Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Newbie

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
El Woody - 21 Jul 2007 12:05 GMT
Newly diagnosed....

44 yo
PSA:2.0 (10/04), 2.6 (10/05), 3.3 (10/06), 3.3 w 9% free (1/07), 4.1
(4/07)
normal DREs
Biopsy 6/15/07 Gleason 6 (3+3), 6/12 cores, one core 100%,
T1c (Clinical), T2b (Pathlogical)

Question: Have decided on RP and am scheduled to talk with two
surgeons in August. Their schedules may make me wait until October for
surgery. My local surgical urologist who did the biopsy and diagnosis
has an opening in September. Should I be worried about a month wait?

The doctors are of no help here at all.
chasjac too - 21 Jul 2007 04:22 GMT
Hello, El:

I'm truly sorry you've had to join the group -- and you're so young, too!
But there are lots of reasons to hope.  Ron has given you some of his
wisdom, and quite a few others will join in shortly to wish you well and
offer theirs, too.  

I'm a little confused by your report, in which you have "T1c (Clinical), T2b
(Pathlogical)."  Usually, the clinical staging occurs at the time of
diagnosis, while the pathological staging occurs after the gland has been
removed and analyzed.  Do you mean that one doc couldn't feel it (T1c)
while another could (T2b)?  That's what happened in my case; I had a T1c
staging from my local uro who did the biopsy and diagnosis, while the
surgeon who eventually did the prostatectomy staged it as T2b.  

My local uro sent off the core samples to a pathologist about an hour's
drive from here (west-central NY).  When I settled on my surgeon at Johns
Hopkins, he insisted that I use a pathologist from JH, which was fine with
me.  The Gleason scores did change in my favor.  So, I agree with Ron; get
a second pathologist to take a look at those samples.  

I was diagnosed in late July of 2007, and had my laparoscopic radical
prostatectomy (LRP) in mid-November.  My local uro all but advised me not
to use him; that's why I shopped around a bit.  Baltimore was a good choice
for me, as I had in-laws to recuperate with, and Johns Hopkins has a very
good team.  Others will tell you good things about other places.  If you
have not done so already, it is very much worth your while to get a surgeon
who does this procedure all the time -- more experience translates into
lower risk of side effects.  But you do have time to consider your options.
October is probably not too long to wait.  Prostate tumors are usually
pretty slow-growing.  

Whereabouts are you?  I'm asking because a lot of us can recommend places
for you to visit:  hospitals, support groups, and such.  If you're on the
West coast, you probably won't think about JH or MSK or other places over
on this side.  

There's also a lot of reading you should do -- many of us recommend our
favorite books.  Here are mine:

The Prostate Book, by Peter Scardino
The Prostate, by Patrick Walsh (get the latest edition)
Prostate Cancer for Dummies, by Paul Lange

Others will post some web sites that are really good sources for you as
well.  

Good luck with this, El, and please keep us posted on your progress.  I
imagine that it all feels a little overwhelming now, but that will pass.  

All the best,

charlie

Signature

6/2006 PSA 5.2
          DRE suspicious
7/2006 Biopsy
          2 of 10 positive
          Gleason 7(3+4)
11/2006 LRP
           Clear margins
1/2007 PSA < 0.01
3/2007 PSA < 0.01
6/2007 PSA < 0.01
so far, so good

Heather - 21 Jul 2007 18:40 GMT
From his headers, it looks like he is in Virginia.  Using his NNTP
Posting IP numbers.

Chas....fix your calendar.  (G)  You posted this 8 hours before he did.
ESP??  Just kidding.  Double click on the time in the lower right hand
column and make sure your date is right for starters, then check the
time zone.

Cheers......Heather
> Hello, El:
>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> charlie
chasjac too - 21 Jul 2007 16:58 GMT
> From his headers, it looks like he is in Virginia.  Using his NNTP
> Posting IP numbers.

Then JH is not too far, but there are a lot of other choices, I'm sure.  

> Chas....fix your calendar.  (G)  You posted this 8 hours before he did.
> ESP??  Just kidding.  Double click on the time in the lower right hand
> column and make sure your date is right for starters, then check the
> time zone.

Thanks for pointing that out, Heather ... but there's something weird going
on here.  The time on my desktop is correct, and it's set to the correct
time zone.  I am not sure why the timestamp is exactly eight hours behind.
When I tried to fix it just now, my system rebooted.  I'll have to ask
about it on the Debian NG.  

--charlie

Signature

6/2006 PSA 5.2
          DRE suspicious
7/2006 Biopsy
          2 of 10 positive
          Gleason 7(3+4)
11/2006 LRP
           Clear margins
1/2007 PSA < 0.01
3/2007 PSA < 0.01
6/2007 PSA < 0.01
so far, so good

El Woody - 23 Jul 2007 17:39 GMT
> Hello, El:
>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> 6/2007 PSA < 0.01
> so far, so good

Thanks Charlie. Am in Philly and have really good access to JH, MSK,
Penn, Jefferson docs. Fox Chase Cancer Center (where a former
colleague had his RP in 2001) is a no go since their chief surgeon is
out on medical leave.

As far as the staging, I probably have the second of the two wrong.
Nobody has felt anything.

As far as the books, I have both Scardino's and Walsh's books.
ron - 21 Jul 2007 13:21 GMT
> Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> The doctors are of no help here at all.

Hi EW...Studies indicate that for people with low-risk disease (e.g.
T1c, GS=6, PSA<10), waiting a month or two generally (that's a
probability statement) will not matter.  In other words, the odds are
on your side that waiting a month will not worsen the situation.

Your steadily rising PSA, high core involvement and low GS caught my
eye.  An accurate Gleason score is important in terms of treatment
selection and outcome prediction.  Have you had your biopsy samples
read by someone who is expert in PCa pathology?  If not, it might be
something to consider.  Such second readings are usually covered by
insurance.  If you search "pathology expert" within this newsgroup,
you'll get some leads on names...Best wishes and good health, ron
El Woody - 21 Jul 2007 16:03 GMT
> > Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> insurance.  If you search "pathology expert" within this newsgroup,
> you'll get some leads on names...Best wishes and good health, ron

Thanks Ron. I will be having two surgeons look at the slides from the
biopsy. My initial urologist characterizes this as a "high volume"
tumor(s). Should I get a read from someone other than a surgical
urologist?
ron - 21 Jul 2007 16:21 GMT
> Thanks Ron. I will be having two surgeons look at the slides from the
> biopsy. My initial urologist characterizes this as a "high volume"
> tumor(s). Should I get a read from someone other than a surgical
> urologist?- Hide quoted text -

Apparently, grading PCa tumors is not all that easy, so to get an
accurate assessment it often takes the trained eye of a pathologist
who specializes in PCa.  Usually, if you ask the uro who performed the
biopsy, he will send the slides to whomever you request.  Many on this
list have had a second (expert) reading, and as I mentioned earlier,
it is usually covered by insurance...ron
I.P. Freely - 21 Jul 2007 18:37 GMT
> Should I get a read from someone other than a surgical
> urologist?

The Gold Standard Gleason grading lab was (is still?) Bostwick Labs
(Google it). My local uro sends his cores straight to them routinely.

But would a 5 or a 7, even an 8, change anything? And if Bostwick found
some 4s or 5s to give you a 7 or an 8 total, I'd bet your chosen highly
experienced surgeons would work you in sooner if it alarmed them. I blew
a solid 8 (4+4) my first time up to bat, but none of the half dozen
oncologists I consulted worried about a couple of months; they just
didn't want me waiting much longer. Although my Gleason 8 biopsy and
rapidly rising 8.8 PSA did open a lot of doors and grease many skids for
me, my ~10-week surgery delay alarmed no one.

I.P.
El Woody - 23 Jul 2007 17:47 GMT
> > Should I get a read from someone other than a surgical
> > urologist?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I.P.

Thanks I.P.  Am trying to balance my schedule with the doctors, with
my wife's urge to "get rid of this now", with my reluctance to accept
the fact that I have to have major surgery. I am sure that I can
accelerate the process if the docs feel uncomfortable with waiting.
Alan Meyer - 23 Jul 2007 22:27 GMT
> ...
> Thanks I.P.  Am trying to balance my schedule with the doctors, with
> my wife's urge to "get rid of this now", with my reluctance to accept
> the fact that I have to have major surgery. I am sure that I can
> accelerate the process if the docs feel uncomfortable with waiting.

I'm not knowledgeable enough to say whether waiting until
October is okay or not.  The surgeons may be offering you
the earliest time they have available and that's just all they
can do, whether it's best for you or not.

Personally, I think I'd be inclined to wait for the most expert
surgeon.  I have been told that all studies conclude that success
rates for all medical procedures are higher with very experienced
surgeons than for others.  The guy who does one or two
hundred prostatectomies a year has seen a lot, handled a lot
of complications, and learned more about how to get that last
bit of tumor tissue out.  He (or she) is the one I'd want.

As for your reluctance to accept major surgery, at your age,
I don't think you should delay.  It is unusual to have PCa at
age 44 and especially to have so much of it.  It sounds to
me like you are very likely to die of this disease if you don't
get it treated.  The treatment cannot get easier and the
success rate cannot go up over time.  I would bite the
bullet now and hope for the best.

You might tell the surgeon you like best that you really want
to do this thing and, if he has a cancellation, you would like
to step in, even on very short notice.  I would not worry about
my schedule at all.  I'd be prepared to cancel business
trips, vacations, or whatever else you might have planned
to get this done.  Unless you're doing something that
affects the future of the free world, I'd be prepared to
cancel it and take care of your health first.

You might also start getting yourself in the best physical
shape that you can.  It may help you in the recovery period.

Best of luck to you.

   Alan
A. Black - 26 Jul 2007 19:57 GMT
> > > Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> tumor(s). Should I get a read from someone other than a surgical
> urologist?- Hide quoted text -

I don't think anyone can give a definitive answer regarding delay
but here are the considerations.  See these three abstracts on the
topic of delay:

1. Treatment can be delayed for two years after diagnosis without
affecting outcomes for small, low-grade prostate cancer defined as
having a PSA density (PSA divided by prostate volume) below 0.15, no
more than two biopsy cores involved with cancer, no biopsy core that
showed more than 50 percent cancerous tissue and no high-grade cancer:
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_28_06.html
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/5/355?ck=nck

2. Delay between biopsy and treatment does not have a large effect on
risk of disease recurrence.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=16353213&query_hl=17&itool=pubmed_docsum


3. Ditto:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=17483015&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_DocSum


At the same time, nearly half of GS 6 patients wind up really being GS
7 and it sounds
like they are going to treat you as a 7 regardless of what the
pathologist
says in which case a second opinion on the biopsy won't matter much.
Also this
makes it more important to get on with it.    This paper discusses the
upgrading phenomenon:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
6890675&dopt=Abstract


The waiting time for different surgeons can be quite different and its
not necessarily
true that the experienced ones have longer waiting times so you could
investigate
further what is available to you.

At the same time the surgeon's experience is quite important.  See:
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/04/choosing-surgeon-part-i-considerat
ions.html


Also you can really regard the surgery as up to three different
operations at the same time.
You need to

1. decide among open RP, freehand laparascopic and robotic.  See this
four part article:
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/03/rp-vs-lrp-vs-rlrp-part-1-open-surg
ery.html


2. consider what sort of Lymph Node Dissection procedure to have.
This
is quite a controversial topic:
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/03/lymph-node-dissection.html

3. determine whether you need a concurrent hernia repair and if
unknown whether the
surgeon will determine whether there is existing subclinical trouble
on the spot and repair it:
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/02/inguinal-hernia-and-prostatectomy.html

Also there are surgical details that can vary from surgeon to
surgeon.  For example,
one controversial area is whether to leave in the seminal vesicles:
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/02/seminal-vesicle-ablation.html

By the way, I would start doing ED and incontinence exercises (these
are two
different sets) now since your state going into the operation will, in
part, determine
how fast you recover:
http://www.men-and-health.info/science.html
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com/2007/02/urinary-incontinence.html

and try to line up an ED specialist now for after the surgery.

Hope this helps.

---
The Palpable Prostate
http://palpable-prostate.blogspot.com
Steve Jordan - 21 Jul 2007 18:52 GMT
On July 21, Ron replied to "El Woody" in pertinent part:

> An accurate Gleason score is important in terms of treatment
> selection and outcome prediction.  Have you had your biopsy samples
> read by someone who is expert in PCa pathology?  If not, it might be
> something to consider.  Such second readings are usually covered by
> insurance.

Here is a list of expert labs:

Bostwick Laboratories [800] 214-6628
Dianon Laboratories [800] 328-2666 (select 5 for client services)
Jon Epstein (Hopkins) [410] 955-5043 or [410] 955-2162
David Grignon (Michigan) [313] 745-2520
Jon Oppenheimer (Tennessee)  [888] 868-7522
UroCor, Inc. [800] 411-1839

The website of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) will prove
very helpful:
http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html
Begin with the section "Newly Diagnosed."

The best book for study of prostate cancer (PCa) is:
_A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ 2nd ed., subtitled "The Empowered
Patient's Guide" by medical oncologist and PCa specialist Stephen B.
Strum, MD and PCa warrior Donna Pogliano. It is available from the PCRI
website and the like, as well as Amazon (30+ five-star reviews), Barnes
& Noble, and bookstores. A lifesaver. I know.

There is work to be done to prepare to make an informed decision. Good luck.

Regards,

Steve J

"Empowerment: taking responsibility for and authority over one's own
outcomes based on education and knowledge of the consequences  and
contingencies involved in one's own decisions. This focus provides the
uplifting energy that can sustain in the face of crisis."
--Donna Pogliano, co-author of _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_, subtitled
"The Empowered Patient's Guide."
Paul - 21 Jul 2007 16:27 GMT
>Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>The doctors are of no help here at all.

Sorry to hear it. I'm going to be 6 weeks post op this Tuesday, so as
you can see by the info in my sig, my biopsy was in March and the
procedure was done in June.

After deciding on surgery, I opted for the RLRP mainly because of the
minimally invasive incisions and low chance for a need of a blood
transfusion. As of today, I feel I am doing very well at this early
stage of recovery.

I told myself, the bad new was I was only 45 and that was way too
young to be confronted with this. I told myself the good news was I
was only 45 and in a position to beat what has hit almost every male
ancestor in my family tree.

All I can recommend is read up on this, try and match the treatment
with your situation and don't look back on your decisions. While I was
extremely grateful of my local uro for having the wherewithal to
insist on biopsying me, I was not comfortable with him as my surgeon
and I picked a surgeon who I felt good with. By the time I did my perp
walk to the OR suite, I was a free man!

Now I go from PSA test to PSA test hoping to stay free....

Best of luck to you.

Signature

PSA @ 45 yrs. = 4.7 02/06/2007
Biopsy 03/16/2007 G7(3+4),T2c
RLRP 06/12/2007 G7(3+4),T2cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA 7/16/2007 = <0.1

Steve Kramer - 22 Jul 2007 12:18 GMT
> Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> The doctors are of no help here at all.

El Woody,

You have a goot set of numbers for surgery and your age pretty much
pre-empts everything else.  You can wait a month and your first task should
be to find the best surgery within in your area or means.  You should ask
each one whom you investigate how many surgeries they do, how many
nerve-sparing surgeries, and what their success rate is.

Since you have already determined surgery, I would recommend you immediately
run out and get Dr. Patrick Walsh's Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer.  The
first edition was getting a little dated and I have not seen the second.
But, he does a tremendous job in describing how to select a surgeon.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  <.1  <.1  <.1  .27  .37  .75            PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32                       PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145       PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007)
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Slitheen - 22 Jul 2007 22:50 GMT
> Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> The doctors are of no help here at all.

To complement the therapy your doctors have laid out for you, my Dad really
believes that regularly taking Pomegranate extract tablets and drinking
Pomegranate juice played some roll in his recovery (with his conventional
radiation treatment, of course.)

His doctor too, one of the top Cancer specialists in the world famous
Christies Hospital (A.K.A. Holt Radium Institute), certainly believes in
complimenting traditional therapies with high dose antioxidants. They are
believed by many to slow the development of the bad cells (and possibly
prevent them growing for the undiagnosed). Although he is less than happy
about those who rely solely on these kind of treatments....and I'm sure we
can understand why.

But the research into the effects of antioxidants on cancer cells has been
interesting to say the least. Especially the tests done on mice with
prostate cancer cells. It was that experiment that led my dad to try them.
His doctor described his recovery, and his consistent negligible PSA scores
for two years since, as "quite remarkable". How much of that was due to his
complimenting his 'traditional' therapy with antioxidants we just don't
know......but what can you lose trying? A few measly quid?

Best of luck with whatever treatment you have though, and I wish you a
speedy, full recovery!
Slitheen - 22 Jul 2007 23:03 GMT
Oops, meant to post at least one link to a report on one of the few trials
done. Actually, this one is one I had never heard of.....my dad's cancer
scare was way before this trial. We had only heard of the mice trial when we
decided to try Pomegranate juice/extract. This specifically mentions their
help is preventing the return of the cells after radiotherapy. (My Dad still
takes juice/tabs daily - (0.01 PSA scores for 18 months now...thank
goodness)

http://www.webmd.com/content/Article/106/108151.htm

Like I say though, best of luck whatever you or your doctors do. :)
El Woody - 23 Jul 2007 17:51 GMT
On Jul 22, 5:50 pm, "Slitheen" <slithee...@dropspamgooglemail.com>
wrote:

> > Newly diagnosed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I can afford the quid. Also trying to eliminate animal fats from the
diet. This is tough since I don't need to do this for cardio health
reasons and I love beef!
I.P. Freely - 25 Jul 2007 00:08 GMT
> trying to eliminate animal fats from the
> diet. This is tough since I don't need to do this for cardio health
> reasons and I love beef!

Don't get TOO hung up on animal fat elimination . . . er . . .
avoidance. As you know, cold-water fish fat is very healthy for us. And
very lean beef has about the same fat content as white chicken meat, and
lean pork is trending that direction. Most nutritionists believe we need
some sat fat in our diet.

But let me ask you this, as I'd like to know for myself to help me
convince me and my doc that I don't need a statin for my borderline
cholesterol: How do you know your cardiovascular system is healthy?
Exercise stress tests miss many cases of atherosclerosis, homocysteine
level implications are not clear yet, half of heart attack patients have
great lipids profiles, and red meat has nutrients hard to obtain
elsewhere. I haven't eaten a serving of bacon or a rib in 20 years, but
I had a great slab of lean roast beef with breakfast today with a clear
conscience.

I.P.
El Woody - 25 Jul 2007 19:20 GMT
> > trying to eliminate animal fats from the
> > diet. This is tough since I don't need to do this for cardio health
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> I.P.

I am 5'9", 205 lbs, until last week ate 2-3 servings of red meat per
day (Including Philly Cheesesteaks - about 6000 calories with most of
that fat). My total cholesterol is always in the 113-123 range with
very favorable HDL/LDL ratios and great triglicerides. My 67 y.o. dad
has an even worse diet, does no appreciable exersize and has the same
lipid profile. It seems to be genetic.

However, I would like to shave off some pounds to allow me to climb
moutains faster on my bike (I ride about 2000 miles a season) and to
eliminate the worry about inflamation and cardiac disease. The Pca
diagnoses and the need to "pre-hab" has given me a kick in the rear to
make diet and lifestyle changes that will ensure good health in the
long run and not get dropped as quickly when the roads get steep.

It is very hard here in the states, particularly when you get more
than 50 miles from the coast, to eat healty. Fast food is uniformly
bad. The summer is nice since you can find pretty good fresh veggies
for a price.

What is a homocystine level? I have a troublingly high CRP level on my
bloodwork.
I.P. Freely - 25 Jul 2007 23:25 GMT
> I am 5'9", 205 lbs, until last week ate 2-3 servings of red meat per
> day (Including Philly Cheesesteaks - about 6000 calories with most of
> that fat). My total cholesterol is always in the 113-123 range with
> very favorable HDL/LDL ratios and great triglicerides. My 67 y.o. dad
> has an even worse diet, does no appreciable exersize and has the same
> lipid profile. It seems to be genetic.

My chol is also genetic, but in the other direction: borderline high no
matter what I eat or do (unless you count statins, the only way I had
found to improve my chol.) But since I've always been lean and fit, I
wasn't worried much about weight or diet until the medical and
statistical professions concurred overwhelmingly a couple of decades ago
that sat fats kill (and they recently concurred with my years-old
warning that trans fats are even worse). I dropped my sat fats intake by
something like 95% in the 1980s (I could afford to: I ate steak by the
pound, whole milk by the gallon, pastries by the tray, ice cream by the
quart . . . and burned it all off.)

> However, I would like to shave off some pounds to allow me to climb
> moutains faster on my bike (I ride about 2000 miles a season) and to
> eliminate the worry about inflamation and cardiac disease. The Pca
> diagnoses and the need to "pre-hab" has given me a kick in the rear to
> make diet and lifestyle changes that will ensure good health in the
> long run and not get dropped as quickly when the roads get steep.

I keyed in one one word in that paragraph: "inflammation". That's your
CRP (it should be < 1.0, as you know). Elevated CRP is a better marker
than cholesterol or lipids in general for heightened cardiovascular
risk, especially for athletes who manage to keep their chol down with
aerobics.

> I have a troublingly high CRP level on my bloodwork.

I'd hit that hard on Google and with my doctor. It's much more alarming
than anything but a whole litany of extreme cholesterol numbers, because
inflammation causes the plaque that ultimately leads to arterial
blockage. Many physicians believe statin's benefit is its
anti-inflammatory effect, not its cholesterol effects.

> It is very hard here in the states, particularly when you get more
> than 50 miles from the coast, to eat healty. Fast food is uniformly
> bad.

That also applies regionally, between areas mutually far from a coast. I
moved between interior states and noticed a big difference in the
availability of low-fat foods in the stores and restaurants. But I eat
in restaurants only rarely, and usually eat fish and veggies there
anyway, with sauces and butter on the side. I don't eat in fast food
joints more than a couple of carefully chosen joints and meals a year. I
plan on dying of prostate cancer, not something I actually have some
control over like heart disease.

> The summer is nice since you can find pretty good fresh veggies
> for a price.

Frozen and canned produce is usually more nutritious than "fresh",
because a) it's packaged at its peak and b) much "fresh" produce was
picked green, artificially preserved, artificially "ripened", shipped
thousands of miles, and sold in supermarkets and even roadside stands as
"fresh". The "fresh" strawberries I ate yesterday came from Australia.

> What is a homocystine level?

It's yet another blood component recognized as a cardiovascular disease
marker, so far less well defined and studied than CRP. Google it for an
eyeful (homocysteine). It should run in single digits, and like CRP, is
surpassing lipids as a coronary risk marker.

I.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.