> One year after SRT my PSA is heading north again. I was hoping I see
> my nadir or at least stay level. I suppose I'll be in monitoring mode
> for awhile. Anyone know when another adjuvant therapy would be
> warranted? I presume if did any it would be hormonal? Any new
> treatment for people in this position?
Good to hear from you again, Dominic. It's been almost a year. I sure wish
you had come back with some good news. Dammit!!
To answer your question, "no." There is nothing other than hormone therapy
as the next step, or at least nothing that is universally or widely
accepted. There are a few doctors who, in your circumstance, are hitting it
fast and hard with various combinations of chemo and ADT.
I certainly see that as a legitimate attempt at killing the bastard for
someone who had positive margins and Gleason 8 cancer. If you accept the
theory that ADT is a stop-gap measure to prolong one's life for several
years, then it is often a decision as to whether you want to suffer the side
effects of ADT or the side effects of raging cancer. But, if you're
squarely in the bastard's sights with T4 / Gleason 8, 9 or 10 cancer,
especially if your PSA is still measure in tenths, then I think an agressive
approach just might be the ticket.
You will not need your rad onc, however. You will need a general
oncologist. Your radiation days are over, save for a few treatments for
paliative treatment if and when tumors are noted in areas on whcih the
radiation and be focused.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007)
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
DominicM - 19 Aug 2007 12:10 GMT
> > One year after SRT my PSA is heading north again. I was hoping I see
> > my nadir or at least stay level. I suppose I'll be in monitoring mode
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks Steve.... I am hoping the number is a fluke or if it's real
that it settles down again to <0.1 but given this doubling factor (my
Gleason) I suspect it's not good to deliberate too long? I guess I
need to dust off the med onc names again. :(
Steve Kramer - 19 Aug 2007 21:37 GMT
> Thanks Steve.... I am hoping the number is a fluke or if it's real
> that it settles down again to <0.1 but given this doubling factor (my
> Gleason) I suspect it's not good to deliberate too long? I guess I
> need to dust off the med onc names again. :(
It all seems to be some kind of game, doesn't it? We all have the pieces
and when it's our turn, we have place it in line with the last piece. If
you cheat and skip a piece, you have to go ahead two pieces and you finish
the game sooner.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007)
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
On August 18, Dominic wrote:
> One year after SRT my PSA is heading north again. I was hoping I see
> my nadir or at least stay level. I suppose I'll be in monitoring mode
> for awhile. Anyone know when another adjuvant therapy would be
> warranted? I presume if did any it would be hormonal? Any new
> treatment for people in this position?
If ADT was previously successful in reducing PSA, it would seem
reasonable to try it again if/when PSA rises to whatever is selected as
the "trigger point."
As for what to select as "trigger point," I think that that depends upon
the history. Generally, I would recommend from my amateur's viewpoint
that the higher the beginning Gleason, the lower should be the PSA at
which to restart ADT. This would seem to be applicable here.
If the PSA does not react sufficiently to the ADT, I believe that that
would be the time to consider chemotherapy, as the PCa likely would have
become
androgen-independent.
It would be best to discuss this with a *medical* oncologist.
Preferably a med onc who is one of the few who are expert in tx of PCa.
Something that could prove very helpful is to post a Prostate Cancer
Digest on Physician to Patient (P2P), along with questions. A
well-qualified PCa specialist should respond within a few days. See
http://www.prostatepointers.org/mlist/mlist.html
Regards,
Steve J
"We must tailor the treatment to the nature of the disease. We must
listen to the biology."
-- Stephen B. Strum, MD
Alan Meyer - 18 Aug 2007 20:13 GMT
> ...
> It would be best to discuss this with a *medical* oncologist.
> Preferably a med onc who is one of the few who are expert in tx of PCa.
> ...
Medical treatment is so incredibly technical and specialized these
days that I wonder how many medical oncologists are really up
on all the complexities of hormone therapy: first line vs. second
line, continuous vs. intermittent, single vs. double vs. triple
androgen blockade, ideal target testosterone levels, management
of side effects, tests for adverse effects in the liver or elsewhere,
early vs. middle vs. late initiation of treatment, etc., etc., etc.
So I'm inclined to think Steve's advice here is right on the money.
Try to find a doctor who really knows hormone therapy in and out
if you can. It might also be a good idea to bone up on the issues
yourself. I remember that Strum's book had a lot about it. I don't
know if there's anything later or better.
And hang in there. You've been dealt a nasty hand, but you've
been fighting hard and there's still some potent weapons in
the medical arsenal with more coming down the pike.
Best of luck.
Alan
DominicM - 19 Aug 2007 12:12 GMT
> > ...
> > It would be best to discuss this with a *medical* oncologist.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Alan
Thanks Alan.... I am in slight denial here in that I hope the number
is aberration but I am sure I'll be retested and then if the number is
true then I have some decisions to make. Stay tuned.
DominicM - 19 Aug 2007 12:17 GMT
> On August 18, Dominic wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> listen to the biology."
> -- Stephen B. Strum, MD
ADT is new to me as I've only had RP & Radiation. I guess I'll have
to say good bye to my
rad onc and hello to a med onc. Thanks for the suggestions and link.
I'll keep you posted.
DominicM - 19 Aug 2007 12:19 GMT
> On August 18, Dominic wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> listen to the biology."
> -- Stephen B. Strum, MD
ADT is new to me as I've only had RP & Radiation. I guess I'll have
to say good bye to my rad onc and hello to a med onc. Thanks for the
suggestions and link. I'll keep you posted.
DominicM - 19 Aug 2007 12:25 GMT
> On August 18, Dominic wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> listen to the biology."
> -- Stephen B. Strum, MD
Thanks Steve. ADT is new to me as I've only had RP & Radiation. I
guess I'll have
to say good bye to my rad onc and hello to a med onc. I appreciate the
suggestions and link.
I'll keep you posted.
MAS - 20 Aug 2007 02:04 GMT
Dominic,
If you can find one, look for a Medical Oncologist that specializes in
Prostate Cancer. Both of my Radiation Oncologist made that suggestion. They
both pointed out that the key was someone who knew PCa backwards and
forwards.
In my case, I went very aggressive and went to a medical Oncologist who is
not in private practice - he has been in academia for 28 years researching
Prostate and Kidney Cancers; ie, Genitourinary Cancers - and enrolled in a
clinical trial immediately.
Good luck, never hurts to take an aggressive approach...
Gourd Dancer
>> On August 18, Dominic wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> suggestions and link.
> I'll keep you posted.