 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2007<0.1
Bone scan clean; mets still gone from T3 & L2. Chest, abdomen, and pelvic soft tissue CT's are clear. PSA still <0.1. Medical Oncologist still can not fins any sign that I still have cancer. Happy Dance..... Taking each day as it comes. Gourd Dancer. > Bone scan clean; mets still gone from T3 & L2. Chest, abdomen, and pelvic > soft tissue CT's are clear. PSA still <0.1. Medical Oncologist still can > not fins any sign that I still have cancer. That's great, Mike! Do you have any idea what the chemo was and when it's coming to market?  SignaturePSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04 (06/12/2007) Non Illegitimi Carborundum Steve, yes I do. I can copy the study again if you wish. Two were interveinous and two were oral; plus 30 mg of cortisone a day. Surprising, most of the participants that I talked to, quit taking on of the orals because it made them real sick. I often wonder if there is a connection between the results..... I will have to discuss this with the Doctor in September. Doctor Amato essentially takes drugs with cancer killing properties and formulates certain combinations and studies the "cocktail" and its results. GD >> Bone scan clean; mets still gone from T3 & L2. Chest, abdomen, and pelvic >> soft tissue CT's are clear. PSA still <0.1. Medical Oncologist still can >> not fins any sign that I still have cancer. > > That's great, Mike! Do you have any idea what the chemo was and when it's > coming to market? > Steve, yes I do. I can copy the study again if you wish. Two were > interveinous and two were oral; plus 30 mg of cortisone a day. No, not necessary. I had forgotten you sent it. I have it saved in my HOLD file. Hello, Mike: Congratulations on your continued success battling this. And you've had quite a battle; I looked up your January post to Hugh in which you listed your history. I was wondering about the Urimax. Do you think there was a connection between the Urimax and that rapid PSA rise you had then? It just looked curious to me. --charlie Charlie, given the PSA explosion and two mets that appeared within 4 months, I hardly think that Urimax complicated the issue. PSA aexplosion and mets go hand in hand and obviously there was no infection. GD > Hello, Mike: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > --charlie Bone scan clean; mets still gone from T3 & L2. Chest, abdomen, and pelvic soft tissue CT's are clear. PSA still <0.1. Medical Oncologist still can not fins any sign that I still have cancer. Happy Dance..... Taking each day as it comes. Gourd Dancer. ==> great news.!!!!! definitely time for the happy dance. ~ curtis knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc Thanks, Curtis > Bone scan clean; mets still gone from T3 & L2. Chest, abdomen, and > pelvic soft tissue CT's are clear. PSA still <0.1. Medical Oncologist [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." > http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.