Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2006
DRE & PSA
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Newby - 03 Oct 2006 11:30 GMT I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies.
My Doc does the DRE followed by the drawing of blood. Does it make any difference in the PSA results if the DRE is performed just prior to drawing blood for the PSA? I have read somewhere the blood should be drawn before the DRE is performed but cannot find the article. Please cite references if you can.
Thanks for any info.
c palmer - 03 Oct 2006 12:06 GMT From: nobody@nowhere.net (Newby)
I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies.
My Doc does the DRE followed by the drawing of blood. Does it make any difference in the PSA results if the DRE is performed just prior to drawing blood for the PSA? I have read somewhere the blood should be drawn before the DRE is performed but cannot find the article. Please cite references if you can. Thanks for any info.
=====> no problem - here's an article that plus reference on where it came from. hope this helps.....
~ curtis
-----------------------
The total PSA test and digital rectal exam (DRE) are ordered to screen both asymptomatic and symptomatic men for prostate cancer. Since the DRE can cause a temporary elevation in PSA, the blood is usually collected prior to performing the DRE. If either the PSA or the DRE are found to be abnormal, then the doctor may choose to follow this testing with a prostate biopsy and perhaps imaging tests, such as an ultrasound. If the DRE is normal but the PSA is moderately elevated, the doctor may order a free PSA test to look at the ratio of free to total PSA. This can help to distinguish between prostate cancer and other non-cancer causes of elevated PSA. Since the total PSA test can be elevated temporarily for a variety of reasons, a doctor may order another PSA a few weeks after the first to determine if the PSA is still elevated.
©2001-2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Newby - 03 Oct 2006 12:34 GMT From: nobody@nowhere.net (Newby)
I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies.
My Doc does the DRE followed by the drawing of blood. Does it make any difference in the PSA results if the DRE is performed just prior to drawing blood for the PSA? I have read somewhere the blood should be drawn before the DRE is performed but cannot find the article. Please cite references if you can. Thanks for any info.
=====> no problem - here's an article that plus reference on where it came from. hope this helps.....
~ curtis
-----------------------
The total PSA test and digital rectal exam (DRE) are ordered to screen both asymptomatic and symptomatic men for prostate cancer. Since the DRE can cause a temporary elevation in PSA, the blood is usually collected prior to performing the DRE. If either the PSA or the DRE are found to be abnormal, then the doctor may choose to follow this testing with a prostate biopsy and perhaps imaging tests, such as an ultrasound. If the DRE is normal but the PSA is moderately elevated, the doctor may order a free PSA test to look at the ratio of free to total PSA. This can help to distinguish between prostate cancer and other non-cancer causes of elevated PSA. Since the total PSA test can be elevated temporarily for a variety of reasons, a doctor may order another PSA a few weeks after the first to determine if the PSA is still elevated.
©2001-2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
[snipped]
Thanks. Could you post a link to the article?
c palmer - 03 Oct 2006 19:11 GMT =====> no problem - here's an article that plus reference on where it came from. hope this helps..... ~ curtis ----------------------- ©2001-2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry [snipped]
Thanks. Could you post a link to the article?
========> this article was just one of quite a few that stress the importance of doing the psa test first. just do a google or one of the other search engines and there should be a ton of info to pop up. if not, you can probably go to American Association for Clinical Chemistry and find the article at their website.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Claude - 03 Oct 2006 14:02 GMT >I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Thanks for any info. I've always understood that the DRE definitely should not be done before the PSA blood draw. Neither is it advisable to have sex within 48 hours before the draw. Somewhere I recall reading that even a lot of bike or motorcycle riding right before the test is not good. All of these, I've read, will most likely give you an elevated reading.
Newby - 03 Oct 2006 22:20 GMT > >I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies. > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > riding right before the test is not good. All of these, I've read, will > most likely give you an elevated reading. You recollection and mine are about the same. I'm gonna keep lookin'.
Thanks.
Steve Jordan - 03 Oct 2006 19:35 GMT (snip)
> My Doc does the DRE followed by the drawing of blood. Does it make any > difference in the PSA results if the DRE is performed just prior to drawing > blood for the PSA? I have read somewhere the blood should be drawn before > the DRE is performed but cannot find the article. Please cite references if > you can. > Yes, It can make a difference to the extent of unreliable findings. It's a pleasure to see a reference to a medic who is familiar with such important details. Some are not.
Anything that stresses the gland can cause increases in expression of PSA.
For details see this article on the authoritative website of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute: http://prostate-cancer.org/education/preclin/PCRIViewOnTesting.html
Regards,
Steve J
"We must tailor the treatment to the nature of the disease. We must listen to the biology." -- Stephen B. Strum, MD
Steve Kramer - 04 Oct 2006 02:24 GMT >I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > if > you can. I rarely cite references, especially when told to, but it is a fact that DREs and even bowel movements can cause PSAs to rise.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Alan Meyer - 04 Oct 2006 18:25 GMT >I have posted this over in alt.support.prostate also. So far, no replies. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Thanks for any info. IIRC, I had a PSA reading of 10.3 two hours after a DRE. A PSA reading a month later was 8.7.
That's not proof of anything, but it's a data point to consider.
I am surprised at the number of doctors, including urologists, who don't believe this and think that it doesn't matter if a DRE is done immediately before a blood draw. Even if the evidence for it were inconclusive, it would make sense to me to not take chances.
Alan
From Bob - 04 Oct 2006 18:32 GMT This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed.
Newby - 04 Oct 2006 23:06 GMT > This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i > would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. Thanks for the comment. Can you cite a reference that I can use to educate him?
Thanks again.
I.P. Freely - 05 Oct 2006 02:41 GMT >> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i >> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. > > Can you cite a reference that I can use to educate him? Any doctor that needs to be educated by his patient -- or in my case refuses to even look at solid references -- needs a new client, 'cause I'm outta there. A DRE expresses urine from me; it's only logical that it will also express some blood, which includes PSA.
I.P.
Newby - 05 Oct 2006 12:58 GMT > >> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i > >> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I.P. I haven't seen the "solid references" to which you are referring. Would you cite them for me?
Thanks.
I.P. Freely - 05 Oct 2006 18:48 GMT >>>> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i >>>> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I haven't seen the "solid references" to which you are referring. Would you > cite them for me? "In my case" refers to my initial GP who refused to consider large bodies of peer-reviewed and accepted data about PSA thresholds, the effect of grapefruit juice on statins, and the cardiovascular implications of ED. My point was not whether a DRE raises PSA; it was that "Any doctor that needs to be educated by his patient -- or in my case refuses to even look at solid references -- needs a new client, 'cause I'm outta there." By now there's plenty of discussion of the DRE/PSA connection -- or lack thereof -- in other posts. I guess the real question of your doc is whether s/he knew of the connection and judged it inconsequential, or just wasn't even aware of the debate.
I.P.
MAS - 05 Oct 2006 05:54 GMT Tell your physician that you have read that sex, bicycle rising, infection, and DRE's all stimulate the prostate gland and and cause a release of excess antigens into the vascular system. Is this correct? And then ask him to site his reference.
Google "PSA rises causes" and read.
PSA is only a bio-marker that show a relationship to cancer growth. The more growth, then more antigens in your system. Cancer is only one raeson for PSA rises. Only a biopsy can tell for sure.
>> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i >> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Thanks again. Steve Kramer - 05 Oct 2006 11:32 GMT >> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i >> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. > > Thanks for the comment. Can you cite a reference that I can use to > educate > him? Okay, just his one time....
Walsh; pp 127 and 128
Causes of elevated PSA include:
Trauma vigorous rectal exam prostate biopsy transurethral resection Prostatitis Secual activity
etc.
Newby - 05 Oct 2006 13:11 GMT > >> This is pretty basic, if your doctor does the DRE before the PSA, i > >> would get a new doctor, he is not very well informed. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > etc. Thanks. Followed your tip and came up with the following:
http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/oncology/o0002e.htm#Methods
"Ejaculation and DRE have been reported to increase PSA levels, but studies have shown the effects to be variable or insignificant.[36] For this reason, PSA testing can be performed with reasonable accuracy after rectal examination.[37] Prostate biopsy and cystoscopy, however, will usually cause substantial elevation of PSA, and PSA testing should be postponed for at least 3 to 4 weeks due to this effect.[37]"
JohnHace - 05 Oct 2006 15:23 GMT > Thanks. Followed your tip and came up with the following: > > http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/oncology/o0002e.htm#Methods > > "Ejaculation and DRE have been reported to increase PSA levels, but studies > have shown the effects to be variable or insignificant.[36] Newby,
Check this out:
http://www.medic8.com/healthguide/articles/prostatepsa.html
says that sexual activity can increase PSA.
"Ejaculation
In men above 49 there is a definite rise in PSA with a peak increase within one hour following ejaculation. The mean rise of PSA is 0.8-2 ng/ml but increase in levels as much as 9.2 ng/ml has been recorded.
Therefore, men should abstain from ejaculation for at least 48 hours prior to PSA determination otherwise many prostate biopsies may be performed unnecessarily."
John
Beverley - 05 Oct 2006 16:52 GMT We had another single male poster on this group a few years ago who had seeds and RT. He ran into an old flame one weekend prior to a PSA test on Monday. Being a normal male he spent just about every waking moment with this gal and apparently had a "wonderful" weekend. His PSA test result on Monday was through the roof. He told his doctor about the weekend and the doc had him retest about 2 weeks later and the PSA returned to its normal falling pattern. The poster swore that the high PSA result scared the cr*p out of him but the weekend was worth it. Bev
> > Thanks. Followed your tip and came up with the following: > > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > John Alan Meyer - 05 Oct 2006 16:15 GMT ...
> http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/oncology/o0002e.htm#Methods > > "Ejaculation and DRE have been reported to increase PSA levels, but studies > have shown the effects to be variable or insignificant.[36] For this reason, > PSA testing can be performed with reasonable accuracy after rectal > examination.[37] I went to Pubmed to find the cited article for footnote 37 and read the abstract, which is accurately cited in the cancernetwork article. Then I looked at what Pubmed showed for "related articles". The first one I looked at agreed with this statement. The second did not. See:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=R etrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=8976249
Among other things it said:
... Total and free PSA measurements were repeated 1 and 24 hours after the rectal examination. Serum total and free PSA also was measured immediately before, and 1 hour, 24 hours and 1 week after prostatic biopsy in 30 men. RESULTS: Biological variation for total and free PSA was 14.7 and 14.0%, respectively. At 1 hour after rectal examination total and free PSA increased by more than the biological variation in 31 and 48% of the men, respectively. ...
So in this study of 30 men, variation in total PSA exceeded 14.7% in 31% of men.
I'm not able to say which study is right, and haven't looked at the raw data that might be in the full original articles, but it still seems to me that arranging for the DRE after the blood draw costs nothing and _might_ give a more accurate reading. I can't think of any reason not to arrange things in that way.
Alan
wife - 05 Oct 2006 16:11 GMT found this web site for you, hope it helps. Kim
http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/preclin/PCRIViewOnTesting.html
Newby - 05 Oct 2006 22:26 GMT > found this web site for you, hope it helps. Kim > > http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/preclin/PCRIViewOnTesting.html Yes it does
Thanks for posting the link.
Steve Jordan - 05 Oct 2006 23:07 GMT Quoting "wife"
>> found this web site for you, hope it helps. Kim >> >> http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/preclin/PCRIViewOnTesting.html >> He responded:
>> Yes it does >> >> Thanks for posting the link. >> I'd appreciate some help, here. I posted that exact same link on October 3. No response.
I'm wondering whether some folks simply do no receive my messages on this NG.
Of course, if that's the case, I'll get no reply to this post. Hmmm.
Regards,
Steve J
"Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy." --Joseph Campbell
JerryW - 06 Oct 2006 00:15 GMT > I'd appreciate some help, here. I posted that exact same link on October > 3. No response. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > "Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy." > --Joseph Campbell SteveJ,
I saw your reply post of 10/3/06. I think you're getting through OK, even if you may not be "getting through" :-)
 Signature JerryW
Please respond to group; email address is not valid
2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62) 2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe 5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes PSA <0.1 since
Steve Kramer - 06 Oct 2006 01:38 GMT > I'd appreciate some help, here. I posted that exact same link on October > 3. No response. > > I'm wondering whether some folks simply do no receive my messages on this > NG. Nope. I didn't get this. Please resend.
Newby - 06 Oct 2006 02:20 GMT > > I'd appreciate some help, here. I posted that exact same link on October > > 3. No response. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Nope. I didn't get this. Please resend. I didn't get it either.
wife - 06 Oct 2006 15:44 GMT I'm still trying to figure out how to work this board!!!!
NICK - 06 Oct 2006 21:06 GMT > I'm still trying to figure out how to work this board!!!! Dart board?
Scrabble board?
Chess board?
Ouija board?
Sorry, couldn't help it. The devil made me do it. <g>
wife - 06 Oct 2006 22:18 GMT that's ok, apology accepted <grins>, it gets downright comical when I try to answer a question or make a reply. Hopefully it ends up in the place it's supposed to be. Still trying though.
NICK - 06 Oct 2006 23:05 GMT > that's ok, apology accepted <grins>, it gets downright comical when I try > to answer a question or make a reply. Hopefully it ends up in the place > it's supposed to be. Still trying though. At least you're posting in the correct net.
I've made posts intended for this and the arthritis groups into FidoNet, PoliceNet, SafNet, FireNet and others. <g>
|
|
|