Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Waiting....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RocSam - 30 Jul 2006 19:15 GMT
I posted about 60 days ago regarding my husband.  He decided to go sky
diving and beforehand wanted to buy an additional life insurance policy
that would take him up through the age of 71.  All his blood work came
back great EXCEPT his PSA.  It was 5.02.  The previous year it had been
3.8.  He had recently really got serious with his diet and excercise as
he had to be a certain weight to jump out of the airplane...this is why
his other bloodwork was better than it has been in many many
years...his blood pressure low, pulse awesome, chlosterall good...but
the damn PSA.  They denied the insurance and that has sent us to this
point.  One other thing that he has yet to discuss with the Dr.  He had
started taking stinging nettle...to be blount...he thought his
testicles were shrinking and he found some advice on line this might
help...I guess he was worried about testerone.  He would kill me if he
knew I put this out here...but this is the one thing we wonder could
have possibly effected his prostate too.

Our primary Dr. sent him to a ur.  The urolgoist was not available so
the physcian assistant...a very young physcian assistant saw my
husband.  He did a DRE and reviewed bloodwork from the life insurance
company and scheduled a biopst in 2 weeks.  He did not explain the
biopsy...my husband did not ask questions either.   I asked my husband
why they did not repeat psa and why not a free psa. He did not know.  I
called the physcian asst....he told me he did not see either
warranted..but DRE seemed normal.  I don't know I just did not feel
real good about the real Dr. not making the call for biopsy. I know the
outcome could be the same but I believe one has to be an advocate for
their own care. Okay..moving on.  A week before the biopsy my husband
hurt his hand and had to go back to our primary Dr. and while my he was
there he and the dr. spoke of the upcoming biopsy. Our primary Dr. said
he did not want to step on any toes but my husband had a right to know
why they did not repeat psa and had the given any consideration to an
infection.  In the mean time the UR office called and wanted to do
another PSA.  The nurse told me most likely after the Dr. reviewed the
physcian asst. notes he called for another psa.  My husband talked to
nurse about repeat test and infection.  She called back and Dr. decided
to put him on 30 days of antibotics with a repeat psa/fpsa upon
completion.  Well, Friday he completed and had test and we wait.
My husband has read and researched all he can in the last 30 days.  So,
we wait...they said it could be 7 to 10 days or it could be 3 before we
get results back......We have been dealing with this since the end of
May.  It feels like you can't plan to far ahead because you don't know
what the future holds....sometimes all feels a bit sureal.  He did tell
his boss at work but we have not said anything to the kids...grown kids
until we know more.  He is sort of sorry he told his boss at work
because he is afraid it might effect his future with the
company.....possible promotion....that is it...I just wanted to get it
all out there.

Husband is 51 years old
He is in good health
First psa @ 50
DRE every year
Dad had prostate cancer

Thanks, Lisa
Bob Anthony - 30 Jul 2006 19:57 GMT
Lisa:

I hear ya! All of my blood work came back great except that "damn psa".
Mine was around 7. I was 53 when dx'ed and in great shape over all.
A 5.02 could mean Pca or something more benign. Either way, he will be
ok. I'm ok! I had surgury 12/04.
Forget about GP's and physician's assistants and go to a Pca specialist
now to rule it out. In other words, get a new PSA test, free PSA test,
and if warranted, a biopsy from competent doctors/specialists.
No one probably really cares at the office, (more likely they do not
than do) especially his boss. They are watching out for their own
"bottom" lines. You watch out for yours.
If the antibiotics work and reduce his PSA to undetectable or almost
undetectable levels, then all may be well in the Pca department.
Waiting since May can be very stressful to the both of you, your jobs,
and your relationship. You, as other have here, will get through this
successfully.
Pca, if it is, is cureable and not a death sentence!
And, of course, all this may be a moot point too if the antibiotics
work. The waiting to know is tough.

B.A.
Steve Kramer - 30 Jul 2006 19:57 GMT
>I posted about 60 days ago regarding my husband.  He decided to go sky
> diving and beforehand wanted to buy an additional life insurance policy
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> company.....possible promotion....that is it...I just wanted to get it
> all out there.

I remember you posting mid-June.  I believe then I agreed with the biopsy.
I still do.  But, antibiotics and re-test is not a bad way to go.

Biopsies are easy for most, especially if given happy juice in advance.
Don't cut yourself short on a quick diagnosis just because you're worried
about a few needle pricks.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Steve Jordan - 30 Jul 2006 22:07 GMT
On July 30, Lisa wrote, in pertinent part:
> I posted about 60 days ago regarding my husband.  He decided to go sky
> diving and beforehand wanted to buy an additional life insurance policy
> that would take him up through the age of 71.  All his blood work came
> back great EXCEPT his PSA.  It was 5.02.  
At age 51 with a father who had PCa, Lisa's husband (what's his name?)
is at risk for PCa.

But the PSA test is not specific for PCa. The result could be from
prostatitis, an infection (I'm very disappointed that the uro had to be
*told* to initiate antibiotic therapy), stress to the gland from, frex,
the DRE if it was performed within a day or so before the blood draw or
sex within 48 hours, even bicycle riding. IOW, the PSA is more likely to
result from something *other than* PCa.

(snip)
> He had started taking stinging nettle...to be blount...he thought his
> testicles were shrinking and he found some advice on line this might
> help...I guess he was worried about testerone.  
I don't believe in eye of newt and toe of frog magical medicine, but
that's just me. One thing I am sure of: One should never, ever, dose
oneself with anything without coordinating with the MD.

There is a blood test for testosterone.
> He would kill me if he
> knew I put this out here...but this is the one thing we wonder could
> have possibly effected his prostate too.
>  
Seems doubtful to me, but asking a prostate cancer specialist would be best.

Also: if the husband doesn't want the info posted, he'll soon learn
better if he indeed has PCa.
There are no secrets here, and no embarrassment, either. We're dealing
with something that is far more important than shyness. And men are,
unfortunately, much more shy than women.

(snip)
> Friday he completed and had test and we wait.
> My husband has read and researched all he can in the last 30 days.  So,
> we wait...they said it could be 7 to 10 days or it could be 3 before we
> get results back......
Amazing. I get my PSA results within three days directly from the lab --
because I asked for it.

As for the biopsy, I recommend insisting upon an anesthetic. Pain relief
is a patient's right, and the biopsy is no time to test one's
macho-ness. Some men experience little or no pain even without
medication, but how is the pt to know beforehand?

It would be well to bear in mind that a uro is a surgeon. Therefore, if
the dx is PCa, he is almost certain to press for surgery. Do not be
rushed into any tx before studying all options.

An excellent source of authoritative and objective information is the
website of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute at:
http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html

Good luck. Let us know what happens. There is, if the dx is PCa, much to do.

Regards,

Steve J

"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but (to) be aware of the
lack of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with
nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies."
-- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate
Problems Mailing List
Thank you, Brian.
David&Joan - 30 Jul 2006 22:09 GMT
Hmm!!

You posted about the travails of waiting about 60 days ago. Today you have
no further info other than to tell us your hubby used something wierd for
his perceived small testicles.

Now you complain about waiting!!!

Do something about this now.

If the repeat PSA shows 5 or higher, get a biopsy.

David
RocSam - 30 Jul 2006 22:58 GMT
I did not mean for it to come across as complaining about
waiting...only I wanted to express how hard it has been to wait.  I
know as many things in life...waiting is necessary and as it has been
said here and I believe not to RUSH into anything too quickly.  But
everyone is entitled to their opinion.   As you might note....he took
antiboics for 30 days.  Once we got the lab work back,  got in to the
primary, got in to the UR, schedule for biopsy and then ask to take 30
days of pills....I hardly see how to avoid waiting.  I do believe I
have more to report....as all the things above have taken place and we
are at the stage where a biopsy will most likely be next.....Again, I
feel the last thing I want to do...is to get all freaked out and
hurry....we are crossing each path as it presents itself and trying to
make informed choices.
> Hmm!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> David
MAS - 31 Jul 2006 07:17 GMT
Instead of waiting and worry do what you can control today, make like
bunnies...... If it is PCa, then it will be a looooong time between......

:)

>I did not mean for it to come across as complaining about
> waiting...only I wanted to express how hard it has been to wait.  I
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>> David
RocSam - 09 Aug 2006 23:04 GMT
Update on our waiting.  Paul had another psa and finally got the
results.  The number has gone to 5.3 from 5.03.  We have scheduled a
biopsy for August 21st..this is as soon as the current uro could get us
in.  There have been several incidents that have caused us to be a bit
uneasy with current uro...nothing he has done but it is what he has not
done.  We spoke to my husband's exwife who is a nurse.  I wish we would
have called her sooner.  She recommended us to another Dr.  Dr. Frey.
Paul has an appt. with him on the 15th.  We are not canceling the
biopsy with first Dr. for now but we are going to see how we like new
doc.  The new doc's office said if biopsy comes back positive for
cancer they would send us to one of two docs in their group who deal
primarily with prostate.  They also do the Da Vinci surgery.  So, that
is where we are...taking one day at time. This is very new territory
for us so we are trying to do the best we can.

> I posted about 60 days ago regarding my husband.  He decided to go sky
> diving and beforehand wanted to buy an additional life insurance policy
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> Thanks, Lisa
Steve Jordan - 09 Aug 2006 23:53 GMT
On August 9, Lisa wrote:
> Update on our waiting.  Paul had another psa and finally got the
> results.  The number has gone to 5.3 from 5.03.  
In and of itself, that change is in my non-expert opinion not likely to
be significant. It very well could be within the margin of error of the
test protocol.
> We have scheduled a
> biopsy for August 21st..this is as soon as the current uro could get us
> in.  There have been several incidents that have caused us to be a bit
> uneasy with current uro...nothing he has done but it is what he has not
> done.  We spoke to my husband's exwife who is a nurse.  I wish we would
> have called her sooner.  She recommended us to another Dr.  
(snip)

If Paul is not confident in the uro he should change. It is his life at
stake. FWIW I have fired two medics and am much the better for it.

But Paul must do his homework, which is why I previously recommended the
Prostate Cancer Research Institute at: http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html

IMO an educated, empowered, patient is certain to have a better outcome
than a patient who blindly relies upon his medic. As Dr. Strum has
written, "MD does not mean 'Medical Deity.'"

(snip)
> Paul has an appt. with him on the 15th.  We are not canceling the
> biopsy with first Dr. for now but we are going to see how we like new
> doc.  The new doc's office said if biopsy comes back positive for
> cancer they would send us to one of two docs in their group who deal
> primarily with prostate.  They also do the Da Vinci surgery.  
If the dx is PCa, surgery might be the appropriate tx. But it might not
be. That's why I nag nag nag about doing homework. Examine all options
and choose the one that is best for THIS patient at THIS time.

It isn't easy. It certainly isn't fun. But doing it will at minimum give
the patient confidence that he has done his best.

Regards,

Steve J

"We must tailor the treatment to the nature of the disease. We must
listen to the biology."
-- Stephen B. Strum, MD
Peter Headland - 10 Aug 2006 00:41 GMT
Sorry about the PSA, but it is what we all expected. Don't worry about
the days ticking by, it is extremely unlikely a few weeks more or less
will make any difference to the final outcome.

If the biopsy comes back positive, you would be well advised to send
the samples for a second opinion. Bostwick Labs is often mentioned, I
believe there are one or two others. The biopsy results are very
material to treatment choices, so it is wise to be absolutely certain.
You are entitled to take possession of all the samples and do whatever
you want with them; don't let yourself be persuaded otherwise by the
original lab/urologist.

Whilst surgery is an appealing option for younger men, you should
probably consult a radiation oncologist with strong experience dealing
with PCa before making any final decision. Full disclosure: I didn't
bother to talk to a rad onc before choosing surgery, but I had done a
bunch of reading before I made my decision and had strong reasons for
my choice which I did not feel would be altered by talking to a rad onc
- your circumstances and set of values may be completely different to
mine.

Signature

Peter Headland

Steve Kramer - 11 Aug 2006 00:18 GMT
> Update on our waiting.  Paul had another psa and finally got the
> results.  The number has gone to 5.3 from 5.03.  We have scheduled a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> is where we are...taking one day at time. This is very new territory
> for us so we are trying to do the best we can.

As I recall your appointment, switching doctors is a good idea.  But, please
do not make the mistake of liking a doctor for his manner.  For a GP, a good
diagnostician is best.  For surgery, nothing replaces a good surgeon.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.