Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

psa rising

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bruce - 27 Oct 2007 17:41 GMT
I am 69 years old now and in 1999 I was diagnosed as having prostate cancer.
My psa was in the high teens. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, and the
Gleason was 8. I don't recall the other numbers, but I think I was T1c. I
had an RP in 2000. The psa never did drop to near zero.  In 2002 I had beam
radiation, 30 doses over about 6 weeks, due to increasing psa levels.
During the next few months there was an abrupt psa rise to nearly 2.0. This
gradually subsided so that a year later my psa seemed stable around 0.31 -
0.35. As a result of the radiation I have continued to be affected by
radiation proctitus. This is an on-going situation that I have gradualy
learned to live with. I am fortunate that I have no problem with
incontinence, however from the time of the RP my I have been unable to have
an erection. Not an easy situation to accept or live with, but we accept
what we must.
The following is a brief history of my psa levels:
In August 2003 my psa was 0.31; January 2004, 0.34; July 2004, 0.57;August
2005, 0.51; September 2005, 0.7; April 2006, 0.73; July 2006, 0.91; October
2006, 1.15; April 2007, 1.47; October 2007, 2.16.
I haven't graphed these numbers but it is easy to see that an exponential
curve has developed. I suspect that my next appointment with my oncologist
in April 2008 will show a more dramatic increase. The doctor has decided to
hold off on chemical treatment (Casodex, or whatever?) until next visit
because of "unpleasant side effects". I agreed with him but I don't  feel
very good about it because I believe that the Pca is growing somewhere in my
body.
If someone would care to comment, negatively or positively, about this
little story I would be grateful.
Thank you!
Bruce
Alan Meyer - 27 Oct 2007 19:26 GMT
Hello Bruce,

I'm sorry about your rising PSA.

I'm not a doctor.  My opinions are purely those of a layman who
has, himself, been treated for cancer.  So I'm not qualified to
give any expert advice.

Now having said that, here's my inexpert advice:

If you aren't already doing it, I would start by taking those
nutritional supplements that are thought to have a positive
impact on cancer.  See the recent thread here on pomegranate
"Another report on benefits of pomegranates" and look for other
info about supplements.

Who knows if they really work, and who knows which ones work, or
how much to take (there is a discussion of that vis a vis
pomegranate in the above thread.)  But if they don't hurt and
don't cost an arm and a leg, maybe they can help slow things down
for you.

Secondly, I would try hard to find a medical oncologist who
specializes in prostate cancer.  It would be a rare urologist or
radiation oncologist who really understands this stuff.  It's not
their specialty and most of them know no more than, Give the guy
some Casodex pills, then give him a shot of Lupron.  When the
Lupron stops working, kiss him goodbye.

A qualified med onc can do much more than that.  Specifically,
they can try double or triple ADT if they think it's warranted,
intermittent ADT if they think that's warranted, provide
recommendations on supplements, take blood tests that may tell
them more about your disease than just the PSA tells, find and
treat negative reactions and side effects of the ADT and, if and
when the ADT stops working, they can try other techniques such
as secondary ADT or chemotherapy and can guide you in finding
clinical trials.

If you tell us the general area where you live, someone here may
be able to recommend a doctor to you.

As to when to start ADT, there is debate about that.  Dr. Patrick
Walsh, one of the foremost experts in the world on PCa, thinks
there is no benefit to starting ADT earlier than when the PSA is
way out of control.

However, in spite of the good doctor, I would be inclined to
start it earlier rather than later.  My reasoning is: It can
never be good to have more cancer in your body rather than less.
With less total cancer in the body it seems to me there are fewer
tumor cells to mutate into ADT resistant cells.

The argument for early ADT isn't just based on emotion.  There
have been studies that support it.  My radiation oncologist, a
researcher at the National Cancer Institute (I was treated in a
clinical trial there) said that recent evidence indicates a
survival advantage for early ADT over late.

You've been placed by fate on a rocky path that none of us like
to follow.  But with good treatment and a little luck, it can turn
out to be a very long path, with years and years of good living
still ahead.

Best of luck.

   Alan
Steve Jordan - 27 Oct 2007 19:26 GMT
(snip)

> The following is a brief history of my psa levels:
> In August 2003 my psa was 0.31; January 2004, 0.34; July 2004, 0.57;August
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> very good about it because I believe that the Pca is growing somewhere in my
> body.

Omigod.

Is this a genuine cancer specialist? Is he well-experienced in treatment
(tx) of prostate cancer (PCa)?

I've seen all too much about medics who either don't care or don't know
about the side effects (SEs) of "chemical treatment." Now here's one who
perhaps knows about them but declines to deal with them. Or doesn't know
how.

"Chemical treatment" is a vague term, but I presume that he means
androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) by which means one hopes to starve
PCa cells that require testosterone (T) and its powerful metabolite,
dihydrotestosterone (DHT), to survive and proliferate. Or maybe he means
use of such meds as Taxotere™ (docetaxel).

There is much that can and should be done to deal with, for example, the
SEs of ADT. They are so well known to medics who care that they have a
name: Androgen Deprivation Syndrome (ADS). See the encyclopedic website
of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) at
http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/sidefx/Strum_ADS.html or
http://tinyurl.com/g6fzp

Using the Search function on the term ADS will produce many hits.

The SEs of Taxotere are also covered on the PCRI site.

One should bear in mind this grim item: The SEs of doing nothing are
terrible.

The medic has done nothing about a serial rise in PSA for over a year.
What is he waiting for? Metastases? And he doesn't want to see you for
six months?

It might be prudent to consult a medical oncologist who is familiar with
tx of PCa. Some are listed on the PCRI site via a link at
http://www.prostate-cancer.org/resource/find-a-physician.html

Good luck!

Regards,

Steve J

"There is NOWHERE in oncology where waiting for the tumor cell
population to increase (and to mutate) is in the better interests of the
patient."
--Stephen B. Strum, MD
Medical Oncologist
Steve Kramer - 27 Oct 2007 23:38 GMT
>I am 69 years old now and in 1999 I was diagnosed as having prostate
>cancer.

Bruce the Muce!  I remember.  Haven't heard from you in a couple of years.
Glad to see you back.

> The following is a brief history of my psa levels:
> In August 2003 my psa was 0.31; January 2004, 0.34; July 2004, 0.57;August
> 2005, 0.51; September 2005, 0.7; April 2006, 0.73; July 2006, 0.91;
> October 2006, 1.15; April 2007, 1.47; October 2007, 2.16.

Doubling time of 21.71 months or 1.81 years.  Not bad, but certainly the
PSAs are getting into a range where you want to do something.

> The doctor has decided to hold off on chemical treatment (Casodex, or
> whatever?) until next visit because of "unpleasant side effects". I agreed
> with him but I don't  feel very good about it because I believe that the
> Pca is growing somewhere in my body.

Whether or not it's a good decision, I do not know.  But, it is YOUR
decision, not his, to make.  It is true there are side effects with ADT.
I've been on Lupron for 4+ years and Casodex for more than a year.  I made
the jump when my PSA was 0.32.  I have had just about all the SEs and have
never regretted my decision.  My PSA is less than 0.04 and has been since
July 2006.

There are lots of ways to handle the side effects.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  <.1  <.1  <.1  .27  .37  .75            PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32                       PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145       PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04, <0.04 10/11/07
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Leonard Evens - 28 Oct 2007 02:28 GMT
> I am 69 years old now and in 1999 I was diagnosed as having prostate cancer.
> My psa was in the high teens. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, and the
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> If someone would care to comment, negatively or positively, about this
> little story I would be grateful.

I think you've analyzed the situation correctly.  It seems that PSA is
now growing fast enough to merit ADT.  But you might try to get some
additional opinions from oncologists, particularly about the type of ADT
and its timing.

> Thank you!
> Bruce
Alan Meyer - 28 Oct 2007 03:12 GMT
> ... As a result of the radiation I have continued to be affected by
> radiation proctitus. This is an on-going situation that I have
> gradualy learned to live with. ...

Have you tried compounds like Preparation H?

Prep H is mostly just petroleum jelly, together with some other
soothing ointments.  It coats the walls of the rectum and reduces
friction from bowel movements and from the walls of the rectum
rubbing against each other.

It works pretty well for me.

   Alan
Bruce - 28 Oct 2007 17:44 GMT
Wow! You guys really do respond with alacrity! Thank you!
I really appreciate your thoughts and advice on my post.  Living as I do,
well out onto the prairies of Canada, in the Province of Manitoba, there is
little choice when it comes to specialists. It is common for people in rural
or small town places to travel for medical service and that's what we do.
However we do not have many options as to which physician/specialist we get.
We consider ourselves lucky, sometimes to get med service at all, what with
the shortages of doctors and nurses.
Be that as it may, we do get seen and treated, eventually.
I have been reading a lot of posts and had lots of visits to web sites in
the past day. It seems that those of us who have PCa want early treatment
for rising PSA, but there are those professionals (I guess?), specialists
who are split by the quandary of early treatment vs later treatment.  My
Radiation Oncologist in Winnipeg is obviously one of those who prefers not
to start ADT early. My preference is early, and when my PSA began to rise I
was upset by his stand. In the last year or more I've been accepting his
decision without argument, just sort of sitting back FDH (Fat Dumb and
Happy) and letting my health care be managed by others.  Finally, with the
exponential rise becoming obvious, it is time for me to make some decisions
about my Tx.
Thanks to you people, I feel more confident in taking charge, or at least
making my opinion heard in the right places.
I think I'll start with my local GP who is new to us as our Doc of 3 years
left town. I hope he can find an oncologist who specializes in PCa, or at
least someone who cares, and will make the appropriate referral.
As for the proctitis, I will give Preparation H a try. Thanks for the
suggestion.
Bruce
Bruce - 28 Oct 2007 17:49 GMT
Wow! You guys really do respond with alacrity! Thank you!
I really appreciate your thoughts and advice on my post.  Living as I do,
well out onto the prairies of Canada, in the Province of Manitoba, there is
little choice when it comes to specialists. It is common for people in rural
or small town places to travel for medical service and that's what we do.
However we do not have many options as to which physician/specialist we get.
We consider ourselves lucky, sometimes to get med service at all, what with
the shortages of doctors and nurses.
Be that as it may, we do get seen and treated, eventually.
I have been reading a lot of posts and had lots of visits to web sites in
the past day. It seems that those of us who have PCa want early treatment
for rising PSA, but there are those professionals (I guess?), specialists
who are split by the quandary of early treatment vs later treatment.  My
Radiation Oncologist in Winnipeg is obviously one of those who prefers not
to start ADT early. My preference is early, and when my PSA began to rise I
was upset by his stand. In the last year or more I've been accepting his
decision without argument, just sort of sitting back FDH (Fat Dumb and
Happy) and letting my health care be managed by others.  Finally, with the
exponential rise becoming obvious, it is time for me to make some decisions
about my Tx.
Thanks to you people, I feel more confident in taking charge, or at least
making my opinion heard in the right places.
I think I'll start with my local GP who is new to us as our Doc of 3 years
left town. I hope he can find an oncologist who specializes in PCa, or at
least someone who cares, and will make the appropriate referral.
As for the proctitis, I will give Preparation H a try. Thanks for the
suggestion.
Bruce (not the Muce, originally, but why not now?)
J - 29 Oct 2007 11:42 GMT
> I am 69 years old now and in 1999 I was diagnosed as having prostate cancer.
> My psa was in the high teens. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, and the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Thank you!
> Bruce

Hi Bruce,
I'm from Canada as well.
I couldn't find the Manitoba cancer guidelines, but here's the BC's ones.
<
http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/HPI/CancerManagementGuidelines/Genitourinary/Prostate/
Management/default.htm


They get as good results as anywhere else in the world.
This is a link off their page, regarding treatment deicisons.
http://www.cfpc.ca/cfp/2004/Jan/vol50-jan-cme-2.asp
Your PSA seems to be rising very slowly. You might want to ask the oncologist if
there are other sources of PSA in the body. The oncologist from BC, on
sci.med.diseases.cancer says there are, but he did not state which organs.
And other ways to reduce the PSA.

If you've ever lived with a woman who went through menopause (for some it lasts
4 or more years), drenching sweats and mood swings, that gives a glimmer of some
of the side effects of hormone therapy.  If you've got good quality of life now,
perhaps the oncologist wants to protect you from the side effects.  "pay me now"
in side effects, or "pay me later" in side effects. And after all, there's other
types of cancers. Do you lie awake in bed worrying about lung or colon cancer?
Do you lie awake worrying about heart attack?  Or falling through the ice while
ice-fishing ?  If not, why would you worry about a slowly rising PSA ?

3 of my grandparents and one other relative lived well into their 90's. I think
that was lifestyle factors. Only 2 of their 8 children lived till 80.  I think
the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to the US.
72 for males and 75 for females.  Do you want to spend the next 3 - 8 years
drenched in sweat and moody as all get out, or have quality of life? And deal
with it, when it happens?

Food for thought?  Perspective? When talking with your doctors, including your
risk factors.
Best,

J
David&Joan - 30 Oct 2007 03:41 GMT
J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
the US.
72 for males and 75 for females. "

No, no, no!!! The life expectancy of the average 60 year old is in the mid
80s male or female (a few years higher for females) in the US and most
developed nations.

David
J - 30 Oct 2007 09:05 GMT
> J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
> the US.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> David

http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/health26.htm
He was born in 1938
J
rosbif - 30 Oct 2007 09:30 GMT
>> J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
>> the US.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>He was born in 1938
>J

I don't know if there are other tables available via  that link, but
the one I saw provides life expectancy figures *at birth*.

For those who've already reached 60, the life expectancy figures would
be higher.
Larry Sabo - 30 Oct 2007 22:02 GMT
>> J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
>> the US.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>He was born in 1938
>J

What you want is the life expectancy of a man of a certain age, not at
birth, e.g.

http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/84F0211XIE/2004000/part1.htm
says that, based on the 2004 census, in the section...

Life expectancy at birth and at age 65

"In 2004, life expectancy at birth was 80.2, 77.8 for males and 82.6
for females. Life expectancy at age 65 was 19.5, 17.7 for males and
21.0 for females."

That makes it 82.7 for a 65 year old male, and 86.0 for a 65 year old
female, in 2004. It is probaly similar today.

Larry
Steve Kramer - 30 Oct 2007 12:06 GMT
>J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
>the US.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 80s male or female (a few years higher for females) in the US and most
> developed nations.

According to national health statistics, when I was born, I had a life
expectancy of 66.5 years.  At 53 and a PSA of <0.04, I have an excellent
change of getting within a few years of that.
cognite tute - 30 Oct 2007 15:37 GMT
> J wrote: "I think the average age of death for Canadians now, is similar to
> the US.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> David

both statements are true.

Average life expectance is 72 and 75 at birth.

obviously is you are 72 or 75 your life expectancy is higher.

j.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.