Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2007
Interim PSA test
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Clarence Crow - 21 Aug 2007 23:01 GMT Hello all
I'm still kicking, albeit feebly.
My clinical trial has me now on 6 mth monitoring, so I decided on an interim 3mth PSA test, via my GP (PCP).
It's now 0.2 (up from 0.05 last reading). For panic merchants, that's Quadruple! However, I had to use a different Path Lab and do not know the sensitivity of their equipment. The GP says not to worry and the Rad Onc people say the same. The general consensus is that they wouldn't re-intoduce any treatment unless I reach 6.0 in a 6 month period.
For the newbies, I had XRT, HDRB plus 18 mths ADT commencing Oct 2004. My entry PSA was 21.0, T2C & G8 on 4 cores.
-Please reply to group as my email addr is fake!
-Regards CC
Beverley - 22 Aug 2007 04:37 GMT That sucks! And now you have to wait another three months. Sending you well wishes. Bev
> Hello all > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > -Regards CC Steve Kramer - 22 Aug 2007 19:36 GMT > I'm still kicking, albeit feebly. Is it the ADT kicking your butt? (or the 73 years?)
> The GP says not to worry and the Rad > Onc people say the same. I'm sure that makes you feel much better about it.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Clarence Crow - 23 Aug 2007 00:20 GMT >> I'm still kicking, albeit feebly. > >Is it the ADT kicking your butt? (or the 73 years?) ADT, Overcooked Rad, Scar Tissue TURP et. al. (SEs all considered OT by the doyens of this ng)
When I'm 73, I'll let you know next year.
>> The GP says not to worry and the Rad >> Onc people say the same. > >I'm sure that makes you feel much better about it. This recent Path Lab is not to be trusted with consistency or accuracy. On Liver Function Tests, they had me up to 24x, 10x and now the normal over a period of 3 mths. I was sent to a Hepatologist, who threw my case in the bin. Oddly enough, I didn't have any symptoms or supporting Diagnosis of impending liver failure. (Just some Nos. that showed up in my annual Diabetes II assessment.)
Problem is, it's hooked up to my GP's Clinic, whereas the other Path Lab is hooked up to the Rad Onc Clinical Trial "show".
I say trust nobody!
-Please reply to group as my email addr is fake!
-Regards CC
Heather - 23 Aug 2007 00:34 GMT Hi Clarence.....
It looks like you and Ron are following the same routine. He goes tomorrow to get blood drawn and then to the hospital oncologist in a week. We too are on a *watchful waiting* course now due to the ADT *kicking his butt*, as Steve K. says.
In March of this year, his PSA was 0.08, up from 0.05 in Sept. 2006. I think Dr. Loblaw said they let it get as high as 10.0 before kicking in with another round of Zoladex. No more Casodex for the next time, he said.
Cheers....Heather
> Hello all > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > -Regards CC ron - 23 Aug 2007 01:54 GMT > Hi Clarence..... > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Clarence, Heather & Ron...If the SEs from Lupron and/or casodex (or their analogues) are "kicking anyone's butt" consider discussing transdermal estrogen therapy with your onc. It may be a reasonable alternative both in terms of SEs and PCa efficacy. Further, there may be some advantage in terms of delaying androgen indepent PCa, by rotating through different ADT regimens. Again, it's probably at least worth discussing if SEs limit implementation of the current ADT package...ron
Heather - 23 Aug 2007 04:31 GMT >> Hi Clarence..... >> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > least worth discussing if SEs limit implementation of the current ADT > package...ron Hi Ron.....I did discuss using estrogen with him well over a year ago just in a general way, and while I can't remember the exact wording, he did not agree with using it. I am not sure whether he feels there could be more problems using it than not.....or that it didn't do enough to relieve the SE's. If I think of it, I will ask his opinion again next week.
Ron was understandably nervous about coming off the ADT, but is now very glad he did. At least he has his energy back and is no longer so depressed. For him, intermittent ADT seems to be the answer so far.
Thanks.....Heather (and Ron)
BH - 23 Aug 2007 15:56 GMT I was on Casodex for over 9 months and stopped for a one-month "experiment" two weeks ago. I, too, am glad I stopped. I feel SO much better..... But, I'll have to talk with the Doc at the end of the month to decide what to do next.
What sort of intermittent schedule is Ron on, or considering? (How long on / off?)
Thanks,
Burney
>Ron was understandably nervous about coming off the ADT, but is now very >glad he did. At least he has his energy back and is no longer so >depressed. For him, intermittent ADT seems to be the answer so far. > >Thanks.....Heather (and Ron) Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com
WhiteSoxFan - 23 Aug 2007 18:18 GMT I've been off of ADT for 7 months now. Man-o-man what a difference. I took myself off of the clinical trial that was supposed to last 24 months. I got as far as 8 months before I pulled the Zoladex and Casodex plug. I qualified for the trial with my Gleason of 8 and my <0.1 PSA at my first blood test. Since my RP in January of 06 I've been recording PSAs of <0.1 including this last one a week ago. I hate talking about this for fear of jinxing my good fortune for the last year and a half but I do want to contribute when the subject warrants it.
Todd
BH - 23 Aug 2007 18:53 GMT I'm wishing you all the best, Todd. After more than 9 months on Casodex, I'm having a serious debate with myself over quality of life concerns.
Burney
>I've been off of ADT for 7 months now. Man-o-man what a difference. I >took myself off of the clinical trial that was supposed to last 24 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Todd Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com
BH - 23 Aug 2007 19:59 GMT I should have mentioned that after 9 months on Casodex, I've now been off for two weeks - and I feel GREAT! Thoughts of going back on are not appealing!
Burney
>I'm wishing you all the best, Todd. After more than 9 months on >Casodex, I'm having a serious debate with myself over quality of life [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com
Heather - 23 Aug 2007 21:52 GMT Super!! I think Ron was at the 0.1 level last March......Steve Kramer can check and let me know. If Ron is still at that number, we will be very happy!!!!
Cheers.....Heather
> I've been off of ADT for 7 months now. Man-o-man what a difference. I > took myself off of the clinical trial that was supposed to last 24 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Todd Steve Kramer - 24 Aug 2007 01:35 GMT > Super!! I think Ron was at the 0.1 level last March......Steve Kramer can > check and let me know. If Ron is still at that number, we will be very > happy!!!! off Casodex (11/05), PSA 1.0 (9/06), .08 (3/07)
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Heather - 23 Aug 2007 21:51 GMT Hi Burney.....
Just got back from Toronto where our cancer hospital is (there are 2 major cancer centres in that city, plus others).
Ron was on Zoladex and Casodex from October of 2004 until Xmas of 2005. Dr. Loblaw took him off Megace (for hot flashes) and Casodex at that time, but Ron was too nervous to quit the shots so had one more which lasted until mid February of 2006. So he has been off all of the ADT stuff for 18 months. It took about 7 months for his testosterone to start rising again and it is now normal, I assume. I will check all of the numbers if you wish.
His PSA had been at less than 0.02 for all of the time on the ADT, but he suffered badly from total weakness and couldn't do anything. Plus he kept passing out when it was hot in the summer.
The medical oncologist in this City (we are on the outskirts of Toronto) insisted Ron HAD to stay on the ADT and I insisted he DID NOT!! Male doctors don't like that....(VBG)
I called up Sunnybrook and told our original radiation oncologist what was going on and the fact that this doctor was not adhering to the strict 90 day interval between shots, etc., so we were back down and under his wing immediately!!!! Dr. Loblaw is a brilliant research oncologist and has worked at both major cancer hospitals. I trust him 200%.
He immediately took Ron off all ADT as I said above, and said we would just do 6 month checks on his PSA and T levels and address any problems if and when they arose. He did quote a number and I believe he said they could let his PSA get up close to 10 before putting him back on Zoladex.
So we saw a slight rise in his PSA (up to 0.05) last Sept. which was 7 months after the shot wore off. But I also saw a MAJOR physical and mental change in him..... my old Ron was back again. He hated the way he looked and felt. I can't read my writing properly, but it did show another slight rise in March of this year. Not sure where it will be as of today. But no point in worrying about it.
Ron is a bit of a mystery to the prostate cancer doctors due to his rather bizarre PSA rise in the summer of 2004 (a year after HDR radiation treatment). At that time he went from 11 to over 25 in 3 months and once they checked everything out (ultra sound, bone scan, x-rays.....nada showed up) they put him on ADT and he plummeted to 0.02 immediately.
So we are on an undefined period of watchful waiting. He is OK with that now that he feels like his old self and understands that he may have to go back on it some day. But Dr. L. felt that this was also a good thing because it lengthened out the effectiveness of the ADT. The thought also crossed my mind that at 75 years old, his Testosterone levels are probably naturally lessening......yet another good thing.
Hope this helps and wasn't too long and involved. If memory serves me right, Dr. Loblaw felt the Casodex was harder on him than the Zoladex, but I could be wrong.
Cheers.......Heather
>I was on Casodex for over 9 months and stopped for a one-month > "experiment" two weeks ago. I, too, am glad I stopped. I feel SO [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com
|
|
|