"Eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message
> The positives of more accurate seed implantation seem obvious. I was
> wondering what the negatives would be, and what those specialty
> brachytherapy clinics such as in FL, GA, and Seattle think of it.
>> ...
>>The nearest I can come is HDR (High Dose-Rate) brachytherapy, which is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>It's done by remote control, which does not fit the correct definition
>>of "robotic." But then, neither does the da Vinci procedure.
I had HDR done with what was described as a robot. I was
knocked out for the procedure and never saw the machine
or how it was controlled.
In my treatment there were several stages.
1. Imaging to determine the location of the prostate and the
tumors.
This was done with endo-rectal MRI.
2. Treatment planning.
The MRI data was fed into a computer which generated images.
The radiation oncologist then worked with a computer program
to produce a map of where the seeds should be planted for
optimum coverage.
3. Implantation of treatment catheters.
The catheters are thin plastic tubes inserted through the
perineum into the prostate. As I understand it, this was done
by a surgeon working with his hands, but I'm not absolutely
sure. I will ask the next time I meet with the oncologist for
followup.
4. Seed placement.
This is done by the robot, or waldo, or whatever it is. In my
case, I was told it was a robot and that a computer moved the
single seed into a treatment catheter, held it in position for
a programmed amount of time, moved it a few millimeters, held
it again, etc., eventually removing it and moving it to
another treatment catheter.
I was told that the seed itself (I think they only need one
with HDR) is too radioactive to be handled by humans.
I didn't chose this procedure because I thought it was better
than other ways of doing it, though I was hoping it would be. I
chose it partly because I trusted the doctors, and also partly
because it was an NIH clinical trial. I work at NIH and get my
income from them and believe in what they're doing. When I got
cancer myself I wanted to, as it were, put my money where my
mouth was and help out with the research.
So far, the treatment seems to be working.
Eddie - 31 Oct 2007 21:38 GMT
Again, my original post was referrring to something brand new for
permanent seed implantation, not HDR.
>"Eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
>So far, the treatment seems to be working.