Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

post RLRP ED questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gary - 13 Dec 2006 06:33 GMT
i had my surgery oct 31st.  incontinence went from a diaper for 2 wks
after catheder removal to 2 or 3 pads per day.  my psa is 0.015.  i
have been taking 50mg viagra since 9 days after surgery.
i have been masterbating daily with a wet noodle for about 3 weeks.
the 1st time i could not feel the orgasm.  currently, i barely feel it.
i saw an ed specialist today that i was referred to by the NY Ed
specialist Ridwan Shabsigh, who in turn,was recommended in this chat
room.  Shabsigh is of the school of thought that the injections are the
most effective treatment to recover erection post surgery.
the ED specialist i saw today dissagreed.  he said it is currently ok
for occasional use for intercourse but not recovery of ED.  he stated
he is involved in research which demonstrates that immediate use of
viagra (within 4 days after surgery) is critical.  he was talking about
a muscle that starts to deteriorate 48 hrs after surgery.  i told him
that i didn't start it until 9 days after surgery.  he said to keep
using it since it might still be ok and that everybody is different.  i
left his office feeling depressed since i was thinking that i missd the
boat and i didn't hear what i expected about the injections.  this
evening i have been talking to a few patients who had the RLRP over a
yr ago and they indicated that they started the viagra/levitra/cialis
about the same time as i did and their ed recovered.  it recovered over
an avg 8 mth  period.  it went from 0 to 1 or 2 in about 2 or 3 mths
then 4 in about 4 mths then 6 in about 6 mths etc.
then i began to wonder about the muscle the ED specialist was talking
about.  it's the one that opens and closes to let the blood flow in for
the erection and out afterward.  why would that start to permanently
deteriorate after 4 days?  if he is correct, then why did the other
post surgical guys i talked to still have a recovery?  am i supposed to
believe him?  what do i do with this information, forget it? what about
the ED specialist in NY?  am i supposed to believe him about the
injections?  sounds like i should believe the post surgical guys i
talked to over the specialists.  they are the ones that already went
through what i am going through with the same surgeon .

gary
gary - 13 Dec 2006 07:31 GMT
> i had my surgery oct 31st.  incontinence went from a diaper for 2 wks
> after catheder removal to 2 or 3 pads per day.  my psa is 0.015.  i
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> gary
I.P. Freely - 13 Dec 2006 07:38 GMT
> he stated
> he is involved in research which demonstrates that immediate use of
> viagra (within 4 days after surgery) is critical.

Masturbation with a catheter in place? Sure -- if you want to tear your
urethra up . . . and then try peeing through it! I    d o n ' t   t h i
n k    s o.

I.P.
Claude - 13 Dec 2006 17:21 GMT
>> he stated
>> he is involved in research which demonstrates that immediate use of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I.P.

I believe this research just involves dosing with the Viagra, certainly not
encouraging sexual activity during that very early time.
I.P. Freely - 13 Dec 2006 19:36 GMT
>>> he stated
>>> he is involved in research which demonstrates that immediate use of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I believe this research just involves dosing with the Viagra, certainly not
> encouraging sexual activity during that very early time.

THAT'S a relief.

I.P.
gary - 13 Dec 2006 07:54 GMT
my wife, who was at the ED specialist appointment with me today
corrected me.
he said that it would recover optimally if the viagra were started
during the 1st 48 hrs or at least the 1st 4 days following surgery.
that did not mean that the muscle wouldn't recover.  it might just take
longer or it might not recover with as well.  however, it is a muscle
and it is possible that the viagra might exercise it enough if started
after 4 days to still get a good recovery.  because everyone responds
differently it is hard to predict individually.  i am assuming from his
comment that his research findings are statistically based.
gary

> i had my surgery oct 31st.  incontinence went from a diaper for 2 wks
> after catheder removal to 2 or 3 pads per day.  my psa is 0.015.  i
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> gary
Steve Kramer - 13 Dec 2006 11:15 GMT
> i have been masterbating daily with a wet noodle for about 3 weeks.

> he said to keep
> using it since it might still be ok and that everybody is different.  i
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> yr ago and they indicated that they started the viagra/levitra/cialis
> about the same time as i did and their ed recovered.

When I had my surgery, I wasn't started on Viagra until six weeks later...
or more.

> deteriorate after 4 days?  if he is correct, then why did the other
> post surgical guys i talked to still have a recovery?  am i supposed to
> believe him?  what do i do with this information, forget it? what about
> the ED specialist in NY?  am i supposed to believe him about the
> injections?

> sounds like i should believe the post surgical guys i
> talked to over the specialists.

Sounds like you ought to get your mind of your crotch.  I cannot speak to
the quackery of your doctors; I don't know them.  But, outside of
weightless, I'd bet the most quack show up in the ED field.

Take a reasonable approach to long life and quit worrying about seeing how
many differing opinions you can get.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Steve Kramer - 13 Dec 2006 11:28 GMT
> Sounds like you ought to get your mind of your crotch.  I cannot speak to
> the quackery of your doctors; I don't know them.  But, outside of
> weightless, I'd bet the most quack show up in the ED field.

That should have read:

"weight loss, I'd bet the most quacks show up in the ED field."
kh - 13 Dec 2006 12:09 GMT
> about.  it's the one that opens and closes to let the blood flow in for
> the erection and out afterward.  why would that start to permanently
> deteriorate after 4 days?

That makes no sense.  After they stuck me with the Lupron needle, my
noodle went limp for over a year.

Maybe I had some "deterioration" but I can get up to 80% firmness
without Vitamin-V, that's enough for a woo-hoo good time if I think
real hard about nosing the tip slowly into a wet, slippery, squealing,
gasping woman.

90+% on Vitamin-V, of course that's all of 5 inches but who's
measuring.

All I can say is, do what feels right, keep pullin'.  If it helps,
think about my "petite-ami" from 25 years ago, the twenty-something,
curly haired, grad student who could suck a golf ball through a garden
hose.

-kh
Claude - 13 Dec 2006 17:15 GMT
IMHO, the most important thing for you to do is relax, accept the fact that
getting erectile function back takes time.  I had one nerve spared back in
2002 when I was 64, and I got my function reasonably back in 6 months.  If
you do any reading in this group, you will see that that is in the early
range of erectile recovery.  One to two years is, I think, more common.  My
first erections were with the help of Viagra at 6 months.  I started out
with 25 mg and then 50 mgs.  Neither did anything for me.  But when I went
to 100 mgs, voila.  Now I can get by without it, but it is better with 25
mgs.  The more anxious you get about erectile function, the more difficult
it will be to recover it.  (And please note-my first doses of Viagra came
months after the surgery.  As far as I know, the value of an immediate
Viagra regemin (sp?) is, right now, just a theory.)

>i had my surgery oct 31st.  incontinence went from a diaper for 2 wks
> after catheder removal to 2 or 3 pads per day.  my psa is 0.015.  i
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> gary
gary - 14 Dec 2006 02:32 GMT
the ED doctor said that viagra exercises the ED muscle that permits the
blood flow to the penus.  it does it with nitrous oxide that causes the
muscle to contract.  would you say that using a chemical to cause
contraction gets the same effect as pushing against resistence.
if the muscle contracts, why am i not getting blood flow for the
erection?
does it have something to do with the nerve bundle?
gary

> IMHO, the most important thing for you to do is relax, accept the fact that
> getting erectile function back takes time.  I had one nerve spared back in
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> >
> > gary
Claude - 14 Dec 2006 03:45 GMT
I really havent done any research into the biology of erections.  All I am
saying is that it is very early after surgery to be expecting erections.

> the ED doctor said that viagra exercises the ED muscle that permits the
> blood flow to the penus.  it does it with nitrous oxide that causes the
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>> >
>> > gary
gary - 14 Dec 2006 06:58 GMT
Claude
it seems that the kegel exercise speeded up the healing of my
incontinence.
that treatment is based on the school of thought that muscles can be
rehabilitated by exercising them.  that is why viagra is being used, to
exercise the muscle that controls the blood flow into the penus.
it seems that the injections (which is also a chemical)  would also
exercise the ED muscle.
the difference being that it would actually complete the blood flow.
that is why i am asking why the blood doesn't flow when viagra
exercises that ED muscle?  if it's because of the nerve bundle, then
why does the injection work?  does anyone have the answer to that
question?

gary
> I really havent done any research into the biology of erections.  All I am
> saying is that it is very early after surgery to be expecting erections.
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> >> >
> >> > gary
Leonard Evens - 14 Dec 2006 15:39 GMT
> Claude
> it seems that the kegel exercise speeded up the healing of my
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> why does the injection work?  does anyone have the answer to that
> question?

Gary,
You should read the description of what takes place during a normal
erection in a book such that that by Scardino or Walsh.   The 'muscle"
is smooth muscle tissue, that has to RELAX for an erection to occur.  It
is not a matter of exercising it in the sense that you would exercise a
voluntary muscle such as one in your arm or leg.  That relaxation takes
place because certain chemicals are generated in your penis which signal
the erectile tissue to relax and let more blood in. It is the
engorgement with blood that produces the erection.  This is a multistage
process involving different enzymes.  In a normal man, the process is
initiated by a nerve signal from the erectile nerves, and those are
damaged during surgery.  As these nerves heal, erections will begin to
return.  Even without those nerves, however, if you inject the right
chemicals directly in the penis, an erection should follow.  What Viagra
does is to allow the usual biochemical process to begin when the nerve
signal is lessened.  If the nerves are destroyed, Viagra won't work.
But if the nerves are working somewhat, but not enough to allow an
erection, the use of Viagra may still encourage some relaxation of the
erectile tissue and increased flow of blood to the penis.

If I understand it correctly, if a man goes without an erection for a
long time, the erectile tissue may become less flexible.  The point of
using Viagra early, I think, is to prevent that by encouraging early
blood flow.  As best I can tell, Viagra shouldn't have much effect on
how fast the erectile nerves recover, but perhaps there is something I
don't know.

I didn't use Viagra until something like 6 weeks after surgery, and then
only sporadically because it didn't do any good.  I did use a pump.   I
used it both to have intercourse and also on occasion for practicing.
Before surgery, I'm sure I had regular nocturnal erections, but after I
started using the pump, I probably didn't have anything close to that
with the pump, just about once or twice a week.  Still after about 18
months erections returned, and now I do reasonably well with some
Viagra, sometimes with nothing.  And I was 67 at the time of surgery, so
my chances were not as good as yours should be.

I would recommend that you concentrate on resurrecting your sex life,
possibly with a pump or injections, and not be concerned about what else
will happen when.
gary - 15 Dec 2006 06:52 GMT
thank you Leonard
i am also almost 67 yrs old, so i am in your catagory.
since the muscles in the penis that controls the blood flow works on
the basis of relaxation,  then the chemicals in  the injection would
seem to be a natural method of getting the blood flow by causing them
to relax.  the ED doctor said that it was important to rehabilitate the
muscles.  doesn't that mean to get them to relax?  geting blood into
the penis also seems to be important for healing,as you indicated.  it
just seems to me that the injection does both whereas the pump only
gets the blood into the penis.  if the viagra gets blood into the
penis, why doesn't it get erect?  based on your explanation, the nerves
are not dissableing the chemical that prevents muscle relaxation.  so
what good is it to take viagra unless the nerves recover?  is it that
we don't know when the nerves recover so we are covering our bases?
besides, even a little bit of nerve recovery helps get some blood flow?
so, is the bottom line  that we want both muscle relaxation and blood
flow and the injection does both, the pump does blood flow and viagra
initially does neither but will progressively do both as the nerve
bundle recovers?  for now, wouldn't the injection be the way to go?
Gary

> > Claude
> > it seems that the kegel exercise speeded up the healing of my
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> possibly with a pump or injections, and not be concerned about what else
> will happen when.
Ron B - 15 Dec 2006 12:44 GMT
Gary, Leonard is exactly right.

First, you're VERY early in your recovery so try to relax.

Many folks are started on an ED drug at about 4 weeks after surgery.

This is to help relax the muscles and improve blood flow BUT..as was
pointed out...the NERVE healing is the key to spontaneous erections.

The injections work so well because THEY get blood to fill up the penis
even WITHOUT the nerves.

Time and healing is the key.

Use the pump and ED drugs and keep trying as you heal.

I'm about 20 months out...and though I get some increased size with the
ED drugs...not enough for a usable erection.

Orgasms...yes (from the beginning)...but no spontaneous erections.

The nerves get beat up sometimes during surgery and take longer to heal.

Best wishes,

Ron B.

Chicago
I.P. Freely - 14 Dec 2006 23:57 GMT
> Claude
> it seems that the kegel exercise speeded up the healing of my
> incontinence.

That . . . and/or healing.

I.P.
gary - 16 Dec 2006 21:09 GMT
Leonard
i read the books about the erectile nerves,as you suggested, but i
could not find an explicit explanation about how the erectile nerve in
the nerve bundle gets the information to send to the brain.  what
information does it send?
gary

> > Claude
> > it seems that the kegel exercise speeded up the healing of my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I.P.
I.P. Freely - 16 Dec 2006 21:41 GMT
> Leonard
> i read the books about the erectile nerves,as you suggested, but i
> could not find an explicit explanation about how the erectile nerve in
> the nerve bundle gets the information to send to the brain.  what
> information does it send?

"Me so horny."

I.P.
gary - 16 Dec 2006 22:56 GMT
I.P.
where does that nerve get that information?
if that is all it gets, how does that differ from what the brain gets
from other sources like visual and touch?  why is this nerve so
impotant in relation to the erection?
gary

> > Leonard
> > i read the books about the erectile nerves,as you suggested, but i
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I.P.
I.P. Freely - 16 Dec 2006 23:57 GMT
> I.P.
> where does that nerve get that information?
> if that is all it gets, how does that differ from what the brain gets
> from other sources like visual and touch?  why is this nerve so
> impotant in relation to the erection?
> gary

>>> i
>>> could not find an explicit explanation about how the erectile nerve in
>>> the nerve bundle gets the information to send to the brain.  what
>>> information does it send?

>> "Me so horny."

Oops, sorry. You assumed my joke had a real message. Sometimes they do,
but not this time. I've never studied this aspect of our new lives
because a) I  don't consider these details to be of any practical use
for us laymen and b) if my uros and I can't even get me out of pads yet,
I surely can't solve my ED beyond diligent practice. My surgeon removed
what he felt was required to optimize my chances of survival, and that
included at least one set of nerves. He also decided real time against a
sural nerve graft, considering how unlikely it was to help in my case.
At two years post-op, I have improved a little bit since my one-year point.

My penis will engorge on blood, but with only maybe 75% rigidity at peak
and not for long because the blood flows back out again before it's done
its job. Viagra made no obvious difference, and I'm not going to bother
with any artificial aids.

I.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.