On October 24, "Khan" responded to me:
> ......I stopped reading the article when it says it "prolonges ..." I
> published the URL which claim 'cure' !!! CURE IS WHAT WE NEED NOT 2
> MORE MONTHS OF REMISSION!!!
Uh huh.
Let's look at the facts.
(1) After correcting the spelling, I find that nowhere in the article
does the word "prolongs" occur. "Khan" used quotes; evidently incorrectly.
(2) In the article, the following is found: "The (Phase II) trial was
designed to end after 24 weeks of treatment, but was extended to 90
weeks because of the unexpected prolongation of time to progression in
some patients." Hello? Is this bad?
(3) The claimed "cure" involves *mice* not humans. There is a
difference. Maybe it is a cure, maybe it is not. After a while, we will
know.
There is nothing to be gained by PCa patients in an attack upon a
treatment that helps us to survive.
And lastly, to repeat myself, I never never ever rely upon a press
release or reporter's interpretation for medical information. That way
lies disaster.
Regards,
Steve J