ron
i assume therefore that the possible side effects normally connected
with radiation therapy would still be applicable in this procedure. is
that correct?
jay
> > a good friend has just begun a procedure in which he says that three
> > gold pellets were inserted in his prostate and he will follow up with
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> reproducibly register the radiation and take into account prostate
> movement...Best wishes and good health, ron
ron - 15 Aug 2006 00:04 GMT
jay...that's my understanding...ron
> ron
> i assume therefore that the possible side effects normally connected
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > reproducibly register the radiation and take into account prostate
> > movement...Best wishes and good health, ron
Alan Meyer - 15 Aug 2006 00:10 GMT
> ron
> i assume therefore that the possible side effects normally connected
> with radiation therapy would still be applicable in this procedure. is
> that correct?
> jay
Yes.
The gold pellets do not themselves radiate and have no effect one
way or the other on side effects. They are there to reveal the exact
position of the prostate (which can shift slightly from day to day) on
xrays and make it easy for the technicians to exactly locate the
prostate for the next round of radiation.
The radiation delivered will be one of the normal external beam
types, with the normal side effects.
As I understand it, the use of gold pellets for targetting is not common,
but is a well accepted practice. I would think it can only improve the
aiming, and therefore the effectiveness, of the radiation he receives.
Alan