Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Shift in prostate cancer Gleason grades from 1989 to 2001

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
c palmer - 26 Jun 2006 20:19 GMT
Monday, 26-Jun-2006   

 Since the clinical introduction of PSA testing, there is reason to
hypothesize that prostate cancer (CaP) Gleason grades may have shifted
due to a variety of factors. 

Dr. Sengupta and associates at the Mayo Clinic report this to be the
case in the epub version of Cancer.

Between 1989 and 2001, 8750 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy
at the Mayo clinic met the study criteria.  Gleason grades over the 13
year period were reviewed and biochemical recurrence (defined as a PSA
>0.4ng/ml) was recorded.  Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS)
was estimated using Kaplan Meier methodology. 

The percentage of RP specimens assigned a Gleason grade of 3 as either
the primary or secondary grade increased from 86% vs. 49% for primary
and 71% vs. 47% for secondary pattern for
1999-2001 vs. 1989-1999, respectively.

During the same time periods, the prevalence of Gleason grade 2 tumors
decreased from 0.4% vs. 38% for primary and 1.3% vs. 28% for secondary
Gleason grade patterns.  As a result, less Gleason score 4-5 tumors
and more Gleason score 6-7 tumors were identified. 

The BRFS for patients with Gleason score 6 and 7 tumors improved over
the time periods.  For Gleason score 6 the 5-year BRFS improved form
47% to 87% over the two time periods.  For Gleason score 7 the 5-year
BRFS improved form 51% to 66% over the two time periods.  There were
no significant changes noted over the same time periods for Gleason
scores 2-4 or 8-10.  In multivariate analysis, improved BRFS remained
for Gleason score 6, but not for patients with Gleason score 7
tumors. 

The noted Gleason grade shifts may be a result of true stage migration
secondary to PSA screening or changes in pathologic interpretation over
the time period studied.

By Christopher P. Evans, MD

Reference:

Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;106(12):2630-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/
Sengupta S, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Sebo TJ, Myers RP,
Cheville JC, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H.

 

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
ron - 26 Jun 2006 21:12 GMT
c palmer wrote...snip...

> The noted Gleason grade shifts may be a result of true stage migration
> secondary to PSA screening

and increased biopsy sampling (e.g. 6->12+ cores)

> or changes in pathologic interpretation over
> the time period studied.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.