Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / September 2007
Low-fat, vegetarian diet may stall prostate cancer
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Roman Bystrianyk - 14 Sep 2007 12:08 GMT "Low-fat, vegetarian diet may stall prostate cancer", Reuters, September 11, 2007, Link: http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTON17435520070911
Low-fat, plant-based diets may help prevent or slow the progression of prostate cancer, according to a new research review.
A number of studies, though not all, have suggested that eating plenty of fruits and vegetables may help ward off prostate cancer, while "Western"-style diets heavy in animal fat and dairy products may increase a man's risk of developing the disease.
In the current study, researchers reviewed 25 previously published studies that examined the effects of plant-based diets on prostate cancer development or progression.
Overall, the evidence suggests that diets high in fiber, fruits and vegetables, and low in meat and dairy, can help battle the disease, they report in the journal Nutrition Reviews.
For example, several studies of men with prostate cancer have linked high saturated fat intake to faster disease progression and a higher risk of death. Saturated fat is found mainly in animal products.
In contrast, some small trials have found that a high-fiber, low-fat vegetarian diet may slow the growth and spread of early-stage prostate tumors. Some other studies have suggested that components of plant- based foods -- like certain antioxidants or soy isoflavones -- might be beneficial.
"For men diagnosed with prostate cancer, the key to improving the odds of survival is avoiding high-fat fare and instead choosing fruits, vegetables, beans and other cancer-fighting vegetarian foods," lead study author Dr. Susan Berkow said in a statement.
Berkow is with George Mason University in Alexandria, Virginia, and serves as a consultant to Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a group that advocates vegetarian and vegan diets.
Berkow and her colleagues speculate that the fiber and other nutrients found in plant-based diets may affect prostate cancer by altering levels of certain hormones that can feed tumor development, including testosterone and insulin.
he balance of fats in a man's diet may also be key, the researchers point out. Some studies have found that omega-3 fatty acids may help stall prostate cancer progression. Omega-3 fats are found largely in oily fish, but also in some vegetable sources, like flaxseeds and canola oil.
SOURCE: Nutrition Reviews, September 2007.
california_chief - 14 Sep 2007 18:46 GMT > SOURCE: Nutrition Reviews, September 2007. You failed to include "© Reuters2007All rights reserved"
Alan Meyer - 14 Sep 2007 19:24 GMT > ... > A number of studies, though not all, have suggested that eating plenty > of fruits and vegetables may help ward off prostate cancer ... If I put some extra olives in my martini, will that do the trick?
Alan
tarhoosier@carolina.rr.com - 14 Sep 2007 19:26 GMT > "Low-fat, vegetarian diet may stall prostate cancer", Reuters, > September 11, 2007, [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > SOURCE: Nutrition Reviews, September 2007. All: My urologist, a skeptical scientist, to be sure, says he has several PCa patients pursuing active surveillance of their disease and following a vegetarian diet, with success therein retarding the growth of the disease. I assume these are men with small amounts of slow growing disease, though he did not elaborate. He also did not explain if this was his recommendation or that of the patient himself, or a consensus. This doctor is not a fan of supplements so his pride in success with diet was surprising to me. The best proof is the conversion of a skeptic.
JohnC
A M L [Manchester England] - 16 Sep 2007 04:07 GMT tarhoosier@carolina.rr.com wrote in news:1189794389.891236.91190 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> This doctor is not a fan of supplements so his pride in > success with diet was surprising to me. The best proof > is the conversion of a skeptic. With the bearded organic foods mob round every corner, you do need to be careful about these rumours. The positive correlation between meat eating and pc is well known.
This is not an advocacy for trendy foods in general, neither is it a complaint about eating reasonable quantities of meat and animal products, (unless you have pc or a propensity to pc).
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
A M L [Manchester England] - 16 Sep 2007 03:51 GMT > "Low-fat, vegetarian diet may stall prostate cancer", Reuters, > September 11, 2007, > http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTON17435520070911 This has been known for some time. It's may really, more "does stall pc."
I dare say repeating the message means it may eventually get through. A complete vegetarian diet has to include some proteins rare outside of animals products, last I heard (a long time ago), only found in peanuts.
The vegetable rule is a good one, generally, but there are exceptions. Pigs liver is a healthy food, high in polyunsaturated fat, particularly helpful with MS.
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
california_chief - 16 Sep 2007 06:48 GMT > complete vegetarian diet has to include some proteins rare outside of > animals products, last I heard (a long time ago), only found in peanuts. SOURCES: Milk, eggs, cheese, meat, fish, and some vebetables such as soybeans. Proteins are found in both vegetable and meat sources of food. Many incomplete proteins are found in vegetables; they contain some of the essential amono acids. A veggie diet can make up for this by combining vegetable groups that compliment each other.
Taber's CYCLOPIC MEDICAL DICTIONARY
A M L [Manchester England] - 16 Sep 2007 16:49 GMT > A veggie diet can make up for this > by combining vegetable groups that compliment each other. Thanks.
If you do want to cut down on meat, in this case to restrain pc, SosMix is popular in the UK. £2 to make 2 pounds (weight) of the stuff, although it does not taste much like sausage, it is a pleasant food.
Something costing £2 in the UK will generally cost about $2.40 or so in the US (the US dollar is under valued).
And if you want to know what SosMix looks like, thought the taste is more difficult to convey, it looks like this
http://www.sosmix.broomleigh.com/
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
california_chief - 16 Sep 2007 17:46 GMT > And if you want to know what SosMix looks like, thought the taste is more > difficult to convey, it looks like this > > http://www.something.com/ Did you read the charter of this group before posting a commecial site's URL?
Alan Meyer - 17 Sep 2007 20:41 GMT >> And if you want to know what SosMix looks like, thought the taste is more >> difficult to convey, it looks like this [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Did you read the charter of this group before posting a commecial site's > URL? I don't think he had any commercial intent Chief, he's just trying to be helpful.
Alan
A M L [Manchester England] - 18 Sep 2007 06:56 GMT > Did you read the charter of this group > before posting a commecial site's URL? No. I'm sorry.
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
JerryW - 18 Sep 2007 13:53 GMT >> Did you read the charter of this group >> before posting a commecial site's URL? > > No. I'm sorry. I haven't read it either, Chief. Could you please direct me to where I can find it.
 Signature JerryW
Please respond to group; email address is not valid
2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62) 2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe 5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes Fully continent by 9/04 PSA through 4/2/07: <0.1
Steve Kramer - 18 Sep 2007 14:12 GMT >>> Did you read the charter of this group >>> before posting a commecial site's URL?
> I haven't read it either, Chief. Could you please direct me to where I can > find it. The only one that I have ever seen was the very first post in 1994.
More options Dec 14 1994, 7:53 pm
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer.prostate, alt.support.cancer From: Chic...@ix.netcom.com (B. H.) Date: 14 Dec 1994 23:53:17 GMT Local: Wed, Dec 14 1994 7:53 pm Subject: Charter
This is not a official charter, but rather a few thoughts on what one might include. I think that the purpose of alt.support.cancer.prostate is to capture all the postings on prostate cancer that are occuring all over the net. AOL, PRODIGY, Compuserve, Delphi and others all have postings scattered in various places as does sci.med and alt.support.cancer. If these people could be gathered into one group, a serious political force could be created. Meanwhile, people can share ideas, information, and experiences. BH, MD
JerryW - 18 Sep 2007 14:36 GMT Thanks, Steve.
JerryW
>>>> Did you read the charter of this group >>>> before posting a commecial site's URL? [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > ideas, information, and experiences. > BH, MD HT - 19 Sep 2007 00:24 GMT >>>> Did you read the charter of this group >>>> before posting a commecial site's URL? [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >ideas, information, and experiences. >BH, MD Actually, even though Alt. isn't in the Big 8 newsgroup heirarchy (.rec, .org,.com, etc), it falls as a subset of alt. support.cancer which does have a full charter and rules.
Alt.support.cancer.prostate is a subset of alt.support.cancer, and falls within that alt.group . Main charter: http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html The main charter applies to all subsets. See subset index of support.cancer at http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/links.html , which includes .prostate..
Hope this helps. By the way, it would be a good idea for a regular to post this charter here monthly. It would save a lot of discussions/arguments, etc. if trouble ever came here.
Here's what the pertinent parts says. This is the part that needs to be posted here periodically:
""Welcome to the official FAQ for newsgroup alt.support.cancer. Please take the time to read this document, especially if you are new to alt.support.cancer.
Disclaimer: this FAQ is provided for educational purposes only. It cannot be used for diagnosing or treating a disease. If you have or suspect you may have cancer, you should consult your doctor. The external links in this FAQ are provided for the convenience of alt.support.cancer visitors. The alt.support.cancer newsgroup has no interest in, responsibility for, or control over the linked sites and no responsibility is accepted for information on any linked page, please read the linked provider's own disclaimer where appropriate. The alt.support.cancer newsgroup makes no promises or warranties of any kind, express or implied, including those of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, as to the content of any linked site. In no event shall the newsgroup alt.support.cancer be liable for any damages resulting from use of these links.
This FAQ is intended to provide detailed information about alt.support.cancer to the users so that the alt.support.cancer newsgroup will be better utilized for the purposes of supporting cancer patients and caregivers.
This FAQ is written and maintained by the users of alt.support.cancer. The latest alt.support.cancer FAQ can be found online at www.cancersupporters.com The FAQ will be periodically posted by a member of the group to news:alt.support.cancer newsgroup.
Corrections and minor updates are permitted without a vote. The exception is the Charter, which, cannot be changed without a group vote. Update procedures for this FAQ can be found at the end of this section.
The purpose of alt.support.cancer :
The Usenet group alt.support.cancer is a resource for those whose lives are touched by cancer. The primary purpose of alt.support.cancer is for emotional support and discussion among patients and caregivers. It is also a place to gather and discuss issues related to cancer and the impact it has on patients and caregivers .
Policy:
Appropriate posts are welcome.
Lurkers and newbies are always welcome in alt.support.cancer.
The members of alt.support.cancer must be overly considerate and protective of the newbie or the casual lurker to this NG, so that these new members to the cancer club don't get mislead, or feel that this NG is not living up to our purpose.
Because Usenet is susceptible to net abuses, and because alt.support.cancer is not moderated the alt.support.cancer members in good standing deem it necessary to self-regulate the group's content. Members in good standing follow the guidelines outlined in this FAQ.
Who determines what is appropriate in alt.support.cancer? With few exceptions, that is up to the individual to decide. You might think a post is perfectly okay, while someone else could well consider it ridiculously far off-topic or otherwise inappropriate. If that happens, consensus of the group reigns. If after reading the group for a while you are still unsure as to what sort of posts are acceptable in alt.support.cancer, check out The alt.support.cancer archives on Google Groups.
The newsgroup will prosecute violations of the Charter or FAQ as deemed necessary by the group.
What is strictly prohibited on this newsgroup?:
Under no circumstances is it appropriate to contact a member of the newsgroup at their residence or place of employment without their prior approval. Read this again. There are no exceptions!
Posing as a medical professional is strictly prohibited. For example, don't use a doctorate in finance or mineralogy to convey the impression that you are a medical doctor qualified to recommend treatments or diagnose disease. This includes the use of "Dr., Doc, PhD, RN, LPN, med, etc." in your name, e-mail address, or alias. If you claim one of these titles be prepared to provide degree, major/minor, university, year it was earned, and years experience. You must provide substantive information if asked by any member of the group.
If you have been convicted of health fraud, you are not welcome in alt.support.cancer.
Posing as a cancer patient/caregiver for promoting products or services is strictly prohibited.
Commercial advertising is prohibited.
Product posts by individuals with a financial or business interest are prohibited.
Deceptive posts disguised to conceal other prohibited content are prohibited.
For sale, sales, links to auction sites i.e. eBay, or selling items are prohibited.
Donation requests are prohibited.
Soliciting for capital funds is prohibited.
Chain letters, mailing lists, frauds, urban legends, Multi-level Marketing, Make Money Fast, investment schemes are prohibited.
Posting in HTML or attachments containing binaries or images are prohibited.
Off-topic materials, advertising, spam, excessive posting of the same material, cancel attacks, encrypted or coded postings, and inappropriate cross-postings are prohibited.
Opportunities, business opportunities, job postings, resumes, announcements, flaming, trolling, baiting, flooding, post bombing, troublemaking, or other forms of net-abuse or abuse of alt.support.cancer newsgroup users are prohibited.
Troll posting (cross-postings directed to a.s.c from other newsgroups with the express purpose of disrupting the a.s.c group), flame baiting or unwarranted flaming is prohibited.
Fraudulent activity is prohibited.
Deceptive information is prohibited.
Making outrageous or unsupported claims is prohibited.
Slander or other criminal acts are prohibited.
Hipcrime or other inappropriate posts made via malicious scripts or programs are prohibited.
Test messages are prohibited use alt.test instead and put "ignore" in the subject.
Legal notices:
The information provided in this FAQ is designed to support-not replace-the relationship that exists between a patient and their health care system. Information from this document should be used only for individual educational purposes. If any of the information in this FAQ conflicts with professional advice you have received, follow the professional advice.
This newsgroup is not affiliated with any profit/nonprofit organization or corporation.
By posting to this group, you acknowledge having read the FAQs document, and agree to adhere to it. You further agree that failure to abide is grounds for members of alt.support.cancer to blacklist you and file formal complaints with your ISP or web host. Members of alt.support.cancer hereby give notice that any failure to abide by the FAQs will be prosecuted fully at their discretion. By posting to this group, you agree to hold alt.support.cancer members harmless for prosecution of those complaints.
You must abide by your Internet Service Provider's Acceptable Use Policy to be a member in good standing of alt.support.cancer. Violation of your ISP's AUP is a violation of our policies and opens you to prosecution by the group.
Understand that these are other human beings you are communicating with and that normal legalities and proprieties that are appropriate in public are applicable in alt.support.cancer.
Criminal activities will not be tolerated.
Usenet/ISP AUP commercial posting violations will be prosecuted, one occurrence will be considered an offense.
This is an unmoderated newsgroup by definition. Having said that, there exists a form of user moderation. We cannot control what you post to the NG, but we can and do hold you accountable for straying from acceptable behavior as defined in this FAQ. This is not intended as censorship, but rather, to prevent the NG from turning into a cesspool. Please help us keep the signal-to-noise ratio down.
Before you post to alt.support.cancer:
Please read the newsgroup before posting. Lurking for at least one week prior to posting the first time in a new newsgroup is considered standard acceptable behavior.
Before you post your first message, spam proof your e-mail address by setting your From: and Reply: e-mail address to nospam@nospam.inv or adding words or numbers that the sender can be instructed to remove.
Search Google Groups for the answer to your question. If you cannot find the answer there, then it is appropriate to post to the NG.
Verify that your newsreader options for posting to a newsgroup are set to TEXT, and not set to HTML. Plain text means it's text only, with line length under 80 (preferably under 72) characters. See Configuring Mail Clients to Send Plain ASCII Text.
Do not use stationery backgrounds, color backgrounds, or color text. Use plain text on a plain background.
Posting to alt.support.cancer:
A post should contribute to the general discussion.
Post in English.
Please post links to sites that are English language.
Please do not criticize the spelling or grammar of another person.
If you don't understand what someone has posted ask for clarification. Be polite.
Do not respond/complain on the newsgroup about inappropriate or off-topic posts. Ignore them or put them in your kill file.
If you don't like the content or direction of the newsgroup, feel free to killfile or exit the group.
If you can find a more appropriate newsgroup for your message, post to it.
In general, if you feel the need to vent your spleen online, write the message, go and moan about the issue to your spouse, relatives, neighbors, and friends, then if you still feel it's appropriate, send it.
If you cannot resist posting a cure or treatment here, post the complete treatment description with supporting data. That would include clinical trial results and papers published in reputable journals. Provide your connection or affiliation-financial or otherwise-with the product, the company, board of directors, or owners. Provide your qualifications to discuss this product, including but not limited to degrees, positions, experience, titles, publications, and references. If you have a record of criminal arrest, you must reveal the date, location, circumstances, and outcome. Links to this information are acceptable.
Please do not ask us to e-mail you for information; after all, this is a newsgroup. If it can't be posted to the group it won't pass the smell test.
Patients and caregivers please do not post your name, address, or telephone number on this newsgroup. It is OK to remain anonymous. Since 1981, all posts to newsgroups are archived by Google.
Please use good netiquette, trim quoted material (long messages) or unnecessary cross posting in your replies, and avoid top posting and SHOUTING. Don't assume that your message will be read at the same time as the post you are replying to, and don't assume that all readers will be using a threaded newsreader. By quoting the relevant parts of the message you are replying to, it provides a context for your reply. Your message will make more sense to readers if you reply below quoted text. This is true if the reader has not seen the post to which you are replying, or reads it out-of-order.
Read The power of negative thinking: The seven don'ts of Usenet, or how to excel without doing anything.
Do not have unreasonable expectations.
Just because it is posted (multiple times) on alt.support.cancer does not make it true.
If you make a mistake, own up to it, we are all human; nobody will think any worse of you.
Inquiries about cancer medicine may be posted to sci.med.diseases.cancer. If your post is more about medicine than cancer support, post to sci.med.diseases.cancer instead.
Please think carefully before posting a news article. If you must, post the link not the complete text.
Cross-posting should be limited to other appropriate groups.
Trim cross-post groups from your replies.
Choose your topic/subject line carefully to obtain the best replies. Non-specifics like "Help" or "Question" make it more difficult to search them later (for others) in the Google archives. A well-thought out subject will get the attention of the persons you hope to reach quicker than a "generic" subject line.
Categorize your post in the subject field by using the appropriate subheading abbreviation for your topic. This would identify the topic in the thread and allow users to filter or ignore threads that they have no interest in. Also helpful for those only looking for posts about specific kinds of topics/cancers, and makes it easier when searching through the archives. Absence of any subheading-the default-implies that the content is concerning general cancer support issues. [ADMIN] - newsgroup administration [ALT] - alternative, or unconventional cancer therapies [ANCMT] - events, announcements [BMT] - aggressive chemotherapy with bone marrow transplant or stem cell rescue [CAM] - complementary and alternative medicine [CHEM] - chemotherapy, antineoplastics [CHEMO] - chemotherapy [COPE] - emotional or psychological issues [FAQ] - frequently asked questions [FRAUD] - health fraud [FUN],[ JOKE], or [HUMOR] - a moment of silliness [INT] - issues of intimacy, relationships and sex, family members [MAMO] - imaging, mammography, radiology [MED] - medical [METS] - metastases, advanced cancer [MISC] - miscellaneous (anything not listed) [OT] - off topic [PAIN] - pain [PATH] - pathology, biopsies, staging [RANT] or [VENT] - blowing off steam [RECR] - recurrence [SUP] - messages of support, words of encouragement [TAMX] - tamoxifen and related drugs
All off topic post headers should have [OT] at the beginning.
What are considered appropriate topics on this newsgroup? :
Questions and answers from patients and caregivers.
Emotional support of patients and caregivers.
Sharing of problems and solutions.
Friendly conversations about patient and caregiver.
Discussions of treatments for cancer.
Dignity
Friendship
Compassion
Understanding
Respect
Information about clinical trials for cancer treatments
Information on support products such as Miracle Mouthwash, Second Skin, etc. (only if posted by those with no financial or business interests)
Ranting and raving to vent frustration or a complaint. A rant is usually off-topic, but occasionally concerns one of our topics of discussion. There is nothing wrong with an occasional rant.
Humor. Many believe that a positive attitude and a good laugh can improve the effectiveness of any treatment. It certainly improves the quality of life.
Periodic reposts of the FAQs or links to them
FAQs business, updates, call for votes, other related issues or newsgroup business.
What are considered inappropriate topics on this newsgroup?
Encouraging patients to stop or avoid conventional proven cancer treatment in favor of unconventional and unproven treatment is inappropriate.
Encouraging patients to accept the use of unproven diagnostic techniques including, but not limited to self-diagnosis, diagnosis by questionnaire, diagnosis by fraudulent machines is inappropriate.
Advocating treatments that have been disproven scientifically or have not successfully completed all phases of a clinical trial is inappropriate.
Impersonation of another user is inappropriate.
Canceling posts of another user is inappropriate.
Harassment is inappropriate.
Threats are inappropriate.
Cross posting to groups outside of the cancer support community is inappropriate. Cross-posts should be limited to other newsgroups that are part of the support community or deal with cancer topics. Cross posting means that a message is simultaneously posted in other groups. Excessive cross posting (cross-posting to four or more newsgroups) is inappropriate. Consider posting copies to other newsgroups.
Excessive multi-postingdefined as posting many repeat copies of a substantively identical article (i.e. reposting spam)is inappropriate.
Offensive or cruel posts are inappropriate.
Off-topic posts are inappropriate.
Political calls to action requests are inappropriate.
Signature files in excess of four lines or V-cards are inappropriate on the NG and are discouraged.
Newsgroup responses:
If you did not get the response you expected, consider these questions:
Is it possible that the question has already been answered?
Is it possible that nobody has anything to add to the thread?
Is it possible that nobody knows the answer to your question?
Is it posted to the newsgroup best able to answer? If not, post to a more appropriate group.
Read your post again and see if it conveyed your message as you intended. If not, try reposting your message with a clearer statement of what you want from the group. Be sure to include symptoms, tumor locations, diagnosis, staging, grade, and any other relative information that may help the group to understand your post.
Many people post to a NG using an archiving service like Google groups, and these messages may not be properly propagated over Usenet. Therefore, they arent read by everyone. In addition, some ISP's or their NG providers dont propagate well with the same result. Try posting from another source.
How to address the problem of posters violating the FAQ:
This is probably the most difficult part of using unmoderated newsgroups on Usenet.
A grassroots organization exists in the NG that reserves the right to determine what is appropriate content and response. In reality there are numerous reasons why free speech is not/cannot be censored on the Internet. Realizing that, the best that alt.support.cancer can hope for is compliance with the rules in this FAQ. Compliance would afford someone the ability to post here, if they must, without irrational reaction from the group. Noncompliance by a person would open them up to the wrath of the group. Both are forms of positive or negative feedback intended to control the enforcement of the FAQ. That seems to be a now-working formula.
The alternative is to let this newsgroup decay and those who need help; support, etc. would all end up leaving.
©Copyright 2003 alt.support.cancer newsgroup. All rights reserved under both Pan American and international copyright conventions. No reproduction of any part may be made without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.""
HT
Steve Jordan - 19 Sep 2007 01:37 GMT On September 18, HT wrote, in pertinent part:
(snip)
> Alt.support.cancer.prostate is a subset of alt.support.cancer, and > falls within that alt.group . Main charter: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > post this charter here monthly. It would save a lot of > discussions/arguments, etc. if trouble ever came here. (snip)
> Here's what the pertinent parts says. This is the part that needs to > be posted here periodically: (snip)
> The Usenet group alt.support.cancer is a resource for those whose > lives are touched by cancer. The primary purpose of alt.support.cancer > is for emotional support and discussion among patients and caregivers. > It is also a place to gather and discuss issues related to cancer and > the impact it has on patients and caregivers . Amen.
(snip)
> The newsgroup will prosecute violations of the Charter or FAQ as > deemed necessary by the group. Um, good idea, but who/what would be the plaintiff? And exactly what statute would have been violated? This looks to me to be an idle threat, however estimable the idea.
> If you have been convicted of health fraud, you are not welcome in > alt.support.cancer. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Deceptive posts disguised to conceal other prohibited content are > prohibited. Often violated, unfortunately.
(snip)
> Posting to alt.support.cancer: (snip)
> Please use good netiquette, trim quoted material (long messages) or > unnecessary cross posting in your replies, and avoid top posting and > SHOUTING. Ah. I've been snarled at for daring to say that top posting is impolite. "Polite" is defined as behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people. It is also impolite to fail to trim messages, as above. But there are some who seem to believe that being polite is somehow unmacho. Lawn fertilizer.
There is much more good sense, but this will do for now.....
Regards,
Steve J
"Moving parts in rubbing contact require lubrication to avoid excessive wear. Honorifics and formal politeness provide lubrication where people rub together. Often the very young, the untraveled, the naive, the unsophisticated deplore these formalities as 'empty, 'meaningless,' or 'dishonest,' and scorn to use them. No matter how 'pure' their motives, they thereby throw sand into machinery that does not work too well at best." --Lazarus Long
HT - 19 Sep 2007 15:28 GMT >On September 18, HT wrote, in pertinent part: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> post this charter here monthly. It would save a lot of >> discussions/arguments, etc. if trouble ever came here.
>> The newsgroup will prosecute violations of the Charter or FAQ as >> deemed necessary by the group. > >Um, good idea, but who/what would be the plaintiff? And exactly what >statute would have been violated? This looks to me to be an idle threat, >however estimable the idea. Good question, which is answered in the posted Charter. You agree to abide by the Charter by the fact of posting to the group. It states that you agree to do so, and that members who disagree should not post but go elsewhere. Posters who violate the Charter can be reported to their ISP for violation of the Charter. Most ISP's have their own rules concerning spamming or disruption, or misuse of their service and are willing to respond with punishment to members who create problems in newsgroups. It's part of the agreement their member's agree to when they choose their ISP. In the vast majority of the cases, the .cancer Charter would be recognized as a legitimate charter by those ISP's and they would respond to complaints made about their members abuse of it.
JerryW - 19 Sep 2007 15:00 GMT <snip>
> Alt.support.cancer.prostate is a subset of alt.support.cancer, and > falls within that alt.group . Main charter: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/links.html , > which includes .prostate. <snip>
> Hope this helps. > > HT Thanks, HT.
 Signature JerryW
Please respond to group; email address is not valid
2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62) 2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe 5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes Fully continent by 9/04 PSA through 4/2/07: <0.1
Heather - 18 Sep 2007 17:39 GMT Jerry, there are NO Charters or Bosses on Usenet. Usually a mild reproof works.......with people whose IQ is over 50.
But not with those idiot spammers/scammers. Those get either ignored or killfiled on this machine.
Heather
>>> Did you read the charter of this group >>> before posting a commecial site's URL? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I haven't read it either, Chief. Could you please direct me to where I > can find it. JerryW - 18 Sep 2007 22:21 GMT Yes, Heather, that has been my understanding too. Except for moderated groups, we generally follow the standard rules of "netiquette" adopted by most Usenet users. California_Chiefs' response to a posting he seemed to feel was from a spammer led me to believe maybe he was aware of the existence of some charter for a.s.c.p. If so, I was interested in seeing such a document.
Thanks for the clarification.
 Signature JerryW
> Jerry, there are NO Charters or Bosses on Usenet. Usually a mild reproof > works.......with people whose IQ is over 50. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> I haven't read it either, Chief. Could you please direct me to where I >> can find it. Larry Sabo - 18 Sep 2007 23:38 GMT >Jerry, there are NO Charters or Bosses on Usenet. Usually a mild >reproof works.......with people whose IQ is over 50. Hi Heather! I'm sure you meant the "alt." groups of usenet, not all of usenet.
Cheers
Heather - 19 Sep 2007 01:41 GMT >>Jerry, there are NO Charters or Bosses on Usenet. Usually a mild >>reproof works.......with people whose IQ is over 50. > > Hi Heather! I'm sure you meant the "alt." groups of usenet, not all of > usenet. Whoops!! Yes I did. I forgot about the other more "normal" groups. (cough) Although that alt.spyware one tries to make people toe the line via a charter of sorts..... Good luck to them. (G)
Cheers......Heather
HT - 19 Sep 2007 15:21 GMT >> A veggie diet can make up for this >> by combining vegetable groups that compliment each other. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >http://www.sosmix.broomleigh.com/ As this has become a 'big' issue, I'd like to weigh in with my opinion of if this is spamming. Here goes, apologys beforehand.
Geez, guys, get a grip. the man just gave a link to a product that fits in the main subject of this thread. It isn't spamming, he has no expectation of profit from it, and is just passing along some info.
This link is no different than someone posting the link to www.alldaychemist.com in a thread about ED meds, or www.healingwell.com in a discussion about sources of info. Even though I posted a link to these site, that doesn't make me a spammer. I would expect anyone who makes accusations of spamming would first take the time to read a little and see what spamming is and isn't. We people here have enough stress and problems with this disease as it is without people wanting to throw a load of accusations and dump guilt on someone who doesn't measure up to their misguided sense of what is right and wrong. Take a deep breath, relax, and ask yourself is you are gaining anything from being such a 'stickler' for your self-determined rules.
How do we share info about things affecting our cancer and quality of life, if no info can be shared without the risk of being accused of being a spammer. I think most of us here can discern which is a commercial spammer post and which is a personal sharing of info. with a link If you can't, then you need to sit back and keep the little fingers off the key board until you learn the difference.
That after all is my opinion.....lol I suppose I am getting a little edgy (5 days to surgery), so if I stepped on your toes.....it's because I don't ilke to see good people bullied....
Medusa - 16 Sep 2007 18:22 GMT On Sep 15, 9:51 pm, "A M L [Manchester England]" <ab...@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote:
> > "Low-fat, vegetarian diet may stall prostate cancer", Reuters, > > September 11, 2007, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > complete vegetarian diet has to include some proteins rare outside of > animals products, last I heard (a long time ago), only found in peanuts. Ummm, plant proteins are "incomplete," in other words, they do not contain all the essential amino acids humans need. BUT, plant proteins can be "complimented" to be made "complete." Beans and rice, wheat and peanut butter. . .this is basic vegetarianism. The only nutrient you can't get from plants is Vitamin B12, but milk products are rich in it.
I became a vegetarian when I found out I did not have to eat meat. I didn't like the taste of meat, and I was delighted to stop eating it.
That was when I was a teenager; an eon ago! I don't know if my diet has kept me healthier, but more and more evidence says it did.
Medusa
AA #2281
Alan Meyer - 17 Sep 2007 20:44 GMT ...
> I became a vegetarian when I found out I did not have to eat meat. I > didn't like the taste of meat, and I was delighted to stop eating it. > > That was when I was a teenager; an eon ago! I don't know if my diet > has kept me healthier, but more and more evidence says it did. ...
Medusa,
I have to ask, have you ever been diagnosed with cancer? I know full well that a statistical sample of one person is of no use in understanding trends, but I'm still curious to know if a lifelong vegetarian got PCa.
Thanks.
Alan
Medusa - 19 Sep 2007 00:36 GMT > ...> I became a vegetarian when I found out I did not have to eat meat. I > > didn't like the taste of meat, and I was delighted to stop eating it. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > understanding trends, but I'm still curious to know if a lifelong > vegetarian got PCa. No cancer. I am not a lifelong vegetarian, though. I stopped eating meat when I was 16.
I do eat "animal" products, though. Yogurt, some cheese, and eggs, not on their own, but in other foods.
Medusa
AA #2281
A M L [Manchester England] - 18 Sep 2007 07:18 GMT > BUT, plant proteins can be "complimented" > to be made "complete." Beans and rice, > wheat and peanut butter. . .this is basic > vegetarianism. The only nutrient you can't > get from plants is Vitamin B12, but milk > products are rich in it. Thanks. I was wondering what he meant. When you say milk, do you mean cows milk?
> I became a vegetarian when I found out I did not > have to eat meat. I didn't like the taste of meat, > and I was delighted to stop eating it. In fairness, with exceptions, vegetarian food does take longer to cook?
We used to have a myth in the UK, less common nowadays, that there was something healthy about a daily midday meal of "meat and 2 veg." Vegetarians called this "corpse and 2 veg."
> That was when I was a teenager; an eon ago! I don't > know if my diet has kept me healthier, but more and > more evidence says it did. And if that doesn't make you a vegetarian, try eating a sausage in the company of vegetarians: it cannot be done. You put the fork into the sausage, and their eyes widen, and at every move, until you leave that corpse alone, their eyes open wider and wider.
Not a word was said, and I put the corpse in the bin.
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
Alan Meyer - 18 Sep 2007 19:06 GMT On Sep 18, 2:18 am, "A M L [Manchester England]" <ab...@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote: ...
> And if that doesn't make you a vegetarian, try eating a sausage in the > company of vegetarians: it cannot be done. You put the fork into the > sausage, and their eyes widen, and at every move, until you leave that > corpse alone, their eyes open wider and wider. > > Not a word was said, and I put the corpse in the bin. ...
My wife and I went out to a restaurant with some Vegan friends. They insisted that we should eat whatever we wanted, don't pay any attention to them.
But how can you so disappoint such nice people?
Alan
Steve Kramer - 18 Sep 2007 23:49 GMT > On Sep 18, 2:18 am, "A M L [Manchester England]" > <ab...@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > But how can you so disappoint such nice people? That's easy. Order steak. :-)
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum
A M L [Manchester England] - 19 Sep 2007 06:58 GMT Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1190138762.076059.151410 @y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:
> But how can you so disappoint such nice people? I think maybe if they care about you, and/or the animals, then it is difficult to do something they would never do, in their company.
Can I say thank you for sticking up for me on the advertising issue? As you say, it was not deliberate.
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
Alan Meyer - 19 Sep 2007 20:37 GMT > ... > Can I say thank you for sticking up for me on the advertising issue? As > you say, it was not deliberate. My pleasure. I also responded to your recent post about it.
I'm sorry about all the confusion that occurred about this. The people in this group are actually very nice, but chief somehow got sidetracked into a misunderstanding and things went downhill from there.
Please don't give up on us. This was an aberration.
Regards,
Alan
Medusa - 19 Sep 2007 00:50 GMT On Sep 18, 1:18 am, "A M L [Manchester England]" <ab...@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote:
> > BUT, plant proteins can be "complimented" > > to be made "complete." Beans and rice, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Thanks. I was wondering what he meant. When you say milk, do you mean > cows milk? Yes, but I do eat feta cheese, which is made with goats' milk.
> > I became a vegetarian when I found out I did not > > have to eat meat. I didn't like the taste of meat, > > and I was delighted to stop eating it. > > In fairness, with exceptions, vegetarian food does take longer to cook? Not really. Vegetarian food can be as simple or compicated as you like.
> We used to have a myth in the UK, less common nowadays, that there was > something healthy about a daily midday meal of "meat and 2 veg." > Vegetarians called this "corpse and 2 veg." I don't like to critize what other people eat. It's just not, well, polite. I allow anyone to eat anything in my place, but if I'm cooking, it won't be meat!
I have heard of people who were vegetarian for religious reasons. They would not allow their guests to bring fastfood burgers into their house!
> > That was when I was a teenager; an eon ago! I don't > > know if my diet has kept me healthier, but more and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Not a word was said, and I put the corpse in the bin. It would be cool with me if you brought a cooked sausage into my house. I'd even let you use one of my plates!
Medusa
A M L [Manchester England] - 19 Sep 2007 07:05 GMT > It would be cool with me if you brought a cooked sausage > into my house. I'd even let you use one of my plates! To the best of my knowledge, they were not intentionally putting me off my food. You say it would be cool to eat meat in your home, but do you know your unintentional "non-verbal" indicators when people do?
It depends how you feel about meat eating I suppose.
 Signature http://broomleigh.com/
Medusa - 19 Sep 2007 20:44 GMT On Sep 19, 1:05 am, "A M L [Manchester England]" <ab...@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote:
> > It would be cool with me if you brought a cooked sausage > > into my house. I'd even let you use one of my plates! > > To the best of my knowledge, they were not intentionally putting me off my > food. You say it would be cool to eat meat in your home, but do you know > your unintentional "non-verbal" indicators when people do? Geez, I really don't know how I make people feel about eating meat around me. I hope I don't give off any unintentional "non-verbal" negative reactions to people eating meat in front of me. I must not, bcause my friends eat with me and feel free to dig into their meat dishes.
I only react if people critize me for not eating meat; I just tell them I don't like it. Some people don't like cocoanut cream pie, but that has never stopped me from eating it in their company. I think everyone has a list of food they just don't like. BTW, my list of disliked food is not restricted to meat; I can't stand squash or cucumbers, either.
> It depends how you feel about meat eating I suppose. Perhaps you're right. I feel no moral complusion to avoid meat; I just don't like it.
Medusa
AA #2281
|
|
|