Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

August 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Semmel - 23 Aug 2007 20:10 GMT
TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.

A famous 2002 study found that a small spot of gray duct tape applied
to a wart for up to two months eliminated it in nearly all cases,
whereas a recent 2007 study found that transparent duct tape hardly
worked at all.  The investigators jumped into the most complicated
speculations, ranging from the body's immune system to the adhesive's
magic chemicals, yet what is the simplest explanation for why the
opaque version resolves warts but the clear one does not?

As sunburn vividly demonstrates, sunlight stimulates circulation in
the skin, so darkness must dull it.  By blocking light, the gray duct
tape just reduces blood flow to the wart and it starves.

But a spot of pigmented tape is an artificial mole.  Thus, tape
occlusion should come with a warning--it raises the risk of melanoma.

James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico

reference:
http://www.mpip.org/cgi-bin/mpip/dbforum.pl?db=main_bb&post=392298
Last month's follow up to the 4th annual discussion: "Is melanoma
simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
california_chief - 24 Aug 2007 00:36 GMT
> A famous 2002 study
> a recent 2007 study

Where are these "famous/recent" studies to be found?
Steve Jordan - 24 Aug 2007 01:30 GMT
Quoting Semmel:

>> A famous 2002 study
>> a recent 2007 study

Cal Chief replied

>  Where are these "famous/recent" studies to be found?

Answer: In his head.

Regards,

Steve J
california_chief - 24 Aug 2007 03:04 GMT
Cal Chief asked:

>>  Where are these "famous/recent" studies to be found?

And Steve Jordan replied:

>  Answer: In his head.

That's what I always believe with those types of  intros, i.e. "famous".
<g>
James Semmel - 25 Aug 2007 15:33 GMT
> Quoting Semmel:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Steve J

LOL!
James Semmel - 25 Aug 2007 15:33 GMT
On Aug 23, 5:36 pm, "california_chief"
<Fire_Chief@Jamacha_Junction_FD.ca.us> wrote:
> > A famous 2002 study
> > a recent 2007 study
>
>  Where are these "famous/recent" studies to be found?

pubmed.gov
chasjac too - 25 Aug 2007 04:04 GMT
> On Aug 23, 5:36 pm, "california_chief"
> <Fire_Chief@Jamacha_Junction_FD.ca.us> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> pubmed.gov

Lots of stuff is published on pubmed.  Can you be more specific?

--charlie
Signature

6/2006 PSA 5.2, DRE suspicious
7/2006 Biopsy:  2 of 10 positive, Gleason 7(3+4)
11/2006 LRP:  Clear margins
PSA < 0.01 on 1/2007, 3/2007, 6/2007
so far, so good ...

James Semmel - 28 Aug 2007 17:23 GMT
duct tape warts

On Aug 24, 9:04 pm, chasjac too <chazjac@_takethisout_chazjac.com>
wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 5:36 pm, "california_chief"
> > <Fire_Chief@Jamacha_Junction_FD.ca.us> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> PSA < 0.01 on 1/2007, 3/2007, 6/2007
> so far, so good ...

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.