Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / December 2006
Lurking for HELP!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
mikeddy@hawaii.rr.com - 21 Dec 2006 05:42 GMT Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I am 55 years old, I have been happily married for 35 years, I have two grown sons, I live in a tropical paradise, and I have just been diagnosed with Prostate Cancer. All of the initial tests seem to indicate that the Cancer has not spread to any other organs. I am now at the point I must decide between Radiation Therapy or RP, and my head is spinning with all of the available data. I should also mention that I am scared to death. I don't want to die, but I also don't want to see my wife (also 55 years old) spend the rest of her life dealing with my impotence. I am scared, confused and I feel as if there is no hope. I would appreciate hearing from others who have felt this same way yet have positive comments to share.
Thank you.
Mike
Steve Jordan - 21 Dec 2006 06:20 GMT On December 20, Mike wrote:
(snip)
> All of the initial tests seem to > indicate that the Cancer has not spread to any other organs. I am now [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > there is no hope. I would appreciate hearing from others who have > felt this same way yet have positive comments to share. This is unlikely to be the end, or even the beginning of the end, though without the test results it is impossible to say for certain.
I have three recommendations:
1. See the authoritative website of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) at http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html ...and start with the section “Newly Diagnosed.” There is much excellent and objective information.
2. Meet the members of the local chapter of the support group UsToo! International. There are four Hawaii chapters listed on the website at http://www.ustoo.com/Default.asp It’s a wonder how helpful face to face discussion with others — including wives — who have been there can be.
3. Buy and study the best book (IMO) on the subject, _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ 2nd ed., by medical oncologist and PCa specialist Stephen B. Strum, MD, and PCa warrior Donna Pogliano. It is available anywhere books are sold and on the UsToo! and PCRI sites.
The better educated the patient, the more likely an optimum outcome.
Good luck. Keep us informed.
Regards,
Steve J
"Empowerment: taking responsibility for and authority over one's own outcomes based on education and knowledge of the consequences and contingencies involved in one's own decisions. This focus provides the uplifting energy that can sustain in the face of crisis." --Donna Pogliano, co-author of _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_, subtitled "The Empowered Patient's Guide."
Steve Kramer - 21 Dec 2006 11:07 GMT > Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > there is no hope. I would appreciate hearing from others who have > felt this same way yet have positive comments to share. Mike,
Welcome to the club for which no one petitioned membership.
I was in your shoes six years ago (10/17/2000) at Age 46. I was married 25 years and had children. As a matter of fact, if you look back through the archives of this newsgroup, you will find that almost everyone was devastated with their diagnosis, they were all scared to die, and most were first concerned for their wives and or families. In other words, you dropped into a group of men just like you.
If you doc is telling you that the cancer has not spread, then you likely have low numbers, like PSA <4.0, Stage of T1 or T2, and Gleason of 6 or 7. We would like to know these numbers so we can best address your concerns. Some may then tell you of the wonders of surgery and others will steer you to radiation. But none will do so without knowing the numbers.
In the end, we will all agree that you need to research, research, research. This is a mind-boggling disease and you need to know the pros and cons of each treatment and compare them to your priorities and realities. Unfortunately, you will find that impotence, at least temporarily, is a very good possibility. So is incontinence. But, for most, these are temporary.
Two things are certain:
1. Your life just changed. 2. You just made a whole bunch of new friends.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Buttercup's Dad - 21 Dec 2006 13:18 GMT Hello Mike: You will get a lot of good advice here, part of which will be to research all you can because once you make the decision there is no turning back. I had the surgery, and part of my reasoning was that if there were to be a reoccurance I would have a second swing at the beast with salvage radiation. I have seen a lot of guys say that here. But you will also find a lot in the ng that had radiation and are doing fine. In my case I somehow came out of the surgery incontinent and impotent. Now I had ED problems going in, so I cannot blame the RRP for that. I did have nerve sparing surgery btw. I am 59 now and had the surgery three years ago. I was 55 when diagnosed. Not particularly happy about being impotent, but given the alternative I would say I am satisfied. Good luck to you. I hope it turns out so you can have a very Happy New Year! David S.
> Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Mike cmdrdata - 21 Dec 2006 13:21 GMT > Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I > am 55 years old, I have been happily married for 35 years, I have two > grown sons, I live in a tropical paradise, and I have just been > diagnosed with Prostate Cancer. ... Mike, so sorry to hear this news. You're feeling the same thing I am going through, DXed in Sep2006. I've done lots of studies/research and contacted several doctors, and finally (I almost sure) that I will go with SBRT at a local teaching medical center here. Like everyone says, look up everything, decide which side effect bothers YOU most, and go from there.
Claude - 21 Dec 2006 15:10 GMT > Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Mike Be aware, of course, that you may suffer the side-effects of treatment, at least to some extent. Be aware, also, that you may come out of it pretty good. It is very important, as Steve and others have said, to do the objective research, apply it to yourself, and then make the difficult decision. Make sure you discuss all this with your wife. Always remind yourself of the priorities, however. Don't forget---corpses can't have erections and have no concern for incontinence. For most of us, destroying the cancer through removal or radiation was primary.
Try to stay positive. I, for one, had a good result, despite positive margins. I had an RP at age 64, one nerve spared. I was basically continent within 48 hours. I don't have the same holding power that I did before, but I can accomodate to that. My erections returned within 6 months. Suitable for a 69 year old, I believe, without Viagra, and a bit better with. Despite the positive margins, my PSA is still undetectable. But don't put too much weight on any one person's experience. Most people who have been treated for prostate cancer are not in this forum. You need objective information and then application of that to your own emotional base.
Leonard Evens - 21 Dec 2006 15:32 GMT > Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > at the point I must decide between Radiation Therapy or RP, and my > head is spinning with all of the available data. I suggest that you get Peter Scardino's book "The Prostate" and read that. You may also find Patrick Walsh's "Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer" useful. Both these books describe the advantages and disadvantages of the choices before you, surgery and radiation. They were written by recognized authorities in prostate cancer. Both are surgeons, but they give a balanced presentation of other alternatives, including radiation. Either treatment method is a possible choice in your case. But in the end you will have to rely on the medical advice from your doctors since each case is different. Also, keep in mind that generalities about things like how likely impotence might be may not be very useful. The important thing is how likely particular outcomes are with the treatments that are available for a man like you with the practitioners you have available. Ask your doctors about those likelihoods if they treat you.
Some people like to recommend Strum's book and the prostate-cancer.og website. My feeling is that the information there might be more useful if you were a candidate for medical oncology treatment, which appears not to be the case. In my opinion, Strum is an outlier, even among medical oncologists.
I should also
> mention that I am scared to death. I don't want to die, That is understandable. In fact, the risk of death in your case is very small in the foreseeable future. That would be true even if you did nothing. So try to calm down and understand the alternatives as objectively as possible.
> but I also > don't want to see my wife (also 55 years old) spend the rest of her > life dealing with my impotence. Keep in mind that even if you end up permanently impotent by virtue of treating the prostate cancer, there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to resume your sex life. After you recover from the treatment, you will still have normal desire and still be able to experience orgasm. Impotence refers only to the ability to maintain an erection, but there are a variety of mechanisms for dealing with that.
I was 67 when I had my radical prostatectomy, and the odds of my regaining erections were at best 50 percent. For 18 months following surgery, I was impotent. During this time I used a pump (vacuum erection device) and my wife and I had intercourse at about the same frequency as before surgery. My wife was happy with the experience. Many men find injecting medication in the penis, which is much easier than it sounds, works very well. And there are other alternatives. After 18 months, my erections started to return, and now I can sometimes manage with nothing, but I usually use Viagra.
In your case, if your doctors are skilled, your chances of not being permanently impotent are a lot better at 55 than mine were at 67. So don't assume you will necessarily remain impotent, and remember what I said above. Where there is a will there will be a way. So don't let the possibility of impotence deter you from treatment.
> I am scared, confused and I feel as if > there is no hope. I would appreciate hearing from others who have > felt this same way yet have positive comments to share. Your feelings are quite natural under the circumstances, but objectively speaking, the situation is not nearly so dire. I don't know the details of your diagnosis, but typically a man like you has an excellent chance of a cure and the side effects of treatment are manageable.
Good luck in whatever you decide.
> Thank you. > > Mike Steve Jordan - 22 Dec 2006 01:27 GMT On December 21, the mathematician Leonard Evens sneered, in pertinent part:
> Some people like to recommend Strum's book and the prostate-cancer.og > website. My feeling is that the information there might be more useful > if you were a candidate for medical oncology treatment, which appears > not to be the case. Leonard herewith demonstrates his lack of familiarity with either source.
> In my opinion, Strum is an outlier, even among medical oncologists. PPOR. Or does Leonard think that, so long as he labels his pontifications as “opinion” he need not show any foundation for such pontifications/opinions?
I’m reminded of the principle that academic expertise in one field does not support avowal of expertise in another.
Regards,
Steve J
"I am under no obligation to respect your beliefs. Respect is earned; it is not an entitlement..." -- Lionel Shriver
Beverley - 21 Dec 2006 15:36 GMT Hi Mike, Welcome to the club that no one wants to belong. I'm so sorry you are now facing prostate cancer. (PC or PaC We use lots of acronyms so don't be afraid to ask if you don't know what something is) First of all this is a treatable cancer!
At age 55 you are a fence sitter as most older men have a slower growing cancer and younger men tend to have fast growing cancers. There is no way to determine which you have right away.
If you have any numbers it would help to post them. If you don't have the numbers than call your doctor and ask for them. You will probably have a PSA number, possibly a fPSA or free PSA and that normally is a % and a Gleason score which is three numbers such as 6 (3+3) or 7(3+4) the order of those numbers in the brackets is important.
There is something called brachytherapy or seeds or radioactive seeds. The seeds can be implanted directly into the prostate. It has fewer side effects with virtually no time lost from work. If done correctly it will destroy the cancer and the prostate. But not every man is a candidate for this procedure.
As for impotence it can happen with any procedure including brachytherapy. It happens less often with brachy, in fact it is considered to be rare. My husband fell into the rare category and has fought with impotence.
No matter which method you chose you are apt to be dealing with it (ED) but you must realize that it is also treatable. The most common method is to use Viagra, Cialis or Levitra. There is a pump (VED) and then there are things such as Muse or injections. And when all else fails there is an implant.
You have one thing in your favor going into this situation. You obviously have a good sex life with a loving partner. You will get through this. You might have to work at it a bit more (or a whole lot more) but sex will continue. No matter which treatment (Tx) you choose you are apt to face problems and you will lose your ejaculate. You will have what is known as dry orgasms. Some of the guys don't like it, some have no problems with it, some will say it is less intense and some will say it is more intense but they will all tell you it is different. The other thing is, you don't have to have an erection to have an orgasm. That can be a real shock for some.
Take some time and explore your options. I'm not saying to take a year to do this but several weeks is not going to make a big difference. Be certain before you choose. You need to choose a treatment and a doctor. For instance brachytherapy needs to be done by a specialist that has a good track record. (Ours has never had a failure and has been doing them since 1989)
You need to see at least two doctors - a urologist (uro) (RP) as they do surgery and a radiation-oncologist (rad-onc) as they do radiation (RT) and brachytherapy (brachy). These two groups are filled with subspecialties. If I try to name them all I will skip something . There is a radical prostatectomy (RP) that's where they rip the prostate out and hopefully all the cancer with it. That gets divided into several ways of doing it such as the RRP , the LRP and now the new robotic procedure. Radiation is also divided by the type of equipment used and there is a dozen or so procedures such as basic RT to proton beam and in between there are several more but mostly they fall under IMRT. And then there is brachy under the RT.
Do your research. If you have questions there's usually someone around here who can say they've been there and done that.
As for the stress of the situation. I think I cried for a couple of weeks. I was scared of losing my husband. I'd look at him and start to cry. He'd kiss me and I'd start to cry. (And I'm not a crier!) But the thought of losing him was too much.
We did do something that I will recommend. Once you have all your information and you are at the point of making a decision - get out of Dodge! Do not go to the in-laws! Get and B&B or a motel/hotel. Go camping. Go to the mainland . Go someplace!!! Talk and talk some more and make a few memories - pretend you are 22 again and mate like bunnies. It's your body so it is your decision but it is important to know that your wife is 100% behind you decision. Bev (wife of 4 1/2 year PC survivor: brachytherapy with RT on IMRT, May 2002)
> Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Mike chasjac - 21 Dec 2006 15:54 GMT Hello, Mike:
I know just how you feel. I was diagnosed in August, and it was all pretty overwhelming. I did the research I needed to make a decision, including asking for some help on this newsgroup. I've stayed on, lurking for the most part, as I learn a lot from reading the thoughts of the other posters.
I had a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins in November. I was in the hospital for two nights, and on a catheter for a week after. It is not a time I'll remember with fondness, but I got through it.
I am both impotent and incontinent at the moment, but it has been only five weeks, and I am noticing that I am slowly regaining some bladder control. I expect that erectile function will take longer; at least that's what my docs tell me. But my wife and I have already resumed a sex life that includes orgasms for both of us. It's very therapeutic.
I chose surgery because my numbers were right for it, the potential side effects of radiation (seeds or beam) were scarier to me than the side effects of surgery, and I wanted to know as soon as possible if there was any spread. But I almost chose to go with seeds, and see the sense of it for those who go that route.
I've heard good stories and bad about both surgery and radiation. Stories are shaped as much by a man's expectations as they are by the actual outcomes. If I don't get any better than I am right now, I'll be fine with it, but another man might find it intolerable. All we can do is to make the most informed decision possible, hope for the best, and accept what comes.
My wife has been an absolute rock for me the last few months. She has been involved in my visits to urologists, surgeons, and radiological oncologists; she has been supportive of my decisions; and she has been a willing participant in helping me deal with the recovery and the side effects. As traumatic as all of this has been, it has convinced me that I made the best choice of my life 18 years ago when I married her.
Mike, I hope this is helpful to you. You and your wife will get through this together. Please let the newsgroup know how it turns out.
--charlie
Maui Mike - 21 Dec 2006 18:02 GMT Thank you so much to everyone who replied with advice and encouragement. I will try to reach my Dr. today to obtain the specifics of my pathology report and I will post them here. I am new to newsgroups so I am not sure if I always return to this thread with my posts or if I start another thread. Either way, I look forward to participating in this group. Again, thank you. It means so much to me to have others to talk to who understand what I am going through.
Mike
>Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their >experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Mike Steve Kramer - 21 Dec 2006 23:33 GMT Keep in touch, Mike. Learning how to do the basics of newsgroups is not important and not hard.
> Thank you so much to everyone who replied with advice and > encouragement. I will try to reach my Dr. today to obtain the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >> >>Mike I.P. Freely - 22 Dec 2006 02:03 GMT Read the prostate cancer books, at least their chapters pertinent to your choice between radiation and surgery. Scardino, Walsh, Bubley, Lange (Dummies), Grimm, Marks, even Strum -- every one is worth its price IMO, as each presented some unique information. Given your dilemma, you'll find them grimly fascinating. More important, as you read, read, and read some more, and after talking LATER with surgical and radiation urologists, a clear choice will emerge. When that happens, schedule your treatment, go windsurfing, and get treated. (Hint: get your treatment by March and you'll miss few good trades days.)
I say "LATER" because you will want to be very educated in PC language and facts to get all you can out of those uro visits, for several reasons including: 1. Treatment is YOUR call. You and your wife have too much at stake to let anyone else make it. 2. Very few doctors take the time to educate you enough to make the call. 3. Many of them just flat don't know or willingly omit important facts, especially where side effects are concerned. 4. Their decision criteria are often quite different from those of their patients.
And, oh yes . . . involve the wife in every step. She will want and need to understand both the underlying facts and the resulting decision.
I.P.
fred - 22 Dec 2006 03:04 GMT The only thing I would add to the excellent advice already posted is to say that, for me, the absolute worst time was where you're at now....immediately after dx and trying to figure out what the hell to do and who to trust. I think you'll find that once you make the decision and have a game plan, everything will look much better.
Fact is, you've probably got a better than 90% chance of a complete cure (unless you ignore the problem completely).Yes, you will have some side effects but they are generally manageable. Life will still be fun and enjoyable.
Fred
4/99 PSA 1.58 10/01 PSA 1.68 9/02 PSA 2.7 10/03 PSA 3.8 11/03 needle biopsy. Positive for Gleasons 6 on left side. 12/03 Radical Prostatectomy performed at the Cleveland Clinic. Gleasons 3+4 = 7, clear surgical margins, extracapsular extension established. 3/17/04 PSA 0.003 4/27/04 PSA 0.003 7/22/04 PSA <0.1 (not 3rd generation test) 11/10/04 PSA <0.1 (not 3rd generation test) 5/10/05 PSA <0.1 (not 3rd generation test) 10/19/05 PSA 0.050 2/3/06 PSA 0.082 3/23/06 PSA 0.110 3/06-6/06 IMRT SRT 9/06 PSA 0.044 12/06 PSA 0.025
Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2006 11:19 GMT trying to sneak in that his IMRT has resulted in successive PSAs of 0.044 and 0.025.
Congratulations, Fred!!
> The only thing I would add to the excellent advice already posted is to > say that, for me, the absolute worst time was where you're at [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > 9/06 PSA 0.044 > 12/06 PSA 0.025 fred - 29 Dec 2006 03:09 GMT > trying to sneak in that his IMRT has resulted in successive PSAs of 0.044 > and 0.025. > > Congratulations, Fred!! Ok...NOW I finally understand the post on the other topic, Steve! An unfair and unjust accusation!! LoL
Fred
kh - 21 Dec 2006 22:33 GMT > Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their Hey mike, Aloha-nui, brah!
> at the point I must decide between Radiation Therapy or RP, and my > head is spinning with all of the available data. I should also > mention that I am scared to death. I don't want to die, but I also Well, the bad news is that you ARE going to die. That's guaranteed.
What isn't guaranteed, in fact it's unlikely that prostate cancer will kill you if you receive quality treatment. Depending on the stage of your disease and other factors, it's better than 90% that the prostate cancer won't kill you.
If you go RP, get the best surgeon you can find. I'm sure there are great ones in Hawai'i.
If you go rad, check out TRILOGY and seeds. The TRILOGY is a next-generation IMRT and is an amazing toy.
> don't want to see my wife (also 55 years old) spend the rest of her > life dealing with my impotence. She won't.
Either RP or rad, if you are potent now, you have a good chance of being potent after treatment and a healing period (perhaps a year or two).
Most likely, you'll come through with some impairment. Don't let anyone kid you about that. Most guys lose something, some loss of libido, feeling, orgasms aren't as good, many need help from Vitamin-V to, er, catch-the-bone, some have to use injectable drugs like MUSE.
Some guys are an inch or two shorter after surgery. If you're like the typical Hawai'ian, your 9 inch penis may end up only 7 inches long. The good news is that you won't have to tie a knot in it to keep the tip from hanging out of your trunks.
Just about everyone has dry orgasms, that means no semen. The stick twitches, it feels good but nothing squirts out. There's variation here. I squirt-dribble. It's not so bad.
There's a real temptation to avoid or delay treatment. I don't think that's a good idea because as the disease advances and evolves, it can become untreatable. At that point you're fighting a losing war.
Look up Lamar Hunt, a billionaire who died of prostate cancer. I think he avoided treatment until it was too late.
For now, have as much sex as you can. Not just once or twice a day, Hemmo-skin, 3, 4 times a day.
-kh
Maui Mike - 22 Dec 2006 05:50 GMT For those that asked, here is a brief medical history:
10/26/01 PSA 4.7 Biopsy Negative 3/1/02 PSA 5.1 Biopsy Negative 8/1/02 PSA 6.9 3/4/03 PSA 9.1 Biopsy Negative 9/5/03 PSA 8.1 3/19/04 PSA 6.3 9/28/04 PSA 5.8 11/20/05 PSA 6.0 5/16/06 PSA 6.6 11/15/06 PSA 13.8 Biopsy Positive Stage T1-C Gleason Score 6
Out of the 30 punches taken during the last biopsy, Cancer was detected in 40% of one punch. I have since had a CT Scan, Bone Scan and full blood work but nothing appears to be out of the ordinary.
I continue to be sexually active and have absolutely no problems with ED at this time. The thought of pumps or pills in the future does not bother me, but I may have to draw the line when it comes to sticking a needle in my penis.
Thank you all for sharing, and for caring. Happy Holidays.
Mike
>Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their >experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Mike Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2006 11:26 GMT > For those that asked, here is a brief medical history: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Out of the 30 punches taken during the last biopsy, Cancer was > detected in 40% of one punch. I would think that is extraordinary. Your PSA would seem to indicate the probability of some sort of prostate problem for five years. And then to have only one needle of maybe almost 100 sticks come up with something at PSA 13.8. I don't know quite what to make of that. Hopefully, it means you have a very small, compact tumor center mass in your prostate and removing it will be an absolute cure.
Did your uro advise how close to the surface or vesicles the found cancer was?
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Maui Mike - 22 Dec 2006 17:59 GMT >>Did your uro advise how close to the surface or vesicles the found cancer >>was? He told me it was centrally located.
>> For those that asked, here is a brief medical history: >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >Did your uro advise how close to the surface or vesicles the found cancer >was? 10/01 PSA 4.7 Biopsy Negative 3/02 PSA 5.1 Biopsy Negative 8/02 PSA 6.9 3/03 PSA 9.1 Biopsy Negative 9/03 PSA 8.1 3/04 PSA 6.3 9/04 PSA 5.8 11/05 PSA 6.0 5/06 PSA 6.6 11/06 PSA 13.8 Biopsy Positive G6, T1c, 55 yrs.
Steve Kramer - 22 Dec 2006 21:25 GMT >>>Did your uro advise how close to the surface or vesicles the found cancer >>>was? > > He told me it was centrally located. Like I said, my knowledge or brain is insufficient to reconcile the numbers and the 99% missed cancer rate. But, it seems like it should be really good news.
I remember Walsh saying to beware of T1c ratings. I'll have to read up on that.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
kh - 22 Dec 2006 12:02 GMT Maui wrote:
> For those that asked, here is a brief medical history: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > 5/16/06 PSA 6.6 > 11/15/06 PSA 13.8 Biopsy Positive Stage T1-C Gleason Score 6 The Gleason 6 is about as low as people report. That's a good number, better than 7, or 8, or 9.
> Out of the 30 punches taken during the last biopsy, Cancer was > detected in 40% of one punch. I have since had a CT Scan, Bone Scan > and full blood work but nothing appears to be out of the ordinary. Both my business partner and I had a history of rising or elevated PSA's, according to my rad-doc's nurse, we had it for years, they simply did not pick it up in our first biopsies. That suggests that you've had it for years too. She said that it starts as a single errant cell and then there are two, then four, then eight, and so on. Since the reproduction cycle is slow (she didn't say how slow), it takes years for a colony to grow large enough for the biopsy to skewer.
That slow reproduction cycle is the good and bad part of prostate cancer. Since it's slow, it won't "get ya" for years. Even if it's loose through your system, hormone shots will slow it down and may give you an extra 5, 10, 15 years of life. That may be long enough for heart disease or a stroke to get you first.
The problem with "slow" is that traditional chemotherapy doesn't work well on prostate cancer. Chemo is good for fast growing cancers.
> I continue to be sexually active and have absolutely no problems with > ED at this time. The thought of pumps or pills in the future does not > bother me, but I may have to draw the line when it comes to sticking a > needle in my penis. Pumps and needles probably won't be needed. No guarantee because dumb luck plays a big role.
Based on the stats, given your youth, no ED going in, low Gleason and low stage (which suggests that the docs can go easy on you), you'll end up about where the majority does.
That's slightly impaired, kinda off your game.
It's hard to quantify but I figure the treatment aged me 10 years between my legs. I went in as a 57 year old and two years later, I'm 67.
Before treatment, I could be with a woman or, ah, "Rosy Palm", every other day. It's more like once a week now.
After the treatment, my libido plunged. The 8 months on Lupron was a big factor but I'm almost 2 years past the Lupron and my libido is still off.
It reminds me of what some women say, how they enjoy sex but it has to be with the right person, under the right circumstances, romantic surroundings, even then, it takes a while for them to warm up to the idea.
This is in contrast to the typical guy, "It's been TWO WHOLE WEEKS, I gotta do something about THIS and soon."
-kh
Phil - 28 Dec 2006 22:08 GMT Mike,
I haven't been on this site for a long time. I had my rp over two years ago. I can't say it was fun, but I was up and about in a few days. No reoccurrance of cancer. No problems with incontinence after a short time. And no problems with ED. I sometimes take Cialis, but sometimes don't.
I am probably one of the luckier ones. But I think there has been a lot of progress in this area. I would be willing to discuss on the phone with you if it would help. Please e-mail me if you would like to talk. I'm not on this site regularly.
Regards
Phil monsterbassgroove@yahoo.com
> Aloha from Hawaii to all of the people willing to share their > experiences and offer their support to this group. My name is Mike. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Mike
|
|
|