Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PSA On the Rise

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 17:13 GMT
Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question.  Here's the
history:

1991    10/14      .6
1992    11/24      .4
2001    01/04      .96
            08/15    1.01
2003    08/01    1.06
2004    02/19    1.8
            09/16    2.1
            12/15        Total knee replaced +
                               6 blood transfusions
2005    02/02    4.62
            03/25    7.2
            04/06         Prostate Biopsy
                               Mostly 7s + One 9
             Bone Scan Positive Several Sites
             CT Scan No Soft tissue Involved
             05/12    20.5
             05/13          Started Lupron Rx
             06/07    22.2
             08/10    14.84
             08/31      9.66
             10/05      4.45
             10/10      3.5
             12/30      2.6
2006     03/31      6.65
             04/26            Started Casodex
             07/14    18.3

Not really worried - Not in pain - hot flashes 12 to 18 per day mostly just
annoying - Just turned 80 and have had a good life - Blood taken yesterday
for Urologist visit next week - Not complaining - Just curious about what
may be coming next - Questions:

1) How frequently do you folks have your PSA checked and does Medicare pay
for them all?

2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all that
foreign blood entering my system.  Thought being it might have somehow
compromised my immune system is some way.  Urologist said it was totally
unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time.
Any thoughts?

Thanks
Jerry
Dick Smith - 17 Aug 2006 17:25 GMT
Jerry,
I don't understand something. It seems like they did a bone scan and
from those results they decided that doing a RRP or radiation was not
in the cards, so they put you on hormone therapy? Is that correct? Were
they sure the "hot spots" was from the PCa?

The jump from 1.06 and 1.8 in a year is a red flag.
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 17:58 GMT
It seems like they did a bone scan and
> from those results they decided that doing a RRP or radiation was not
> in the cards, so they put you on hormone therapy? Is that correct? Were
> they sure the "hot spots" was from the PCa?

That's right.
There were hot spots on on the spine at L4 and L5, several in the rib cage,
several in the pelvic area mostly on the ileum. My urologist said the
radiologist who read the pictures was very experienced and had been doing
the entire urology group's work for years. One of the things I'll ask next
week is if it is time to repeat the studies.
Steve Kramer - 17 Aug 2006 19:05 GMT
> 1991    10/14      .6
> 1992    11/24      .4
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 2004    02/19    1.8
>             09/16    2.1

I think in February 2004, your PSA indicated a pattern that should have
alerted your doc.  By September, I think you should have had a biopsy.  Was
he doing DREs (digital rectal exams) all along?  If so, what did he feel?

> 1) How frequently do you folks have your PSA checked and does Medicare pay
> for them all?

My age and PSA are completely different, but I have gone the Lupron route
and later Casodex.  My PSA is tested every 4 months.  Medicare is but a
dream for me, so someone esle will have to fied that one.

> 2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all
> that foreign blood entering my system.  Thought being it might have
> somehow compromised my immune system is some way.  Urologist said it was
> totally unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time.
> Any thoughts?

It is totally unrelated and you probably had it 1½ years before.  I think
your PSA in August 2003 was the first telling PSA, but your doc would have
to have been psychic to know it then.  The industry standard is to look for
three consecutive increases and you hit that by September 2004.

I don't think the intervening 6 months had much affect, however, on your
eventual Gleason, mets or treatment.  Hopefully, that serves to calm your
second thoughts.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

ron - 17 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT
Jerry wrote...snip...
>              09/16    2.1
>              12/15        Total knee replaced +
>                                 6 blood transfusions
> 2005    02/02    4.62

> 2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all that
> foreign blood entering my system.  Thought being it might have somehow
> compromised my immune system is some way.  Urologist said it was totally
> unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time.

Hi Jerry...That's an interesting question.  When RP plus adjuvant RT is
contemplated, they don't irradiate immediately after surgery, they wait
for things to heal.  Immediately after surgery there are so many growth
factors promoting healing and regenerating blood vessels in the area of
the RP incisions and margin, that radiation at this time would be
counter-productive.  Certainly after your surgery, your body was
producing a lot of growth factors to  repair the surgical area.  I
wonder what the lifetime of these growth factors typically is and
whether they can be transported to other areas of the body (e.g. your
prostate).  It doesn't seem inconceivable that the growth factors could
have affected PCa cell growth and produced the PSA spurt you observed,
but this is pure speculation on my part...Best wishes and good health,
ron
Alan Meyer - 17 Aug 2006 20:39 GMT
> Jerry wrote...snip...
> >              09/16    2.1
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> but this is pure speculation on my part...Best wishes and good health,
> ron

Ron's speculation is very interesting.  He's speculating that the
healing process itself could have stimulated the growth of new
cells in your body - including cancer cells.

Some factor in the blood you received compromising your immune
system would also be speculation.  I'm no expert, but I'd guess
that, even if it were true, it would have been a choice between
taking that hit, or dying on the spot from lack of blood.

Unfortunately, growing older is, all by itself, a major risk
factor for cancer.  It's probably the biggest risk factor of all.
Your immune system grows weaker with age while your DNA
accumulates 80 years worth of mutations that could be the
stimulus to cancer.  Some scientists believe that anyone who
lives long enough will develop cancer.  It's something that seems
to be a natural consequence of aging and the rough and tumble of
life.

It's very unfortunate that you got so little benefit from the
Lupron.  The remaining possible therapy - chemotherapy - is
usually even less effective and harder on the body.  It is
possible that some of the experimental therapies in clinical
trials could be of use, but they are, after all, experimental,
and a lot of the trials researchers prefer younger patients if
they can get them because the younger patients have fewer
complications.

I'm not a doctor and I am reluctant to speculate about what is
coming for you.  However I know that if I were in your shoes I
would want to know, and doctors are not always willing to tell
the truth when the news is bad and there's little to be done
about it.

My non-expert speculation is that symptoms, in the form of pain
in the joints, might begin to appear in anywhere from a few
months to 2-3 years.  After that, I would speculate that you
might get around another year before it kills you.  The last year
will be a tough one, but can be made much, much easier if you can
find the right medical care to help you with it.

At this point, I think you will be much better off if you can
find a good medical oncologist rather than a urologist.  Your
disease is no longer confined to the prostate.  The urologist's
specialty is becoming irrelevant to your problem.

A medical oncologist might have a better idea about what
treaments are useful for delaying progress of the disease, for
palliating symptoms, or for easing pain.  He might have some
opinion about whether you should stay on hormone therapy, and for
how long, whether different hormone combinations should be tried,
and if and when chemotherapy or experimental trials should be
attempted.  If he's good, he may help you to remain as functional
and pain free as possible, as near to the end as possible.

I'm hoping that the time left to you, and to all of us, will be
happy and productive, and that you have many good times to come.
If it is important to you, then this may be a good time to begin
writing down what you know about your early life and about the
people in your family that only you remember.  It may be a good
time to visit those places or people you've been meaning to see.
It might be smart to start simplifying financial affairs and
getting things in order.

My best to you and your family.

   Alan
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 22:53 GMT
(snip)
> Some factor in the blood you received compromising your immune
> system would also be speculation.  I'm no expert, but I'd guess
> that, even if it were true, it would have been a choice between
> taking that hit, or dying on the spot from lack of blood.

Oh,  I agree completely!  I'm certainly not thinking of this as an issue -
just a concept and a curiosity.  My knee surgeon said that at least I was
smart enough for the first two pints to be my own autogenous donation.

You make some really fine points in your various responses and I appreciate
the insights.  Gives me many more things to explore next week with the
urologist.

(snip)
> If it is important to you, then this may be a good time to begin
> writing down what you know about your early life and about the
> people in your family that only you remember.  It may be a good
> time to visit those places or people you've been meaning to see.
> It might be smart to start simplifying financial affairs and
> getting things in order.

Really curious!  I just returned from a big family reunion in Boise, ID. We
are scattered all over the map from California to Ohio and from Texas to
Chicago and Boise.  I was the senior member of course and some of the nieces
and nephews wanted a family tree chart back to their great grandparents -
which I produced for them along with what I remembered about each entry
block.  Some of them brought old pictures to get some identifying names on
them.  My niece in Ohio recently asked me to write up some comments about
what it was like growing up in Brooklyn with two older sisters - one being
her mother.  I'm working on it.

I've always been very active and vigorous - and maybe that's what got me
this far. I sold my plane a few years ago and I'm starting to get my boat
ready to sell it.  None of my 3 sons have any interest in sailing and I
can't single hand it anymore, so after 8 years of part time cruising I'm
ready to become a fulltime landlubber.  I have a commitment from my son in
Boise to take care of my dog when and if it becomes necessary and I have
commercial plane tickets to visit my sister in Ohio next month . The oldest
of my 2 lawyer sons has a folder in his files to take care of the mundane
matters when the time comes.  Uncle Sam will not get more than he deserves
:-)

So you see, I am on top of things and ready for whatever comes next. Seems
to me though, that you are a very sensitive and wise person, and I greatly
thank you again for your insight and comments. Good luck to you too and to
the other visitors in this community.

Jerry
Alan Meyer - 18 Aug 2006 01:36 GMT
> ...
> I've always been very active and vigorous - and maybe that's what got me
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ready to become a fulltime landlubber.
> ...

A pilot and a sailor!  A man after my own heart.  I fly a sailplane
in Maryland and I once had a tiny sailing dinghy that I built myself
out of wood and sailed on the Chesapeake.  One of my fantasies
about the best way to go is to have my wife beside me and sail
into the sunset.  But if I want to do that here on the East coast
I'll have to sail out sea during the day, time it just right, and then
head back :)

> I have a commitment from my son in
> Boise to take care of my dog when and if it becomes necessary and I have
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thank you again for your insight and comments. Good luck to you too and to
> the other visitors in this community.

Thank you.

Life is so good it's a shame we can't extend it forever.  But those of
us who have been fortunate in our family, work, or personal lives
have nothing to complain of.

I think I may have licked this round of cancer.  I'm only 60 and
might still have a decade or two left in me.  I hope to enjoy every
minute of it that I can.

Regards,

   Alan
NICK - 18 Aug 2006 06:31 GMT
> Oh,  I agree completely!  I'm certainly not thinking of this as an issue -
> just a concept and a curiosity.  My knee surgeon said that at least I was
> smart enough for the first two pints to be my own autogenous donation.

I made a 2-pint autogenous donation just before my total hip
replacement in July 2000.

It wan't needed, but it was there "in case."

Eventually I'll need another THR on the other side.
ralphv - 18 Aug 2006 00:37 GMT
Hello Jerry,
I think you have the right attitude in dealing with your disease. When
your PSA doubled between 2003 and 2004, it seems the cancer was on the
march already. The knee replacement is a major operation and a trauma
to the body.

Tumor angiogenesis is an important factor in the progression of tumors
because without the development of new blood vessels, tumors cannot
grow beyond 2-3 mm. In a surgical trauma like you experienced,
surgical wounds are characterized by a rapid and early angiogenic
environment. Factors such basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and others are radidly
recruited to promote the healing process. It is very possible that
under those conditions the process of neovascularization of the wound
also increased the possibility that tumor cells in your circulation
gave rise to the bony metastasis. Your PSA increases reflect such
event.

On the other hand, your response to androgen deprivation has been
rather poor (some 10 months) and that is an indication or resistive
(androgen independent) disease. This event in most men is usually slow
(years) and since your progression has been rather rapid, it is very
possible this has been a long process that went undetected.

I wonder if you have been offered some medication to offset the loss of
bone mineral density while on androgen deprivation. An every
three-month infusion of a bisphosphonate like Zometa is common practice
these days. Be aware that these medications (bisphosphonates) have a
low incidence on osteonecrosis of the jaw bone (ONJ), but all in all
seem to be beneficial in preventing loss of mineral bone density and
slow down the propagation of further bone lesions.

I am sure preservation of QOL is a priority for you and therefore wish
you the very best outcome and QOL in the years to come.

RalphV
www.azustoo.org

> Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question.  Here's the
> history:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> Thanks
> Jerry
Jerry - 18 Aug 2006 01:31 GMT
(snip)
> I wonder if you have been offered some medication to offset the loss of
> bone mineral density while on androgen deprivation. An every
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> seem to be beneficial in preventing loss of mineral bone density and
> slow down the propagation of further bone lesions.

Thanks for the note.
Actually,  I was diagnosed with osteopenia in Aug 2000 and have been on
Fosamax plus 1500 mg calcium and 800 iu vitamin D ever since.  Annual bone
density tests have shown slow but continual improvement to the point where
the last one, in Oct 2005, indicated the spine assay was just into the
normal range and the femoral neck just slightly below it.  Overall
evaluation: low fracture risk.
Anyhow, you've provided more points for discussion with the doc. Might even
be able to teach him something  :-)
Jerry
kh - 18 Aug 2006 14:55 GMT
> Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question.  Here's the
> history:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>               04/26            Started Casodex
>               07/14    18.3

Thanks for posting your PSA readings.  This helps me a lot.  I have
not been able to find much raw data.  The web and newsgropes are
full of opinion and reposts of "guidance" but the data is hard to
find.
Alan Meyer - 18 Aug 2006 18:13 GMT
<... PSA data deleted ...>

> Thanks for posting your PSA readings.  This helps me a lot.  I have
> not been able to find much raw data.  The web and newsgropes are
> full of opinion and reposts of "guidance" but the data is hard to
> find.

kh,

I wouldn't use Jerry's data as indicative of anything you
or someone else might experience.  The development of
cancer is highly individualistic.  "Prostate cancer" merely
names the tissue from which cancer develops.  The actual
cancer cells and the specific genetic mutations that make
them cancerous, can vary widely from person to person.

One fellow on this newsgroup had RP, went several years,
and then had a very slowly rising PSA that has gone up to
3.something over multiple years.  Another guy had RP,
had undetectable PSA for a number of years, then went
from undetectable to 744 in one year and died shortly
after that.

Similarly, some men, like Jerry, have gotten less than a
year of benefit from hormone therapy, while others, such
as Francois Mitterand, former President of France, is said
to have been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer
and managed it successfully with HT during his entire 14 year
term in office.

   Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.