Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Strategy sound?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 31 Jul 2006 20:32 GMT
My Dad has "presumed" PCa based on an initial PSA of 83 March '05. A
CAT showed some enlargement of lymph nodes. He refused Biopsy and has
been getting Lupron cycles with lowering first to teens then below 1 at
which point a cycle was skipped. It's back up to 8 now and just got
another cycle. He's 73 and has numerous health issues including
infections due to cathreization. We are looking at PVP but I am
wondering if DAvinci RP or cryoablation is something to be considered
here. Is "some enlargement" really definitive regarding nodal
involvement? Any downside to having PVP first? It might help him to get
off teh catheter and free of infections long enough to be stronger for
other treatments.
Alan Meyer - 31 Jul 2006 21:09 GMT
> My Dad has "presumed" PCa based on an initial PSA of 83 March '05. A
> CAT showed some enlargement of lymph nodes. He refused Biopsy and has
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> off teh catheter and free of infections long enough to be stronger for
> other treatments.

Caveat: I'm not a doctor.

A PSA of 83 almost certainly indicates metastatic cancer.  If it is
metatstatic, RP, radiation, cryoablation, HIFU, or any other primary
treatment aimed at the prostate will do no good and shouldn't be done.
The treatment he got, hormone therapy, is all that is really available
for now, though some researchers are experimenting with chemotherapy
before HT failure and there are new treatments in clinical trials.

I would think your Dad should only consider PVP as a treatment for
his other problems, not for his cancer, which is probably no longer
confined to the prostate.

The good news in all this is that your Dad's response to hormone
therapy was excellent.  If and when he gets back on it, it may give
him many more years before any symptoms appear.  HT is a real
pain in the neck, but many men in this group have been on it for
years and are functioning very well.

Good luck.

   Alan
Steve Jordan - 31 Jul 2006 21:11 GMT
> My Dad has "presumed" PCa based on an initial PSA of 83 March '05. A
> CAT showed some enlargement of lymph nodes. He refused Biopsy
That was foolish. Why? He now does not really know the true nature and
extent of the "presumed" disease. Neither do his medics, which is
frightening.
> and has
> been getting Lupron cycles with lowering first to teens then below 1 at
> which point a cycle was skipped. It's back up to 8 now and just got
> another cycle. He's 73 and has numerous health issues including
> infections due to cathreization.
Those comorbidities should be of great concern. And at his age,
aggressive treatment (tx) might be actually harmful, overall.

But first the facts must be learned. That means a biopsy. If he's
concerned about pain/discomfort, he can insist upon anesthesia.
> We are looking at PVP but I am
> wondering if DAvinci RP or cryoablation is something to be considered
> here.
Those are both aggressive txs. Careful consideration and professional
advice are required.
> Is "some enlargement" really definitive regarding nodal
> involvement?
I doubt it, but recommend asking the medic, not us.
> Any downside to having PVP first?
Again: ask the medic.

Regards,

Steve J

"What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts?
Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget 'what the stars
foretell,' avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind
the unguessable 'verdict of history' -- what are the facts, and to how
many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are
your single clue. Get the facts!"
--Lazarus Long
Rich - 31 Jul 2006 21:24 GMT
Yes..he was not in the best of mental states at the time..another
issue. He was going by junk mail that said it would spread the cancer
"like wildfire". But he was also on blood thinners and his primary told
him "she" would do the same thing if him.

Regarding HT, I have read some saying that combining Lupron or the like
with a pure antiandrogen can decrease "flare" and make HT a better
tool. This has not been brought up by docs. Is this idea new or
discounted?
c palmer - 31 Jul 2006 21:54 GMT
From: richreilly@hotmail.com (Rich)
Yes..he was not in the best of mental states at the time..another issue.
He was going by junk mail that said it would spread the cancer "like
wildfire". But he was also on blood thinners and his primary told him
"she" would do the same thing if him.

Regarding HT, I have read some saying that combining Lupron or the like
with a pure antiandrogen can decrease "flare" and make HT a better tool.
This has not been brought up by docs. Is this idea new
or discounted?

=======

on your comment.....

He was going by junk mail that said it would spread the cancer "like
wildfire".

He refused Biopsy and has been getting Lupron cycles with lowering first
to teens then below 1 at which point a cycle was skipped. It's back up
to 8 now and just got another cycle.

=====>there are two points to consider.   first, you normally do not
skip a cycle once you start HT.     since his psa jumped to 8, let's
hope that it will drop back to below 1 again.

but because there are two basic types of prostate cancer cells.  hormone
sensitive and non hormone sensitive.   HT is only affecting the hormone
sensitive type.  the non hormone sensitive is still growing.  the good
news is that they are slow growing.   but there becomes a time when the
non hormone cells will large enough in numbers to produce enough psa to
override the effects of the lurpon shot and  to "wake" the hormone
sensitive and then your statement, spread the cancer "like wildfire"
makes more sense.

unfortunately, there is nothing known to stop the non hormone sensitive
pca cells except to remove them by surgery or burn them by radiation.

---------

on your comment..... Regarding HT, I have read some saying that
combining Lupron or the like with a pure antiandrogen can decrease
"flare" and make HT a better tool. This has not been brought up by docs.
Is this idea new
or discounted?

====> there is a doctor out in california getting rich off of pca
patients by offering triple androgen blockade.   you can probably do a
google and see the pros and cons about his activity.

all the best,

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Steve Jordan - 31 Jul 2006 22:02 GMT
On July 31, Rich replied to me:
> Yes..he was not in the best of mental states at the time..another
> issue. He was going by junk mail that said it would spread the cancer
> "like wildfire". But he was also on blood thinners and his primary told
> him "she" would do the same thing if him.
>  
"Junk mail" is an excellent label for that lawn fertilizer. The 'net is
infested with it. I do not presume to give medical advice, but can say
with absolute assurance that there is not a scintilla of evidence to
support that allegation. If it were true, just about every man who
develops PCa and has a biopsy (roughly 100%) would die from PCa fairly soon.

So far as blood thinners are concerned, once again I'm not a medic. But
I do know that that issue can be dealt with by a competent medic. Think
for a moment: most men who develop PCa are middle-aged or older. Many of
them are likely on thinners. But they have biopsies anyway. And survive.
> Regarding HT, I have read some saying that combining Lupron or the like
> with a pure antiandrogen can decrease "flare" and make HT a better
> tool. This has not been brought up by docs. Is this idea new or
> discounted?
>  
When a man *first* starts androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), it is
normal to begin with a short course (around 30 days) of an antiandrogen
such as Casodex. This prevents the "PSA flare" that often occurs with
the LHRH agonist such as Lupron is started. The reason for the "flare"
is that the LHRH agonist causes an initial surge in testosterone (T)
production, which can encourage growth of the PCa tumor(s). If the docs
did not mention it or know about it, I would have to suspect that they
are not experienced in tx of PCa. A word to the wise......

Check out the PCRI website.

Regards,

Steve J

"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result
of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the
enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle."
-- Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
Steve Jordan - 31 Jul 2006 22:14 GMT
I wrote:
> Check out the PCRI website.

Oops. Silly me. The Prostate Cancer Research Institute site is:
http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html
It is authoritative and objective. A gold mine of information.

Regards,

Steve J
Bill - 01 Aug 2006 16:30 GMT
I'm not so sure that not having a biopsy was so crazy in this instance.
What is it but a diagnostic test to determine the existence, extent,
and aggressiveness of PCa? What do you want that for but to determine
whether to have local or systemic Tx? W/ a PSA of 83, it is not
unreasonable to assume an advanced case of systemic PCa, which would
not be treated by primary local Tx. He went straight to the systemic Tx
of choice and had a good response. Strum is one of the pioneers of
intermittent HT and he generally does not go off-cycle until PSA is
undetectable in men w/ who have had their prostates removed or nuked. I
don't know what the standard would be when IHT is the primary Tx but a
PSA of 1 in a Pt w/ an intact cancerous prostate sounds pretty amazing.
Since he has other health issues, I'm thinking that taking just enough
HT to keep the PCa reasonably under control w/o symptoms is a pretty
rational Tx plan.

Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
PSA .93
Memphis
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.