Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Any implant recipients out there??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dgmoore@erols.com - 04 Dec 2006 17:23 GMT
I'm functionally at the end of the road - have extensively tried every
legitimate treatment for several years now (following a stroke with
neuro damage). V, C, and L were effective for a couple of years, but
gradually stopped working; I never had any luck with Muse, and
injectables (Edex, Caverject, and trimix, either alone or stacked with
an oral) have not worked at all. Three urologists and my internist all
agree that only remaining alternative is an implant, and all are
recommending the surgery while downplaying the trauma of the surgery
and recovery.

I realize that an implant is irreversible, but since I have no chance
of functioning normally that is not of any concern.

Are there any implant recipients out there who have been through this
who can tell me if the results are worth the surgery and recovery
period, or if I should just forget about a sex life and take up
shuffleboard instead?

Thanks
Dave
I.P. Freely - 04 Dec 2006 21:54 GMT
> should I just forget about a sex life

There are many ways to have sex without intercourse. The REAL dilemma is
INTERCOURSE vs implant.

I.P.
Beverley - 05 Dec 2006 18:15 GMT
We have (I think two guys) with implants but I don't have their email addies
and they don't come out here on a regular basis. I think Steve will direct
you, so hang tight . It costs a fortune!
Bev

> I'm functionally at the end of the road - have extensively tried every
> legitimate treatment for several years now (following a stroke with
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks
> Dave
dgmoore@erols.com - 05 Dec 2006 19:08 GMT
Thanks!

> We have (I think two guys) with implants but I don't have their email addies
> and they don't come out here on a regular basis. I think Steve will direct
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > Thanks
> > Dave
Steve Kramer - 08 Dec 2006 01:50 GMT
> Are there any implant recipients out there who have been through this
> who can tell me if the results are worth the surgery and recovery
> period, or if I should just forget about a sex life and take up
> shuffleboard instead?

     junioredens@webtv.net Junior Edens

     emeraldkr@aol.com wife

     Dale@anywhere.com DP

     george.loiacano@NOSPAM GEOLOCO

Junior's was in 2003.  Emerald is the wife of a penal implant recipient.
Dale had a botched implant.  I don't remember George's, but with his
address, he'd have to be a lurker to do you much good.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Steve Jordan - 08 Dec 2006 02:15 GMT
On Pearl Harbor Day, Steve Kramer wrote, in pertinent part:

(snip)
> .........Emerald is the wife of a penal implant recipient.....
(snip)

Snert. Penal? An implant of or relating to punishment?

Hee hee. Sorry; couldn't restrain myself.

;-)

Regards,

Steve J
Steve Kramer - 08 Dec 2006 11:13 GMT
> On Pearl Harbor Day, Steve Kramer wrote, in pertinent part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Hee hee. Sorry; couldn't restrain myself.

Had just come back from a 1500 trip (up to Sault Ste Marie, Michigan and
back).  I think, last night, I would have had a hard time coming up with the
correct spelling after your challenge.

But, in the case of Dale's, I think we can agree it was penal.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

I.P. Freely - 08 Dec 2006 17:28 GMT
>> On Pearl Harbor Day, Steve Kramer wrote, in pertinent part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> But, in the case of Dale's, I think we can agree it was penal.

That works.
So, is urinary incontinence peenal?

I.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.