Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Phenoxodiol again

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve Jordan - 24 Oct 2007 21:47 GMT
Several months ago, phenoxodiol (PXD) was not approved by the FDA due to
flaws in trial design. A severe disappointment.

No revenge-seeking investors sued the committee members, though, as is
the case with Provenge.

Now, Yale University has begun recruiting men for a follow-on trial of PXD.

See:
http://www.marshalledwardsinc.com/index04.cfm?section=04&status=1&id=219

I hope it will be approved by the time I need it.

Regards,

Steve J

"Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path
and leave a trail."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Sveh Khan - 25 Oct 2007 00:10 GMT
Steve; I stopped reading the article when it says it "prolonges ..."   I
published the URL which claim 'cure' !!!  CURE IS WHAT WE NEED NOT 2
MORE MONTHS OF REMISSION!!!

Just as  refresher ... one injection and the test subjects ALL healed
and became further resistsant to any new cancer exposure!  Probably cost
1$ to produce the caccine - that is before 'big goverment and big drug'
gets hold of it ...

http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=70927&sc=270
khan
Steve Jordan - 25 Oct 2007 01:36 GMT
On October 24, "Khan" responded to me:

> ......I stopped reading the article when it says it "prolonges ..."   I
> published the URL which claim 'cure' !!!  CURE IS WHAT WE NEED NOT 2
> MORE MONTHS OF REMISSION!!!

Uh huh.

Let's look at the facts.

(1) After correcting the spelling, I find that nowhere in the article
does the word "prolongs" occur. "Khan" used quotes; evidently incorrectly.

(2) In the article, the following is found: "The (Phase II) trial was
designed to end after 24 weeks of treatment, but was extended to 90
weeks because of the unexpected prolongation of time to progression in
some patients." Hello? Is this bad?

(3) The claimed "cure" involves *mice* not humans. There is a
difference. Maybe it is a cure, maybe it is not. After a while, we will
know.

There is nothing to be gained by PCa patients in an attack upon a
treatment that helps us to survive.

And lastly, to repeat myself, I never never ever rely upon a press
release or reporter's interpretation for medical information. That way
lies disaster.

Regards,

Steve J
Sveh Khan - 25 Oct 2007 00:11 GMT
Steve; I stopped reading the article when it says it "prolonges ..."   I
published the URL which claim 'cure' !!!  CURE IS WHAT WE NEED NOT 2
MORE MONTHS OF REMISSION!!!

Just as  refresher ... one injection and the test subjects ALL healed
and became further resistsant to any new cancer exposure!  Probably cost
1$ to produce the caccine - that is before 'big goverment and big drug'
gets hold of it ...

http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=70927&sc=270
khan
Sveh Khan - 25 Oct 2007 05:34 GMT
Steve J; your point well taken... and the spelling, let's just say that
the chemo cruses neuropathology - a drag!  khan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.