with it.  Sorry for not reading posts from 2004. Wish me luck.
I have few months (March) before I start the trial. I won't to be as
mentally and physically prepared as possible.

Thanks
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 02:40 GMT
> > (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

excuse typos   ....meant to write... want to be as
> mentally and physically prepared as possible.
Heather - 18 Nov 2007 02:50 GMT
>> (snip)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I have few months (March) before I start the trial. I won't to be as
> mentally and physically prepared as possible.

Hi Dominic.....

My husband was on HT (or ADT) for over a year and yes, he did have a
miserable time on it, but he had no other choice.  That is what this
boils down to.  At the moment, what other alternative is there??

But do realize that you can come off for a while provided your PSA stays
at the undetectible level for a year.  And trust me, it most likely
will.  Ron has been off Zoladex and Casodex for about 2 years now and
has slowly crept up from 0.02 to 0.19.  That is quite
acceptable......for now.  We just deal with it.

Apparently 0.20 is where his PSA should be after radiation.  He had the
same method of radiation as Alan Myer.....HDR radiation.  It is not
quite as common in the US due to the rather hefty price tag, but up here
in Canada, it is more widely available.

There are a few of the men in the same situation as my husband and
yourself.  And they will be quite happy to answer any of your questions
and prop you up if you need it.

All the best and just sit back and enjoy your Christmas......you have 4
months to go before you are on HT.  Btw, the side effects don't usually
hit till about 3 months later and Ron actually went 7 months before they
did.

Heather (wife of Ron)
DominicM - 18 Nov 2007 13:41 GMT
> >> (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thank you Heather. At least this Christmas season unlike 2005 I won't
have a damned cathether!  Wish you and Ron the best. I appreciate the
encouragement.
Alan Meyer - 19 Nov 2007 04:24 GMT
> ...
> My husband was on HT (or ADT) for over a year and yes, he did have a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> now and has slowly crept up from 0.02 to 0.19.  That is quite
> acceptable......for now.  We just deal with it.

Hi Heather.

I know you can't help but be alarmed about the gradual rise of PSA,
but it sounds like you might be very much okay in spite of it.

Hormone therapy wears off slowly.  How slowly depends, among
other things, on a man's age and on how long he's taken the
treatment.  It may well be that all of Ron's rise is attributable
not to cancer, but to a gradual decrease of the influence of the
HT.

In my own case, my PSA has gone up and down and up and
down.  It never went as high as Ron's (my top was 1.8), but
it never went as low either.  My last test, 3.5 years after
treatment, was .21 - I'm still hoping to get down to where Ron
is now, but, as far as I know, I'm not showing any evidence of
cancer recurrence.

My rad onc at NIH, who has made a study of PSA bounce,
has told me that most bounces occur in the first three years,
but that some have been reported out to five years.  So, he
said, I shouldn't immediately jump to HT if my PSA goes up
again.  He wanted me to watch it and see for sure if it's a
recurrence.

I'm hoping that 1) Ron is not showing evidence of cancer at
all, or 2) if it is cancer, it's growing a rate that will kill him only
after he reaches the age of 130.  Either of those looks possible
from what he's showing now.

Best of luck.

   Alan
Alan Meyer - 19 Nov 2007 04:41 GMT
> Guys:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance for sharing. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.

And happy Thanksgiving to you.

Others have already given you a lot of information.  I'd like
to make a brief statement about side effects of hormone therapy
and then a longer one about clinical trials.

The side effects of HT can be a bitch, no doubt about it.  But
it is very important to fight against them.  Steve Kramer has been
on HT for longer than most men here but he's been pretty active
in fighting the side effects with exercise, sleep, and lots of water
and he seems to be battling successfully.

I was only on HT for four months (five or six if you consider how
long it actually took to wear off).  During that time I maintained
a rigorous exercise program.  My ability to exercise dropped
dramatically from what it had been before radiation and HT, but
it never dropped to zero.  I was able to maintain enough reserve
energy to go to work every day, lead a normal life, and never feel
down and out.  I even forced myself to have sex (I never would
have imagined I'd have to force myself) and, to my surprise and
delight, succeeded and enjoyed it.

Now about clinical trials.  I'd like to put in a few good words for
them.

Clinical trials have benefits for you and for the whole cancer
community.  Our sons will have better treatments available to
them because we participate in clinical trials.

If your experience in a clinical trial is like mine, you will
experience the following direct benefits:

1. You'll get more medical testing than would ever be done
for you in normal treatment.

2. You'll get access to a higher level of expertise than most men
can get.  The doctors and scientists who participate in clinical
trials are usually the best of the breed - the ones with the greatest
scientific knowledge.

3. You'll get more time with the docs.  My clinical trials doctors
had a much smaller patient load than most doctors and were able
to give me a fair amount of time.

4. You may benefit from more advanced treatment.  This is far
from certain, but it's a possibility.  Clinical trials are not done for
treatments that are thought to be worse than the standard
treatments.

5. You may have lower costs.  My treatment in a clinical trial was
free.  My insurance was not involved and there were no copays.
I don't know if that's true in the one you are investigating.  I have
gotten follow up care from very good doctors for over three years
now.

Good luck.

   Alan

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.