Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Test could spot aggressive prostate cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
c palmer - 05 Oct 2006 21:50 GMT
WASHINGTON (HealthDay News) -- Australian researchers say they've found
a new marker for identifying aggressive prostate cancer.

"Men who have low levels of a marker called AZGP1 in the prostate at the
time of [prostate removal] surgery have a greatly increased risk of
developing metastatic cancer," Sue Henshall, leader of the prostate
cancer research group at the Garvan Institute in Sydney, said in a
prepared statement.

"This means two things: that these men could benefit from more
aggressive treatment such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy around the
time of surgery when they still have potentially curable cancer; and
that patients with a low risk of developing metastatic disease will have
the option of deferring treatments that have a negative impact on
quality of life," Henshall added.

The next step of this research is to study the association between AZGP1
levels and metastatic cancer in prostate cancer patients who don't have
surgery, the researchers said.

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Alan Meyer - 06 Oct 2006 20:50 GMT
> ...
> "This means two things: that these men could benefit from more
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> quality of life," Henshall added.
> ...

I've heard of patients being offered hormone therapy and radiation,
or surgery and radiation, or even all three as part of primary
treatment.  But I've never heard of anyone being offered
chemotherapy unless and until the primary treatment has failed.

I wonder if anyone is experimenting with using chemotherapy as
an adjunct to primary treatment?

   Alan
NICK - 06 Oct 2006 21:52 GMT
> I wonder if anyone is experimenting with using chemotherapy
> as an adjunct to primary treatment?

I was using chemotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis
between April 2003 and November 2005.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.