I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
12/2004 PSA is 2.5
01/2006 PSA is 2.7
03/2007 PSA is 3.2
I went to a ugologist and ended up having a biopsy 04/06/07 and it was
normal although I have an enlarged prostate. He said this when he first saw
me and the DRE he could tell right away. I do go more than most men but get
throught the night with only one bathroom trip.
I have my PSA done again last week and now is is 3.8
Any thoughs would be appreciated as I have been reading much but I don't
like this development. They sent the results to my urologist so I am waiting
to see what the office thinks.
Seems like these things start rising and it is not good at my age.

Signature
Mark Cleary makes music on the finest Jazz guitars.
http://hollenbeckguitar.com/
--
Mark Cleary makes music on the finest Jazz guitars.
http://hollenbeckguitar.com/
Steve Jordan - 17 Sep 2007 23:10 GMT
> I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
> months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> like this development. They sent the results to my urologist so I am
> waiting to see what the office thinks.
(snip)
What size is the prostate?? A certain amount of "benign" PSA is
expressed by healthy cells. An enlarged prostate will express more than
smaller glands.
The formula is: volume x 0.066 = benign PSA. Anything in excess
requires explanation. Infection or prostatitis is a common reason for a
somewhat high PSA. Also: was the gland stressed within 48 hours of the
blood draw? Such stress could be ejaculation, a DRE, even bike riding.
The *least* likely explanation is PCa.
Second: I recommend that the lab be directed to send copies of all test
results to the patient. That way, he does not have to rely upon some
clerk in the uro's office to remember to call.
Objective and reliable information is available on the website of the
Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) at:
http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html
Search on "Undiagnosed"
Regards,
Steve J
"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but (to) be aware of the
lack of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with
nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies."
-- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate
Problems Mailing List
Thank you, Brian.
Mark Cleary - 18 Sep 2007 00:14 GMT
I am a long distance runner and I did run 9 miles the morning they drew the
blood for the PSA but frankly I run at least 6-9 miles each day of the week
except I take one day off. I don't know how this effects PSA but for me this
is a routine day so the body should be use to it. I know when they take my
pulse which runs about 47 they usually are surprised until I I tell them I
am a runner. I guess I am a bit worried but as a cleric in the Church I deal
with health issues and peoples lives.
Deacon Mark
>> I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
>> months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Mailing List
> Thank you, Brian.
Leonard Evens - 18 Sep 2007 15:15 GMT
> I am a long distance runner and I did run 9 miles the morning they drew
> the blood for the PSA but frankly I run at least 6-9 miles each day of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> until I I tell them I am a runner. I guess I am a bit worried but as a
> cleric in the Church I deal with health issues and peoples lives.
Years ago when I was still running, I got hit by a car while running
across a street in the walk lane with the walk light on. I was bruised
and just to be sure nothing was broken I called 911. The ENTs took my
blood pressure and pulse rate and decided to insert an IV on the basis
that I must be having a heart attack. It was only with some difficulty
that I convinced them that 100-110 systolic BP and pulse rate under 50
was normal for me.
I started carrying a card with normal readings of pulse rate and BP with
me so that EMTs finding me unconscious wouldn't be spooked by what they
measured.
Alas, those days were long ago. At 74 I still get some aerobic
exercise by cycling, and I am not in too bad shape, but my arthritic
back precludes really vigorous exercise.
> Deacon Mark
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>> Problems Mailing List
>> Thank you, Brian.
ron - 18 Sep 2007 01:06 GMT
> I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
> months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> --
> Mark Cleary makes music on the finest Jazz guitars.http://hollenbeckguitar.com/
Hi Mark...You are right to follow up on your rising PSA. Prostatitis
usually makes the PSA go up and down. I don't know how many samples
they took on your biopsy, but looking for PCa is like the proverbial
needle in the haystack. If you live in CA (Duke Bahn), MN (Fred Lee)
or NY (I've heard that MSK has an artist) you could consider a color
doppler ultrasound by an artist. The cdus can image the entire
prostate, a biopsy can only probe about 80% of the prostate. Other
tests such as the PCA3 test (a urine test that requires prostate
massage) could also be useful...best wishes and good health, ron
Steve Kramer - 18 Sep 2007 01:39 GMT
> 12/2004 PSA is 2.5
> 01/2006 PSA is 2.7
> 03/2007 PSA is 3.2
> I have my PSA done again last week and now is is 3.8
> Any thoughs would be appreciated as I have been reading much but I don't
> like this development. They sent the results to my urologist so I am
> waiting to see what the office thinks.
Your age is in your favor. Very few get this disease at 45 -- though that
didn't help me.
The negative biopsy is also in your favor.
And, the enlarged prostate and apparently smooth texture is in your favor.
That said, biopsies can miss, especially in larger prostates. And, your PSA
is certainly rising at a PCa rate.
Are you being treated for BHP? if yes, I think I'd give it another three
months and get a 20-needle biopsy.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007)
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Mark Cleary - 18 Sep 2007 22:55 GMT
I have only posted twice here just to get some insight and I must say this
group has been really kind and helpful. Most of you seem to have a huge
knowledge of this disease and I really appreciate your post to follow. I am
going to see the urologist on Thursday to see what he says. I am lucky I
have a brother-in-law who is a family physician and my brother Deacon in the
Parish is a family physician too. I get there input that is great.
Thanks again and I shall keep this group in prayer.
Mark

Signature
Mark Cleary makes music on the finest Jazz guitars.
http://hollenbeckguitar.com/
>
>> 12/2004 PSA is 2.5
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are you being treated for BHP? if yes, I think I'd give it another three
> months and get a 20-needle biopsy.
Mark Cleary - 21 Sep 2007 22:41 GMT
I saw the urologist yesterday and he said at my age a biospy is what he
would do. He said if it is negative then the odds of error go down and we
just monitor it. I think he is being very ahead in thinking and I did
tolorate my last biospy fine. I ran the next day 8 miles but I did get a bit
of a fever a few days later and ill but not bad. Some antibiotics and I was
fine. I have it scheduled for this Thursday AM. I am heading to the Chapel
will pray for this group during my hour of adoration.
Deacon Mark
>> 12/2004 PSA is 2.5
>> 01/2006 PSA is 2.7
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Are you being treated for BHP? if yes, I think I'd give it another three
> months and get a 20-needle biopsy.
rosbif - 18 Sep 2007 13:36 GMT
>I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
>months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Seems like these things start rising and it is not good at my age.
On the other hand Mark, you're in very early indeed with your
monitoring. I keyed your PSA results into excel to plot a graph
(instructions at end if you want to do it yourself) and it does show a
gentle exponential rise. But if just 2 of your 4 figures are slightly
distorted for any reason then this could shape the graph quite
differently so it's too early to be alarmed.
Also, PSA density (PSA/vol) is considered to be a significant
diagnostic tool, and the fact that you have an enlarged prostate puts
a better gloss on your PSA figures - your density will be lower and
that's good. It might be worth getting a figure for the volume by MRI
scan if you don't already know what it is.
As Steve K suggested, another biopsy with more cores would probably be
wise and of course another PSA result soon to put into the graph would
help also. I do hope you don't have PCa. If you do, it looks like
you have plenty of time on your side.
Best of luck.
****************
(there's probably something online but I couldn't find it....this is
dead easy)
Open excel. This should immediately give you a new unfilled excel
workpage - if not go to the menu at the top and select: File/New then
select 'blank workbook'
Click cursor on the 'A' of column 'A' so that the entire column is
highlighted. Go to the menu and select: Format/cells, click the
'Number' tab and select 'date' in the drop-down menu. This opens up
another drop-down with lots of date-format options. Run down these
until you get to one that looks like 'month-year'. This seems to vary
but on my copy of excel I see 'Mar-01'. Select that and click 'OK' at
the bottom of the dialogue box.
Work down the cells of column 'A' keying in your dates - you'll find
that it's quite tolerant of what you key in - at least up to a point.
e.g. Dec2004 or 12/2004 will fill the cell with 'Dec-04'
Do that for all your dates.
Now go to column 'B' and work down the cells of the column filling in
the PSA values which correspond to the dates in 'A'.
Select just the data in the 2 columns (don't include the column
headings) by click-dragging from the first to the last; i.e. if you've
got 6 dates in all, you'll click-drag from 'A1' to 'B6'. The data
area should now be highlighted.
Go to the menu and select: Insert/chart and then 'XY (Scatter)' or
'Line' from the drop-down menu. Then select finish.
That's it! If you click on your graph you'll see various anchor
points from which to click-drag and stretch for optimum perspective
and size.
If anyone tries this and meets a problem let me know.
Leonard Evens - 18 Sep 2007 15:02 GMT
> I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
> months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Seems like these things start rising and it is not good at my age.
It is sometimes possible to distinguish between prostate cancer and BPH
by means of a free PSA test. A low percentage suggests a higher risk
of prostate cancer. This is sometimes helpful in deciding whether or
not repeat biopsies are appropriate.
Mark Cleary - 04 Oct 2007 17:29 GMT
Well I went in and the doctor did a biospy last week got the results today
they were negative. I was happy and the doc of course wants to see me in 6
months for another PSA,. He told me my volume of the prostate was 52grams.
It was high but not bad I don't have any real symptoms. What would be a
normal size prostate for a 46 year old?
Thanks for the reponse from the group previous and I lift all of you in
prayer it is the Feast of Saint Francis of Assisi. Fitting day for the news.
I follow a jazz guitar newsgroup and other than that and this group most of
the newgroups can be spam but your group is on task and a real community.

Signature
Mark Cleary makes music on the finest Jazz guitars.
http://hollenbeckguitar.com/
>I wanted to post this with some thoughts since I previoulsy did about 6
>months ago. I am 46 years old here are my PSA levels and dates
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Seems like these things start rising and it is not good at my age.
Steve Kramer - 10 Oct 2007 13:44 GMT
> Well I went in and the doctor did a biospy last week got the results today
> they were negative.
That's great news, Deacon. We will, of course, have to pull your temporary
membership card. :-)