Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

AMS 800 update.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
friendofcurtis@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2006 13:41 GMT
  The AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in September
of last year.  My experience with the device has not been entirely
satisfactory.  I went from filling up a Depends Guard in two hours to
where I have stabilized now at two Guards per day.  My uro said that he
could add an additional cuff in an attempt to cut down on the leaking
further, but that he would have used a smaller cuff in the first place
if it were available.  As it is, what he implanted is the smallest AMS
makes.  I see no sense in undergoing surgery again just to implant
another device that is too big for my apparently undersized urethra, so
I have decided to stick with where I am at now.  Two pads a day is
certainly tolerable.  A bit of a disappointment with the implant, but
tolerable.
  My uro told me that there are a couple new procedures being
performed, some only in Europe at this point, that have promise.  One
sounded like a variation on the sling where the urethra and sphincter
are repositioned using tissue from the patient himself in order to put
things back to where they were when the prostate was still there.  At
the point I spoke to him he said they have only done that procedure
four or five times, but it looked promising.  The other was taking
tissue from the patient and placing that around the urethra with the
AMS 800 cuff over this new area, giving it time to vascularize, and
then activate the AMS device.  That supposedly makes for a better
clamping and gives better control.  I do not know where that one stands
at this point.  I will report if I hear more later.
   Seriously looked into the AMS 700 implant, but decided against that
at least for now.  I am not anxious to get on the operating table
anytime soon again.  Seven surgeries in the last six years is enough.
  Any questions?  
Thank you.
David S.
Ron B - 01 Jun 2006 17:00 GMT
Thanks for the update David...even if it isn't as you had planned.

My one thought...which I've never asked you via e-mail (cuz I didn't
think of it)...

how much difference can there BE in urethras?

I'm serious.  I mean...you would think that to do a surgical
procedure...they would take into account the slight variations in
different urethras and the cuff would be made to 'work' for everyone.

I could see differences in healing etc., but once done properly...you'd
hope the thing would work as you had expected.

I also understand not wanting to see an OR anytime again.  :-)

Best of health to you and everyone,

Ron B.

Chicago
friendofcurtis@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2006 17:36 GMT
Hi Ron:
  I did call AMS to put in a word to make a smaller cuff.  I doubt
anything will come of that, but who knows, if they get enough feedback
perhaps they will at least look into making a smaller one.
  Take care.
David

> Thanks for the update David...even if it isn't as you had planned.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Chicago
Tdub - 02 Jun 2006 03:55 GMT
So sorry to hear the device hasn't worked out for you, David. This
makes me feel even more lucky, god bless, that mine is working so well.
I found that my bladder muscles were a bit overactive (asking me to go
pee when I didn't need to) after the 800 install. Detrol LA has solved
that problem. I now only have to go every 4 hours or so. And I no
longer can feel the 800 in my body - early on there was some
intermittent gravity-induced discomfort from the device, but that is
gone. My only limitation is that I can't sit forward and then get up
right away - sitting in that position puts pressure on the cuff and
causes it to deflate ("Woops"). I use one regular Poise pad a day, and
it has hardly anything in it after that. I do have an un-occasional
accident (usually associated with social pressures that apparently
cause my bladder muscles to get real active, but that seems to be
lessening over time as well).    Hang in there dude, a procedure will
come along to fix your situation B4 you know it.   God bless Dr.
Laurence Levine!   I wanted to give my experience with the 800 so other
readers can get a balanced view of the 800 - it has rescued my (quality
of) life (now if I can somehow manage to keep my arteries open!).
Bob C - 02 Jun 2006 12:58 GMT
Real sorry to hear that the AMS 800 has not done a good job for you. I have
had one for over a year now and am satisfied. Overall experience is about
the same as Tdub. One light pad does it for a day, but a major cold with
lots of coughing will find me replacing it during the day. That's about the
only time I have a real leakage, with hard coughs. On occasion I go to pee
and am distracted and suddenly wonder why nothing is happening, and then I
remember to ue the pump! Duh. Prior to the 800, I would not have to pee all
that often during an active day as I leaked so much, with the range being
from 2-6 pads a day. A day at the desk would be a 1-2 pad day. I do recall
the Dr saying something about having to size the cuff at the time of the
surgery, so there must be something to what you say about different
diameters. I also have read about adding tissue to make for a more
apropriate fit, so maybe that's an option. Good luck to you.
>   The AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in September
> of last year.  My experience with the device has not been entirely
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Thank you.
> David S.
friendofcurtis@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2006 17:43 GMT
I want to be careful to be clear that I am not recommending against the
device.  Before the AMS 800 I was filling up a Depends Guard every two
hours or so.  Although my experience was not what I had hoped for, I am
much better off and only using two pads per day.  So I did not want to
leave a negative impression for someone facing the decision to have the
device implanted.

On healing, I was outside the curve on that also.  I remember one
member here telling me that it took five months for the soreness in the
testicles to go away.  Most guys do not experience that.  Somehow I was
one of the "lucky ones" to have it take five full months for that
soreness to cease.  Getting out of the shower and looking in the mirror
still causes me to smile though.  The side of the scrotum with the pump
hangs much lower than the other side.  Maybe I should get the AMS 700
to balance things out?

Take care guys.  Good health and low PSA's to all.

David S.
friendofcurtis@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2006 17:44 GMT
I want to be careful to be clear that I am not recommending against the
device.  Before the AMS 800 I was filling up a Depends Guard every two
hours or so.  Although my experience was not what I had hoped for, I am
much better off and only using two pads per day.  So I did not want to
leave a negative impression for someone facing the decision to have the
device implanted.

On healing, I was outside the curve on that also.  I remember one
member here telling me that it took five months for the soreness in the
testicles to go away.  Most guys do not experience that.  Somehow I was
one of the "lucky ones" to have it take five full months for that
soreness to cease.  Getting out of the shower and looking in the mirror
still causes me to smile though.  The side of the scrotum with the pump
hangs much lower than the other side.  Maybe I should get the AMS 700
to balance things out?

Take care guys.  Good health and low PSA's to all.

David S.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.