Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / November 2007
Seed implants 1 year ago...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Naaman - 15 Nov 2007 05:24 GMT ...and my psa reading today was 0.1. I meet with my rad onc tomorrow to see what she has to say about how things are progressing. I'm curious to see when she will schedule by next psa.
Side effects, at least those that I have experienced so far, seem to be under control at this point. I'm still taking Flomax primarily because of a bladder problem that existed before the seeding.
Now it's just wait and see what happens on down the road.
Naaman
Alan Meyer - 15 Nov 2007 20:06 GMT > ...and my psa reading today was 0.1. I meet with my rad onc tomorrow to > see what she has to say about how things are progressing. I'm curious to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Naaman .1 is a great number Naaman. My last reading was .21, down from .25 the previous year. Different doctors argue for different end points as goals of radiation therapy, but I've never heard one as low as .1. In other words, by every definition I've seen of successful radiation, .1 is a success.
Alan
Beverley - 15 Nov 2007 20:15 GMT Most of what I read they consider 0.2 as great. So we were surprised to watch George's fall lower and lower. 0.02, 0.01 and then finally it was returned as 0.00 which just means it was less than 0.01
It's just a very slow slide to the bottom! Bev
> > ...and my psa reading today was 0.1. I meet with my rad onc tomorrow to > > see what she has to say about how things are progressing. I'm curious to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Alan 3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina - 15 Nov 2007 21:22 GMT > Most of what I read they consider 0.2 as great. So we were surprised to > watch George's fall lower and lower. 0.02, 0.01 and then finally it was > returned as 0.00 which just means it was less than 0.01 > > It's just a very slow slide to the bottom! > Bev OK, now I'm concerned. Maybe I shouldn't be. My first PSA after seed implants 3 months after was 1.1 , 6 months after it was 0.9. My urologist says he wants it down to 0.5 next January. But what if it bounces upwards?
Alan Meyer - 15 Nov 2007 23:59 GMT On Nov 15, 4:22 pm, "3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina" <3putt@PawleysIslandSC> wrote:
> > watch George's fall lower and lower. 0.02, 0.01 and then finally it was > > returned as 0.00 which just means it was less than 0.01 [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > implants 3 months after was 1.1 , 6 months after it was 0.9. My urologist > says he wants it down to 0.5 next January. But what if it bounces upwards? My PSA bounced around like crazy. It was held artificially low by HT for the first few months, then it went up to .8, down to .6 up, down, up down, then gradually settled down. My highest reading was 1.8. My last one was .21. If it goes up, you can't help but be concerned, but it's not by itself a sign of failure. It's only if you have a long term upward trend that you know your treatment failed.
I was part of a clinical trial of MRI image guided HDR brachytherapy. The doc in charge told me that a significant number of men in the trial had PSA bounces, the highest one of which was something like 2.4. But all eventually came down as of the last report.
Alan
Beverley - 16 Nov 2007 04:09 GMT A bounce is not unusual in the first year or two. In lay terms and not exactly being accurate about this, but the prostate after brachytherapy was put on a slow kill cycle. In other words the RT damaged it beyond repair. It's not going to die gracefully, and it will fight until it has lost. We never saw a bounce. It could have happened in-between PSA tests or it could have happened in the first six months. The prostate cells are going to continue to divide and replace themselves but the genetic stuff is fouled up so even if they do manage to do it the cells don't have the ability to survive. The prostate might try to have one last hurray and put out a bunch of cells (rise in PSA) but then those cells falter and die. Eventually you wind up with nothing left.
A PCP did a DRE on my husband about a year ago and couldn't even find his prostate. The PCP commented that he didn't realize he'd had a RP. No he didn't have a RP; he had brachy. At this point my husband was white knuckled while this doc was trying to find the prostate. I was there so I told the doc he'd only feel a minor bump where the prostate should have been. He was shocked that this little bump was what remained after brachy. Yep, seeds and some scar tissue, maybe the half the size of a small dried lima bean. We knew this because my husband's rad-onc kept giving us the equivalents as the prostate died and receded.
Your 0.9 could have been a bounce and the next PSA could be 0.1, but there is no way to know. Just remember it is a slow downward curve. It took my husband about 3.5 years to hit the bottom. Each time we were so surprised to see it fall one more time. So if the next one is 0.7 it's still going down, or maybe that one is the bounce. You could ask for a three month PSA check. I think the hardest part of brachytherapy is waiting for it to fall to the bottom and worrying about the bounce that you might never see. I gather that they want to see it fall to at least 0.2 and if it levels off there then they will accept it but to watch it go further down is awesome. Three years out from brachy he was 0.04, at sixteen months he was 0.18, and at 22 months he was 0.15. At 28 months he fell to 0.10
The four year PSA will be the predictor for the 15 year PSA.
The benchmark PSA for 6 months is 2.0 The benchmark PSA for 2 years is under 0.2 and they figure they've got it.
3Putt you're well under the 6 month benchmark! Just stay ahead of the benchmarks. Seems you're doing fine! I hope some of this helps.
I found this on a Google search:
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jun 1;56(2):448-53
Prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate seed implantation for localized prostate cancer: descriptions and implications.
Stock RG, Stone NN, Cesaretti JA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. rst...@mssm.edu
PURPOSE: To calculate the actuarial risk of developing a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after prostate brachytherapy alone, using three definitions of bounce mentioned in the literature, and to explore the relationship between disease and treatment variables and the risk of developing a bounce. The impact of PSA bounce on PSA failure was also explored.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 373 patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer underwent radioactive seed implant using 125I (n = 337) or 103Pd (n = 36) without hormonal therapy or external beam RT. All patients had a minimum of 1 year (median 4, maximum 11) of follow-up and at least three follow-up PSA values. PSA bounce was defined by a rise of one or two PSA values with a subsequent fall. Three definitions of bounce were used: definition 1, rise > or = 0.1 ng/mL; definition 2, rise > or = 0.4 ng/mL; and definition 3, rise >35% of previous value.
RESULTS: The actuarial likelihood of experiencing a PSA bounce at 5 years was 31% for definition 1, 17% for definition 2, and 20% for definition 3. The median time to develop a bounce was 19.5 months for definitions 1 and 2 and 20.5 months for definition 3. Gleason score, initial PSA level, and clinical stage did not predict for bounce using any definition. Using definition 1, younger patients (< or = 65 years) had a bounce rate at 5 years of 38% vs. 24% for older patients (p = 0.009). 125I patients receiving an implant dose of < or = 160 Gy had a bounce rate (definition 1) at 5 years of 24% vs. 38% for those receiving a dose delivered to 90% of the gland on the 1 month postimplant dose-volume histogram (D90) >160 Gy (p = 0.04). Using definition 2, prostate volume significantly affected the incidence of bounce. Patients with larger glands (>35 cm(3)) were more likely to experience a bounce (23% at 5 years) than those with smaller glands (< or = 35 cm(3)) who had a bounce rate of 11% at 5 years (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis of factors predicting for PSA failure, PSA bounce was not found to be significant.
CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common phenomenon after prostate brachytherapy and occurs at a rate of 17-31%, depending on the definition used. It is more common in younger patients, those receiving higher implant doses, and those with larger glands. PSA bounce does not predict for future PSA failure.
3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina - 16 Nov 2007 13:11 GMT >A bounce is not unusual in the first year or two. In lay terms and not > exactly being accurate about this, but the prostate after brachytherapy [quoted text clipped - 102 lines] > >Thank you for the insight Beverly. Naaman - 16 Nov 2007 16:04 GMT >> Most of what I read they consider 0.2 as great. So we were surprised to >> watch George's fall lower and lower. 0.02, 0.01 and then finally it was [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > implants 3 months after was 1.1 , 6 months after it was 0.9. My urologist > says he wants it down to 0.5 next January. But what if it bounces upwards? After confirming that I should be pleased with the progress my psa is showing, my rad onc cautioned me that about 25 percent of seed implant patients show a psa "bump" somewhere about the 1-year mark. She is recommending that I still get my psa checked every three months for the next year. I don't mind a cautious doctor.
Naaman
Greg Louis - 16 Nov 2007 12:09 GMT > Most of what I read they consider 0.2 as great. So we were surprised to > watch George's fall lower and lower. 0.02, 0.01 and then finally it was > returned as 0.00 which just means it was less than 0.01
>> > ...and my psa reading today was 0.1. I meet with my rad onc tomorrow >> >> .1 is a great number Naaman. My last reading was .21, down from .25 >> the previous year. Sounds great to me! Today is the 3rd anniversary of my seed implant, and I'm off to the lab for a PSA test this morning -- seeing the uro in 2 weeks. After hitting a low of 0.59 at 7 months, my PSA level climbed: at one year it was 0.8, two years 1.7, 26 months 3.29 -- then 1.29 (whew!) at 28 months, 1.43 (oh-oh) at 31 and 0.78 (whew again) at 33. Needless to say, today's result will be awaited with some interest, though it seems the 3.29 was just a bigger spike than most.
(My family physician asked whether I'd go this route if I had to relive the experience -- yes I would. The suspense around the spike wasn't much fun but in general I think brachy was a good choice for me. I couldn't have dealt easily with the downtime that surgery produces. My sex life has been pretty normal all along. No big incontinence problems either.)
So good luck, Naaman -- keep those 0.2-and-unders coming -- but don't panic if a bounce should appear!
 Signature Greg At age 58, PSA 5.4 rising triggered biopsy 2004-06-22, Gleason 3+3, T1c, prostate volume 27 cc. Monotherapy, 55 I-125 seeds implanted 2004-11-16.
Alan Meyer - 16 Nov 2007 18:16 GMT > ... > Sounds great to me! Today is the 3rd anniversary of my seed implant, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > to say, today's result will be awaited with some interest, though it > seems the 3.29 was just a bigger spike than most. Surprisingly, there is apparently some evidence that men who experience PSA bounce are _less_ likely to have a recurrence of the cancer than men who don't.
Don't you love it when science predicts you're cured?
> (My family physician asked whether I'd go this route if I had to > relive [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > has been pretty normal all along. No big incontinence problems > either.) When I had my biggest uptick I thought, well, this is going to kill me, but no one lives forever. I reconciled myself to it and decided not to let it ruin what was left of my life. I lost less sleep than I did in the beginning when I first learned I had cancer.
> So good luck, Naaman -- keep those 0.2-and-unders coming -- but don't > panic if a bounce should appear! Exactly.
Alan
Steve Kramer - 16 Nov 2007 00:24 GMT > ...and my psa reading today was 0.1. I meet with my rad onc tomorrow to > see what she has to say about how things are progressing. I'm curious to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Now it's just wait and see what happens on down the road. That's great news, Naaman. However, there is a goodly number of people who would probably like to express their joy and support, but don't know it's good news.
Hey everyone! Naaman had Brachy one year ago and his quarterly PSAs have been 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1!!!
It's all in how you tell it :-)
|
|
|