Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Try these first four pages of the Introduction.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hugh Kearnley - 08 Feb 2007 22:30 GMT
This has been prompted by what I have knowledge of.
I may be ENTIRELY wrong in many of my assumptions. Please - correct them -
but NOT necessarily in the Group. I would prefer email.
What I'm seeking - is some affirmation that I'm on the right road.
(Err - and it all looks much nicer in RICH text!)
Got a shock when all my nice formatting went up the chimney!

Those who want to take part - info CAN be sent as EITHER MSOffice formats or
as PDF. Just say.

Suggested foods and Menus that may help in Prostate Cancer

Introduction.
           I decided to compile these menus in the hope that they might be
of some dietary help for men suffering from Prostate Cancer, more especially
for those men whose Cancer has Metastised to other parts of their bodies.
Prostate Cancer impacts on Family life more than other forms, as one of the
first treatments is to stop the Testicles from making Testosterone - which
feeds the Cancer cells. Without Testosterone however, libido and sex life
are very much affected.
In some - if not many or most cases, sexual relations just stop for at least
a protracted period of time. The hormones stopping Testosterone being made
have other effects much less desirable - at an extreme - Husband and wife
becoming simple caring housemates and this at times leading to breakdown of
the relationship. With most couples though, there is more than enough Love
to keep it all together.  It is Guys living alone and without support who
may get more from this.  However, it's meant to help everyone. I trust it
will.
I am not able or qualified to make comment on the side-effects of Treatments
and Hormones - apart from saying that in my own case, it has been described
to feeling like an extreme case of the Female Menopause. Hot flushes and
temper-tantrums, mood-swings and sulks being the least of it to date.
This will kept as free from jargon as possible and there will be few - if
any - references in the text although there will be a selective list of
references and a further reading list in the appendices.

1.    Many people simply get stuck trying to envision healthy and helpful
foods and meals beyond a limited knowledge or from reading recipes in
magazines.
2.    Lots of guys lose their appetite after diagnosis. Food doesn't seem to
matter to them as much as it did a day or so ago.
3.    Some get bored TRYING and give up - go back to their old styles of
eating.
4.    Some don't EVEN try and stay stuck in their old eating habits until it's
rather late in the day for anything to help meaningfully.
5.    Some have no knowledge and many don't have the skills so they again -
don't even try.
6.    Some are determined that they are not going to change
7.    Some just don't know how to make the effort
8.    Some are just not interested.  They have given up.  There are other
reasons too.  Some people think it might be too expensive.

These are NOT reasons to NOT at least TRY to change things if even a little
for the better. There are extensive essays to be found by very highly
qualified people, some of them Urology specialist Doctors and Oncologists
specialising in Prostate Cancer, some food scientists and one who is even a
Food Writer for a famous Food Magazine and a National Newspaper.  From these
Essays and from proven research, it is suggested that certain foods from
many sources may have some very important benefits to impart for guys with
Prostate Cancer.  I have made it a point of trying at least - to treat my
Cancer in a complimentary way to help medicines and more conventional
therapies such as Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy.
No-one has ANY idea whether any of these dietary measures WILL help in
Prostate Cancer, for nothing is beyond a doubt, proven.  However - we DO
know that changes in the diet that are for the better - generally do have at
least SOME impacts, especially on general health.  Much research has gone
into many specific foods and how they are cooked. Most of that research DOES
show that including more of some foods and cutting down others CAN have
benefits in Prostate Cancer.
Because I suffer not just from Cancer, but from Coronary Heart Disease and
Diabetes too - I am a T2 - I have tried to make the suggested meals as
friendly as possible for myself - and who knows - there may very well be
someone else out there with multiple diseases too whom this will all help.
I MUST point out that I know nothing whatever about Kidney Disease and must
exclude from this work, any recommendations for anyone on a Low-Potassium
diet.
In any case, before even thinking about eating anything that's in here -
please ask first the advice of your GP Doctor and he may - if you prompt
him - have you referred to a qualified dietician.  Before this is published
in any way or let loose on an unsuspecting public, it will be read over by
Dieticians specialising in each of the three diseases which I have.  They
will correct errors and omissions, but well aware of their zealousness - I
will allow those with a pinch of salt.

A VERY Brief explanation of Angiogenesis - what it is and what it does -in
Layman's terms.

Angiogenesis, is the natural process that all the cells in our bodies use to
grow new blood vessels.
Cancer cells also use this process to grow new blood vessels - and ONLY in
our Cancer cells - do we want that to stop.
When we discover something that helps to stop Angiogenesis in Cancer cells -
we call these "Angiogenesis Inhibitors"
When we discover something that helps Angiogenesis to happen - we try to
avoid that - 'something' getting into our bodies.
Almost all cells in our bodies do at some time get worn out and they do a
remarkable thing - they 'commit suicide'
That suicidal property is called "Apoptosis"
Unfortunately, Cancer Cells do not want to commit suicide, in fact Cancer
Cells don't know what to do with themselves,
so they just keep getting bigger and try to spread. THAT is the nature of
Cancer Cells and we have to try to arrest that by
finding some way to MAKE them subject to Apoptosis - and die.

·        In Prostate Cancer - the Cancer Cells are nourished by one of the
very Hormones that make us be physically Male - Testosterone, manufactured
mainly in our Testicles since the time of Puberty.
·        The use of other Hormones by way of Tablets, Injections or a
combination of them, send messages to the Pituitary gland in our Brain that
tells the Testicles to stop making Testosterone.
·        When the Prostate Cancer Cells stop being fed, they do what we do
when we stop being fed.  They stop growing - at least as fast as they
normally would - but they don't die. They have to be encouraged or taught
how to die by that process called Apoptosis.
·        There are, apart from certain medicines and medical procedures,
some foods that are thought from long investigation, to encourage this
process - Apoptosis. So, perhaps we should try to eat more of those foods.
·        There are a number of foods and substances in foods that actively
encourage Cancer Cells to grow, that help to feed them, even with or without
the presence of Testosterone. These are loosely termed as
"Angiogenesis-Activators"
·        Obviously - we should try to make our intake of foods that
encourage Angiogenesis, as low as possible and to make inclusions in our
diet of foods that might be Angiogenesis-Inhibitors as much as we can.

Finally in this section, I think the reader may think that although there is
no definite One Million Percent Proof that FOOD will help at all, that we
SHOULD nevertheless try to PREVENT Angiogenesis in Prostate Cancer Cells by
making selective choices in our diet -  and use diet too - to encourage
anything that MIGHT starve our Prostate Cancer Cells and encourage them to
commit suicide - that process called - Apoptosis.

So - What foods to cut down - or avoid - and why?

There is a substance called Omega-6 fatty acids found in many common foods,
most especially in Red Meats and Dairy Produce and to a lesser extent in
Normal Chicken and Duck Eggs. (In other Eggs too, but which are not in the
'normal' Scottish diet, such as Goose, Ostrich, Penguin etc.)
It's also found but to a (Not much) lesser extent in most Poultry that's
common to the Scottish diet - Chicken, Turkey, Duck, Goose, Guinea Fowl,
etc. It's less common (in the diet of some islanders who STILL like to
include) certain sea-birds and their eggs (as part of their diet.)
When Omega 6 Fatty Acids are eaten, they become a source in the body of both
Linoleic and Arachidonic Acids (among many others) and these are
unfortunately Angiogenesis activators - they encourage Angiogenesis - a VERY
bad thing for us guys with Prostate Cancer.
Dairy foods are brimming with Omega-6.
Pork has a lower Omega-6 content than most other meats from what we'll call
"4Legs & a Face"
The message is - stop eating as much from "4Legs & a Face" but IF you MUST
eat Animal Meat - use MORE from "Two Wings and a Face"  There is absolutely
NO restrictions on FISH - Especially  OILY FISH, like Salmon (NOT Farmed
Salmon - eat ONLY the WILD kind) Fresh Tuna, Sardines - both fresh and
canned - Herrings - Kippers - Bloaters - Mackerel - Pilchards - Sild - so
many more.
BUT - try to avoid Shellfish. Seafood is OK though. Squids and Octopus are
fine. Most Oriental seafood I have already looked at seem fine.

More on "How-To" - later.

So - what else about this Omega-6 stuff?

·        All forms of BEEF, LAMB, VEAL, ALL Furred Game and to a lesser
extent Feathered Game, need to be severely restricted. I know that an awful
lot of Scottish Men would find it difficult to completely cut out "Mince &
Tatties" - I'm NOT saying cut it out - just have it a lot less often, but
more on that later.
·        ALL DAIRY produce needs to be severely restricted. No more BUTTER,
as little CHEESE as possible - and most obviously - MILK consumption has to
be reduced as far as possible. Many Margarines are based on Dairy products
as part of their essential recipes - so be careful to read labels.
·        Switch to using either - or both - Oat Milk or a Soya Milk in place
of Animal Milks. The two best Oat Milks I have found - neither of which are
of the slightest use in tea or coffee - are - 1) "Oat Supreme" - sold in
Morrison Supermarkets. 2) "Oatley" seems only to be sold in Sainsbury. Both
are equally nice as a drink, but are best used for making 'smoothies', - as
savoury sauces for poached fish or as-is on cereals for breakfast.  Soya
Milks, the two best tasting - 1) is "So-Good" which has a superior if
slightly sweet flavour but only available in the chill cabinet. Among the
UHT Soya's, the best tasted is Morisson's own brand Unsweetened Soya Milk.
Not with the usual aftertaste at all.   I can NOT recommend ANY Rice Milks,
but someone might like to check some out. I tasted five and they were all
pretty awful.
·        CHEESE: - I have only tried two Non-Dairy Cheeses.  One purported
as being a non-dairy cheddar and was made from Soya. Called "Tofutti" it was
pretty horrible. These were cheese slices - akin to Kraft Slices. I tasted
the slices on their own - but they might be quite nice in a salad sandwich?
The Rice Cheese was again in slices - this one called "Rice Slices" as a
Mozzarella Type and at £2.19 for 8 slices - acceptable only as an occasional
treat as a substitute cheese for a Pizza-Type - it DOES taste like
Pizza-type Mozzarella   (More on this cheese later)
·        BUTTER - you really MUST eat as little as possible now. Occasional
treats are fine - once a week. Otherwise, find yourself a spread that has NO
Dairy products in the recipe. I made the mistake of buying a famous
margarine that WAS Dairy-Free, but the newest advice is to AVOID all spreads
made with SUNFLOWER OIL - because in a study - Guys with recurrent Cancer -
had been eating Margarines made from Sunflower Oils. The recurrences put
down by some VERY experienced Chemistry oriented Pathologists specialising
in Prostate Cancer - to - consumption of margarines containing Sunflower
Oil. This is ESPECIALLY now true for Prostate Cancer patients - who SHOULD
realise that the likes of a recently widely promoted Margarine that lowers
cholesterol - COULD kill them.
·        Sunflower Oil itself -  The "Saviour of Mankind" is a HUGE supplier
to the body of Alpha-Linoleic and Arachidonic Acids. THAT fact, is largely
ignored and disputed by dieticians of ALL persuasions. It is ALMOST - I
repeat - ALMOST - OK for use by VERY healthy people. MOST people are NOT
that healthy. Especially in Scotland.  So - restrict it's use even MORE than
Butter.
·        DON'T use Sunflower Oil - nor ANY other kind of Oil for deep
frying, unless you dispose of that oil after a single use.
·        Margarines and spreads made from OLIVE OIL - BUT which must contain
NO Trans-Fatty acids are your ideal spread. A reasonable one, is called
"Bertolli Spread" but it lacks taste. (I had to whip an amount of sea-salt
into it to make it acceptable - else it was very 'lardy' tasting and not
very nice.
·        DEEP FRYING - Many years ago in Sardinia, I first tasted "Potato
Chips" (In the US - French Fries) fried in Olive Oil. They were supremely
tasty -but the flavour, I later discovered, was down entirely to them being
fried very slowly from COLD until they were really golden and crispy. The
Oil was NEVER allowed to get to be very hot - if the oil got HOT - it
altered the flavour of the oil. So ALL my deep-frying now - when - and IF I
do it, is in Olive Oil.
·        OLIVE OIL - is almost UNIQUE - it has NO Omega-6 Oils.
·        Olive Oil - is expensive. But you CAN afford it. Think about the
cost if you DON'T.

Some More DONTS
I.P. Freely - 09 Feb 2007 00:57 GMT
> This has been prompted by what I have knowledge of.
> I may be ENTIRELY wrong in many of my assumptions. Please - correct them -
> but NOT necessarily in the Group. I would prefer email.

I didn't get past that request. E-mail opinions in alt.comix.peanuts are
fine, but in any topic more important than that, readers need a public
sanity check. If you want my editing, it will be right here for all to
see so I can't deliberately or accidentally mislead you.

I wouldn't rely on e-mailed cancer advice from anyone short of Peter
Scardino, and I'd double-check *his* identity and advice simply because
a) he wouldn't be e-mailing me and b) he doesn't know *me* as well as I
do. I'd generally be outright suspicious of any advice concealed from
public scrutiny, because at the very least it's subject to bias and/or
ignorance.

I.P.
NICK - 09 Feb 2007 20:39 GMT
Hugh Kearnley wrote:

>>  I would prefer email.

And I.P. replied:

> I didn't get past that request. E-mail opinions in alt.comix.peanuts are
> fine, but in any topic more important than that, readers need a public
> sanity check. If you want my editing, it will be right here for all to
> see so I can't deliberately or accidentally mislead you.

That is also a well-known tactic of e-mail address harvesters.

Reply via e-mail and they KNOW they have a valid address.

Then the spam follows.
I.P. Freely - 09 Feb 2007 06:24 GMT
Good start, Hugh. I'll be curious how long this project grows. i.e.,
where ya going to draw its limits?

Quick comments off the top of my head, some of which I think merit
further Googling:

First word of each sentence and proper nouns such as names of people and
places are about all that get capitalized.

Soy (including soya milk, tofu and its various forms such as tofutti and
tofurkey, soy-based vegetable protein) appears to encourage existing PC.

Butter is bad, period. Margarine is worse . . . not even counting any
Omega 6 content.

Peanut and then canola oils are better for frying because they degrade
less in the heat than olive oil. There's a tradeoff between their
Omega-6 content and the ill effects of degradation; I don't know which
impact is overall more important to PC pts, but the whole idea is to
actually *eat* little of the oil in which foods are fried.

From what we're seeing in this forum, many sexual relationships just
"evolve", not stop, until something like ADT shuts them down. Randy
and/or romantic couples find ways.

The guys living alone will die sooner anyway, statistically speaking;
men without partners die significantly earlier, especially with medical
problems.

These two statements seem to contradict:
"No-one has ANY idea whether any of these dietary measures WILL help in
Prostate Cancer, for nothing is beyond a doubt, proven." and
"Most of that research DOES show that including more of some foods and
cutting down others CAN have benefits in Prostate Cancer."
That's not surprising, because the research -- pardon me; the lay
*literature* we see -- is also contradictory. But you may want to
eliminate that conflict within your "Thing".

I'd get my dietary advice from a nutritionist rather than a physician.
U.S. physicians just don't study it very much unless that's changed
recently. I've had doctors not only prescribe dangerous food
combinations with meds and medical conditions, but refuse to heed my
insistence that they look it up.

Sea salt won't harm a healthy person, but it offers nothing special,
either. It's just coarser.

Some people, such as competitive athletes or . . . heart (and maybe
stroke?) patients . . . benefit from angiogenesis. It serves many valid
and even vital roles in their performance and health. It's yet another
benefit/detriment tradeoff to be researched and resolved on a case by
case basis.

As best as I can tell so far, farmed salmon is as good as wild, even
better in some ways.

Isn't most of dairy's Omega 6 in its fat content, thus avoidable with
low- or non-fat milk, thus allowable? I *hate* olive oil on my cereal,
which is one of my main meals most days.

What's the problem with shellfish? I love it and am not aware of a
problem with it.

I.P.
Bob C. - 09 Feb 2007 14:25 GMT
>  >
> As best as I can tell so far, farmed salmon is as good as wild, even
> better in some ways.
I.P., I have been of the understanding that fresh salmon is superior to
farm raised in terms of having lesser amounts of contaminants, PCB,
mercury and such. Omega 3 comparisions I don't know about (or remember?.
I have read this from more than one source over the years, but still do
not understand (or remember?) the reasoning for it. Large fresh salmon
have easily disposed of fat layers, and the younger smaller fresh salmon
have little to start with. Be the fish farm raised or fresh, removing
the fat beneath the skin along the sides  and the lighter hued fat along
the very top of the fish (if there is any) should eliminate the vast
majority of any contaminants. On larger fresh salmon, it is also
advisable to remove a portion of the belly meat.

Since going on Lupron, I watched my cholesterol levels climb in spite of
appropriate drugs. After a couple years of this, one  casual
recommendation of my Dr was to consume more salmon. Increasing my
consumption to 1-4 meals per week may have been the reason for a
dramatic reduction in the cholesterol levels I had, enough of a
reduction that the Doctor questioned what was I doing different. On
average, we consume one main meal of fresh salmon per week, with that
meal being large enough that there are left overs for 1-3 breakfasts.
There is normally also a weekly meal of some fresh water fish, or
sometimes Halibut. The salmon and Halibut are always done on the grill
so no oils are involved, and freshwater fish are now cooked in olive oil.

I also would be interested in hearing more about shellfish, as I am not
aware of any problem.

> Isn't most of dairy's Omega 6 in its fat content, thus avoidable with
> low- or non-fat milk, thus allowable? I *hate* olive oil on my cereal,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I.P.
I.P. Freely - 10 Feb 2007 04:53 GMT
> I.P., I have been of the understanding that fresh salmon is superior to
> farm raised in terms of having lesser amounts of contaminants, PCB,
> mercury and such. Omega 3 comparisions I don't know about (or remember?.

Some of those and related issues are addressed in the current issue of
the Harvard Health Letter article, "The Dish on Fish". It rated salmon
as the best deal on on EPA and DHA (you'd pay 20 times that much for the
same amount of Omega 6 from catfish, for example), and says farmed has
more PCBs (which *may* cause cancer, immune deficiencies, and
neurological defects) but has 2.5 times the Omega 6 of wild salmon.
Farmed has less mercury than, say, tune, but until you and I get
pregnant we don't care about a little mercury. Besides, selenium may
mitigate mercury's impact, and fish and shellfish are rich in selenium.

I haven't researched the salmon tradeoffs thoroughly, but there seems to
be consensus on two aspects of it: its benefits exceed its risks and
beyond 6 oz a week its benefit plateau. Of course, who eats only a
six-ounce sliver out of a two-pound Costco slab of freshly grilled
salmon (I prefer theirs to the commercial salmon Gold Standard, Copper
River salmon, and prefer either to freshly caught salmon my friends have
given me from the nearby Columbia River.

> Since going on Lupron, I watched my cholesterol levels climb in spite of
> appropriate drugs. After a couple years of this, one  casual
> recommendation of my Dr was to consume more salmon.

One of the reasons doctors offer for fish's otherwise unexplained
favorable impact on our lipids it that if we're eating fish, we're
eating less red meat and its sat fat. Since I had to quit statins
because of muscle and joint pain, my lipids have gone haywire again . .
. total and low-density chol up, HDL down, triglycerides up . . . but
those are just numbers on a page compared to debilitating pain with
every move. Besides, the threat of moderately high cholesterol may be
way overblown as other markers take its place, and even triglycerides
have some advantages.

I.P.
Bob C. - 10 Feb 2007 15:08 GMT
>   >
> One of the reasons doctors offer for fish's otherwise unexplained
> favorable impact on our lipids it that if we're eating fish, we're
> eating less red meat and its sat fat. Since I had to quit statins
 I.P., I also questioned whether the numbers benefits I saw came
directly from the increased consumption of salmon, or was a percentage
of the benefit due to replacing red meats. Based only on my own
experiences, I am pretty sure that most of the benefits came directly
from the increased intake of the salmon with a much lesser benefit being
derived from the exclusion of red meat. I say this based upon 1)
watching my cholesterol and triglycerides remain at very high levels in
spite of reducing red meat consumption in earlier periods of time.  2) I
currently make little attempt to reduce red meat intake, but the salmon
meals we have only eliminate one meal of red stuff each week on average.
The additional salmon consumption is at breakfasts which almost never
included red meats or saturated fats anyway. 3) My doctor, knowing how
my numbers had leveled out at such high levels (memory glitch here, but
300+ for total choles and 506 for trig) even while on statins,
questioned what did I do, when my numbers began to drop. During this
time I was still at my desk job so there were no substantial changes in
physical activity, and my Lupron weight was very slowly climbing.  Right
now I run about 179 for total cholesterol and 282 for triglycerides. Not
great, but lots better.

I do not claim the salmon intake to be a magic bullet for cholesterol
problems, but I sure am not going to reduce my intake of it. I have a
hundred  plus pounds of locally caught king and coho salmon and other
fish in the freezer (along with a similar quantity steaks, hamburger,
venison, and other red meats) and it will all be going to waist, rather
than to waste. The Great Lakes, our woodlot, and nearby farmers, have
all providith well!

After all this, I now am remembering that I did go for some extended
time period where we were consuming even higher amounts of salmon that I
now claim, like a couple main meals a week plus the numerous breakfasts
to handle the leftovers. Maybe that was when the numbers began to
improve so much, when we did eat a lot more of it. Well, for what little
it's worth, that's my story on salmon. Now I will go get a package of
Coho out of the freezer for tonight, instead of the venison tenderloin I
was planning on.
I.P. Freely - 12 Feb 2007 00:07 GMT
That's a significant improvement; I'd keep on keepin' on with the fish
at that rate. Do you know what your chol and trig were before your ADT
began? I *know* my doc is going to want me back on statins soon, because
they improved my lipids very significantly.

I.P.

>>   >
>> One of the reasons doctors offer for fish's otherwise unexplained
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Coho out of the freezer for tonight, instead of the venison tenderloin I
> was planning on.
Bob C. - 12 Feb 2007 15:24 GMT
> That's a significant improvement; I'd keep on keepin' on with the fish
> at that rate. Do you know what your chol and trig were before your ADT
> began?
I.P., all I remember is that my total cholesterol was just low enough
that I did not any need medication for it or for blood pressure, but I
have no recollection of what my triglycerides were. Every pre-surgery,
pre-radiation, pre-Lupron doctor exclaimed at what good shape I was in,
how healthy I was. Hmmm, have not heard that for awhile now. But we are
doing pretty good in spite of it all.
Hugh Kearnley - 09 Feb 2007 18:42 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "I.P. Freely" <fuhgheddaboutit@noway.nohow>
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer.prostate
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: Try these first four pages of the Introduction.

> Good start, Hugh. I'll be curious how long this project grows. i.e., where
> ya going to draw its limits?

Hi I.P. - nice to hear from you.
I'm concerned MAINLY with the FOOD aspects, but anything that impacts on PCa
would be considered.
This is NOT meant to be an encyclopaedia dealing with Prostate Cancer - but
about foods that might help and substances and habits we should put in the
cellar out of harms way.

> Quick comments off the top of my head, some of which I think merit further
> Googling:
>
> First word of each sentence and proper nouns such as names of people and
> places are about all that get capitalized.

Obviously you ain't a Food Pro, - it's a habit you get into when making up
menus - Capitalising the names of foods and descriptions of them in written
or printed menus. Next time you go out have a hard look at some menus - it
MIGHT be different in North America, but fairly common here in Europe. - I
also use Capitalisation to **STRESS** certain words, a habit I got into when
preparing texts for trainee chefs. If it wasn't written BIG - it was passed
over ...

> Soy (including soya milk, tofu and its various forms such as tofutti and
> tofurkey, soy-based vegetable protein) appears to encourage existing PC.

Yes, I have read about those from several sources - and stopped taking a
supplement (Spent a damned fortune a week ago in a health foods shop - most
of it rubbish!) of Soya Isoflavones.
The reason I started with Soya Milk - I'd been trying to eliminate Dairy as
much as possible, but your point about low fat (Dairy) milks has me thinking
all over again. Low fat and totally skimmed must be VERY (Sorry!) low in
sources of the eventual Arachidonic acid. I'll have a really hard look at
that.

> Butter is bad, period. Margarine is worse . . . not even counting any
> Omega 6 content

Yup - totally agree - but the once a week slice of hot buttered toast at
bedtime is SUCH comfort food...! (Especially with a large mug of Hot
Chocolate! - ha-haa!)

> Peanut and then canola oils are better for frying because they degrade
> less in the heat than olive oil. There's a tradeoff between their Omega-6
> content and the ill effects of degradation; I don't know which impact is
> overall more important to PC pts, but the whole idea is to actually *eat*
> little of the oil in which foods are fried.

The point I was making regarding Olive Oil - was **flavour** and
low-temperature cooking so the fat would NOT (Sorry! - and thats the last
time I apologise for it) begin to de-nature to harmful phenols.
As far as I know, Olive Oil is the ONLY oil that's virtually free of Omega
6 - that's why I use it as much now.
Peanut Oil is available in UK and I prefer using that oil for the likes of
Curries and other dishes that require Oil, but I don't want Oil flavours
creeping in.  But I have yet to see anywhere in UK - anything described as
Canola Oil - although it seems to a very common and much used oil in North
America. Maybe I'm looking but not seeing?  Only very recently did I see in
the shops "Miracle-Whip" - something that seems to have been in common use
in North America for a good number of years.

> From what we're seeing in this forum, many sexual relationships just
> "evolve", not stop, until something like ADT shuts them down. Randy and/or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> without partners die significantly earlier, especially with medical
> problems.

Oh - thanks very much! I just KNEW that living alone would come along and
kick me in the Butt at some point! But, I'm ME - NOT a statistic. (Yet)
I think that perhaps I should have left that section OUT.  I'm no expert
regarding relationships - apart from how to break them up. (Or is it the
ladies - who although they KNOW that I'm utterly happy with XYZ Curtains,
Carpets, placing of furniture and so on - nevertheless get me extremely
annoyed when chairs are re-arranged, different curtains put up, and in one
case - the kitchen re-arranged to something resembling a charity auction.
(That lady lasted exactly two and a half days)  I know EXACTLY where
everything in my home is. People why try to re-organise me just cause
grief - mostly for themselves.

> These two statements seem to contradict:
> "No-one has ANY idea whether any of these dietary measures WILL help in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> *literature* we see -- is also contradictory. But you may want to
> eliminate that conflict within your "Thing".

Exactly, I.P., why I need someone or more persons, to correct me. I'm a
learner at all this - you guys are a very deep mine of information that I
need to contribute to this.
I want this to be able to show some other Newbie who feels a bit lost - and
maybe too - some guys who have been around a lot longer - that there MIGHT
be something they can do to help not just grab this Tiger by it's tail, but
to throw it right outta the fuckin window.
The information I have gathered - some of it IS contradictory and a lot of
what is available is unfounded. Lots of 'we suspect that' - 'it could be' -
'there would seem to be' and so on.  Nothing seems to be set in stone
regarding the benefits of certain foods or food supplements.
But where you get the occassional Gem - such as the benefits of Capsaicin
and maybe Pomegranates - that has to be seriously considered.
I'll admit to at times - being contradictory.
YOU are the guys to sort that and stop it. OK? - So Give me help there - do
some editing. Suggest different wording.

> I'd get my dietary advice from a nutritionist rather than a physician.
> U.S. physicians just don't study it very much unless that's changed
> recently. I've had doctors not only prescribe dangerous food combinations
> with meds and medical conditions, but refuse to heed my insistence that
> they look it up.

MOST of what I have learned regarding PCa Nutritional advice HAS come from
the Internet and has been written by Physicians and some by guys with PCa.
In the UK, we do have Nutritionists but they are few and far between. Hard
to get hold of.
Most branches of individual diseases in the UK - such as Diabetes, Heart
Health, Cancers, etc  - all have their own specialised Dieticians. Some of
the individual advices from the different branches are extremely
contradictory - and MANY of them quite out of date with current thinking and
science.
My own training as a Chef dealt with Nutrition, but was very basic. It was a
simple interest in nutrition generally that has made me aware of the
different requirements for not just basic good health, but for different
diseases. I tried to keep up to date with it all - sometimes confounding a
doctor's advice and challenging thier knowledge.  A doctor who I saw at a
Diabetes clinic, insisted that he was correct in telling me to eat less
cholesterol. When I told him that dietary cholesterol has little impact on
serum cholesterol, he got very agitated  He disagreed with me when I said it
was heavy (Saturated) fats and more especially trans-fats that caused rises
in serum cholesterol. (He had to go and check then came back and changed the
subject...)
I'm NOT an expert, but I DO know that the advice dolled out in a leaflet by
UK Cancer Dieticians is absolute Crap! They are recommending CAKES filled
with DAIRY Cream, packets of Chips, (UK - Crisps) - High Sugar drinks - high
carbohydrate foods that would have my Diabetic Dieticians screaming!  ALL
very confusing - so now I'm just ignoring most of it - filtering out the
obvious rubbish - but in the end - put it all in a seive and even the REAL
GEMS of postive information get washed away with the meaningless chaff.
I'm TRYING to find those Gems and sort them into something positive that
MIGHT help.

> Sea salt won't harm a healthy person, but it offers nothing special,
> either. It's just coarser.

Beg to differ Pal - Sea Salt has minute amounts of many other minerals that
common rock salt doesn't have.
Normally, I use Iodised Salt for cooking - something that escapes me now
about radiation absorption prevention...
And those Ions are present anyway in sea-salt.
Maybe MY immagination - but sea-salt - you seem to need less of it to get
the same flavour development than if you used common rock or mined salt.
ANOTHER word on Salt - my Coronary dietician advised AGAINST using
Low-Sodium Salt - it's TOO high in Potassium  - with risks of Brachycardia.
Is there NO end to all the nonsense?

> Some people, such as competitive athletes or . . . heart (and maybe
> stroke?) patients . . . benefit from angiogenesis. It serves many valid
> and even vital roles in their performance and health. It's yet another
> benefit/detriment tradeoff to be researched and resolved on a case by case
> basis.

I THINK I said in my "Very Basic" intoduction to Angiogenesis, - which may
now have to be edited to make it properly understood - I think I said that
it was necessary for all the body's cells to grow and regenerate, but it
wasn't desirable in Cancer Cells. I will look at that again.  In my own
case - Angiogenesis was considered a terrifically GOOD thing when after
three Angioplasty procedures with Stent placements and nothing further to be
done on that score, drugs that encouraged angiogenesis were given and
resulted in new blood vessels being grown to naturally by-pass the affected
arteries.

> As best as I can tell so far, farmed salmon is as good as wild, even
> better in some ways.

My information on that may be UK/Europe specific. I.P.
Feedstuffs for Farmed Fishes in Western Europe comes mainly from the far
east. (So cheap....)
For a LONG time, a lot of that feed was badly contaminated with Cadmium and
Chromium and not discovered until the fish were exported to the Russias -
when immediately those heavy metals were discovered in the FLESH - NOT just
the FATS. Imports of Farmed fish from Western Europe were immediately
banned.
The ban was eventually lifted late last year after elimination of the
affected feeds.
However - most of the Scottish Salmon Farms are on the West Coast of
Scotland.  They are subject to some tidal influences, most of them being
contained within sea-lochs.
The West Coast Waters of both Scotland and England are home to the waste
products from Nuclear Power Generation stations.
Many examples in the last 20 years have shown radiological traces in the
flesh of most fish caught in Hebridean, the Minches and West Scotland waters
due to Dounereay and the other Nuclear Power Stations.
Now - I prefer to eat North American WILD Salmon and would advise others to
do that too.  I will search out the lnk where I first saw about Contam of
Farmed Fish and post that for further reading.
Incidentally - almost ALL canned Salmon sold in the UK - is sourced from
North American Wild Salmon (Expensive ones from Pacific Seas & Rivers) - so
there you are on that! I actually prefer canned Salmon over Fresh Salmon.
The bones annoy me too much - but in Canned Salmon - just 'nibbly-tasty'
bits -like the skin too. Full of Vits and Mins.

> Isn't most of dairy's Omega 6 in its fat content, thus avoidable with low-
> or non-fat milk, thus allowable? I *hate* olive oil on my cereal, which is
> one of my main meals most days.

Ha-ha! - I 'm not fond of Olive Oil on MY Wheetiebangs either!  Can't fail
to have a good meal with wheetiebangs & cold Cow's Milk! But my own
preferred breakfast is Oatmeal porridge flavoured with Powdered Cinnamon and
lots of Icy-Cold Milk poured over. NO added salt. Sometimes uncooked
Oatflakes with grated fresh apple or a Mango obliterated into the milk.
Another MILK point to be seriously hard looked at.
IF the Omega 6 is ONLY in the fat content - I see no reason now to avoid
Cow's milk - as long as it's very low in fat. THAT alone - allows great
scope in the recipe sections for using Cow Milk for making sauces and
enriching soups
Yup - yet another terrific comment that I appreciate being made.

> What's the problem with shellfish? I love it and am not aware of a problem
> with it.
>
> I.P.

There are SUGGESTIONS that foods rich in ZINC - among the biggest culprits -
shellfish - may have in advanced PCa, certain 'other' nutrients that are
unfriendly to us.  Puts paid to the previously thought Oysters, but these
nutrients do not apparently have any great effects on early detected
cancer - that is - PRE-Mets.  My own GP advised me to stop taking the Zinc
supplemements.  I'll find it very hard to stop eating Crab and Rock Lobster
though...!  (Maybe as a treat will be fine) Needs more investigation.

Thank-You so much, I.P., and the other guys who have responded to this -
together - we might make this a definitive guide to Nutrition for the new
guys.
Keep it up - Huh?

Right now - away to get ready for the Fishing Club's first expedition of
this year to the northern town of Fraserburgh. Hoping to catch some good
in-shore Flounders, perhaps even a few Sea-Bass that I love to eat just
wrapped in a paper bag and roasted, - quite luscious with a glass of beer.
The weather though is pretty horrible!
See yas all later - Sunday after Church probably for a catch-up.
Thanks so much guys.
HUGHIE.
Hugh Kearnley - 09 Feb 2007 19:12 GMT
Also meant to say that I have an Hour long appointment booked with  my
personal Dietician on 7th March - she has been busy looking at the
differences between all the varying recommends from different health
interest dieticians.
Possibly a a LOT of information?
Her email to me - she sounded - annoyed?
Maybe she's learned some thing that challenges HER knowledge too.
Maybe - she's just pissed at me!
However - I have been summoned. (Gentle cough as I get the sleeping bag
ready for our trip up north...)
Good Fun - I LOVE fishing!
Righto..
Good weekend in prospect.
HUGHIE.
I.P. Freely - 11 Feb 2007 05:01 GMT
> Yup - totally agree - but the once a week

If I had tried to quit donuts, bacon, butter, and fried chicken skin
"except for once a week" 20 years ago, I'd  a) have quit them 1,040
times by now and b) found a way to stuff chicken breasts with donuts and
wrap them in bacon and deep fry them in boiling butter once a week. Cold
turkey, once, was easy.

> The point I was making regarding Olive Oil - was **flavour** and
> low-temperature cooking so the fat would NOT (Sorry! - and thats the last
> time I apologise for it)

No apology needed here; I also use caps for emphasis on USENET. It's the
 Turkey and Cheese caps that don't cut it in any literature I've seen.

begin to de-nature to harmful phenols.
> As far as I know, Olive Oil is the ONLY oil that's virtually free of Omega
> 6 - that's why I use it as much now.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> People why try to re-organise me just cause grief - mostly for themselves.

Hah! I LOVE that sentiment.

>> These two statements seem to contradict:
>> "No-one has ANY idea whether any of these dietary measures WILL help in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> learner at all this - you guys are a very deep mine of information that I
> need to contribute to this.

OK, how about this:
"Foods and supplements rumored to affect prostate cancer fall into three
classes: a couple have been proved to promote PC, a couple have been
proved to suppress PC, and the rest are suspected of clustering near one
of those extremes . . . including some that tend to switch clusters as
studies come and go. Their uncertainty implies that we needn't get too
obsessive about this."

 >> Sea salt won't harm a healthy person, but it offers nothing special,
>> either. It's just coarser.
>
> Beg to differ Pal - Sea Salt has minute amounts of many other minerals that
> common rock salt doesn't have.

Mayo clinic: " Sea salt and kosher salt: Are they better for you than
regular salt? Nutritionally speaking, kosher salt and sea salt are no
different than table salt. "

Gourmetsleuth.com: "most sea salt (even the stuff sold in health food
stores), is every bit as refined as mined salt, so the bulk of the trace
minerals are processed out--a fact that is even recognized by some sea
salt advocates such as Christiane Northrup, M.D., a physician
specializing in women's health and editor of the newsletter "Health
Wisdom for Women.""

Dr. Mirkin, a syndicated medical studies junkie: " Sea salt is not more
healthful than regular table salt. Sea salt and table salt both contain
sodium chloride. Sea salt also contains small amounts of magnesium
chloride, magnesium sulfate and calcium sulfate, which are nutritionally
insignificant. Sea salt, kosher salt, monosodium glutamate, and
seasoning salts are all treated the same way in your body."

And on and on and on. I put far more faith in medical sites than I do in
sites selling anything.

> Normally, I use Iodised Salt for cooking - something that escapes me now
> about radiation absorption prevention...
> And those Ions are present anyway in sea-salt.

Nope. The iodine must be added, and by the time they do that, the sea
salt has been refined to the point it's generally . . . table salt. The
iodine is *vital* to our health.

> ANOTHER word on Salt - my Coronary dietician advised AGAINST using
> Low-Sodium Salt - it's TOO high in Potassium  - with risks of Brachycardia.
> Is there NO end to all the nonsense?

Apparently not, as I've read that potassium chloride -- i.e., half of
low-sodium salt -- is not very bioavailable, thus not even a good source
of potassium, let alone too much of it. I haven't followed that dilemma
very far across the internet yet, so don't *know* the answer, but,
personally, I need to take potassium daily (despite using low-sodium
salt for many years) so my legs don't cramp during and after extended
exercise. The improvement was obvious within 24 hours.

>> Some people, such as competitive athletes or . . . heart (and maybe
>> stroke?) patients . . . benefit from angiogenesis. It serves many valid
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it was necessary for all the body's cells to grow and regenerate, but it
> wasn't desirable in Cancer Cells. I will look at that again.  

Not on my account; I agree.

> my own
> preferred breakfast is Oatmeal porridge flavoured with Powdered Cinnamon and
> lots of Icy-Cold Milk poured over.

I really like oatmeal, as we call it, but ate it prepared like you do
for some 60 years. But now there's a palm print embedded in my forehead,
 put there the first time I conceded to try it the way my wife eats it:
a  dash of maple syrup and/or brown sugar *instead* of milk. CRAP! I've
wasted 6 decades making milk soup out of my oatmeal when I could have
been using syrup and brown sugar for superior flavor and enjoying far
superior texture. (I also add LOTS of raisins a couple of minutes before
removing the oatmeal from the stove.)

> I'll find it very hard to stop eating Crab and Rock Lobster
> though...!  (Maybe as a treat will be fine) Needs more investigation.

Absolutely! I'd neither start eating crappy foods nor quit eating great
ones without pretty hard proof of their effects.

> Right now - away to get ready for the Fishing Club's first expedition of
> this year to the northern town of Fraserburgh. Hoping to catch some good
> in-shore Flounders . . . and sea bass

Have to laugh. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Bay_Jubilee 
 . We'd run down to the shores of the Gulf of Mexico with huge tubs at
dawn, pick up flounder and sea bass and crabs by the hundreds, run back
up to the house and cook 'em before they were even dead. GOOD eats!
OTOH, here near the opposite corner of the States, the sports pages of
local newspapers quote the number of hours the average fisherman spends
to catch *each* steelhead -- measured in hours, often 6-10 hours between
adjacent catches. Others fish for our sturgeon, which can hit about 700
kilograms in the local river. Saw a guy's knee destroyed when a leaping
sturgeon hit him while he was windsurfing.

I.P.
WhiteSoxFan - 09 Feb 2007 15:57 GMT
Amazing what we 'catch' when we go fishing. Googling is a little like
fishing. Ya chooses your lure (search words) and up pops the finds. At
any rate I put my lure out consisting of the search words (omega-6 and
yogurt) because I have some whole grain cereal along with Brazil nuts
(selenium) and fresh fruit topped with yogurt just about every
morning. I was curious about the yogurt and its omega-6 content. At
any rate a few finds down I came across this blog that is pretty darn
good:

http://weightoftheevidence.blogspot.com/2006/10/omega-3-and-omega-6-food-sources.html

Keep in mind that the above url may be partially hyperlinked and you
may need to copy and paste the whole thing. This blog has detailed
ratios of omega-6 to omega-3 for dozens of foods in many food groups
which I think would prove interesting to many of you. The first set of
ratios are confusing to read but further down someone has clearly
retyped the ratios.

An other of my recent food finds include lemongrass and ginger. I've
found a teabag that is a green tea with lemongrass and ginger. But
better than that when I can get it is I buy fresh lemongrass and
ginger. I slice a stalk of lemongrass into half inch pieces crosswise,
the ginger into slivers, about 3 to 6 and boil these in a cup and a
half of water for about 6 to 10 minutes. I've drunk this straight on
occasion but its pretty strong. Sometimes added honey. Sometimes
dilluted it with water, etc.

WSF
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.