Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WOW!!! This is cure!!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sveh Khan - 23 Oct 2007 08:16 GMT
http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=70927&sc=270
<http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=70927&sc=270>

Unfortunately, 'big drug' and 'big government' will insure that
something like this will not be available for the mases for many years
to come!  that also means that most on this discussion board have very
little chance of seeing the dat when you get one injection and the
cancer is cured!

If I thnik of it that would put millions of very influential people out
of business!!!  each one probably not wanting this on the market!!

khan

__________________________________________________________________________________
Vaccine company on verge of breakthrough print this article

ANDREA MACDONALD
The Daily News

Brian Lowe is asking shareholders to have a little patience.

He believes his company is on the verge of a major breakthrough: a
vaccine that eradicates cancerous tumours in mice that could eventually
be used in humans.

But it's early days yet in a race fraught with hurdles.

Lowe is chief operating officer of ImmunoVaccine Technologies Inc., a
Halifax company whose single-dose VacciMax provides _long-term
protection with no significant side effects and requires no booster shot._

Incorporated in March 2000, IVT started off in animal infectious
diseases. In 2004, it branched out to human health. Today, the company
focuses largely on therapeutic vaccines for cancers such as cervical and
melanoma, not to mention flu and whooping cough.

Results have been extremely promising in clinical trials involving mice
genetically cloned to replicate humans.

Scientists initially injected the mice with cancer cells, which formed
huge tumours and made them very ill. _Within 14 days of receiving the
vaccine, each one became tumour-free and perfectly healthy. The mice
were re-injected and no new tumours formed. The trials were repeated
three times with the same results._

In October 2006, IVT held a cancer workshop in Halifax to show off its
findings.

"The experts who attended said it was just striking data, and the sooner
we can move into humans, the better," Lowe said yesterday at Atlantic
Canada Opportunities Agency's Atlantic Art of Success conference. IVT
was one of 20 successful entrepreneurs recognized by ACOA as part of its
20th anniversary celebrations.

Several years ago, IVT received $3.8 million through ACOA's Atlantic
Innovation Fund. It was the largest such award for any privately held
company in Nova Scotia and gave the company credibility and the chance
to leverage other private-equity capital.

Wealthy individuals have kicked in about $10 million to help finance the
first phase of the human clinical trials. IVT hopes to start injecting
people in the last quarter of 2008.

The company has no intention of taking its vaccine all the way to
market, which would cost hundreds of millions. Instead, it plans to
license the technology to a large pharmaceutical company.

"Some of these companies came to us when they only had an embryonic idea
on a piece of paper," ACOA spokesman Richard Gauthier said of the 20
companies recognized this week.

"And we and other partners had a role to help them along, build their
business case and in many instances, they're one of the leading
companies in their sector in Atlantic Canada."

amacdonald@hfxnews.ca
13/10/07

Comments:
This Conversation is Semi-Moderated. What is moderation?
What does moderation mean?    
The Daily News is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among
our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on
a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a
result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online
conversation among our readers.

This is a semi-moderated or reactively moderated conversation. Once a
reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it
goes directly to the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for
reasons of content or language.

All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree
to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
(Post a comment)

1.
Anders Chydenius from Miami, FL writes: It is wonderful to see the
Canadian economy expand beyond energy and mining. Canada has the
potential to become one of the world's great knowledge centers.

I wish this company all the best!
Posted 14/10/2007 at 1:31 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

2.
Chris from Alberta writes: ^^^ Potential? We already are!
Posted 14/10/2007 at 1:58 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

3.
Brandon from FL writes: And people kept saying You can't cure cancer,
it's a mutation. Keep up the good work, and make sure to cure diabetes
and heart disease before I get too much older. =)
Posted 14/10/2007 at 2:06 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

4.
Rich Monk from Los Angeles, California writes: Great news. A company
focused on the greater good, groundbreaking research, and a possible
defense against cancer. Keep it up, Canadians, show us how it is done. :)
Posted 14/10/2007 at 3:12 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

5.
Jon from Arkansas writes: I think it is interesting to note that they
have no intention of bringing the drug to market. I guess they will
depend on one of those evil American drug companies to spend the
hundreds of millions of dollars necessary to get that done. Then they
can be castigated for not giving away the drug for free. Sounds like a plan.
Posted 14/10/2007 at 5:26 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

6.
CM from Ontario writes: Jon from Arkansas

Under both FDA and Health Canada regulations even if it was found to be
a flawless silver bullet with no side effects and produced for $1 a dose
it would still take 5 years of 'testing' before it would be allowed on
the market. There is very little incentive to develop a marketing or
distribution plan half a decade ahead of release.
as an aside
I worked for one of the largest international pharmaceuticals and they
get their title of 'evil' deservedly. They are no longer inventing new
'bullets' but are focused only on dependence drugs, ie ones you have to
take daily for the rest of your life. they also spend the vast majority
of their intake on 'marketing'
read that as both the ads we are bombarded with and paying off doctors
and the government
Posted 15/10/2007 at 1:26 am | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

7.
JC from Wisconsin writes: Unfortunately CM is right. If they sell the
silver bullet to a major drug company, they will either just sit on it
or sell the drug for BIG bucks... it won't be affordable for a
loooooooong time. It probably won't see the light of day. Why would the
drug companies sell the 'cure for cancer' when a good portion of their
sales comes from treatments for cancer?..l that's right, they wouldn't.
They're out for their investors.. not for the greater good.
Posted 15/10/2007 at 12:32 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

8.
Bryan from California writes: That's why we need to take control and
push the legislative bodies of government to put those companies out of
business.

If anyone sits on a cure-all to a disease, it should be considered a
criminal offense.

On the other hand, it's kind of nice knowing the population of hell
certainly isn't in jeapordy of decreasing anytime soon. Those losers
think they're rich now, but just wait until it's their judgment day.
Posted 15/10/2007 at 6:15 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

9.
Elucidatus from Qubec writes: This will be just another Gardasil and
countless more adults and children will suffer because of its side
effects. Ask yourself tonight while you inject another squirrel if this
is what you would inject in yourself. I just hope it works.
Posted 15/10/2007 at 7:14 pm | Alert an Editor | Link to comment
ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT    
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained
in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful,
harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the
appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules,
for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling
errors or multiple postings.

Comment is inflammatory
Comment is offensive
Comment is advertising/spam

NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for
persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers
of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may
slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone
who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of
Usage for this section.
Alan Meyer - 23 Oct 2007 12:35 GMT
Cancer vaccines have a lot of promise.  They work by stimulating
the patient's immune system to better recognize and attack the
cancer cells.

Unfortunately however, as I understand it, vaccines haven't been
as successful in humans as we would like.

The way the immune system works is that a lymphocyte, a white blood
cell in the patient's bloodstream, attaches to a diseased cell and
injects it with a chemical that, in effect, orders the cell to die.
Mechanisms within the cell receive this signal and the cell commits
suicide.

However, cancerous cells have mutated from normal cells and it often
happens that some of them reject the kill signal.  The cell death
mechanism is not activated by it.  If a person has such cells, they
may gradually repopulate the body with immune resistant cells in
a way that is similar to the way that hormone independent cells can
gradually repopulate the body after the hormone dependent cells are
suppressed, or chemotherapy resistant cells can repopulate the body
after the chemo-sensitive cells are killed off.

Apparently, the problem is much worse in people than in mice.  Maybe
it has to do with the mouse's short life span.  Or maybe our cancers
are different.

At any rate, vaccine therapies for cancer show considerable promise
as yet another treatment, suppressing tumors and extending life.  I
don't know that anyone has yet shown one to be a real cure.

Still, every therapy we develop against cancer is good news.

   Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.