Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2006
Chemo HDK+HC Side effects
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Duke Slater - 16 Jul 2006 14:41 GMT My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med ONC told me last week he will start me on HDK+HC when I say go. Those of you that have experianced these treatments, could you share the side effects you experianced and how thse affected your day to day routine? I know it varies, but would like to have a game plan in place when all of this begins. Can you alleviate any SE's? Are there things I need to be careful about or do during infusion to help manage it? What kind of results have you had on this regimine? I know this is not good news, but I have to forge forward and hope for the best. My stats:
60 in good general health DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis, ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant PSA at DX - 44 Tx 3/17 Lupron 4months + 50mg Casodex Follow up PSA: 4/15 - 3.1; 5/15 - 5.1; 6/12 - 7.1 stopped Casodex; 7/3 - 13.8 (Damn) 7/14 - 2nd Lupron uro said start HDK+HC as indicated by MedOnc and Taxane, which med onc didnt' mention. I meet with med onc 7/24, have talked with his nurse thus far. I may also enter a Zometa clincal trial. Duke
Steve Kramer - 16 Jul 2006 16:24 GMT First, let me express my sorrow for your continuous bad news. It must seem that from March to July, your world has just gone topsy-turvy.
I have not been through these treatments yet, but....
> 60 in good general health > DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis, > ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant I do not recall you before mentioning mets on your pelvis. Were you trying to say "no lymph invovlement...."? Otherwise, your state would be a T4 and then some, but then you say the Dexascan was excellent. Which is why I think you mistyped.
Of course, this may all be moot. You may be (and have been) a T4 all along, based on your barely interrupted rise in PSA.
Please let us know how things are going as you proceed. I, for one, fully expect to be in your position too soon.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Duke Slater - 17 Jul 2006 02:35 GMT > > 60 in good general health > > DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis, > > ribs, sacrum; no chest inovlment; Dexascan all excellant I wasn't clear - I had a bone scan, CT and chest xray on 3/20 after being diagnosed on 3/17. Bone scan at that time was positve along with lymph involvment, and CT showed pelvis, seveeral ribs, L4, involvement. Chest was clear. A dexascan I had a few days later showed bones mineral density to be excellant. I got the whole enchilada - no syptoms that appeared to be PC related until diagnosis. So once more into the breech!
Duke
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 23:02 GMT >> > 60 in good general health >> > DX 3/17 Biopsy Gleason 9, lymph invovlment and bone mets in pelvis, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > appeared to be PC related until diagnosis. > So once more into the breech! No, it was my own Lupron moment. I confused bone density scan with bone scan.
I didn't realize that you had had all that involvement; as if the G9 wasn't bad enough.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
ron - 16 Jul 2006 18:20 GMT Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT treatment? Sometimes the ADT dosage or specific ADT drugs need to be adjusted/switched to effectively reduce T to castrate levels. If your T level was not tracked, then it is an assumption that ADT did not work (that you are hormone resistant) and that you need to move on to chemo. In fact, typically hormone resistant men will show a PSA decrease when casodex is removed, you did not...Best wishes and good health, rion
> My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT > in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > trial. > Duke Duke Slater - 17 Jul 2006 02:30 GMT > Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT > treatment? My T level was <18 at the June PSA test. I knew there was a problem. And guess what, I had to ask that my T be checked. I have been accepted by Dr, Myers in VA. and will see what he has to say. Thanks.
Duke
ron - 17 Jul 2006 03:38 GMT You picked a good one, Dr. M. is one of the best. Good luck!..ron
> > Hi Duke...Did your docs measure your T level during your 4 month ADT > > treatment? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Duke I.P. Freely - 17 Jul 2006 01:39 GMT > My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT > in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I know this is not good news, but I have to forge forward and hope for > the best. My stats: IMO, Duke, any doc who put me on all those chemicals, including chemical castration, without giving me a complete course in ADT SE likelihoods, prevention, and cures would see little more than a cloud of dust where I used to sit in his office. The SE list is long, their likelihoods vary significantly among sources, their incidence and severity and impact and preferences vary dramatically among individuals, some SE preventatives must be initiated BEFORE treatment or at its beginning, and maybe most important . . . no one man's experience is worth squat to you for many reasons.
A few basic "facts" about ADT SEs include: 1. They include almost certain fatigue, osteoporosis, hot flashes, and emotional changes, all of which can be reduced -- not necessarily prevented, REDUCED -- by other meds which have their OWN SEs *IF* one can tolerate those meds (a large percentage of middle age men can't take osteoporosis meds, for example). 2. ADT will not cure PC. It may delay its progress by months on average, with a range from negligible to years. 3. Most SEs will decline within months when a pt quits the ADT. Exceptions include bone loss, breast growth, and older men who don't recover their testosterone production (the primary SE cause is T deprivation, not the drugs per se). 4. Strum's ADT Syndrome treatise lays out many detailed pages of ADT SE discussion. It looks extremely scientific and useful, but many researchers doubt his credibility because Strum can't back it up to their satisfaction. Base decisions on it at your own peril. 5. One of the reasons anecdotal ADT experience is all but useless to individuals is that reactions to ADT range from a) such devastation that even some oncologists have stopped it at their own grave risk to z) pts who claim not to notice it a whole lot as long as they follow their anti-SE regimens. A poll of this forum yielded about 20 responses over that range, with a vast majority in the severe range.
There was extensive HT (aka ADT) discussion here over the winter of '04-'05, beginning roughly in about Nov-Dec '04, and it has sporadically returned. Do you know how to Google it up?
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 11:42 GMT > A few basic "facts" about ADT SEs include: > 1. They include almost certain fatigue, osteoporosis, hot flashes, and ... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ... > 5. One of the reasons anecdotal ADT experience is all but useless to ... All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being useless).
However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your quality of life. MOST people manage under ADT.
Personally (and anecdotally), I have been on Lupron for 3 years. I don't like it. I don't like the SEs. I don't like the meds to reduce the SEs. But, I work every day of the week and I work harder on weekends helping my mom, mom-in-law and three descendent families. I have sex precisely one less time per month than before PCa. I sleep fitfully 8 hours (on average) each night. I walk several miles every week. Almost no one (aside from the 40,000,000 that has access to this newsgroup) knows I'm on ADT.
And, mine is the most common story in these parts.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
I.P. Freely - 17 Jul 2006 16:53 GMT > All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being > useless). Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience?
> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your quality > of life. Sure, it can be stopped. However, the older we are, the greater the odds that stopping the chemicals does not stop the T deprivation which causes most of the SEs. Just something older men need to be aware of.
MOST people manage under ADT.
> Personally (and anecdotally), I have been on Lupron for 3 years. I don't > like it. I don't like the SEs. I don't like the meds to reduce the SEs. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > And, mine is the most common story in these parts. According to the poll here (if that's what you mean by "these parts") early last year, the primary commonality is that you manage (and better than many people). But that's not true of all even in this small poll, let alone the populations of the literature.
But one primary thing Duke needs to take away from this tangent is this: with his mets, ADT is not really optional (unless its SEs proves severe), and there are steps he should take to minimize its SEs. They include pre-initiation chest radiation to preclude gynaecomastia and taking bone-preservation drugs (IF he has no GERD or other contraindications). Most other counter-SE drugs can wait until the SEs show up, if they do, as long as he and his friends watch closely for signs of depression very commonly caused by low T and monitor the usual SE suspects such as weight gain, cholesterol, OA exacerbation, temper, hot flashes, etc. It also wouldn't hurt to get used to the gym now rather than waiting until he really needs it.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 17 Jul 2006 23:31 GMT >> All very true (aside from your insistence that anecdotal experience being >> useless). > > Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience? Well, for one, you now are just a little more at ease about trying it if the time comes and circumstances indicate.
>> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your >> quality of life. > > Sure, it can be stopped. However, the older we are, the greater the odds > that stopping the chemicals does not stop the T deprivation which causes > most of the SEs. Just something older men need to be aware of. I think most would realize the quality-of-life dis-benefits long befor 10-month to 2-year period that T deprivation becomes a serious issue... if it does.
>> And, mine is the most common story in these parts. > > According to the poll here (if that's what you mean by "these parts") > early last year, the primary commonality is that you manage (and better > than many people). But that's not true of all even in this small poll, let > alone the populations of the literature. I'll not argue that posit, as I did not quantify or qualify the responses. However, I believe that there are very few here that, for no other reason than quality of life, discontinued their dosages.
> But one primary thing Duke needs to take away from this tangent is this: > with his mets, ADT is not really optional (unless its SEs proves severe), [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > wouldn't hurt to get used to the gym now rather than waiting until he > really needs it. We can find common ground here, but, unfortunately, Duke's initial treatment was ADT2 and it's intended effects lasted all of one month.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
I.P. Freely - 19 Jul 2006 03:03 GMT > "I.P. Freely" >> Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience? > > Well, for one, you now are just a little more at ease about trying it if the > time comes and circumstances indicate. But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless.
>>> However, ADT can be stopped at any time if these SEs screw up your >>> quality of life. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > 10-month to 2-year period that T deprivation becomes a serious issue... if > it does. I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if it's going to.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 19 Jul 2006 11:36 GMT >> "I.P. Freely" >>> Of what practical application to another man is one man's experience? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless. I know that this is probably sacrilage to a scientist, especially a military scientist, but life's decisions are not, and should not, always be based on the rational. That's one difference between man and all other living organisms. The reflective property of addition does not always hold with man, to say nothing of more complicated therorums.
> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if > it's going to. First, it's theoretical in the first place, but I've read 1½ to 2 years. I think it was your favorite doc, Strum.
I.P. Freely - 19 Jul 2006 17:13 GMT >> But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless. > > I know that this is probably sacrilage to a scientist, especially a military > scientist, but life's decisions are not, and should not, always be based on > the rational. Life's everyday decisions, no. Life and DEATH decisions, why not? Are you advocating basing a tx decision on Uncle Joe's genitals falling off after a week of WW, or Cousin Sam's complete recovery from terminal brain mets after he drank a glass of Mojo juice? If so, on which case should the newbie base his choice? Advising a newbie to discount data gathered from tens of thousands of pts and instead ask a few guys how their tx went strikes me as extremely irresponsible. It's like buying a car or voting or choosing a wife by asking a couple of guys what they drive, elected, or married rather than doing the homework and considering one's own situation and choices, except for one HUGE difference: THIS choice often determines how long and how well the rest of our life goes.
>> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if >> it's going to. > > First, it's theoretical in the first place Not at all.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 20 Jul 2006 01:32 GMT >>> But not rationally so, since another's experience is meaningless. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > a week of WW, or Cousin Sam's complete recovery from terminal brain mets > after he drank a glass of Mojo juice? Yes to Uncle Joe. No to Cousin Sam. :-)
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06, 6/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 Casodex added daily 07/06 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Alex - 21 Jul 2006 00:10 GMT > It's like buying a car or voting or choosing a wife by asking a couple of > guys what they drive, elected, or married True. It's much better to extensively test several models of cars, and a wide range of potential wives. Yeah, but ...
Alex
Steve Jordan - 19 Jul 2006 18:14 GMT At an ungodly hour on July 19, Steve Kramer quoted IP:
>> I don't know how long one must be on ADT for T to become irrecoverable, if >> it's going to. >> And replied:
> First, it's theoretical in the first place, but I've read 1½ to 2 years. I > think it was your favorite doc, Strum. > Here's what Strum says: "Men who are receiving LHRH-A therapy for time periods in excess of two years may have difficulty in returning to a state of normal testosterone production despite discontinuation of LHRH-A." _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ 2nd ed., page B20.
He further says that this, when it occurs, is the result not of testicular atrophy but of "pathological events in the pituitary."
Of course, there are T-replacement txs.
FWIW, I stopped monthly Trelstar depots as of March after 14 months of <0.01 ng/mL. I cannot say that I note any great surge in T effects, but I seem to be recovering a bit of lost hair. Will test in October.
And I will volunteer, doubtless to his surprise, that I agree with IP re: anecdotes about experiences with PCa and its txs. I have elsewhere criticized over-dependence on such anecdotes in the decision process.
Regards,
Steve J
"You live and learn -- or you don't live long." --Lazarus Long
Alan Meyer - 17 Jul 2006 18:57 GMT > ... I have sex precisely one less time per month than before PCa. ... My first thought was, gee, that's pretty good.
Then I thought about it some more. ...
Well, in any case, you're leading a productive life that is of great benefit to many people, and not least to the thousands of men and women who read this newsgroup. There are many men who can't say as much.
Alan
Richbro - 17 Jul 2006 23:50 GMT > My PSA has jumped from 3.1 in April to 13.8 in July after beginning ADT > in March. Met with my uro 7/14 and he said to start Taxane ASAP. Med [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > trial. > Duke Duke, this is my first post, but can relate to your story. I'm a patient and do my reading via books and the internet and have no medical training. I am currently on Taxotere, which is semi-synthetic type of taxane and probably the one you are about to undertake. I am in early metastasis as my PSA was 4.8 at DX with lymph involvement found during surgery - not before. PSA after surgery was <0.1, on hormone for 22 months, then PSA rose to 1.7, then Taxotere. Bone scan negative. The SEs have been tolerable, but frustrating - some diarrhea, some fatigue, some hair loss, and other minor stuff. I would caution you though - everyone is different on SEs from talking to my chair mates after 15 treatments. My biggest problem has been the mental stress which pecks away slowly at your resolve. Currently my PSA is 0.3 with 4 more treatments scheduled, then wait and watch. I wish you well - my advice to me is to stay as active as possible and keep the hope - that's what drives me. Recommend the same. (by the way, I recently joined this group)
Alan Meyer - 18 Jul 2006 00:53 GMT > ... this is my first post ... Welcome to the group as a new poster. You are getting a treatment that many members of this group will face someday, so your experience is valuable to all.
> ... My biggest problem has been the mental stress which pecks > away slowly at your resolve. ... I know that what you are going through is very hard. Some patients have a terrific response to chemotherapy, and I sincerely hope that you and Duke will be among them.
Whatever happens, I hope that you get a chance every day to do something that you like, do something for someone you care about, or do something that is meaningful to you. And I hope that the value of each of those things will outweigh all the pain, the stress and the despair you may face.
Best of luck to you, to Duke, and to all.
Alan
|
|
|