Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2006
PSA On the Rise
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 17:13 GMT Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question. Here's the history:
1991 10/14 .6 1992 11/24 .4 2001 01/04 .96 08/15 1.01 2003 08/01 1.06 2004 02/19 1.8 09/16 2.1 12/15 Total knee replaced + 6 blood transfusions 2005 02/02 4.62 03/25 7.2 04/06 Prostate Biopsy Mostly 7s + One 9 Bone Scan Positive Several Sites CT Scan No Soft tissue Involved 05/12 20.5 05/13 Started Lupron Rx 06/07 22.2 08/10 14.84 08/31 9.66 10/05 4.45 10/10 3.5 12/30 2.6 2006 03/31 6.65 04/26 Started Casodex 07/14 18.3
Not really worried - Not in pain - hot flashes 12 to 18 per day mostly just annoying - Just turned 80 and have had a good life - Blood taken yesterday for Urologist visit next week - Not complaining - Just curious about what may be coming next - Questions:
1) How frequently do you folks have your PSA checked and does Medicare pay for them all?
2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all that foreign blood entering my system. Thought being it might have somehow compromised my immune system is some way. Urologist said it was totally unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time. Any thoughts?
Thanks Jerry
Dick Smith - 17 Aug 2006 17:25 GMT Jerry, I don't understand something. It seems like they did a bone scan and from those results they decided that doing a RRP or radiation was not in the cards, so they put you on hormone therapy? Is that correct? Were they sure the "hot spots" was from the PCa?
The jump from 1.06 and 1.8 in a year is a red flag.
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 17:58 GMT It seems like they did a bone scan and
> from those results they decided that doing a RRP or radiation was not > in the cards, so they put you on hormone therapy? Is that correct? Were > they sure the "hot spots" was from the PCa? That's right. There were hot spots on on the spine at L4 and L5, several in the rib cage, several in the pelvic area mostly on the ileum. My urologist said the radiologist who read the pictures was very experienced and had been doing the entire urology group's work for years. One of the things I'll ask next week is if it is time to repeat the studies.
Steve Kramer - 17 Aug 2006 19:05 GMT > 1991 10/14 .6 > 1992 11/24 .4 [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 2004 02/19 1.8 > 09/16 2.1 I think in February 2004, your PSA indicated a pattern that should have alerted your doc. By September, I think you should have had a biopsy. Was he doing DREs (digital rectal exams) all along? If so, what did he feel?
> 1) How frequently do you folks have your PSA checked and does Medicare pay > for them all? My age and PSA are completely different, but I have gone the Lupron route and later Casodex. My PSA is tested every 4 months. Medicare is but a dream for me, so someone esle will have to fied that one.
> 2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all > that foreign blood entering my system. Thought being it might have > somehow compromised my immune system is some way. Urologist said it was > totally unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time. > Any thoughts? It is totally unrelated and you probably had it 1½ years before. I think your PSA in August 2003 was the first telling PSA, but your doc would have to have been psychic to know it then. The industry standard is to look for three consecutive increases and you hit that by September 2004.
I don't think the intervening 6 months had much affect, however, on your eventual Gleason, mets or treatment. Hopefully, that serves to calm your second thoughts.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
ron - 17 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT Jerry wrote...snip...
> 09/16 2.1 > 12/15 Total knee replaced + > 6 blood transfusions > 2005 02/02 4.62
> 2) Seems to me my real problems started after the knee surgery with all that > foreign blood entering my system. Thought being it might have somehow > compromised my immune system is some way. Urologist said it was totally > unrelated - that I've had the PCa for a long long time. Hi Jerry...That's an interesting question. When RP plus adjuvant RT is contemplated, they don't irradiate immediately after surgery, they wait for things to heal. Immediately after surgery there are so many growth factors promoting healing and regenerating blood vessels in the area of the RP incisions and margin, that radiation at this time would be counter-productive. Certainly after your surgery, your body was producing a lot of growth factors to repair the surgical area. I wonder what the lifetime of these growth factors typically is and whether they can be transported to other areas of the body (e.g. your prostate). It doesn't seem inconceivable that the growth factors could have affected PCa cell growth and produced the PSA spurt you observed, but this is pure speculation on my part...Best wishes and good health, ron
Alan Meyer - 17 Aug 2006 20:39 GMT > Jerry wrote...snip... > > 09/16 2.1 [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > but this is pure speculation on my part...Best wishes and good health, > ron Ron's speculation is very interesting. He's speculating that the healing process itself could have stimulated the growth of new cells in your body - including cancer cells.
Some factor in the blood you received compromising your immune system would also be speculation. I'm no expert, but I'd guess that, even if it were true, it would have been a choice between taking that hit, or dying on the spot from lack of blood.
Unfortunately, growing older is, all by itself, a major risk factor for cancer. It's probably the biggest risk factor of all. Your immune system grows weaker with age while your DNA accumulates 80 years worth of mutations that could be the stimulus to cancer. Some scientists believe that anyone who lives long enough will develop cancer. It's something that seems to be a natural consequence of aging and the rough and tumble of life.
It's very unfortunate that you got so little benefit from the Lupron. The remaining possible therapy - chemotherapy - is usually even less effective and harder on the body. It is possible that some of the experimental therapies in clinical trials could be of use, but they are, after all, experimental, and a lot of the trials researchers prefer younger patients if they can get them because the younger patients have fewer complications.
I'm not a doctor and I am reluctant to speculate about what is coming for you. However I know that if I were in your shoes I would want to know, and doctors are not always willing to tell the truth when the news is bad and there's little to be done about it.
My non-expert speculation is that symptoms, in the form of pain in the joints, might begin to appear in anywhere from a few months to 2-3 years. After that, I would speculate that you might get around another year before it kills you. The last year will be a tough one, but can be made much, much easier if you can find the right medical care to help you with it.
At this point, I think you will be much better off if you can find a good medical oncologist rather than a urologist. Your disease is no longer confined to the prostate. The urologist's specialty is becoming irrelevant to your problem.
A medical oncologist might have a better idea about what treaments are useful for delaying progress of the disease, for palliating symptoms, or for easing pain. He might have some opinion about whether you should stay on hormone therapy, and for how long, whether different hormone combinations should be tried, and if and when chemotherapy or experimental trials should be attempted. If he's good, he may help you to remain as functional and pain free as possible, as near to the end as possible.
I'm hoping that the time left to you, and to all of us, will be happy and productive, and that you have many good times to come. If it is important to you, then this may be a good time to begin writing down what you know about your early life and about the people in your family that only you remember. It may be a good time to visit those places or people you've been meaning to see. It might be smart to start simplifying financial affairs and getting things in order.
My best to you and your family.
Alan
Jerry - 17 Aug 2006 22:53 GMT (snip)
> Some factor in the blood you received compromising your immune > system would also be speculation. I'm no expert, but I'd guess > that, even if it were true, it would have been a choice between > taking that hit, or dying on the spot from lack of blood. Oh, I agree completely! I'm certainly not thinking of this as an issue - just a concept and a curiosity. My knee surgeon said that at least I was smart enough for the first two pints to be my own autogenous donation.
You make some really fine points in your various responses and I appreciate the insights. Gives me many more things to explore next week with the urologist.
(snip)
> If it is important to you, then this may be a good time to begin > writing down what you know about your early life and about the > people in your family that only you remember. It may be a good > time to visit those places or people you've been meaning to see. > It might be smart to start simplifying financial affairs and > getting things in order. Really curious! I just returned from a big family reunion in Boise, ID. We are scattered all over the map from California to Ohio and from Texas to Chicago and Boise. I was the senior member of course and some of the nieces and nephews wanted a family tree chart back to their great grandparents - which I produced for them along with what I remembered about each entry block. Some of them brought old pictures to get some identifying names on them. My niece in Ohio recently asked me to write up some comments about what it was like growing up in Brooklyn with two older sisters - one being her mother. I'm working on it.
I've always been very active and vigorous - and maybe that's what got me this far. I sold my plane a few years ago and I'm starting to get my boat ready to sell it. None of my 3 sons have any interest in sailing and I can't single hand it anymore, so after 8 years of part time cruising I'm ready to become a fulltime landlubber. I have a commitment from my son in Boise to take care of my dog when and if it becomes necessary and I have commercial plane tickets to visit my sister in Ohio next month . The oldest of my 2 lawyer sons has a folder in his files to take care of the mundane matters when the time comes. Uncle Sam will not get more than he deserves
:-) So you see, I am on top of things and ready for whatever comes next. Seems to me though, that you are a very sensitive and wise person, and I greatly thank you again for your insight and comments. Good luck to you too and to the other visitors in this community.
Jerry
Alan Meyer - 18 Aug 2006 01:36 GMT > ... > I've always been very active and vigorous - and maybe that's what got me [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > ready to become a fulltime landlubber. > ... A pilot and a sailor! A man after my own heart. I fly a sailplane in Maryland and I once had a tiny sailing dinghy that I built myself out of wood and sailed on the Chesapeake. One of my fantasies about the best way to go is to have my wife beside me and sail into the sunset. But if I want to do that here on the East coast I'll have to sail out sea during the day, time it just right, and then head back :)
> I have a commitment from my son in > Boise to take care of my dog when and if it becomes necessary and I have [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > thank you again for your insight and comments. Good luck to you too and to > the other visitors in this community. Thank you.
Life is so good it's a shame we can't extend it forever. But those of us who have been fortunate in our family, work, or personal lives have nothing to complain of.
I think I may have licked this round of cancer. I'm only 60 and might still have a decade or two left in me. I hope to enjoy every minute of it that I can.
Regards,
Alan
NICK - 18 Aug 2006 06:31 GMT > Oh, I agree completely! I'm certainly not thinking of this as an issue - > just a concept and a curiosity. My knee surgeon said that at least I was > smart enough for the first two pints to be my own autogenous donation. I made a 2-pint autogenous donation just before my total hip replacement in July 2000.
It wan't needed, but it was there "in case."
Eventually I'll need another THR on the other side.
ralphv - 18 Aug 2006 00:37 GMT Hello Jerry, I think you have the right attitude in dealing with your disease. When your PSA doubled between 2003 and 2004, it seems the cancer was on the march already. The knee replacement is a major operation and a trauma to the body.
Tumor angiogenesis is an important factor in the progression of tumors because without the development of new blood vessels, tumors cannot grow beyond 2-3 mm. In a surgical trauma like you experienced, surgical wounds are characterized by a rapid and early angiogenic environment. Factors such basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and others are radidly recruited to promote the healing process. It is very possible that under those conditions the process of neovascularization of the wound also increased the possibility that tumor cells in your circulation gave rise to the bony metastasis. Your PSA increases reflect such event.
On the other hand, your response to androgen deprivation has been rather poor (some 10 months) and that is an indication or resistive (androgen independent) disease. This event in most men is usually slow (years) and since your progression has been rather rapid, it is very possible this has been a long process that went undetected.
I wonder if you have been offered some medication to offset the loss of bone mineral density while on androgen deprivation. An every three-month infusion of a bisphosphonate like Zometa is common practice these days. Be aware that these medications (bisphosphonates) have a low incidence on osteonecrosis of the jaw bone (ONJ), but all in all seem to be beneficial in preventing loss of mineral bone density and slow down the propagation of further bone lesions.
I am sure preservation of QOL is a priority for you and therefore wish you the very best outcome and QOL in the years to come.
RalphV www.azustoo.org
> Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question. Here's the > history: [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > Thanks > Jerry Jerry - 18 Aug 2006 01:31 GMT (snip)
> I wonder if you have been offered some medication to offset the loss of > bone mineral density while on androgen deprivation. An every [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > seem to be beneficial in preventing loss of mineral bone density and > slow down the propagation of further bone lesions. Thanks for the note. Actually, I was diagnosed with osteopenia in Aug 2000 and have been on Fosamax plus 1500 mg calcium and 800 iu vitamin D ever since. Annual bone density tests have shown slow but continual improvement to the point where the last one, in Oct 2005, indicated the spine assay was just into the normal range and the femoral neck just slightly below it. Overall evaluation: low fracture risk. Anyhow, you've provided more points for discussion with the doc. Might even be able to teach him something :-) Jerry
kh - 18 Aug 2006 14:55 GMT > Been lurking here for a while and thought I'd post a question. Here's the > history: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > 04/26 Started Casodex > 07/14 18.3 Thanks for posting your PSA readings. This helps me a lot. I have not been able to find much raw data. The web and newsgropes are full of opinion and reposts of "guidance" but the data is hard to find.
Alan Meyer - 18 Aug 2006 18:13 GMT <... PSA data deleted ...>
> Thanks for posting your PSA readings. This helps me a lot. I have > not been able to find much raw data. The web and newsgropes are > full of opinion and reposts of "guidance" but the data is hard to > find. kh,
I wouldn't use Jerry's data as indicative of anything you or someone else might experience. The development of cancer is highly individualistic. "Prostate cancer" merely names the tissue from which cancer develops. The actual cancer cells and the specific genetic mutations that make them cancerous, can vary widely from person to person.
One fellow on this newsgroup had RP, went several years, and then had a very slowly rising PSA that has gone up to 3.something over multiple years. Another guy had RP, had undetectable PSA for a number of years, then went from undetectable to 744 in one year and died shortly after that.
Similarly, some men, like Jerry, have gotten less than a year of benefit from hormone therapy, while others, such as Francois Mitterand, former President of France, is said to have been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and managed it successfully with HT during his entire 14 year term in office.
Alan
|
|
|