Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2007
How to Get Unbiased Advice -- Inside Info?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
callalily - 04 Jan 2007 23:33 GMT Dear All,
I saw this in another forum and thought it was interesting.
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:53:14 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Hilton <sunstone4gems@yahoo.com>
My son-in-law, who is an MD, an Internist, and is in training to become a cardiologist, gave me this advice: Anyone diagnosed with Prostate Cancer (and I suppose, any other cancer) should make an appointment with a Medical Oncologist. Unlike specialists, who all seem to believe (or want you to believe) that thier way of doing things is best, a Medical Oncologist does not do the radiation, or the prostate surgery, or other options; they stay abreast of the most recent research in the area of cancer (an often specialize in certain types) and will give the pros and cons of each type of treatment, without having to "sell" any particular one.
My son-in-law was First in his class at George Washington University, trained to be an internist at New York Presbyterian, and Sloan-Kettering, Had the best research paper of his graduating class, (Harvard University asked him to come down to present the paper there.), and he, while in Med school, worked for the Center for Disease Control, and was among those taken to the White House for briefings on bird flu. In short, he is top-notch. Oh, did I mention, he was the top choice of the Director of Cleveland Clinic's Cardiology Department?
He said that the Medical Oncologist can be like a quarter-back directing the over-all treatment program.
Steve Jordan - 05 Jan 2007 00:28 GMT On January 4, Leah wrote, in pertinent part:
> My son-in-law, who is an MD, an Internist, and is in training to > become a cardiologist, gave me this advice: Anyone diagnosed with [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > types) and will give the pros and cons of each type of treatment, > without having to "sell" any particular one. Bingo!
I'm glad to see this support for my oft-repeated rant that PCa patients should consult a real live honest-to-God *cancer specialist* when considering tx options. Unless a uro is one of those few who are thoroughly trained in *cancer* treatment, he will almost always urge surgery. That's how he pays for his lifestyle.
Unfortunately, we all too often see pts here who have proceeded with a surgery which was not (as advertised) curative. IIRC, Strum has written (on P2P) that med oncs frequently are consulted by pts whose clinical situations have deteriorated significantly because they were not properly txd by urologists. So med oncs find themselves confronted by pts who present with awful clinical records and who hope that the med oncs are able to help them.
We also often see pts who are receiving ADT from uros who have no idea what they are doing, but are mindlessly following a recipe. It's called (by medics) "cookbook medicine." It bears little or no resemblance to science. Especially the science of learning about the individual pt's unique clinical record. Too much labor, not enough time.
Yes, it's true that I go on and on about consulting an onc when/if the uro's surgery fails to cure (AIUI, about 30% of the cases). That's because folks who post here are too often post-RP and wondering what to do.
No one should conclude that I am against RP of whatever type. Not that my opinion should control anyone's tx selection. It can be curative but it is all too often not.
> He said that the Medical Oncologist can be like a quarter-back > directing the over-all treatment program. Exactly.
Regards,
Steve J
"We must tailor the treatment to the nature of the disease. We must listen to the biology." —Stephen B. Strum, MD
callalily - 05 Jan 2007 00:50 GMT Hello Steve,
> On January 4, Leah wrote, in pertinent part: > > > My son-in-law, who is an MD, an Internist, and is in training to > > become a cardiologist, gave me this advice: Please attribute this correctly!! I don't even have a son-in-law.
I said that A person in another forum who I don't even know from Adam posted this message (in prostate pointers RP mailing list). Below is the date of the post and the person's name. Only reason I thought it might be reliable is that the son-in-law seems to have excellent credentials. But remember, he is not a cancer specialist but a doctor in training.
This is one man's opinion, keep that in miind.
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:53:14 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Hilton <sunstone4g...@yahoo.com>
Leah
Steve Jordan - 05 Jan 2007 01:15 GMT On January 4, Leah wrote, in pertinent part:
> Please attribute this correctly!! I don't even have a son-in-law. Correction noted.
Regards,
Steve J
I.P. Freely - 05 Jan 2007 03:15 GMT > Dear All, > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > pros and cons of each type of treatment, without having to "sell" any > particular one. You're right that the med onc has broad cancer tx expertise, and thus often directs a pt's tx. But since her primary hammer is medicine -- i.e., drugs, aka ADT in our case -- we need to closely examine her impartiality if she recommends . . . ta daaaa . . . treatment by medicine. I considered, justifiably I believe, the published research/ teaching/ practicing med onc I consulted before deciding about ADT to be just another leg of my treatment stool, along with the rad onc and the uro (surg) onc.
I.P.
Bill - 05 Jan 2007 15:44 GMT Oh were it that simple. Unfortunately, as I noted recently in another thread, there doesn't seem to be many med-oncs who specialize in PCa. Perhaps one reason is because PCa cells divide relatively slowly, traditional chemo that targets fast-dividing cancer cells (and hair) has not worked well on PCa. I.e. med-oncs really haven't had anything for us. And it has been customary for uros to treat through the ADT stage. I'm afraid that unless you find a med-onc specializing or at least having an interest in PCa, you will get the same "cookbook medicine."
Strum is one of the few people I hear talking about futile primary Tx. The fact is that no man wants to hear that he missed his chance for cure, and the "cut-it-out" mentality prevails. It is perceved that having RP, RT, etc. is being aggressive, is doing something, acting, addressing the problem, etc. How many men here, in the absence of documented systemic disease, would forego ablation in one form or another as primary Tx? W/ a PSA of 33 I was on the borderline but everyone I knew, including doctor-friends, said you've got to take the one chance you have at cure. It's human nature - the survival instinct.
I am not arguing against med-oncs - you should have one on your team from the outset; but when you recur, you absolutely need one.
Bill Denton RP 2/12/02 PSA 1.10 Memphis
WANTED: MEDICAL ONCOLOGIST SPECIALIZING IN RECURRENT/ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER. MUST BE ABREAST OF ALL CURRENT RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENTS/TREATMENTS. SOUTHEAST AREA. CONTACT ABOVE.
Jon Bilec - 11 Jan 2007 18:29 GMT Hey, I read your email, and I would just like to share with you what happened to us. I don't want this to sound like an info-merical, but honestly this stuff (Xango) is almost to good to be true.. It has actually been an answer to prayer for us. My mom has been bed ridden for years from rheumatoid arthritis, and she just had her neck and most of her spine fused, and was having complications, actually she was having mini strokes, and migraines everyday. And it was beginning to look pretty hopeless. But an old friend called her, and told her about this product that helped them with some pretty serious health problems, so she decided to try, since there weren't many options left. Within a week, her headaches were gone, and strokes stopped, and she was able to get out of bed, and move around!! And my dad's carpal tunnel pain, went away totally. So we went on it, and my allergies were cleared up, and my acne, also cleaned up. And my wife had chronic pain in her shoulder that she was taking anti-inflammatory, and muscle relaxants, and ranitidine, because of what all that did to her stomach, and now she is down to a couple of Advil before bed!! Anyways, so you can go and check it out yourself. There are testemonials for so many things from cancer, to ms, to kids who have autism becoming more responsive, i know it seems weird that one thing could do so much but on the web site it explains it all. And just so you know, there is a money back guarantee so if it doesn't work for you, you get your money back. That is how sure they are of there product. www.mymangosteen.com/roybilec -tells you about product www.researchmangosteen.org - what it does, testimonials
Sincerely, Jonathan Bilec
I.P. Freely - 11 Jan 2007 22:48 GMT PLONK
Don't these stupid SOBs understand that they're pissing their very target audience?
I.P. on Jon Bilec
|
|
|