Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

checking in: latest psa result

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gabachin - 23 Jul 2007 20:10 GMT
I'm the poster who had a psa rise from .5 to 1.8 in just under two
years and requested advice and information form this group. I have
received great support here.

Just wanted to check in with some new psa numbers. I'm 48, no family
history, and in good health .

10/21/2004  0.5

5/27/2006 1.8

7/20/2007 1.9

the above from the same lab.

11/2006 1.600 with a different assay method at a different lab.

I guess I'm still dodging the bullet, but I still wonder why my psa
jumped by 1.3 points in 20 months and now has levelled off in the last
14 months.

Ideas, thoughts?
chasjac too - 23 Jul 2007 12:16 GMT
Hello, Gabachin:

PSA levels do undergo some short-term variation due to activity, illness,
sexual activity, and other things.  That might explain some of the later
changes.  But I'm not sure about that 0.5 in 2004.  

Has your doc done a DRE?  Have you had a free PSA test?  Might be worth
asking about ...

--charlie

Signature

6/2006 PSA 5.2
          DRE suspicious
7/2006 Biopsy
          2 of 10 positive
          Gleason 7(3+4)
11/2006 LRP
           Clear margins
1/2007 PSA < 0.01
3/2007 PSA < 0.01
6/2007 PSA < 0.01
so far, so good

Steve Kramer - 24 Jul 2007 00:45 GMT
> I'm the poster who had a psa rise from .5 to 1.8 in just under two
> years and requested advice and information form this group. I have
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ideas, thoughts?

Looking for causes is best left to an analytical approach.  Look over the
situation and the environment.  Determine from that the facts.  Determine
from that the problem(s).  Determine from that the solution.

I don't know much about your case other than what you have reported, but I
think the anomaly is the 0.5 in 2004.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.