On Apr 5, 8:00 pm, "3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina"
<3putt@PawleysIslandSC> wrote:
> I had radiation seeding on 29 December following a PSA jump to 4.4 Today I
> had a follow-up with the Urologist, and my PSA had dropped to 1.1 He was
> optimistic, and says my level should continue to drop, and wants it down to
> .5 He was also concerned with the digital exam with some "roughness" on
> what's left of the prostate. We repeat the testing and exam in July. If
> the level does not drop, I'll be looking at external radiation.
The numbers sound reasonable 3Putt.
I had a combination of HDR brachytherapy and external
beam radiation. My PSA went from 8.3 down to .8 at six
months. It bounced around a lot after that, going up as
high as 1.8. But for the last year it's been 0.2 which
pleases me no end.
A drop to 1.1 after 3 months sounds like you're on schedule.
Alan
cognite tute - 06 Apr 2007 16:39 GMT
> On Apr 5, 8:00 pm, "3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina"
> <3putt@PawleysIslandSC> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Alan
I had brachytherapy in Nov. '05, my PSA is staying at 1. My Dr doesnt
seem be concerned.
j.
Alan Meyer - 06 Apr 2007 16:56 GMT
> ...
> I had brachytherapy in Nov. '05, my PSA is staying at 1. My Dr doesnt seem be
> concerned.
>
> j.
It would be nice to see it go lower, but it's far more important
that it not go higher.
How often have you been tested?
Alan
3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina - 06 Apr 2007 19:30 GMT
>> ...
>> I had brachytherapy in Nov. '05, my PSA is staying at 1. My Dr doesnt
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Alan
I was tested every year starting at age 50, that would be 15 years ago. Had
a biopsy 12 years ago that came back negative. PSA was 2.5 until 2-3 years
ago when in went up to 3.5, then 3.7, then 4.4. Biopsy done last
October with a Gleason of 3+3. Will be getting PSAs every 90 days until
some decisions are made. Urologist wants it down to .5, but doesn't want to
see an increase over the current 1.1. (the 1st biopsy was done due to a
rough spot on the prostate, ultrasound, etc.)
chasjac - 07 Apr 2007 17:24 GMT
It sounds pretty encouraging, 3Putt; congratulations!
The seeds continue to do their work for a while longer, right? So
maybe the roughness will go away the next time 'round?
--charlie
3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina - 07 Apr 2007 20:27 GMT
> It sounds pretty encouraging, 3Putt; congratulations!
>
> The seeds continue to do their work for a while longer, right? So
> maybe the roughness will go away the next time 'round?
>
> --charlie
Let's hope so. From what I can gather, the prostate all but disappears
after about one year. I guess my expectations were that the PSA would be
nearer to zero. We'll see what the next 90 days produces.
Tom Cular - 08 Apr 2007 14:30 GMT
Don't expect it to drop to a nadir immediately following the implants, I was
on Lupron prior to and following the implants. The first couple of PSA tests
showed nothing, followed by a couple of higher (read scarey) results. The
latest in Feb. 07 showed a .15 and a .157 from a different lab (my insurance
co. changed labs and I wanted to have a benchmark between the two)
I hope we can soon call you 2putt, I'm not a golfer, but have friends who
are.
Tom
>> It sounds pretty encouraging, 3Putt; congratulations!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> after about one year. I guess my expectations were that the PSA would be
> nearer to zero. We'll see what the next 90 days produces.
cognite tute - 09 Apr 2007 15:33 GMT
>>...
>>I had brachytherapy in Nov. '05, my PSA is staying at 1. My Dr doesnt seem be
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Alan
about every three months.
dr said next test to be 6 months
j.
Alan Meyer - 10 Apr 2007 16:29 GMT
> >>...
> >>I had brachytherapy in Nov. '05, my PSA is staying at 1. My Dr doesnt seem be
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> j.
Every 3 months sounds like a reasonable schedule. If
the PSA was way up or way down during treatment, you
probably would have seen it.
The doctor is probably going to 6 months now on the
theory that the PSA isn't doing anything radical
and doesn't need to be watched so closely now that
you and he know that. If it does go up in 6 months,
the existing flat trend indicates that it probably won't
be up much, and the treatment options would be the same
6 months from now as 3 months.
Of course it's easy for him not to be concerned and much
harder for you not to be concerned. But I'm thinking that
your chances are good. Radiation doesn't kill all the
tumor cells right away. They die slowly, over time, mostly
when they attempt to divide. They continue to express PSA
during that time and may even express more of it due to
the stress on the tumor cells, and the inflammation in the
prostate caused by radiation.
Best of luck.
Alan
and the stres
>I had radiation seeding on 29 December following a PSA jump to 4.4 Today I
>had a follow-up with the Urologist, and my PSA had dropped to 1.1
Great news, 3 putt.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05
Non Illegitimi Carborundum