Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2007
Another soon-to-be joining the club
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Harold - 05 Aug 2007 19:53 GMT Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it goes along. The more we know of others experince the better it is for us when wrestling with this disease, I figure.
I'm 60 years old, in moderate weight range, pretty healthy, the normal high BP middle aged male, married for 38 years, retired and cruising along enjoying life. I have had a few episodes with prostate infections 8 to 10 years ago. My PSA level has floated around from 3.8 to 4.2 for probably 10 years now. I have monitored it, along with my other blood tests each six months.
In April, my family doctor tested again and it came back 7.6. He immedialtely referred me on to a Urologist/Surgeon who specializes in this disease and has a high surgical experience rate. Young guy, but they all are nowdays...lol. He puts me onto a 3 week high dose Cipro (?) antibiotic and anti-inflammatory course, followed by 3 weeks of rest to allow the drugs to leave my system, then another PSA test. This recheck came back 6.7. During the initial exam with the DRE he commented that my Prostate was grossly enlarged and this 'might' be the cause of the elevated PSA, hence the antibiotics try first. Nothing was felt digitally during the DRE.
With the recheck of 6.7, he did a biopsy in July. He got 16 samples, (the last 6 were painful, Novacaine or not, let me tell you). The ultrasound mapping revealed a 76 cc. Prostate. Pathology reported 3 cancerous top to bottom, center of left lobe, Gleason 3/3:6. He setup an appointment for Reporting and Consultation 3 weeks later, July 30th.
During this consult, he reviewed the results of the biopsy, including how it was interperted ( a team of 4 Pathologists, 2 from the same office, 2 from another group) individually looked and scaled it GS 3/3:6. He said it probably had been developing for a year or 2, so it was caught early. He said that it indicated that it was still enclosed, and the 5 years cancer free formula was 80 to 100% chance for this type situation. He gave a through review and instruction of the various options of treatment, really detailing the good and the bad of each. I had spent countless hours on the computer reading and gathering others experiences and information, so I was able to follow along well, plus he had given me plenty of booklets and such at the biopsy, in case. At the end of it all, he asked me to consider it all, not to rush into a decision and to let him know how I wanted to proceed. I took a week and made a decision for conventional Radical Prostatectomy. This will include seminal vessels and abdominal lymph node removal. He wanted me to wait 3 months to do it, for biopsy healing and such, but I managed to get him down to 7 weeks. I have plans for life this winter, and didn't want to wait that long. It'd been fine with me to have done it the next day, as far as I was concerned. I am scheduled for the surgery Sept. 24th. In the meantime, I am learning patience, on a diet to lose a few pounds, have begun a more rigorious exercise program, with weights and abs workouts added. He said these things would speed recovery and even make the surgery easier for both of us. Also, while he has me there, he will repair a moderate hernia that is just 1 1/2 inch from the proposed incision line. So, I get a 2fer....lol
I have read lots of peoples stories in the weeks since I first started with this, and must say that I am surprised by my reaction, as opposed to some peoples strong reaction to their disease. I may be denying a lot, but I am approaching this as a serious health situation, but one that can be fixed reasonably easy, as long as it remains inside the Prostate and it is all removed with the surgery. I won't know with any certainity until it is over and the post-surgery pathology is done on what is removed. If it hasn't remained encapsulated, then that opens a whole new arena for me that I will have to begin dealing with.
My wife is supportive, and is taking it all good so far. She tries not to worry, but I overhear her at times talking to family and friends, and detect some worry and stress, but she seems to be adjusting to the new world we live in ok. She says her worst time will be waiting during the surgery, and she will relax more when it is complete and I am on the way to recovery. We have discussed the life style changes that may be in the future for us as a couple, and we will face them with whatever we need, as we come to them. We have a healthy active sex life now and hope/expect to have the same afterwards. If it must be in some altered form, then so be it.
I hope this is of interest to someone, I know my reading others experiences has helped me a great deal in adjusting to this new reality for me. I will add to the story as it unfolds.
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery Sept. 07: CRP scheduled
Richbro - 05 Aug 2007 22:27 GMT Harold,
As several have said here, welcome to the club no one wants to be a member. Your story is well written and very relatable. I am 60 yrs old at the moment although I'm 3-1/2 years into this crazy battle. It sounds like you're doing all the right things - there is so much information to absorb and our first instinct is to take action. Good luck and keep us informed.
Rich
Steve Jordan - 05 Aug 2007 23:54 GMT (snip)
> In April, my family doctor tested again and it came back 7.6. He > immedialtely referred me on to a Urologist/Surgeon who specializes in [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > an appointment for Reporting and Consultation 3 weeks later, July > 30th. The healthy prostate gland produces prostate-specific antigen. Questions arise when the amount detected by test exceeds that "normal" amount.
A 76cc prostate will express 5.016 ng/mL of normal or benign PSA. The formula is gland volume x 0.066 = benign PSA. See Strum & Pogliano _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ and/or the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) at http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/riskases/Strum_StrategyOfSuccess2.html
In this case it appears that Harold's excess PSA was roughly 1.7 ng/mL.
> During this consult, he reviewed the results of the biopsy, including > how it was interperted ( a team of 4 Pathologists, 2 from the same > office, 2 from another group) individually looked and scaled it GS > 3/3:6. He said it probably had been developing for a year or 2, so it > was caught early. Unless the "team" had at least one expert prostate pathologist on board, I would recommend that the Gleason score be validated by such an expert. It is a "second opinion" and is doubtless covered by insurance and Medicare. In any case, the cost is only about $350, which is a good price IMO for the assurance that the Gleason score is reliable as confirmed by an expert. Why is this important? Because everything that is done from this point forward is absolutely dependent upon the accuracy and reliability of that score.
Here is a list of such labs: Bostwick Laboratories [800] 214-6628 Dianon Laboratories [800] 328-2666 (select 5 for client services) Jon Epstein (Hopkins) [410] 955-5043 or [410] 955-2162 David Grignon (Michigan) [313] 745-2520 Jon Oppenheimer (Tennessee) [888] 868-7522 UroCor, Inc. [800] 411-1839
They will require that the local samples (which in civilized jurisdictions are the property of the *patient*) including the paraffin block be sent to them. This can be arranged.
Anecdote (take it for what it's worth): My second opinion on my second biopsy was done by Bostwick. Verrrry interesting result, which the local hospital lab failed to address.
> I took a week and made a decision for conventional Radical > Prostatectomy. This will include seminal vessels and abdominal lymph > node removal. If the cancer is "encapsulated" I have to wonder why the excision of lymph nodes. That sounds as if the uro suspects that they are involved. Did he explain the side effects, such as possible lymphedema?
(snip)
> I have read lots of peoples stories in the weeks since I first started > with this, and must say that I am surprised by my reaction, as opposed > to some peoples strong reaction to their disease. I may be denying a > lot, but I am approaching this as a serious health situation, but one > that can be fixed reasonably easy, as long as it remains inside the > Prostate and it is all removed with the surgery. Maybe, maybe not. Sorry to seem pessimistic; or is it realistic? Roughly 30% of RP patients recur and require further treatment (tx).
> I won't know with > any certainity until it is over and the post-surgery pathology is done > on what is removed. If it hasn't remained encapsulated, then that > opens a whole new arena for me that I will have to begin dealing with. And that will remain uncertain for some months. Take one step at a time and have Plan B ready.
(snip)
> I hope this is of interest to someone, I know my reading others > experiences has helped me a great deal in adjusting to this new > reality for me. Caution: We must not rely upon the experiences of others as any forecast of our own results. We are all different, especially with regard to our disease. What helps Harold might harm Steve. And vice versa. Personal anecdotes should be taken with a very large grain of salt.
Regards,
Steve J
"As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data." -- Charles L. "Snuffy" Myers, MD Medical oncologist. PCa survivor.
Harold - 06 Aug 2007 04:05 GMT >> With the recheck of 6.7, he did a biopsy in July. He got 16 samples, >> (the last 6 were painful, Novacaine or not, let me tell you). The [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >In this case it appears that Harold's excess PSA was roughly 1.7 ng/mL. In laymans terms, what does this indicate? Does this negate the biopsy results in any way? or change the GS scoring?
>> During this consult, he reviewed the results of the biopsy, including >> how it was interperted ( a team of 4 Pathologists, 2 from the same >> office, 2 from another group) individually looked and scaled it GS >> 3/3:6. He said it probably had been developing for a year or 2, so it >> was caught early. <snip>
>> I took a week and made a decision for conventional Radical >> Prostatectomy. This will include seminal vessels and abdominal lymph [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >lymph nodes. That sounds as if the uro suspects that they are involved. >Did he explain the side effects, such as possible lymphedema? Dunno, maybe as a preventative, I'll check back and see why.
>> I have read lots of peoples stories in the weeks since I first started >> with this, and must say that I am surprised by my reaction, as opposed [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Maybe, maybe not. Sorry to seem pessimistic; or is it realistic? Roughly >30% of RP patients recur and require further treatment (tx). I understand the percentages, and am concentrating on it being still encapsulated. If not, I will deal with that when it occurs. I feel I am being realistic, considering the higher percentage of patients who do not suffer a recurrance.
>> I won't know with >> any certainity until it is over and the post-surgery pathology is done [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >And that will remain uncertain for some months. Take one step at a time >and have Plan B ready. Understood and in place, as much as can be at this early stage.
>> I hope this is of interest to someone, I know my reading others >> experiences has helped me a great deal in adjusting to this new [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >disease. What helps Harold might harm Steve. And vice versa. Personal >anecdotes should be taken with a very large grain of salt. No, but we can learn from other experiences and have 'some' idea of what is ahead for us as we come to grips with this disease. I was really concerned about incontience, until I read of some of the experiences here. They helped me to realize just what is involved and I won't now be as upset if I follow the curve of most I read about. I will be a little more prepared for more adverse results.
>Regards, > >Steve J Thanks Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Alan Meyer - 06 Aug 2007 17:35 GMT >>Maybe, maybe not. Sorry to seem pessimistic; or is it realistic? Roughly >>30% of RP patients recur and require further treatment (tx). [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > am being realistic, considering the higher percentage of patients who > do not suffer a recurrance. Harold,
I think Steve's numbers are general averages developed over a period of many years.
Your own odds may be substantially better than that for several reasons. First, you caught it very early. Second, your Gleason score of 3+3 (assuming it's accurate - as Steve said, there is some tendency to undergrade biopsy slides) puts you in a group that has much lower risk of recurrence. And third (I'm not sure of this) it may be that surgical techniques have improved some since the averages were computed.
Some men with your disease characteristics might even try watchful waiting. But since you're only 60 years old and might well live another 25 years or more, it seems to me very wise to get this treated. The odds that the cancer will turn dangerous sometime during the next 25 years are very high.
One good thing to come out of this is that, with your prostate removed, you should no longer suffer from prostatitis. I had radiation instead of surgery and, although I'm generally quite happy with my decision, I still do get bouts of prostatitis from time to time.
Best of luck to you.
Alan
Hãrõlð - 06 Aug 2007 18:27 GMT >>>Maybe, maybe not. Sorry to seem pessimistic; or is it realistic? Roughly >>>30% of RP patients recur and require further treatment (tx). [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Alan Thanks for the info. I hadn't had the prostatitis in 8 years, but will admit that I have secretly contemplated maybe not having my sleep interrupted for the hourly trip to pee that I have done for several years now. lol
 Signature Hãrõlð "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups" E-Mail munged--Remove the obvious
Steve Jordan - 06 Aug 2007 19:29 GMT Quoting me:
>> A 76cc prostate will express 5.016 ng/mL of normal or benign PSA. The >> formula is gland volume x 0.066 = benign PSA. See Strum & Pogliano _A [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> In this case it appears that Harold's excess PSA was roughly 1.7 ng/mL. He inquired:
> In laymans terms, what does this indicate? Does this negate the > biopsy results in any way? or change the GS scoring? I am sorry if I alarmed Harold. I did the calculation because I was curious, due to the size of the prostate, how much of the reported PSA was from normal tissue.
With regard to the clinical situation, I do not believe that what I reported has any relevance.
Regards,
Steve J
I.P. Freely - 06 Aug 2007 21:12 GMT > I was > really concerned about incontience, until I read of some of the > experiences here. They helped me to realize just what is involved and > I won't now be as upset if I follow the curve of most I read about. Every time I swap pads I thank my lucky stars it's just yellow -- or, if I'm properly hydrated, clear -- rather than brown. When I told a rad onc of that preference three years ago, she immediately recommended surgery, even though that denied her rad-only clinic my business.
I.P.
I.P. Freely - 06 Aug 2007 03:56 GMT > I took a week and made a decision for conventional Radical > Prostatectomy. This will include seminal vessels and abdominal lymph [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > on what is removed. If it hasn't remained encapsulated, then that > opens a whole new arena for me that I will have to begin dealing with. Exactly where I was three years ago ... stuff happens, you deal with it, more stuff happens, you deal with that, more stuff ... No point getting too far ahead of ourselves; hypotheticals could drive ya nuts. And, yes, it's great to find docs who understand that we have lives to live and schedules to live 'em on even if we *are* old retired farts.
I.P.
Paul - 06 Aug 2007 12:34 GMT >Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of >special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] >July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery >Sept. 07: CRP scheduled Harold ,
Good luck to you. I'm coming up on two months post op and fresh from much of what you are going through. I too opted for surgery, specifically robotic surgery. I was extremely pleased with small incisions, no blood transfusion and fast recovery. The catheter ended up being the worst of it. If you explore it, I would urge you to find a surgeon who specializes in it and has a good number of procedures under his belt.
I've been fully continent since 10 days post catheter removal and using Zoom's terminology, on some days I'm 40% wood without any medication. Start thinking Kegels :)
 Signature PSA @ 45 yrs. = 4.7 02/06/2007 Biopsy 03/16/2007 G7(3+4),T2c RLRP 06/12/2007 G7(3+4),T2cN0M0 Neg margins PSA 7/16/2007 = <0.1
chasjac - 06 Aug 2007 15:25 GMT Hello, Harold:
Thanks for the the story. Everything you wrote sounds pretty much within the usual bounds. And you've got a great attitude about it all. One of my colleagues here was diagnosed a month or so after my LRP, and has had his surgery in turn back in May. He was in much better shape physically than I was, and his recovery has been much more rapid, with fewer side effects. Makes me wish I had done more before the surgery.
My wife has kept a stiff upper lip throughout, but I know it's gotten to her at times, even though she tries not to show it. It's just a measure of how much they love us. And now that I'm through it and the results are encouraging, she's a lot less stressed. So, it's temporary.
Good luck, and please keep us posted on how it all goes.
--charlie
Hãrõlð - 06 Aug 2007 18:28 GMT >Hello, Harold: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >--charlie Thanks, Charlie....
 Signature Hãrõlð "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups" E-Mail munged--Remove the obvious
I.P. Freely - 06 Aug 2007 21:24 GMT > He was in much > better shape physically than I was, and his recovery has been much > more rapid, with fewer side effects. Makes me wish I had done more > before the surgery. A doc fixed my inguinal surgery decades ago, knowing he's probably need to fix the other side soon. Sure enough, did the other side a year later. They meant day in the hospital then, so I was eager to recover. I asked him whether conditioning before surgery or physical therapy after surgery would affect recovery. He said, "No. *I* fix you; that other stuff is not a factor as long as you're not a physical wreck."
I did nothing special before or after the first surgery, then busted my living chops before and after the second, identical surgery. The recoveries were as different as night and day in every regard. The doc dismissed that with, "I see that range in recoveries in individuals people all the time even if they do nothing different between left and right hernia repairs.
I'm not convinced.
I.P.
mdrawson - 06 Aug 2007 17:49 GMT Harold,
A couple of suggestions your may want to consider (if you aren't already):
You didn't mention if your surgery was via standard incision or robotic. If it's available, you should go with the robotic since the incisions are minor and recovery is much faster and virtually pain-free (at least mine was). And being less intrusive, there is less chance of severe bleeding. I assume when you allude to lymph-node removal, your doc is talking about sampling the nodes for in-surgery biopsy (as opposed to removing the nodes in their entirety).
As you are getting toned up for this, you should be sure to include an increasingly rigourous Kegel exercise routine (unless your hernia situation precludes those exercises). Post-surgical Kegel exercises can be critical to your post-surgical incontinence recovery, and getting the muscles toned up in advance helps even more.
Continence and sexual functions vary widely by individual, both in terms of extent of recover and length of time involved. Your approach of take-it-as-it-comes is very reasonable and wise, Best of luck.
> Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of > special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] > July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery > Sept. 07: CRP scheduled Harold - 06 Aug 2007 18:35 GMT >Harold, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >extent of recover and length of time involved. Your approach of >take-it-as-it-comes is very reasonable and wise, Best of luck. Thanks. The surgery will be conventional retropubic. The robotic is not available locally, it's 300 miles away at Vanderbilt. It isn't really realistic for me to go there, for several reasons I won't go into here. I have confidence that my surgeon can/will do as good a job, and am willing to trade off the recovery time to stay local.
I've been in the Kegels for a month now, those things can be difficult to keep up after a while. I didn't know I could get so sore from it. Probably most of it comes from the biospy still being relatively fresh.
>> Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of >> special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> along enjoying life. I have had a few episodes with prostate >> infections 8 to 10 years ago. My PSA level has floated around from Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Steve Jordan - 06 Aug 2007 19:40 GMT On august 6, Harold wrote, in pertinent part:
> I've been in the Kegels for a month now, those things can be difficult > to keep up after a while. I didn't know I could get so sore from it. > Probably most of it comes from the biospy still being relatively > fresh. Soreness may be a sign of excessive exercise.
I heard the head of the urology department at the local Mayo Hospital tell a man who inquired about soreness that he was overdoing it. Like any other muscle, those being exercised can be damaged by overstressing them.
The uro may have the answer.
Regards,
Steve J
Harold - 06 Aug 2007 20:12 GMT >On august 6, Harold wrote, in pertinent part: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Steve J Makes sense, thanks. I'll slack off a little and see if it changes... Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
I.P. Freely - 06 Aug 2007 21:36 GMT > I have confidence that my surgeon can/will do as good a > job, and am willing to trade off the recovery time to stay local. Considering how many times I've been back for consultations before and after my surgery and the week I spent in the recover ward (dual surgery), being close mattered a lot to me, too, given the good reputation of my surgeon and hospital. Our 220-mile, mostly traffic-free, 3-hours-on-cruise-control is a piece of cake compared to some major trip a few times a year.
OTOH, what if Walsh or Scardino or Whoever had left me dry? I'll never know, but my surgeon says I'm one of his first continence failures and can't explain it besides the fact that I'm not Kegeling like a machine and am very active physically.
But I still fail to see what good Schwartzeneggerian pelvic floor muscles can do when the "Kegel!" command isn't issued because the leak isn't perceived.
I.P.
ron - 06 Aug 2007 19:00 GMT On Aug 6, 10:49 am, "mdrawson" <mdraw...@cox.net> wrote...snip...
> Harold, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > and recovery is much faster and virtually pain-free (at least mine was). > And being less intrusive, there is less chance of severe bleeding. It's not clear to me that robotic has a significant advantage over open RP, in fact it may be the other way around. While reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, smaller incision sound appealing, the point of the procedure is to remove the cancer and so, at least for me, efficacy in removing the cancer was the basis for my decision. Robotic RP is still relatively new, so, to my knowledge, there are no published studies directly comparing the curative efficacies of the two procedures. So it is not clear whether the open procedure is better, equivalent or worse than the robotic procedure in terms of biochemical freedom from disease. Keep in mind that the surgical procedures and the tools and methods used to cut the surgical margin differ substantially between the two procedures. A number of papers have appeared suggesting that positive margin rates may be higher with the robotic procedure, particulalrly in cases where the tumor is apically located or when disease is more advanced.
As to factors such as blood loss, pain, recovery time, etc., etc., most studies find little difference between the two procedures for men with normal levels of health and fitness. The total length of the robotic incisions more or less equals the length of the incision in the open procedure...ron
A couple of points from recent articles:
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Do Minimally Invasive Approaches Offer Significant Advantages? Joseph A. Smith Jr and S. Duke Herrell Journal of Clinical Oncology(JCO),Nov. 10, 2005 "Separating hype from reality is sometimes difficult with many medical procedures and this is particularly applicable to RALP. Patients who appropriately research treatment options so that they can participate in their own medical decisions may have difficulty interpreting marketing efforts by hospitals and physicians. The lack of randomized trials or even balanced prospective studies limits the ability to analyze comparative results of RALP versus open surgical approaches." ------------------------ http://www.medscape.com/viewprogram/6653?src=mp "While some of the increased popularity of the robotic approach is justifiably due to the minimally invasive nature of the surgery, there is clearly also an element of marketing involved. Although robotic prostatectomy clearly holds promise in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and likely offers some advantages when compared with open surgery, the claims frequently made on its behalf -- better urinary and sexual outcomes, less pain, better cancer control and an overall superior healthcare experience -- are unsubstantiated." -------------------------- http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/507264?src=mp The positive surgical margin rate continues to be higher with laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy compared with the open approach. [54,69,70] It is unclear how this will translate into disease-free and overall survival, since the laparoscopic and robotic experience is still immature. Nonetheless, it is cause for concern. --------------------------- http://www.drcatalona.com/quest/quest_fall06_10.asp Question: I have been hearing a lot of good things about DaVinci Robotics for removing the prostate. I know that you do not practice the procedure, but what would you say about its benefits for preserving potency and continence? And which patients should consider it as a treatment alternative?
Answer: In my opinion, the robotic prostatectomy (often called the DaVinci prostatectomy) is not as effective as the traditional open prostatectomy for simultaneously accomplishing complete removal of cancer and preserving potency.
One of the reasons is that the robot lacks the "human touch" and it is not possible to appreciate how the prostate gland feels and how readily it separates from the nerves and other surrounding tissues. The robot does not handle the prostate gland as gently as the human hand, and not infrequently the robot punctures the capsule of the prostate, leading to positive surgical margins.
Another limitation is that with the robotic prostatectomy, the prostate is removed by burning it out with electrocautery or a so- called harmonic scalpel that cuts by heat, and if the heat is too near the nerves, it irreversibly damages them. Also, if the burning is too close to the prostate gland, it risks cutting into the prostate, resulting in positive surgical margins and possibly leaving cancer behind.
Advocates of robotic surgery say that there is less bleeding and greater magnification with robotic surgery. However, excellent magnification and visualization can be provided with open surgery, and with an experienced surgeon, few patients require blood transfusions from another person.
With robotic surgery, it is more difficult to suture and apply hemostatic clips and it is more difficult to perform a lymph node dissection.
Enthusiasts of the robotic procedure claim it is "less invasive" and has a quicker recovery time. But actually it is more invasive because the surgeon has to go through the peritoneal cavity to get to the prostate (a more invasive approach associated for greater risk for injury to the bowel, major blood vessels, and the ureters and a greater risk for later intestinal obstruction from adhesions). Usually 6 one-inch incisions are made for robotic surgery, while for open surgery, one 4 to 5 inch incision is made that does not enter into the peritoneal cavity. With the smaller incision now frequently used for open surgery, there is no material difference in the recovery time and return to normal activity. . .
The complications with robotic prostatectomy are more serious than with open prostatectomy and they lead to more postoperative emergency room visits, more re-hospitalizations, and more re-operations.
I believe that with the robotic or laparoscopic prostatectomy, the patient and the surgeon have to make more of a stark choice between removing all of the cancer or preserving the nerves to maintain potency. I believe that there is a greater likelihood of accomplishing both objects with the increased access provided by the open approach.
Most importantly, however, the robotic prostatectomy has no track record in terms of long-term cancer control. If small amounts of cancer are left behind, it may not become apparent for years.
Patients sometimes tell me that they know someone who underwent a robotic prostatectomy a few months ago and seems to be doing fine. However, the final outcome of the operation may not become apparent for up to 10 years. Thus, long-term cancer cure rates are needed before one can truly evaluate the effectiveness of the operation.
In sum, I do not believe the robotic prostatectomy is as safe a cancer operation as open radical prostatectomy, and I do not believe that nerve sparing can be as readily or safely accomplished. For patients, the most important outcomes of radical prostatectomy are: Is he cured of his cancer? Is he continent? Can he have erections sufficient for intercourse?
These questions have been well documented for open prostatectomy. The jury is still out with laparoscopic/robotic prostatectomy.
The most important factor is the surgeon and not the technique.
Alan Meyer - 07 Aug 2007 01:20 GMT > http://www.drcatalona.com/quest/quest_fall06_10.asp > Question: I have been hearing a lot of good things about DaVinci [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Answer: < ... many advantages of open surgery elided ... >
> The most important factor is the surgeon and not the technique. This is always an important consideration. From what I have read, I wonder if a great and highly experienced surgeon working with a razor blade and a steak knife won't do a better job than a klutz with the latest tools.
Or, to borrow a page from Lance Armstrong, "It's not about the Bike".
Alan
Steve Kramer - 09 Aug 2007 00:56 GMT I'm a little behind in my reading, Harold, but welcome to the club!
 Signature <mungedNOTTHIS@ORTHISmyrealbox.com> wrote in message news:840cb3d7cfmpo2uf0uk5jfv7nrv2h4peuq@4ax.com...
> Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of > special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] > July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery > Sept. 07: CRP scheduled Zoom - 09 Aug 2007 02:37 GMT Hi Harold, You and I have VERY similar statistics. Gleason 6 pre-op, 60 years old - I'm 12 weeks out from my RRP w/ PSA now undetectable. I also had some prostatitis in my 40s & 50s & had a 72cc whopper that was starting to give me all the classic BPH problems. My uro with 2000 prostatectomies in his resume strongly suggested radical rather than DaVinci, because with our size of a gland he could do a better job bringing it out through a larger opening rather than the smaller robotic incision. I'm very glad I went with a radical because he did see &/or feel cancer at my margin, so he took extra tissue in that area. My recovery has been very good & I lucked out being dry the day of catheter removal. My wife was with me every minute for a week after I came out of the recovery room, so I'm eternally grateful for her love and help through it all. The great cosmic irony is that this cures your BPH! You MUST read through the following famous Post-Prostatectomy-Paraphernalia list that our fellow club member Joe Price has compiled for the newsgroup - I include it because it, more than any other single thing, helped me through this ordeal. Of course, the Scardino & Walsh books too, but this list was invaluable! Good luck my comrade. We're here for you. Z. Age 60 PSA: 4.8 pre-biopsy 4/5/07: Biopsy: Gleason: 3+3, Stage T1c 5/22/07: RRP, Pathology: Gleason 3+4, Stage T2c Positive margin, both nerves spared, no lymph or s.v. involvement 6/4/07: Cath out, dry, no leaks. 7/05/07: 1st post-RP PSA: undetectable (measured <.04) ............................................................................
Post Prostatectomy Paraphernalia by Joe Price: I compiled this shopping list of paraphernalia that would be good to have on hand when you get back from surgery. I started the list in September 2001 before my own operation based on responses I got to a request here for suggestions. Thanks to all those who helped put this list together way back then.
Since then I have re-posted periodically it to make it available to the newly diagnosed. Occasionally, additional items are suggested and I try to remember to add them next time I post this message.
One thing I would like to make clear up front - the list is exhaustive because I have included almost everything everyone has ever suggested. This does NOT mean you should run out and buy everything on this list. Some of these items are in the "luxury - nice to have" category and others are specific remedies some individuals found they needed for complaints that may have been specific to them.
Read through the list and at least think about what is here and what its purpose is. Get creative in thinking how you might adapt something you already have around the house to function in the place of some of these items.
Certain activities, not strictly hardware items, were recommended frequently. I've included those activities as well.
I am not a doctor and this is NOT medical advice! (However, I AM a geologist so maybe this qualifies as a form of geological advice...)
Hardware: - A pair of oversized basketball type warm-up pants with snaps or zipper up the leg (to allow discreet access to the catheter and bag). Get a pair that is large enough to accommodate the large (night) bags and smaller (walking) bags - that will be provided by the hospital. A dark colour will be less likely to show wetness from any accidental leakage compared with a light colour. Fast drying material ("parachute material") is recommended if possible. This is not essential. - I have found convertible hiking pants (pants whose lower leg can be zippered off to create a pair of shorts) to work wonderfully well while wearing a catheter. This type of pant also has a side zipper on the lower leg, which makes leg bag access a breeze. You can open the upper zipper (the one that runs around the leg) part-way to switch bags and let out the hose to the large drain bag. - A five-gallon plastic bucket is very useful at night as a receptacle for the large night bag. The bucket may become your constant companion around the house. Get a square one if you don't already have something else. - "Invalid" cushion (looks like an inner tube) - Antibiotic ointment/lubricant (Polysporin, for example) for where catheter exits (some had this supplied by their hospital). Some recommend a water-based lubricant such as KY Jelly but that tends to dry out quickly. Get gauze 4X4 pads to apply ointment. There has been some debate about the best fluid to use. You want something slick, long lasting and certain not to damage the tube. It would be nice if it were also antibacterial. I used Polysporin and Erythromycin with no problem. Polyfax ointment is a name to look for if you live outside North America. - Alcohol swabs to clean the catheter at the tip of the penis (single use wipes designed for cleaning the skin before an injection). - A pair of slippers or sandals or loafers. - Over-the-counter stool softener - Get a haircut and trim your toenails before surgery - Several people recommended buying, borrowing or otherwise acquiring the use of a reclining chair. - Place a chair by the bed with the back facing the bed. Use the chair as a bedrail to help you get up. Use the seat as a bedside table to hold some of the things you want to keep handy. I would STRONGLY suggest you test this out BEFORE you go to hospital to be certain it can take your weight as a handrail before you rely on it post-surgery! - A pillow to hug early on to ease pain in laughing etc. - A pillow to put between your knees while sleeping on your side. - Grab bars in the area of the commode (don't use towel racks for grab bars!) - Use a plastic coat hanger stuck between the mattress and box spring to hang the bag from or just place it in the bucket on the floor. - Nice baggy, soft sweat pants or warm-ups - oversize with drawstring if the weather is warm inside the house or out of doors - A soft bathrobe belt to make a shoulder strap to suspended the big bag if you prefer it to the "walking" bag. -. Silk/nylon/rayon boxer shorts for the period you have the catheter - A plastic sheet to go under the bed sheets and protect the mattress once the catheter comes out. A large plastic garbage bag might work in a pinch. - Have enough easy to prepare food on hand for 2-3 weeks - Book(s) you've been intending to read - Fresh batteries for your TV remote - A cordless phone and up-to-date phone list - Some big baggy mesh shorts (in summer) - Suspenders may be helpful, in place of a belt - Two dozen inexpensive white washcloths (in a big bundle) - Some of the little plastic, stick-on hooks to put in the shower etc., for a place to hang the bag or simply the pail, placed outside the tub. - To help stave off possible urinary tract infection, either Ural (seems to be an Australia/New Zealand over-the-counter drug) or a supply of cranberry juice. They work in different ways to achieve the same thing. - A watch or interval timer to remind you not to stay sitting too long. The small kitchen timers would work for this and to prompt you to get up periodically at night if you need to do so. . An electronic thermometer (about $10) for keeping track of your temperature for a couple weeks postoperatively. - A walking stick may prove to be helpful. - A safety bench (maybe a plastic lawn chair?) for the shower (sometimes you're a little light-headed when you first come home and it's nice to have something to sit on) - A raised seat to put over the toilet (as an alternative, or in addition to, grab bars) - A grabber for picking things up if you drop them so you wouldn't have to bend down. - If you have the hardware, fill up a MP3 player with your favourite tunes & use headphones to help "drown-out" the hospital noise. - A "toilet seat lifter". I would be inclined to bend a coat hanger into a hook that I could work under the lip and lift, but there are probably commercial step-on type mechanical devices akin to garbage can lid lifters out there. Just use a stick or bend at the knees, keeping the back straight. Heck, just leave the lid up for a few days. - One person indicated his hospital made him wear a pair of anti-embolism stockings the whole time he was there. He bought another pair when he went home and suggests considering doing the same. - Drinking straws - you will want some for the first week. - Plastic cups - they're lighter than glass - Extra pillows - for sitting up in bed and as arm rests at night and for the couch. - Velcro Foley straps - the walking bag can slip down your leg and pull on the tube. - A current phone list - one of contact people who must know, one of friends to come visit you, walk, and meals, shop for you. Spread the burden. - A few woman's (not a few women's- get them from one woman) menstrual pads - don't be shy, the big ones, they're smaller, cheaper than incontinence pads and can be added to the diaper and changed more often. -Travel bag - like a baby changing bag for when you go out or the keep women's pads in your pocket. - Viva paper towels - to help when wet - they're soft. - Toilet wipes - the first few times they're nice, along with baby wipes for everything. - To deal with the rash and itch consider getting tubes of Desitin and/or Butt Paste, both containing zinc oxide. - Diet plan - coffee is bad for bladder, eat more fruit, less meat, no cheese & bananas while on stool softeners. Diet and supplements are part of permanent recovery plan. - Look into a cancer society group such as "Man to Man" that meets monthly and go to a meeting before surgery.
Repeated Advice: - Learn to roll sideways out of bed (rather than sit on the edge trying to stand upright). Practice before going to the hospital. - Walking is the best way to get your body ready and to recover. - Wait to see how bad your incontinence is BEFORE purchasing a lot of pads etc. but do buy a package of men's guards to bring to the appointment when the catheter is removed. Have a look around at what is available and compare costs before hand. - Kegel, pre-operation and post-catheter removal (not with catheter in)
- Remember, what you are going through is TEMPORARY, in a few weeks you won't even remember the discomfort of some of this stuff!
JP
Harold - 09 Aug 2007 16:15 GMT >Hi Harold, >You and I have VERY similar statistics. Gleason 6 pre-op, 60 years old [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >7/05/07: 1st post-RP PSA: undetectable (measured <.04) >............................................................................ Thanks for the reply. I'll be interested is comparing our apples and oranges since we are so similiar in our history. Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult, schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Debbie13331 - 13 Aug 2007 01:56 GMT Hi Harold - One thing I thought I would mention is the comfort and information that I get from the people at this site. I am the wife of a much loved husband and it is important to me to stay informed. I would encourage your wife to check out the posts, or ask questions if she has them. This group is wonderful about sharing their knowledge. Kind regards and best of luck! Debbie
Harold - 13 Aug 2007 17:14 GMT >Hi Harold - One thing I thought I would mention is the comfort and >information that I get from the people at this site. I am the wife of a >much loved husband and it is important to me to stay informed. I would >encourage your wife to check out the posts, or ask questions if she has >them. This group is wonderful about sharing their knowledge. Kind >regards and best of luck! Debbie Thanks, Debbie. She is aware of it and reads sometimes, when I point things out to her. I have fixed her a good reading list of sites that has info for wives and SO's of us guys. She has learned a lot and it is easing some of her/my fears.. lol
Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult, schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Steve Kramer - 13 Aug 2007 19:12 GMT > Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled What date, Harold?
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Harold - 13 Aug 2007 22:41 GMT >> Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled > >What date, Harold? Sept. 24, 6am....They like to get a full day in before noon hereabouts...lol
Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult, schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Steve Kramer - 14 Aug 2007 09:35 GMT >>What date, Harold? > > Sept. 24, 6am....They like to get a full day in before noon > hereabouts...lol We'll be thinking about you and praying for your doctor.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Idaho Guy - 14 Aug 2007 17:53 GMT Hi Harold,
Key for a treatment of any kind is the amount of experience with the treatment and success rate that your surgeon has had.
I had the Da Vinci robotic laparoscopic surgery and am extremely pleased with the overall experience. My current urologist is one of four in my area very experienced with the procedure and has done many over the last five years.
My prior urologist preferred other surgery approaches and if I was still with him, I'd go with what he had the best experience with.
As you know, you are in the driver seat. Ask all the question you can to make you feel more comfortable going in. The treatment you pick for you will be the right one. The people here will offer a lot of good help and support.
I belong to two other prostate cancer support groups as well at "healingwell.com" and "healthboards.com." I find that there are caring people all over who want to help you from their current and prior experience.
You might find one or two of the web sites I'll list below to be helpful as well.
All the best to you, Harold!
Idaho Guy
Age: 54 PSA: 4.3 Biopsy: T1c, 3+3=6, 2 pos. samples in one node, <5% volume Da Vinci 31 Jul 2007: saved nerve bundle on side of non-cancerous node Final pathology: Confined to prostate, T2a, 3+3=6, <1% volume Working to get back into good shape
========== other web sites ============
General information sites: http://www.psa-rising.com
http://www.malecare.com http://www.malecare.com/prostate_cancer_surgery_patient_hints.htm
http://www.yananow.net/ (support group and info) http://www.yananow.net/Experiences.html
www.urologytimes.com (has great, full length articles availale)
www.urotoday.com (good updates and archives)
www.cancer.prostate-help.org/download/jhnomo.pdf (a nomogram chart and amazing research article)
http://www.prostate-cancer.com/
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/prostate-cancer-treatment-choices
Questions to ask your doctor during all stages of evaluation and treatment: http://www.prostatecancerfoundation.org/site/c.itIWK2OSG/b.189974/k.C0A4/Questio ns_to_Ask_Your_Doctor.htm
Comprehensive Profiling Tool: An on-line tool to profile your specific condition and explain various treatment options as they relate to you. You'll need to do a free registration first. The tool may be used before and after treatment to provide additional information. https://www.cancerfacts.com/Secure/InterfaceSecure.asp?CB=14
Complete 2007 American Urologic Association Patient Guidelines for doctors evaluating and treating prostate cancer (very interesting): http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/proscan07.cfm http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/ - additional patient guides and doctor guidelines
Some prostate cancer news: http://www.cancercompass.com/prostate-cancer-news.htm
http://www.fightprostatecancer.org/site/PageServer?pagename=news_prostate
Some information sites for those considering robotic prostatectomy: http://www.prostatecancerrobotic.com/robotic-prostatectomy-at-urology-centers-of -al.php http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070523163005.htm
Complete video of actual laparoscopic surgery: (don't watch if you get queasy) http://www.drslawin.com/surg_video.html
Harold - 14 Aug 2007 19:57 GMT >Hi Harold,
>My prior urologist preferred other surgery approaches and if I was >still with him, I'd go with what he had the best experience with. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >for you will be the right one. The people here will offer a lot of >good help and support. That's my situation now. I am very comfortable with my current Urologist and trust his judgement and skill, knowing his reputation and results amongst my friends and associates.
I forgot to mention in my first post, besides reasons I didn't want to go into for not going 300 miles away for robotic, is my surgeon, and other places I have read that does robotic, say that robotic is harder to complete for a grossly enlarged prostate, mine being 75cc. That helped make my decision easier to have the regular surgery.
As it is, I don't second guess myself, and am just impatiently waiting for the time to get it over with, and see what I end up with afterwards. The uncertainity of the results is far outweighing any worries I have with the surgery itself....if that makes sense.
Thanks for the info and encouragement, I appreciate it. Harold
April 07: PSA 7.6 April 07: Urologist first visit June 07: PSA retest 6.7 July 07: Biopsy 16 cores/3 cancer GS 3/3:6 July 07: Consult, schedule surgery Sept. 07: Conventional RP scheduled
Idaho Guy - 14 Aug 2007 20:52 GMT > >Hi Harold, > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Thanks for the info and encouragement, I appreciate it. > Harold You're welcome, Harold and sounds like you're doing all the right stuff!
Don't beat yourself up for being mortal and having fears, either. Hearing the "C" word applied to yourself is pretty daunting.
There are so many out here "fighting the good fight" that you are in good company. The three docs I visited for second opinions gave me a lot of hope as well.
None of us came into the world with a guaranteed expiration date, so we're still running the show individually with our choices as much as we're able to do so.
Much success!
Idaho Guy
dale.j. - 23 Aug 2007 00:03 GMT > Hello, everyone. Looks like I have found an exclusive club here of > special people. I thought I might join and share by experince, as it [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] > July 07: Consult- Tc1 (?), schedule surgery > Sept. 07: CRP scheduled I had this operation on my 60th birthday, Dec 2, 02, (birthday present my doc said) All turned out much better than I had hoped for. I still jog at almost age 65, LOL, I'm a foolish old fart. Good luck
Dale J.
 Signature Email: dalej2@mac.com
|
|
|