Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chemo HDK+HC Side effects

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Duke Slater - 16 Jul 2006 14:41 GMT
My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT
in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med
ONC told me last week he will start me on HDK+HC when I say go.
Those of you that have experianced these treatments, could you share
the side effects you experianced and how thse affected your day to  day
routine?
I know it varies, but would  like to have a game plan in place when all
of this begins.  Can you alleviate any SE's? Are there things I need to
be careful about or do during infusion to help manage it?  What kind of
results have you had on this regimine?
I know this is not good news, but I have to forge forward and hope for
the best.  My stats:

60 in good general health
DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis,
ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant
PSA at DX - 44
Tx  3/17 Lupron 4months + 50mg Casodex
Follow up PSA: 4/15 - 3.1; 5/15 - 5.1; 6/12 - 7.1 stopped Casodex; 7/3
- 13.8 (Damn)
7/14 - 2nd Lupron uro said start HDK+HC as indicated by MedOnc and
Taxane, which med onc didnt' mention. I meet with med onc 7/24, have
talked with his nurse thus far. I may also enter a Zometa clincal
trial.
Duke
Steve Kramer - 16 Jul 2006 16:24 GMT
First, let me express my sorrow for your continuous bad news.  It must seem
that from March to July, your world has just gone topsy-turvy.

I have not been through these treatments yet, but....

> 60 in good general health
> DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis,
> ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant

I do not recall you before mentioning mets on your pelvis.  Were you trying
to say "no lymph invovlement...."?  Otherwise, your state would be a T4 and
then some, but then you say the Dexascan was excellent.  Which is why I
think you mistyped.

Of course, this may all be moot.  You may be (and have been) a T4 all along,
based on your barely interrupted rise in PSA.

Please let us know how things are going as you proceed.  I, for one, fully
expect to be in your position too soon.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Duke Slater - 17 Jul 2006 02:35 GMT
> > 60 in good general health
> > DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis,
> > ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant
I wasn't clear - I had a bone scan, CT and chest xray on 3/20 after
being diagnosed on 3/17. Bone scan at that time was positve along with
lymph involvment, and CT showed pelvis, seveeral ribs, L4, involvement.
Chest was clear. A dexascan I had a few days later showed bones mineral
density to be excellant. I got the whole enchilada - no syptoms that
appeared to be PC related until diagnosis.
So once more into the breech!

Duke
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 23:02 GMT
>> > 60 in good general health
>> > DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> appeared to be PC related until diagnosis.
> So once more into the breech!

No, it was my own Lupron moment.  I confused bone density scan with bone
scan.

I didn't realize that you had had all that involvement; as if the G9 wasn't
bad enough.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

ron - 16 Jul 2006 18:20 GMT
Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT
treatment?  Sometimes the ADT dosage or specific ADT drugs need to be
adjusted/switched to effectively reduce T to castrate levels.  If your
T level was not tracked, then it is an assumption that ADT did not work
(that you are hormone resistant) and that you need to move on to chemo.
In fact, typically hormone resistant men will show a PSA decrease when
casodex is removed, you did not...Best wishes and good health, rion

> My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT
> in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> trial.
> Duke
Duke Slater - 17 Jul 2006 02:30 GMT
> Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT
> treatment?
My T level was <18 at the June PSA test. I knew there was a problem.
And guess what, I had to ask that my T be checked.
I have been accepted by Dr, Myers in VA. and will see what he has to
say.
Thanks.

Duke
ron - 17 Jul 2006 03:38 GMT
You picked a good one, Dr. M. is one of the best.  Good luck!..ron

> > Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT
> > treatment?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Duke
I.P. Freely - 17 Jul 2006 01:39 GMT
> My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT
> in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I know this is not good news, but I have to forge forward and hope for
> the best.  My stats:

IMO, Duke, any doc who put me on all those chemicals, including chemical
castration, without giving me a complete course in ADT SE likelihoods,
prevention, and cures would see little more than a cloud of dust where I
used to sit in his office. The SE list is long, their likelihoods vary
significantly among sources, their incidence and severity and impact and
preferences vary dramatically among individuals, some SE preventatives
must be initiated BEFORE treatment or at its beginning, and maybe most
important . . . no one man's experience is worth squat to you for many
reasons.

A few basic "facts" about ADT SEs include:
1. They include almost certain fatigue, osteoporosis, hot flashes, and
emotional changes, all of which can be reduced -- not necessarily
prevented, REDUCED -- by other meds which have their OWN SEs *IF* one
can tolerate those meds (a large percentage of middle age men can't take
osteoporosis meds, for example).
2. ADT will not cure PC. It may delay its progress by months on average,
with a range from negligible to years.
3. Most SEs will decline within months when a pt quits the ADT.
Exceptions include bone loss, breast growth, and older men who don't
recover their testosterone production (the primary SE cause is T
deprivation, not the drugs per se).
4. Strum's ADT Syndrome treatise lays out many detailed pages of ADT SE
discussion. It looks extremely scientific and useful, but many
researchers doubt his credibility because Strum can't back it up to
their satisfaction. Base decisions on it at your own peril.
5. One of the reasons anecdotal ADT experience is all but useless to
individuals is that reactions to ADT range from a) such devastation that
even some oncologists have stopped it at their own grave risk to z) pts
who claim not to notice it a whole lot as long as they follow their
anti-SE regimens. A poll of this forum yielded about 20 responses over
that range, with a vast majority in the severe range.

There was extensive HT (aka ADT) discussion here over the winter of
'04-'05, beginning roughly in about Nov-Dec '04, and it has sporadically
returned. Do you know how to Google it up?

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 11:42 GMT
> A few basic "facts" about ADT SEs include:
> 1. They include almost certain fatigue, osteoporosis, hot flashes, and ...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ...
> 5. One of the reasons anecdotal ADT experience is all but useless to ...

All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being
useless).

However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your quality
of life.  MOST people manage under ADT.

Personally (and anecdotally), I have been on Lupron for 3 years.  I don't
like it.  I don't like the SEs.  I don't like the meds to reduce the SEs.
But, I work every day of the week and I work harder on weekends helping my
mom, mom-in-law and three descendent families.  I have sex precisely one
less time per month than before PCa.  I sleep fitfully 8 hours (on average)
each night.  I walk several miles every week.  Almost no one (aside from the
40,000,000 that has access to this newsgroup) knows I'm on ADT.

And, mine is the most common story in these parts.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

I.P. Freely - 17 Jul 2006 16:53 GMT
> All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being
> useless).

Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience?

> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your quality
> of life.  

Sure, it can be stopped. However, the older we are, the greater the odds
that stopping the chemicals does not stop the T deprivation which causes
most of the SEs. Just something older men need to be aware of.

MOST people manage under ADT.

> Personally (and anecdotally), I have been on Lupron for 3 years.  I don't
> like it.  I don't like the SEs.  I don't like the meds to reduce the SEs.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> And, mine is the most common story in these parts.

According to the poll here (if that's what you mean by "these parts")
early last year, the primary commonality is that you manage (and better
than many people). But that's not true of all even in this small poll,
let alone the populations of the literature.

But one primary thing Duke needs to take away from this tangent is this:
 with his mets, ADT is not really optional (unless its SEs proves
severe), and there are steps he should take to minimize its SEs. They
include pre-initiation chest radiation to preclude gynaecomastia and
taking bone-preservation drugs (IF he has no GERD or other
contraindications). Most other counter-SE drugs can wait until the SEs
show up, if they do, as long as he and his friends watch closely for
signs of depression very commonly caused by low T and monitor the usual
SE suspects such as weight gain, cholesterol, OA exacerbation, temper,
hot flashes, etc. It also wouldn't hurt to get used to the gym now
rather than waiting until he really needs it.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 23:31 GMT
>> All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being
>> useless).
>
> Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience?

Well, for one, you now are just a little more at ease about trying it if the
time comes and circumstances indicate.

>> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your
>> quality of life.
>
> Sure, it can be stopped. However, the older we are, the greater the odds
> that stopping the chemicals does not stop the T deprivation which causes
> most of the SEs. Just something older men need to be aware of.

I think most would realize the quality-of-life dis-benefits long befor
10-month to 2-year period that T deprivation becomes a serious issue... if
it does.

>> And, mine is the most common story in these parts.
>
> According to the poll here (if that's what you mean by "these parts")
> early last year, the primary commonality is that you manage (and better
> than many people). But that's not true of all even in this small poll, let
> alone the populations of the literature.

I'll not argue that posit, as I did not quantify or qualify the responses.
However, I believe that there are very few here that, for no other reason
than quality of life, discontinued their dosages.

> But one primary thing Duke needs to take away from this tangent is this:
> with his mets, ADT is not really optional (unless its SEs proves severe),
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> wouldn't hurt to get used to the gym now rather than waiting until he
> really needs it.

We can find common ground here, but, unfortunately, Duke's initial treatment
was ADT2 and it's intended effects lasted all of one month.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

I.P. Freely - 19 Jul 2006 03:03 GMT
> "I.P. Freely"
>> Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience?
>
> Well, for one, you now are just a little more at ease about trying it if the
> time comes and circumstances indicate.

But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless.

>>> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your
>>> quality of life.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 10-month to 2-year period that T deprivation becomes a serious issue... if
> it does.

I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable,
if it's going to.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 19 Jul 2006 11:36 GMT
>> "I.P. Freely"
>>> Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless.

I know that this is probably sacrilage to a scientist, especially a military
scientist, but life's decisions are not, and should not, always be based on
the rational.  That's one difference between man and all other living
organisms.  The reflective property of addition does not always hold with
man, to say nothing of more complicated therorums.

> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if
> it's going to.

First, it's theoretical in the first place, but I've read 1½ to 2 years.  I
think it was your favorite doc, Strum.
I.P. Freely - 19 Jul 2006 17:13 GMT
>> But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless.
>
> I know that this is probably sacrilage to a scientist, especially a military
> scientist, but life's decisions are not, and should not, always be based on
> the rational.  

Life's everyday decisions, no. Life and DEATH decisions, why not? Are
you advocating basing a tx decision on Uncle Joe's genitals falling off
after a week of WW, or Cousin Sam's complete recovery from terminal
brain mets after he drank a glass of Mojo juice? If so, on which case
should the newbie base his choice? Advising a newbie to discount data
gathered from tens of thousands of pts and instead ask a few guys how
their tx went strikes me as extremely irresponsible. It's like buying a
car or voting or choosing a wife by asking a couple of guys what they
drive, elected, or married rather than doing the homework and
considering one's own situation and choices, except for one HUGE
difference: THIS choice often determines how long and how well the rest
of our life goes.

>> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if
>> it's going to.
>
> First, it's theoretical in the first place

Not at all.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 20 Jul 2006 01:32 GMT
>>> But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> a week of WW, or Cousin Sam's complete recovery from terminal brain mets
> after he drank a glass of Mojo juice?

Yes to Uncle Joe.  No to Cousin Sam.   :-)

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06, 6/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145
Casodex added daily 07/06
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Alex - 21 Jul 2006 00:10 GMT
> It's like buying a car or voting or choosing a wife by asking a couple of
> guys what they drive, elected, or married

True. It's much better to extensively test several models of cars, and a
wide range of potential wives. Yeah, but ...

Alex
Steve Jordan - 19 Jul 2006 18:14 GMT
At an ungodly hour on July 19, Steve Kramer quoted IP:
>> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if
>> it's going to.
>>    
And replied:
> First, it's theoretical in the first place, but I've read 1½ to 2 years.  I
> think it was your favorite doc, Strum.
>  
Here's what Strum says: "Men who are receiving LHRH-A therapy for time
periods in excess of two years may have difficulty in returning to a
state of normal testosterone production despite discontinuation of
LHRH-A." _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ 2nd ed., page B20.

He further says that this, when it occurs, is the result not of
testicular atrophy but of "pathological events in the pituitary."

Of course, there are T-replacement txs.

FWIW, I stopped monthly Trelstar depots as of March after 14 months of
<0.01 ng/mL. I cannot say that I note any great surge in T effects, but
I seem to be recovering a bit of lost hair. Will test in October.

And I will volunteer, doubtless to his surprise, that I agree with IP
re: anecdotes about experiences with PCa and its txs. I have elsewhere
criticized over-dependence on such anecdotes in the decision process.

Regards,

Steve J

"You live and learn -- or you don't live long."
--Lazarus Long
Alan Meyer - 17 Jul 2006 18:57 GMT
> ...  I have sex precisely one less time per month than before PCa. ...

My first thought was, gee, that's pretty good.

Then I thought about it some more. ...

Well, in any case, you're leading a productive life that is
of great benefit to many people, and not least to the thousands
of men and women who read this newsgroup.  There are
many men who can't say as much.

   Alan
Richbro - 17 Jul 2006 23:50 GMT
> My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT
> in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> trial.
> Duke

Duke, this is my first post, but can relate to your story. I'm a
patient and do my reading via books and the internet and have no
medical training. I am currently on Taxotere, which is semi-synthetic
type of taxane and probably the one you are about to undertake. I am in
early metastasis as my PSA was 4.8 at DX with lymph involvement found
during surgery - not before. PSA after surgery was <0.1, on hormone for
22 months, then PSA rose to 1.7, then Taxotere. Bone scan negative. The
SEs have been tolerable, but frustrating - some diarrhea, some fatigue,
some hair loss, and other minor stuff. I would caution you though -
everyone is different on SEs from talking to my chair mates after 15
treatments. My biggest problem has been the mental stress which pecks
away slowly at your resolve. Currently my PSA is 0.3 with 4 more
treatments scheduled, then wait and watch. I wish you well - my
advice to me is to stay as active as possible and keep the hope -
that's what drives me. Recommend the same. (by the way, I recently
joined this group)
Alan Meyer - 18 Jul 2006 00:53 GMT
> ... this is my first post ...

Welcome to the group as a new poster.  You are getting a
treatment that many members of this group will face someday,
so your experience is valuable to all.

> ... My biggest problem has been the mental stress which pecks
> away slowly at your resolve. ...

I know that what you are going through is very hard.  Some
patients have a terrific response to chemotherapy, and I sincerely
hope that you and Duke will be among them.

Whatever happens, I hope that you get a chance every
day to do something that you like, do something for someone
you care about, or do something that is meaningful to you.
And I hope that the value of each of those things will outweigh
all the pain, the stress and the despair you may face.

Best of luck to you, to Duke, and to all.

   Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.