Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Update

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Naaman - 17 Aug 2006 06:40 GMT
Briefly, Biopsy on 1/12 showed cancer in 10 percent of 1 of 12
specimens. PSA of 4.5. Lab work by Dyanon Systems. Urologist wanted
another psa in three months. That one came back 4.0. He recommended
another test in 4 months.

That one came back three weeks ago at 5.3. When I visited him last week,
he said his DRE revealed no apparent change in the prostate, but added
it is time to start talking about treatment. He also had blood drawn for
another PSA. It also came back 5.3.

I've done all the reading that has been recommended here.  Also, have
talked with a radiation oncologist about seed implants. Will also talk
to one more. I'm also trying to find someone in the Phoenix area with  a
good reputation for the Da Vinci procedure. There is one doctor doing it
in Tucson, but only for a short time. Since we have a daughter who lives
near Atlanta, maybe I'll contact Scott Miller who was mentioned in the
story in the Chicago Tribune.

Or, perhaps before I go any farther, I may see another urologist.

Oh, yes, I'm 72,73 in November.

Naaman
Steve Kramer - 17 Aug 2006 07:34 GMT
> I've done all the reading that has been recommended here.  Also, have
> talked with a radiation oncologist about seed implants. Oh, yes, I'm 72,73
> in November.

Seems to me that Bev, our Brachy expert, has told us that is too old for
Brachy.  I dont' remember why.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Beverley - 17 Aug 2006 14:09 GMT
Ah, I don't think anyone is too old for brachytherapy. I wonder where you
got that idea? But quite often on older men they just do radiation alone.
Maybe because of other health problems? But 72 is not that old for a man in
good health who might have another 20-25 years ahead of him.

OTOH, my BIL's father is 94-95 and in a nursing home and has PC. The docs
wanted to treat him for PC. My BIL said no, as there was little point in
putting his father through anything that he doesn't really need. He only
needs to be kept comfortable. Other body parts are failing so it is just a
matter of time.
Bev

> > I've done all the reading that has been recommended here.  Also, have
> > talked with a radiation oncologist about seed implants. Oh, yes, I'm 72,73
> > in November.
>
> Seems to me that Bev, our Brachy expert, has told us that is too old for
> Brachy.  I dont' remember why.
Steve Kramer - 17 Aug 2006 15:05 GMT
> Ah, I don't think anyone is too old for brachytherapy. I wonder where you
> got that idea?

I dunno!  Is there a minimum age?
Beverley - 17 Aug 2006 19:34 GMT
I'm beginning to think that there is no minimum age either. I know in
general they tend not to do it on younger men but I'm finding out that there
are quite a few men in their 40's who have had brachytherapy. I think the
fear was that they might develop cancer later as a result of the high dosage
of radiation. So either the medical field has overcome that fear and decided
the odds are so miniscule, or are more men throwing caution to the wind and
having brachytherapy because it has (don't let IP read this! LOL) less side
effects.
Bev

> > Ah, I don't think anyone is too old for brachytherapy. I wonder where you
> > got that idea?
>
> I dunno!  Is there a minimum age?
Naaman - 17 Aug 2006 17:26 GMT
> Ah, I don't think anyone is too old for brachytherapy. I wonder where you
> got that idea? But quite often on older men they just do radiation alone.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> Seems to me that Bev, our Brachy expert, has told us that is too old for
>> Brachy.  I dont' remember why.

Neither the urologist nor oncologist seemed concerned about my age as
far as implants were concerned. And they seem to think my health is
ok--as do I, in spite of hernia surgery and rotator cuff repair in the
past six months. The urologist did mention that several years ago he
might not have suggested RRP for someone my age. But he is willing to
now because of...I don't remember exactly how he phrased
it...improvements. Gotta check my notes.

Naaman
Beverley - 17 Aug 2006 19:40 GMT
You need to check with a radiation oncologist, one who is familiar with
brachytherapy. Is your oncologist a regular user of brachytherapy?
Where do you live?
It is much easier physically to have brachy (pronounced break-e ) done than
a RP. Your down time is less, etc. You just have it done usually as an
outpatient and then come home and be a couch potato for a few days. (No
matter how good you feel stay on the couch!)

If you want more info on brachy just email me.
Bev

> Neither the urologist nor oncologist seemed concerned about my age as
> far as implants were concerned. And they seem to think my health is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Naaman
JohnHace - 19 Aug 2006 16:46 GMT
> You need to check with a radiation oncologist, one who is familiar with
> brachytherapy. Is your oncologist a regular user of brachytherapy?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> outpatient and then come home and be a couch potato for a few days. (No
> matter how good you feel stay on the couch!)

I've ruled out RT and will opt for robotic surgery soon. I'm a very
young 58. I'm ruling out RT for two reasons (I think). One is: if
surgery is unsuccessful, we could use RT as second attempt. Can't do it
the other way around.

The second: RT seems to to be the gift that keeps on giving. I've heard
that some SE don't show up for 7 or 8 years. Then the dose can start
causing urinary and bowel problems.

Am I way off base on this, or is either reason rational?

John
Steve Kramer - 19 Aug 2006 06:51 GMT
>>>> I've done all the reading that has been recommended here.  Also, have
>>>> talked with a radiation oncologist about seed implants. Oh, yes, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Neither the urologist nor oncologist seemed concerned about my age as far
> as implants were concerned.

I was dead wrong about the age.  It was the size of the prostate that Bev
talked about a month or two (or three) ago, not age.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Beverley - 20 Aug 2006 01:49 GMT
Yep, size. They can't do it if the prostate is too large. I don't know why.
I think it has to do with the number of seeds. Maybe too many seeds equals
too much radiation?
Bev

> >>>> I've done all the reading that has been recommended here.  Also, have
> >>>> talked with a radiation oncologist about seed implants. Oh, yes, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I was dead wrong about the age.  It was the size of the prostate that Bev
> talked about a month or two (or three) ago, not age.
NICK - 17 Aug 2006 07:52 GMT
> Oh, yes, I'm 72, 73 in November.

What date in November?  Mine is the 20th.
Naaman - 17 Aug 2006 16:28 GMT
>> Oh, yes, I'm 72, 73 in November.
>
>  What date in November?  Mine is the 20th.

Nov. 15.
Beverley - 17 Aug 2006 19:42 GMT
I'm the 17 and married on the 21.
Bev

> >> Oh, yes, I'm 72, 73 in November.
> >
> >  What date in November?  Mine is the 20th.
> >
> Nov. 15.
james_wv@hotmail.com - 18 Aug 2006 18:28 GMT
I'll be 50 on Nov 15.  My prostate, however, only made it to 48.

> >> Oh, yes, I'm 72, 73 in November.
> >
> >  What date in November?  Mine is the 20th.
> >
> Nov. 15.
Leonard Evens - 18 Aug 2006 16:45 GMT
> Briefly, Biopsy on 1/12 showed cancer in 10 percent of 1 of 12
> specimens. PSA of 4.5. Lab work by Dyanon Systems. Urologist wanted
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Oh, yes, I'm 72,73 in November.

Sounds like you've done your homework and brachytherapy might be a
reasonable choice, if, as I assume, your Gleason is 6.  But also
consider esternal beam radiation.  It is also possible that a man your
age with a non-aggressive small cancer could safely coonsider watchful
waiting with an emphasis on the watchful part.

> Naaman
Naaman - 18 Aug 2006 19:42 GMT
>> Briefly, Biopsy on 1/12 showed cancer in 10 percent of 1 of 12
>> specimens. PSA of 4.5. Lab work by Dyanon Systems. Urologist wanted
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>> Naaman

Yes, Gleason is 3+3=6 and I'm at T1c.

Naaman
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.