Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chi Gong Treatment for Cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sml_lau - 08 Nov 2006 08:27 GMT
Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
has had remarkable successes with treating over 1,000 cancer patients.
Most of them terminal and given up by conventional methods. I just wish
that the 'right' persons in need would get to know of this.
For details:
http://qigonghealingtreatment.com/YuYang_Testimonials.htm
callalily - 08 Nov 2006 18:48 GMT
> Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> For details:
> http://qigonghealingtreatment.com/YuYang_Testimonials.htm

You can study qi-gong anyplace.  If I were desperate I would sooner
travel to Brazil to see a faith healer who was featured on TV (John of
God). Before you laugh at this,  this man has been observed by the best
scientists and they were impressed.  (Ordinarily I'm not even
religious) There are a lot of things science just doesn't know yet
including the power of the mind.

Leah
Just - 08 Nov 2006 21:35 GMT
>> Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
>> that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Leah

Leah,

If you go to that site and check the first testimonial (Breast Cancer
- Chen Ming Zhu, 48) you can read that this lady received the
following advice: "Don't go for surgery, radio therapy, chemo therapy
or any other destructive forms of therapy". In other words: do not
follow any conventional treatment...

This sounds pretty dangerous advice. I can understand the use of
alternative treatments in conjunction with conventional medicine, not
instead of...

OK, this lady seems to have been cured accordingly to the site. I just
don't know if I can bring myself round to believe that...

Regarding John from Brazil, I googled in Portuguese (my mother tongue
/ the language spoken in Brazil) and from what I found I wouldn't rush
to Brazil...

Just
callalily - 09 Nov 2006 00:16 GMT
> This sounds pretty dangerous advice. I can understand the use of
> alternative treatments in conjunction with conventional medicine, not
> instead of...

> OK, this lady seems to have been cured accordingly to the site. I just
> don't know if I can bring myself round to believe that...

[Hello Just--

I'm not suggesting people run off to brazil although it would be a lot
more fun IMO than the "conventional" treatments used now and anyway,
people spend their money on all sorts of things when they are
desperate. My point was Hey, I have qi-kong in my backyard, I am not
going all the way to china for that.

Of course I believe in conventional medicine and would go there first
but I try to keep an open mind on the subject (I think there recently
was a feature story about this "psychic surgery" in the NY Times
magazine and normally they don't publish looney stuff).  Science knows
virtually nothing about human consciousness and discoveries are being
made every day in this area.  For example, it is very likely that
people are indeed "wired" for religion.  That research has come from a
couple of a couple of cognitive neuroscientists at the Univ. of Penn.
Personally, I don't find anything at all surprising about this.  It
really doesn't matter what the Truth is.  Religion has been shown
repeatedly to make people happier and cause them to live longer -- so
why wouldn't it be hard-wired into us.  Anything that helps people
survive and reproduce is useful.  Besides, religion seems to sprout in
even the most hostile soil and when you try to stamp it out it just
grows back!  It must serve a purpose besides causing people to hate one
another.

Also, the "healer" I mentioned doesn't claim to cure everybody.  He
says that sometimes it's just not possible.   In some ways this is not
very different from the buddhist idea of karma. In other words, some
things can't be changed no matter what the person does.  I actually
like this concept because when something bad happens to me I think
maybe it's my just reward for doing something bad to someone else in a
previous life.  At least in that case I deserve it for some reason
(however lame).

BTW according to Buddhism (I've studied a little zen) people with
"higher" souls die younger than others so at least those who are ill
can consider themselves more spiritually evolved than the average
person.

> Regarding John from Brazil, I googled in Portuguese (my mother tongue
> / the language spoken in Brazil) and from what I found I wouldn't rush
> to Brazil...

Neither would I but I'm curious.  I have seen this story told in
respectable sources like NY times and others.

But I certainly  would enjoy the  trip  -- that's one country i haven't
seen yet.  We have a Danish friend who just adores Lisbon -- in fact he
bought us a Lisbon tour guide even though we had no plans to go
anywhere!

I'm in no way putting the Goodhousekeeping stamp of approval on this
"healer"but I thought it was fun to talk about it   There were some top
scientists present at his healing sessions who said they could find no
conventional explanation for his results.  And these scientists were
from very prestigious institutions.  I don't think they're all crazy.
Sometimes we have to think beyond the box.

This "healer"  claims to be "channeling" knowledge from some "spirit."
Well, scientists would agree that  we don't know the slightest bit
about human consciousness so as far as I am concerned they are not in a
position to  rule anything out. I mean before Einstein nobody knew of
relativity, etc.

Cognitive neuroscience is finding out new things about human
consciousness all the time.  There are 2 researchers at the Univ. of
Penn. who have argued that people are indeed "wired" for religion.
Religion serves a purpose. People who practice it are happier and live
longer than others. So if this is an advantage in survival, why would
it not be "hard-wired" into the brain.  Who cares what the Truth is?
Faith is  beneficial and I would be glad to have even a mustard seed of
it.

Going back to the "healer", one scientist who was present at the
healings and was interviewed later opined that whay we call the 'soul"
might be explainable in terms of quantum physics. Most people certainly
are not in a position to refute him.

We all know anyway that people  who have exhausted conventional
treatments do all sorts of unproven things like buying nutritional
supplements and worse. Even if it gives the person hope it's serving a
purpose.

Why do you think people get "cured" going to fatima, lourdes, etc.

You assume it's only that those people believe they will be cured and
so the "cure" is all in their mind or else their mind is influencing
thir body.  Few people disagree that one's thoughts and feelings can
affect them physically.  Emotions are widely believed to influence the
functioning of the immune system.

I think the scientist Stephen Jay Gould said it best in a book about
this subject:  "Science and religion are completely different
"magesteria" (fancy word for "departments').  One simply cannot
comprehend the other. But  he strongly urged that each should  treat
the other with respect.    Many people who have not experienced  faith
personally just don't understand how intelligent people can be
believers. This is because you can't use the same "hardware" to process
both .

Well, I'm sure I've made a complete fool of myself but  it was fun
talking to you.

All the best,

Leah

p.s. i'm not looking forward to getting critical emails on this
subject.  I'm not arguing.  This is  just one person's musings.  I
never once said any of this was the absolute Truth.
sml_lau - 10 Nov 2006 00:46 GMT
Hi Just,

Thanks for your response. You fail to go deeper into your heart where
this message came from and should be received. You only read with your
mind not your heart. Only the heart can understand.

Regards,
Sam

> >> Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> >> that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Just
callalily - 10 Nov 2006 23:42 GMT
> Hi Just,
>
> Thanks for your response. You fail to go deeper into your heart where
> this message came from and should be received.

  You only read with your
> mind not your heart. Only the heart can understand.
>
> Regards,
> Sam

Dear Sam,

Well, you're thinking with your wallet, buddy.  I'm thinking with my
mind and if I ever see you here again I will kick you right in the
cojones.  I hope you get the message.

I had hoped that people intelligent enough to participate here would
not fall for this. It's obviously an adv't.

I really did not want to engage this man. I think the best thing to do
is ignore these people or try to do them some harm.  For example, the
guy that posts from China about prostatitis -- he says he's an English
teacher and lists the school where he works and if I were motivated
enough I would complain to his superiors.  It may involve just sending
an email. Besides, he butchers our mother tongue so badly that he
deserves to be canned anyway.

Leah
NICK - 08 Nov 2006 20:13 GMT
> Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia)

Disgustingly funny how everyone selling something just "stumbled
upon" it.

And how they want to make an "unsolicited" opinion about it.
sml_lau - 10 Nov 2006 00:40 GMT
Hi Nick,

In life you may think you have engineered every move on your own, but
you will soon find out, most of the time you stumble on life changing
events.

Sam

> > Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> > that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  And how they want to make an "unsolicited" opinion about it.
I.P. Freely - 11 Nov 2006 02:22 GMT
> In life you may think you have engineered every move on your own, but
> you will soon find out, most of the time you stumble on life changing
> events.

Every move, of course not. But my personal efforts have made many
GIGANTIC changes -- most of them very positive -- in my life. Examples
have included achieving every job and location I sought throughout my
adult life including during 20 years in the military, early retirement
with no financial worries, and living on an adrenaline high for decades
and counting without -- so far -- crippling or killing myself.

You be as fatalistic as you wish; I choose to take charge of my life
whenever possible, and it usually is.

Somebody gong this guy.

I.P.
Alan Meyer - 08 Nov 2006 23:51 GMT
> Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> For details:
> http://qigonghealingtreatment.com/YuYang_Testimonials.htm

Samuel,

You may be the author of the website or are associated
with it.  If so, then what I have to say below applies to you too.

The website you refer us to is full of lies.  It encourages people
with treatable cancers to forego treatment and get "qigong"
instead.  Since qigong does not cure cancer, most of those
people will suffer horrible pain and then die.  At least some of
those people might have been saved by medical treatment.

The authors of that website are killing people for money.  It
is a combination of murder and robbery.

I hope, for the sake of the people of Singapore, that the authorities
find you and this qigong "healer" and take the action that is
appropriate.

   Alan
Steve Jordan - 09 Nov 2006 00:18 GMT
On November 8, Alan Meyer wrote in response to "Samuel":

(snip)
> The website you refer us to is full of lies.  It encourages people
> with treatable cancers to forego treatment and get "qigong"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> is a combination of murder and robbery.
>  
Alan, please do give these scum the honor of a response.

They are nothing better than the sleazebags who operate "clinics" in
Mexico, killing desperate people by the carloads.

Regards,

Steve J

"Macbeth"
Act IV, Scene one:

A cavern. In the middle, a boiling cauldron

First Witch:
Round about the cauldron go;
In the poison'd entrails throw.
Toad, that under cold stone
Days and nights has thirty-one
Swelter'd venom sleeping got,
Boil thou first i' the charmed pot.

ALL:
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and cauldron bubble.

Second Witch:
Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the cauldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt and toe of frog,
Wool of bat and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg and owlet's wing,
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.

etc.
--Shakespeare, Bacon, whomever
sml_lau - 10 Nov 2006 01:20 GMT
Hi Steve,

The scum is responding.

It is not about money, his charges are less than USD10/- per session
and some people are cured in 3 sessions, rarely does one need more than
100 sessions and that would still be only USD1,000/-. It's actually
about how much you value your body. Serious illnesses are a a big kick
from the body to wake up from the dream of mind which neglects the
body. You have to work too, you have to do a simple half an hour qigong
exercise a number of times a day to go with the treatment. Actually the
teacher only guides and assist you to heal yourself. The human body has
a lot of wisdom but is subjucated by the overally active mind that does
not allow it space to heal itself.

The principle of the 5,000 year old Qigong or ChiKung is based on the
Oneness and Wholeness of Existence/Being. We are in essence not
separated but are connected and animated by Qi (Chi) or Energy of Life.
So it's based on love. Not the love that one individual loving another
individual but that love that knows there is only one loving oneself.
Something like love your neighbour as yourself not as you would love
yourself.

Regards,
Samuel

> On November 8, Alan Meyer wrote in response to "Samuel":
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> etc.
> --Shakespeare, Bacon, whomever
Steve Jordan - 10 Nov 2006 01:28 GMT
On November 8, I wrote:

(ka-snip)
> Alan, please do give these scum the honor of a response.
Oops. Meant to say "please do *not* give....."

Senior moment I guess...

Regards,

Steve J
sml_lau - 10 Nov 2006 00:56 GMT
Alan,

Thank you for your strong reaction to the message. How do you know that
they are lies?
If you allow yourself more space to sink in with the information, you
will gather more information than what your mind is allowing to get
through to you.

Where did this come from? I quote:
"Since qigong does not cure cancer, most of those people will suffer
horrible pain and then die.  At least some of those people might have
been saved by medical treatment."

It is strange how we allow our mind to wreck havoc in our body and this
by the way is one of the main causes of cancer.

Regards,
Sam

> > Hi, I am Samuel Lau from Singapore. I just want to relay the message
> > that I seem to have stumbled upon a Chigong Teacher (in Malaysia) who
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>     Alan
Alan Meyer - 10 Nov 2006 03:04 GMT
> Alan,
>
> Thank you for your strong reaction to the message. How do you know that
> they are lies?

Note to Steve Jordan:

   I understand that this is almost certainly fruitless, but I
   do this because I am a deep believer in science, and a deep
   believer that we have an obligation to try to promote a
   scientific worldview, even if it seems hopeless.  Maybe one
   Usenet reader in Singapore or elsewhere who is on the fence
   will read these words and decide to seek medical treatment
   for his cancer.  If so, what I'm doing here is worthwhile.

Sam:

Let me begin with the science of cancer.

Cancer is a disease caused by mutations in DNA.  The cancers of
older people such as prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer,
etc., are caused by an accumulation of mutations.  There are many
possible root causes of those mutations including inherent
genetic defects, exposure to carcinogens, or just the
accumulation of effects caused by growing old.  These mutations
cause certain genes that should be "expressed" not to be so, or
other genes that should be "repressed" (not expressed) not to be
so.

The result of these changes is that certain cells in the body
that should not divide and replicate do divide and replicate -
out of control.

Qigong is about breathing exercises.  But there is nothing about
breathing technique that can affect DNA, and certainly nothing
that can heal it.  All of the successful cancer therapies,
without a single exception that I am aware of, are based on
a few basic principles.  They try to kill the mutant cells,
aiming at a cure.  Or they might aim at blocking some vital
chemical from reaching them that they require in order to divide
and grow - aiming at suspending the cancer from continuing its
growth.  Surgery, radiation and chemotherapy attempt to kill the
cancer.  Immune system therapies try to kill the cancer by
stimulating the immune system to attack the cancer cells.
Hormone therapy attempts to block a vital chemical from reaching
the cancer.

It is conceivable that qigong could contribute to a cure in some
patients by generally stimulating the immune system.  It might
contribute, for example, if depression and anxiety were
suppresing the patient's immune system and qigong enabled the
patient to relax and allow his body to function more normally.
Perhaps there are other, similar mind/body effects or even
defective breathing problems that qigong could help with.
However I would be surprised if this led to a cure in many
patients.  The patient's immune system has already failed to kill
his cancer and, unless there is something wrong with the immune
system, getting it in order won't stop the disease.  Certainly
qigong will not place antigen target markers on the cancer cells
to increase the likelihood of the immune system killing them -
which is what most immune system therapies I've read about try to
do.  At best qigong should be practiced as an adjunct to
scientific medical treatment, not as a substitute for it.

You ask how I know this?  Because I have read books about cancer
written by people who have spent their lives studying it using
all the most advanced techniques available in modern science.

Could those scientists be wrong?  Anything is possible, but a
patient who bet his life that a qigong practitioner who has never
studied medical science is right, while all of the most
intelligent, well read, well trained, experienced, scientists are
wrong would be almost certain to lose that bet.

You might ask, How can I know this from reading books without
actually trying it?  The answer to that has to do with whether or
not we have a scientific view of the world.

If someone told you he could fly to the moon by using qigong,
would you have to try it in order to figure out that the man is
either lying or crazy?  If a man told you you could make water
flow up hill, look through brick walls, lift 10,000 pounds, run
faster than a racehorse, or stop bullets by using qigong, would
you have to try it to know that the man was either lying or
crazy?

Curing cancer is a similarly difficult problem.  It can be done
in an increasing number of cases, but it's hard and it requires a
lot more than qigong.

If a man says he can fly to the moon using qigong, there are
several possibilities:

 1. He may be telling the literal truth.

 2. He may be very ignorant, deluded, or crazy - believing what
    he says, but not really able to do it.

 3. He may be a liar.

Which is most likely?  Which is next most likely?  Which is
extremely unlikely?

If qigong does not cure cancer, then avoiding medical treatment
and trying qigong as a cure for cancer is a death sentence.  By
the time you find out it doesn't work, it's too late.  That's why
I think that promoting qigong as a cure for cancer is a lot like
murder.

If you wish to practice qigong, there is nothing wrong with that.
It is harmless and may give you mental and physical benefits.
But if you tell someone who has cancer that they should stop
medical treatment because qigong will cure them - you've
condemned that person to death.

Now, if what I said is true, and I can assure you that most
scientifically trained people would agree that it is, the qigong
practitioner you refer people to must know it.  He must know it
because he's been treating people for a long time.  Some of those
people probably never had cancer at all, but the ones that did
will have died, and the qigong practitioner must know that.  But
he doesn't say that on his website.  To my mind, that makes him a
liar as well as a murderer.

As for the fact that he only charges $10, all that says to me is
that he holds life to be very cheap.

Sam,

If you, really want to help cancer patients, then I strongly urge
you to read scientific books about cancer, learn about it, and
recommend serious medical treatment to cancer patients.

    Alan

> If you allow yourself more space to sink in with the information, you
> will gather more information than what your mind is allowing to get
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> >
> >     Alan
sml_lau - 10 Nov 2006 12:23 GMT
Alan,

I thank you for a lesson on the scientific view of cancer. Believe me
that I read the entire message, it must have taken you some time to do
so and I did learn many things. Tks!

Regards,
Sam

> > Alan,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 173 lines]
> > >
> > >     Alan
NICK - 10 Nov 2006 16:13 GMT
Samuel wrote:

> Alan,
>
> I thank you for a lesson on the scientific view of cancer. Believe me
> that I read the entire message, it must have taken you some time to do
> so and I did learn many things. Tks!

But you haven't learned to stop spamming 27 newsgroups with your
phony "cure" that you've been advertising for impotence, arthritis,
diabetes, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, depression,
asthma, sinusitis, heart, and Alzheimers.

You scumbag of the earth.  Lower lifeform than an earthworm.

Go away.

You're not welcome here or in any of the other groups.
callalily - 11 Nov 2006 01:42 GMT
Dear Alan,

>>I understand that this is almost certainly fruitless, but I
>>do this because I am a deep believer in science, and a deep believer that we have an >>obligation to try to promote a scientific worldview,
>> even if it seems hopeless.

Do you mean even if the science is hopeless or it's hopeless to
persuade the person to believe in it? Supposing science cannot offer a
solution to a problem. Then what?

Like you I operate my life according to the rules of science and If I
have a health problem I go to the best allopathic doctor (e.g.,
non-alternative, western) I can find.

> Let me begin with the science of cancer.>
> Cancer is a disease caused by mutations in DNA.  The cancers of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> other genes that should be "repressed" (not expressed) not to be
> so.

Yes. These are theories not gospel truths.

The truth is we know very little about what causes cancer.  For
example, now that they are decoding the human genome and are looking at
cancer at the cellular level they are learning more about "on" and
"off" switches and other mechanisms that cause cancer.  Let's hope a
cure follows.

> All of the successful cancer therapies, without a single exception that I am aware of,   >are  based on a few basic principles.  They try to kill the mutant cells, aiming at a cure.

They also kill healthy cells which leads to other dysfunctions in the
body which may cause cause a lot of pain and suffering as well as
damage to other organs.

>>Surgery, radiation and chemotherapy attempt to kill the cancer.

Yes, and has been said many times, sometimes the cure is worse than the
disease.  As the wife of a prostate cancer patient and a melanoma
patient I am very disappointed in what science has achieved in this
area.  To borrow a phrase, "Science, be not proud."

Re the melanoma: It was cut out by the doctor and all my husband was
left with is a scar.  He participated in a trial of a vaccine and that
was painless. All in all I would say that was a compassionate cure.
All he has to do now is go for periodic checkups and body scans.

Re prostate cancer: Husband had robotic laparascopic surgery done by
world-famous surgeon at world-famous hospital. You call it "surgery"
because that sanitizes the whole thing but I call what was done to my
husband "mutilation."  A robot cut my husband's genitals and rendered
him completely impotent (and very mildly incontinent).  Science can
brag about robots, but you know it doesn't really matter if you were
cut by a robot or by a cave man with a butter knife if the if result is
the same. Being rendered impotent for a man in his prime is probably
the worst thing that could happen.  I know I grieve everyday for his
loss and I can't even begin to imagine how he feels.  I'd rather not go
there.  All in all,  I would call this treatment savage.

On the subject of treating prostate cancer in a more humane  way.
Here's a hypothetical:

Suppose the medical establishment held a conference about a new disease
called "prostate cancer". All the luminaries were present and they were
brainstorming about treatment ideas.  Well, the first person would say
(logically) "'What we are looking for here is a treatment that does not
have to be done ON-SITE.  First thing, lets spare the genitals. We know
how important they are to us and it says, "Do unto others."

Given what's in the neighborhood of the tumor, namely penis, tesicles,
scrotum, etc., we must come up with a non-invasive cure such as a DRUG,
a VACCINE or a GENE THERAPY, or something completely new.  Such
treatments would surely cause less misery than the present ones.  I
have had to watch my husband's genitals "change shape," as Dr. Scardino
puts it. It shocks me and distresses me to no end to look at my
husband's shrunken testicles.

Millions of people are defaced and mutilated every year in the name of
cancer treatment.  Women having their breasts cut off is so common that
we don't even think anything about it. But the breastless woman does.
I could give you an example: my husband mother was a beautiful, vibrant
person but at age 30  was diagnosed with breast cancer.  She had a
double mastectomy.  She was never the same person afterwards, became
seriously depressed and committed suicide leaving behind three
children.  I would have to say that cutting off the breasts of a very
young woman is a pretty brutal way to treat a disease.

>Hormone therapy attempts to block a vital chemical from reaching the cancer.

What can be more brutal to a man than "hormone therapy"?

> You ask how I know this?  Because I have read books about cancer
> written by people who have spent their lives studying it using
> all the most advanced techniques available in modern science.

They will be the first to admit there is a whole lot they don't know
about cancer.

> Curing cancer is a similarly difficult problem.  It can be done
> in an increasing number of cases, but it's hard and it requires a
> lot more than qigong.

There are many cancers in which medicine is rendered completelly
powerless. Forex, pancreatic.  I have a cousin and a friend who had
pancreatic cancer and both died within months of diagnosis.  One was a
young woman whose husband is a friend of ours.  The woman left behind a
15-year-old son who was so traumatized by her sudden death that he went
into a psychotic state and has been in and out of hospitals.  Before
that he was an honor student.

>>That's why I think that promoting qigong as a cure for cancer is a lot like
>>murder. you've condemned that person to death. If you, really want to help cancer >>patients, then I strongly urge you to read scientific books about cancer, learn about it, >>and recommend serious medical treatment to cancer patients.

I think modern medicine has done miraculous things for mankind but I
don't think cancer treatment is one of them.  Based on my own
experience it has a long way to go.

On the other hand, amazing thing have been done in epidemiology, for
example.  Malaria is now curable, but the best example of all is AIDS:
When it first arrived on the scene only 20+ years ago it was viewed as
completely incurable.  It was a death sentence.  Now it can be
controlled with a "cocktail" of drugs and the patient can lead a normal
life.

What we need is a "Manhattan Project" that would focus on curing
prostate and other cancers in a compassionate way  Let's hope it
happens soon.

All the best.

Leah
Alan Meyer - 11 Nov 2006 04:09 GMT
> Dear Alan,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Do you mean even if the science is hopeless or it's hopeless to
> persuade the person to believe in it?

I mean that making an impression on Samuel is hopeless.

I notice he's still out there spamming newsgroups.

> Supposing science cannot offer a
> solution to a problem. Then what?

Science is still very young.  In the 200,000 year history of
modern humans, science has arisen only in the last few hundred,
and the science that is critical to cancer research has been
developed within our own lifetimes.

My favorite definition of science is "Common sense made
systematic."  Science is a technique for relating observation
and theory, and for insisting on empirical evidence for our
conclusions.

So in answer to your question - if science has no solution
then, for now at least, we have no solution.  "Channeling
cosmic energy" (what the Qigong master claims to do), and
similar stuff is, at best, prescientific superstition and, at
worst, fraud.

Sometimes there is no answer.  In the end, all of us will
die, just like all the other plants and animals.  There isn't
a thing we can do about that.

But I don't think you're disagreeing with me on that.

> Like you I operate my life according to the rules of science and If I
> have a health problem I go to the best allopathic doctor (e.g.,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Yes. These are theories not gospel truths.

They are theories that have considerable force of evidence
behind them.  I think that what I wrote above can be found in
most or all of the recent standard biology text books.

My understanding of it came from _The Molecular Biology of
the Cell_, 4th ed. 2002, by Alberts, et. al.  To my knowledge
it's the standard textbook in the field and the theory it presents
is the commonly accepted one in the medical and scientific
community.

> The truth is we know very little about what causes cancer.  For
> example, now that they are decoding the human genome and are looking at
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> patient I am very disappointed in what science has achieved in this
> area.  To borrow a phrase, "Science, be not proud."

I hear you.  I understand what you are saying and why you
say it.  I am a cancer survivor myself and I didn't like what I
had to go through in treatment.

But I look at the half full side of this cup.

Fifty years from now there will probably be very easy treatments
that work with few side effects and provide sure cures.  But on
the other hand, fifty years ago, my chances and your husband's
chances for surviving the disease would have been pretty dismal.

Without the PSA test that was only popularized in the 1990s,
my disease would not have been diagnosed until it was way too
late.  My treatment would have been relatively primitive surgery
or radiation with a small likelihood of success.  Fifty years before
that there probably would have been no treatment at all.

Without the nasty treatment I had (radiation and hormones) I
would probably be dead before reaching my 70th birthday.
That might still happen, but now I have a fighting chance.

...
> I think modern medicine has done miraculous things for mankind but I
> don't think cancer treatment is one of them.  Based on my own
> experience it has a long way to go.

It surely does.

...
> What we need is a "Manhattan Project" that would focus on curing
> prostate and other cancers in a compassionate way  Let's hope it
> happens soon.

I think both of us have agreed in the past that this would be a better
use of the money being spent in the far away place that I will
not mention.

> All the best.

And to you and your husband.  I know he's feeling down and
depressed by all that has happened, but he's a very lucky man
in one way.  He's got a wife who understands and cares about
him (as do I - and it's made a huge difference to me.)  I hope
he is also able to see and enjoy the half full part of his cup.

Life, even dribbling and drooping, is a wonderful thing.  Sometimes
we just need to watch a Steve Martin or Woody Allen or Danny
Kaye movie to put it all in perspective for us.  Sometimes, even
if we can't get it up, just sitting on the couch and snuggling can
be a truly wonderful thing.

Best of luck.

   Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.