Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Robotic Brachytherapy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eddie - 29 Oct 2007 22:26 GMT
Anyone have this new procedure or know someone who has gotten it
recently?
Steve Jordan - 29 Oct 2007 22:36 GMT
> Anyone have this new procedure or know someone who has gotten it
> recently?

Where did Eddie learn about it?

The nearest I can come is HDR (High Dose-Rate) brachytherapy, which is
the insertion then withdrawal of radioactive wires through the perineum
into the prostate.

It's done by remote control, which does not fit the correct definition
of "robotic." But then, neither does the da Vinci procedure.

Regards,

Steve J

PS: Remotely controlled tools are "waldoes."
Eddie - 30 Oct 2007 00:21 GMT
http://urology.jhu.edu/urobotics/pub/2007-patriciu-tbme.pdf
http://www.kimmelcancercenter.org/kcc/kccnew/news/valicenti-dicker-0907.php
http://www.kcc.tju.edu/RadOnc/bod_bulletin/2007Bodinebulletin.pdf

The positives of more accurate seed implantation seem obvious.  I was
wondering what the negatives would be, and what those specialty
brachytherapy clinics such as in FL, GA, and Seattle think of it.

>> Anyone have this new procedure or know someone who has gotten it
>> recently?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>PS: Remotely controlled tools are "waldoes."
Alan Meyer - 31 Oct 2007 17:27 GMT
"Eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message

> The positives of more accurate seed implantation seem obvious.  I was
> wondering what the negatives would be, and what those specialty
> brachytherapy clinics such as in FL, GA, and Seattle think of it.

>> ...
>>The nearest I can come is HDR (High Dose-Rate) brachytherapy, which is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>It's done by remote control, which does not fit the correct definition
>>of "robotic." But then, neither does the da Vinci procedure.

I had HDR done with what was described as a robot.  I was
knocked out for the procedure and never saw the machine
or how it was controlled.

In my treatment there were several stages.

1. Imaging to determine the location of the prostate and the
  tumors.

  This was done with endo-rectal MRI.

2. Treatment planning.

  The MRI data was fed into a computer which generated images.
  The radiation oncologist then worked with a computer program
  to produce a map of where the seeds should be planted for
  optimum coverage.

3. Implantation of treatment catheters.

  The catheters are thin plastic tubes inserted through the
  perineum into the prostate.  As I understand it, this was done
  by a surgeon working with his hands, but I'm not absolutely
  sure.  I will ask the next time I meet with the oncologist for
  followup.

4. Seed placement.

  This is done by the robot, or waldo, or whatever it is.  In my
  case, I was told it was a robot and that a computer moved the
  single seed into a treatment catheter, held it in position for
  a programmed amount of time, moved it a few millimeters, held
  it again, etc., eventually removing it and moving it to
  another treatment catheter.

  I was told that the seed itself (I think they only need one
  with HDR) is too radioactive to be handled by humans.

I didn't chose this procedure because I thought it was better
than other ways of doing it, though I was hoping it would be.  I
chose it partly because I trusted the doctors, and also partly
because it was an NIH clinical trial.  I work at NIH and get my
income from them and believe in what they're doing.  When I got
cancer myself I wanted to, as it were, put my money where my
mouth was and help out with the research.

So far, the treatment seems to be working.
Eddie - 31 Oct 2007 21:38 GMT
Again,  my original post was referrring to something brand new  for
permanent seed implantation, not HDR.

>"Eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
>So far, the treatment seems to be working.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.