Measuring Calcium Intake Can Help To Identify Osteoporosis In Men With
Prostate Cancer
Main Category: Bones / Orthopaedics News
Article Date: 16 Apr 2007 - 1:00 PDT
Measuring a man's daily calcium intake is an effective way of identifying
prostate cancer patients with a higher than average risk of osteoporosis,
according to the April issue of the urology journal BJU International.
Researchers from the Autonoma University School of Medicine, Barcelona,
Spain, looked at a cross-section of 372 men with prostate cancer. 72 per
cent were receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and 28 per cent had
undergone a radical prostatectomy. Their average age was just under 70.
They found that 49 per cent of the men had osteoporosis, including 55 per
cent of those who had received the ADT hormone therapy and 35 per cent of
those who had had a prostatectomy.
These figures are considerably higher than the prevalence of osteoporosis in
the general male population, where it's estimated that about 20 per cent of
all male osteoporosis cases occur in the 61 to 70 age group.
A dietary questionnaire revealed that only seven per cent of the men were
consuming more than 1000 mg of calcium a day - the average daily calcium
intake was 610mg in men with osteoporosis and 683mg in those without.
These levels are well below the 1000mg recommended for all 25-65 year-olds
by the US National Institutes of Health and the 1500mg recommended for men
over 65.
"Our research showed a significant relationship between a low daily calcium
intake and higher levels of osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer" says
lead researcher Dr Jacques Planas from the University's Department of
Urology.
"Men who had undergone ADT hormone therapy were particularly at risk and
longer treatment and increased age were also related to higher levels of
osteoporosis.
"What was particularly interesting was the fact that more than a third of
the patients who hadn't received hormone treatment also developed
osteoporosis."
Osteoporosis is caused by loss of bone mineral density, which makes bones
brittle and significantly more likely to fracture. It is more common in
older people and has been strongly linked to hormonal changes, such as the
female menopause.
Links to ADT hormone therapy have also been reported, but the Barcelona
study is thought to be the first to look at using daily calcium as a
diagnostic tool to identify prostate cancer patients who face an increased
risk of osteoporosis, including those who have not received ADT.
"Men account for about a third of all hip fractures, but they are much more
likely to die after an injury of this nature than women, so it is important
to identify possible risks at an early stage" adds Dr Planas.
Hormone treatment ranged from 12 to 98 months, with an average of just over
42 months. Men with bone disorders or secondary causes of osteoporosis were
excluded from the study.
As well as the dietary questionnaire, the men taking part in the study had
their bone mineral density measured at the lumbar spine and four different
hip sites in line with the guidelines developed by the International Society
for Clinical Densitometry for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
"We carried out our research to discover whether there was a relationship
between low daily calcium intake and reduced bone mineral density, which
there clearly was" say Dr Planas.
"We also wanted to know if daily calcium intake could be used as a
prognostic factor for osteoporosis, especially for patients receiving ADT.
Our research suggests that it does provide a good pointer to whether a
prostate cancer patient also has osteoporosis."
The authors suggest that patients with prostate cancer should be routinely
advised to take at least 1000mg of calcium a day and that their bone mineral
density should be assessed, particularly before starting ADT, and monitored
at regular intervals after the treatment begins.
###
* The relationship between daily calcium intake and bone mineral density in
men with prostate cancer. Planas et al. BJU International. 99, pp 812-816.
(April 2007).
* Established in 1929, BJU International is published 12 times a year by
Blackwell Publishing and edited by Professor John Fitzpatrick from
University College Dublin, Ireland. It provides its international readership
with invaluable practical information on all aspects of urology, including
original and investigative articles and illustrated surgery.
http://www.bjui.org/
* Blackwell Publishing is the world's leading society publisher, partnering
with 665 medical, academic, and professional societies. Blackwell publishes
over 800 journals and has over 6,000 books in print. The company employs
over 1,000 staff members in offices in the US, UK, Australia, China,
Singapore, Denmark, Germany and Japan and officially merged with John Wiley
& Sons, Inc's Scientific, Technical and Medical business in February 2007.
Blackwell's mission as an expert publisher is to create long-term
partnerships with our clients that enhance learning, disseminate research,
and improve the quality of professional practice. For more information on
Blackwell Publishing, please visit http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ or
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/
Contact: Annette Whibley
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Claude - 16 Apr 2007 15:31 GMT
Now I'm confused (not an unusual state of mind). I thought earlier research
indicated that a high calcium intake was associated with a higher rate of
prostate cancer. I've been careful with calcium for that very reason.
Claude
> Measuring Calcium Intake Can Help To Identify Osteoporosis In Men With
> Prostate Cancer
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
> Contact: Annette Whibley
> Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
PCAinAZ@gmail.com - 16 Apr 2007 16:27 GMT
Hello Claude,
You are correct. There is an increased PCa risk with a high intake of
Calcium either by dietary or supplementation means. Calcium is very
important for proper cellular functions but an excess can cause
trouble in inhibiting the formation of calcidiol and calcitriol, which
are forms of vitamin D3 involved in bone resorption and many other
bodily functions. The bottom line is that many men and women do not
produce enough Vit D3 and after establishing their current levels, if
necessary, they should supplement to raise their calcidiol (25-OHD3)
levels to 50 to 80 ng/ml.
This study did not measure Vit D3 in these men. Osteoporosis as a
consequence of ADT is well known. Loss of mineral bone density as a
consequence of low Vit D3 is now surfacing because for ages the normal
daily requirement for this vitamin has been understated. Vieth in
Canada has shown the intakes of cholecalciferol in the order of 2000
IU can almost double the PSADT in men with PCa. Still the word is hard
to get out and much confusion exists.
RalphV
www.pcainaz.org/phpbb
> Now I'm confused (not an unusual state of mind). I thought earlier research
> indicated that a high calcium intake was associated with a higher rate of
> prostate cancer. I've been careful with calcium for that very reason.
>
> Claude
Steve Kramer - 17 Apr 2007 01:55 GMT
> Hello Claude,
> You are correct. There is an increased PCa risk with a high intake of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> necessary, they should supplement to raise their calcidiol (25-OHD3)
> levels to 50 to 80 ng/ml.
That explains why my doc wants me on Vit D as well.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
california_chief - 17 Apr 2007 03:55 GMT
>> The bottom line is that many men and women do not produce
>> enough Vit D3 and after establishing their current levels, if
>> necessary, they should supplement to raise their calcidiol
>> (25-OHD3) levels to 50 to 80 ng/ml.
> That explains why my doc wants me on Vit D as well.
My rheumy has had me on calcium with D for several years.
Steve Kramer - 17 Apr 2007 01:54 GMT
> Now I'm confused (not an unusual state of mind). I thought earlier
> research indicated that a high calcium intake was associated with a higher
> rate of prostate cancer. I've been careful with calcium for that very
> reason.
>
> Claude
My doc has me on Calcium due to ADT bone loss potential.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Joe Price - 17 Apr 2007 05:59 GMT
I was advised to take both Vit D and Calcium when I was started on HT. In
fact I was told, "everyone over 50 should be taking them.".
>> Now I'm confused (not an unusual state of mind). I thought earlier
>> research indicated that a high calcium intake was associated with a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> My doc has me on Calcium due to ADT bone loss potential.
Leonard Evens - 18 Apr 2007 15:11 GMT
> Now I'm confused (not an unusual state of mind). I thought earlier research
> indicated that a high calcium intake was associated with a higher rate of
> prostate cancer. I've been careful with calcium for that very reason.
>
> Claude
Claude,
You are correct that some studies have shown such a link. But there are
several things about the matter that are unclear.
First, I'm pretty sure no prospective randomized study has been done.
The studies were retrospective, meaning that milk drinking habits and
the like for men who developed prostate cancer were compared with those
who didn't. For example, a Harvard study found that men who drank at
least two glasses of milk a day were twice as likely to develop prostate
cancer as men who didn't. But there is an obvious gotcha. Namely, men
who are lactose intolerant don't drink much milk and they may also be
less likely to develop prostate cancer for other reasons.
Second, even if men with high calcium intake are more likely to get
prostate cancer, it doesn't necessarily follow that a man who is
treated for prostate cancer is more likely to develop metastatic cancer
if he has a high calcium intake.
Third, high calcium intake can have other positive effects on health.
for example, it may help control blood pressure and it may make the
development of colon cancer less likely.
As others have pointed out, the theory is that calcium can interfere
with how the body uses Vitamin D, which otherwise would protect against
cancer. Walsh, in his 2000 book, suggests that a diet high in fruit may
counteract how calcium interacts with vitamin D. So eating a lot of
fruit yogurt may be a good idea.
In any case, for men with metastatic prostate cancer who are on ADT, the
risk of osteoporosis is presumably much greater than any theoretical
possibility that extra calcium in their diets might possibly accelerate
the cancer.
>> Measuring Calcium Intake Can Help To Identify Osteoporosis In Men With
>> Prostate Cancer
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
>> Contact: Annette Whibley
>> Blackwell Publishing Ltd.