Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OTP:    Workaholic?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
california_chief - 27 Sep 2007 07:18 GMT
THE LIST
Workaholic cities

September 26, 2007

Men's Health magazine compiled this list of cities with the most - and
fewest - workaholics. The findings were based on percentage of people in the
work force; the amount of overtime logged; commute times; rates of high
blood pressure and self-reported stress; plus the number of unused vacation
days. Here are the results:

Most workaholics
1. Manchester, N.H.

2. San Francisco

3. Denver

4. Orlando, Fla.

5. Durham, N.C.

6. Charlotte, N.C.

7. Aurora, Colo.

8. Boise, Idaho

9. Seattle

10. Anaheim

Fewest workaholics
1. Milwaukee

2. El Paso, Texas

3. Rochester, N.Y.

4. Corpus Christi, Texas

5. Toledo, Ohio

6. Fresno, Calif.

7. Hartford, Conn.

8. Jackson, Miss.

9. San Diego, Calif.

10. Houston, Texas
I.P. Freely - 28 Sep 2007 00:33 GMT
Oh, man ... one of my favorite topics. But don't worry ... it's not
controversial and requires limited discussion, little more than two
words: *STOP IT!*

OK, there's a little more, primarily because there are two types of
workaholics: the victims who hate their work but feel compelled to do it
to excess, and those who love their work. The latter are often happy
with the situation, while many of the former are miserable with it. We
all know both types. More power to the latter, because what could be
better than getting rich doing what one loves (presuming, of course,
that one has no family suffering one's absence.) Many of the latter
include people who are workaholics due to a true calling, common in
medicine, emergency public services, and the military.

Second best is those who love their work but get paid only for the first
40 hours. They really ought to find a way to get paid for the extra
40-60 hours each week they donate.

The third, saddest, probably largest, and IMO most misguided group
consists of the people who think they owe it to someone finish all their
assigned, implied, and even imagined work, to the best of their ability,
on time, all the time, at the expense of their *real* lives. Most of
them really need to think that through further.

I.P.
Alan Meyer - 28 Sep 2007 19:36 GMT
> The third, saddest, probably largest, and IMO most misguided group consists of the
> people who think they owe it to someone finish all their assigned, implied, and even
> imagined work, to the best of their ability, on time, all the time, at the expense of
> their *real* lives. Most of them really need to think that through further.

One day I woke up and asked myself, why am I working so hard
to make the owners of this company rich?  Why am I neglecting
my family for this?  Why do I care whether the company makes
money on this underbid contract?  Why should I bust my a.s
working unpaid overtime so that won't happen?  What loyalty
can I expect from the company to repay the loyalty that I've put
in?

I left that job 24 years ago and became an independent consultant.
I have never regretted it.

   Alan
Steve Jordan - 28 Sep 2007 19:48 GMT
On September 28, Alan Meyer wrote, in pertinent part:

(snip)

> One day I woke up and asked myself, why am I working so hard to make
> the owners of this company rich?

(snip)

Good question. I believe that it's possible for an employer to care
about employees, but rare.

Long ago, I concluded that employers will exploit an employee until he's
of no more use, then throw him away.

Oh, pension plans you say? First, many employees are fired just before
the rights are vested, and second, the plan is effective only as long as
the company remains in business.

Regards,

Steve J
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.