Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PCa and Colonoscopy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RML - 18 Oct 2006 19:14 GMT
Does having been diagnosed with PCa (in and of itself) increase the
frequency one needs a colonoscopy?

Have others been told to have one more often after diagnosis of PCa?
I.P. Freely - 18 Oct 2006 20:48 GMT
> Does having been diagnosed with PCa (in and of itself) increase the
> frequency one needs a colonoscopy?
>
> Have others been told to have one more often after diagnosis of PCa?

That's a new one on me, and I've researched both colon and prostate
cancers extensively because I have (had?) both (unrelated). Not saying
it's not valid, just that I didn't run across that advice. Doesn't PC
metastasize primarily to such locations as bone, bladder, etc. and much
less often to the colon?

I.P.
MH - 19 Oct 2006 01:57 GMT
I had an early stage colon cancer and had a portion of my colon removed
three years after my prostatectomy.  But.... my gastroenterologist was quick
to point out that there was *no* correlation between the colon polyp cancer
and the prostate cancer.

MikeH

> Does having been diagnosed with PCa (in and of itself) increase the
> frequency one needs a colonoscopy?
>
> Have others been told to have one more often after diagnosis of PCa?
Alan Meyer - 24 Oct 2006 04:53 GMT
> Does having been diagnosed with PCa (in and of itself) increase the
> frequency one needs a colonoscopy?
>
> Have others been told to have one more often after diagnosis of PCa?

I have been so told.

There are two reasons I know of to think about it.

One is that, according to some, whatever it is about your genetic
makeup that makes you susceptible to one kind of cancer might
mean that you are also susceptible to others.

I've heard that theory stated but have no information about
whether it's just a hypothesis or whether there's data to back
it up.

The second one is that, if you have radiation therapy, you
might conceivably get a secondary cancer from it and you
should be monitored.  The odds are apparently very low, but
higher than if you didn't have radiation.  Obviously, this only
applies to radiation patients.

   Alan

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.