Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

difficulty reaching orgasm.  takes too long

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gary - 20 May 2007 01:18 GMT
i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
depending on stress.  from a few to 12 drops).
i practice keigles and take 50 mg viagra and masterbate daily.
my penis has been getting fuller over time as i reach orgasm.  it's
about 50 to 70% erect.
my biggest problem is that it takes me a long time and tremendous
concentration of fantasy to reach orgasm.
knowing that i have lost 3 sources of feedback (ejaculation, prostate
and full erection) i realize that i have to use my head more.
my urologist told me to concentrate on erotica and let go of my
stressful thoughts.  i am struggling with that.
i am starting to think about using marijuana.
i used it back in  the 1960's and had great orgasims.
anyone have any thoughts about trying it today?
 gary
glassman - 20 May 2007 01:58 GMT
>i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
> 1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> anyone have any thoughts about trying it today?
>  gary

  Sorry Gary but I don't agree about your "feedback" losses. I was having
limp noodle orgasms as soon as my cath was removed, that were as good as any
other ones. It's all a mental issue, and perhaps an age one as well?  I'm
guessing you're in your 50's-60's, so it's normal to be cutting back anyway.
Perhaps once a day is not as good as every other day would be?  Try
different surroundings.  If you don't have access to the real thing, than I
find that some types of porn work wonders for me. Thousands of free pix &
videos in the net. Take your pick of subject matter... take a day off... and
then give it a shot. Good luck!

Signature

JK Sinrod
www.SinrodStudios.com
www.MyConeyIslandMemories.com

gary - 20 May 2007 02:27 GMT
> >i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
> > 1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> --
> JK Sinrodwww.SinrodStudios.comwww.MyConeyIslandMemories.com

JK
i was told by the surgeon to masterbate frequently to get the blood
flowing.
gary
Alan Meyer - 20 May 2007 14:36 GMT
>> "gary" <garymille...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>> > i am starting to think about using marijuana.

You can try it if you can get it but I suspect that, just as
other things change as we get older and take various hits,
your response to marijuana will also have changed.

>> Perhaps once a day is not as good as every other day would be?

> i was told by the surgeon to masterbate frequently to get the blood
> flowing.

There are two different issues here.  One is how can you
recover the ability to have erections?  For that, I'm thinking
that your surgeon is right.

The other is how can you reach orgasm more easily.  For
that I'm thinking that JK is right.

What you could do is stimulate yourself but not all the way
to orgasm.  That will "get the blood flowing".  Go to orgasm
every second or third day.  I bet it will be much easier.

   Alan
glassman - 21 May 2007 20:48 GMT
>> >i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
>> > 1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> flowing.
> gary

  I agree, but a 24-48 hour break works wonders sometimes.  As for pot, I'm
not so sure that using it won't make it even worse. I can remember/not
remember, aimlessly drifting for hours in bed with a sweet young thing,
thinking it was great, but in reality it was limp and I was on another
planet. When you're young, who cares?

Signature

JK Sinrod
www.SinrodStudios.com
www.MyConeyIslandMemories.com

kh - 20 May 2007 16:05 GMT
> i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
> 1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> knowing that i have lost 3 sources of feedback (ejaculation, prostate
> and full erection) i realize that i have to use my head more.

You're doing good. The loss of the walnut-of-joy is a big deal but if
you can get to 70% already, then, er, keep pullin'.

I have a good imagination as well as a wealth of early life
experiences to draw on.  The problem that I have is that I reach "the
point" too soon now and -bing-bing-, the experience is over.

Is, is, is that ALL???

It's not like the old days when gals would complain about walking
funny the next day.

-kh hey, you called me last night.
Steve Kramer - 20 May 2007 17:34 GMT
> i am struggling with that.
> i am starting to think about using marijuana.
> i used it back in  the 1960's and had great orgasims.
> anyone have any thoughts about trying it today?

You would be a lot better off with methamphetamines.  I understand they
create a tremendous eroticism and will screw your brain up a lot fast than
marijuana.
Ron B - 20 May 2007 18:49 GMT
I'll try to hit a few points in one post.

First, kh is right...you're very early into this thing (6.5 mos) and
doing GREAT as far as erections are concerned.

Be grateful.

Many guys take several years.

The orgasm stuff (and I've learned most of this from the guys here) is
not affected so much PHYSICALLY by the surgery...since different nerves
are involved.

Some of us have had orgasms right after cath removal (and a few BEFORE I
think :-)

Orgasms are possible just by playing with the 'turtlehead'.

Your 70% erection must be nice.

It IS in your mind...and though we may not respond to visual stimulaton
as we once did...'touching and rubbing' (A Seinfeld reference to
oitbso)...should bring a climax.

If marijuana is something that makes you 'horny'...go for it.

You'll be fine.

About eating meat...(previous topic)...they have come out with a study
that said Lycopene was no help in preventing PCa.

So...I still take it...and trying to keep healthy (good weight and
fitness) is always good to fight a plethora of ailments.

Eat meat, don't eat meat...just try to stay healthy.

That's the best we can do.

Nobody has "THE" answer.

Best of health to everyone,

Ron B

Chicago
I.P. Freely - 21 May 2007 01:19 GMT
> my biggest problem is that it takes me a long time and tremendous
> concentration of fantasy to reach orgasm.

And your complaint is . . . ?
Good sex is like a good vacation, in that getting there is half the fun.

I.P.
gary - 21 May 2007 05:29 GMT
> > my biggest problem is that it takes me a long time and tremendous
> > concentration of fantasy to reach orgasm.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I.P.

thank you to all who responded.
since it takes so long to reach orgasm, my mind drifts and so does my
erection.  that is why i am thinking about marijuana.  it makes me
uninhibited.  i remember that i really got into what ever i was doing.
i was thinking of using it only when i have foreplay with my wife.
who knows, the 50 to 70% erection might become closer to 100%.
one of the reasons we stopped using it was that we both noticed a
spacy side effect for days after.  i'm sure that is so great since we
both need to be clear thinkers for our work.
gary
DoubleOwSeven - 21 May 2007 05:52 GMT
>> > my biggest problem is that it takes me a long time and tremendous
>> > concentration of fantasy to reach orgasm.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>both need to be clear thinkers for our work.
>gary

I've wondered if it would work.  I have not used it for a very long
time but I do recall having some very long (or at least they seemed
long) sessions when smoking it.
I.P. Freely - 21 May 2007 15:51 GMT
> one of the reasons we stopped using it was that we both noticed a
> spacy side effect for days after.  i'm sure that is so great since we
> both need to be clear thinkers for our work.

And you're considering sacrificing brain power for maybe slightly
enhanced sex? Which head are you thinking with?  ;-)

I.P.
jimmy - 22 May 2007 06:07 GMT
> i am  6.5 mths since RLRP (radical laproscopic robotic prostetectomy).
> 1 pad at night (minimal leakage)  and 1 during day (variable leakage,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> anyone have any thoughts about trying it today?
>   gary

I've tried the porn, viagra and no hard-on, six months since the op,
except when constipated when trying to discharge and then only at the
root of the penis.  At 59 and without the operation would I have been
fertiliser in two to three years?  Feel cheated, but then life
compared with one's ancestors I am doing really OK.  But, then the old
man who drank like a fish, well over weight had smoked heavily died
with prostate cancer but the stomach cancer got him first at 79
years.  Bottom line guys its all statistics some fair well others get
it bad, but on average the human race,in western, modernised asian and
south american societies have never had it so good.
kh - 22 May 2007 13:18 GMT
> I've tried the porn, viagra and no hard-on, six months since the op,
> except when constipated when trying to discharge and then only at the
> root of the penis.  At 59 and without the operation would I have been
> fertiliser in two to three years?  Feel cheated, but then life
> compared with one's ancestors I am doing really OK.

Sounds like you have some twitchin' at 6 months.  That's still early
according to reports here.

-kh  keep pullin'
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.