Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / May 2006
Dave's path report
|
|
Thread rating:  |
juniper - 07 May 2006 06:06 GMT Hi, all. Hoping for some feedback here for Dave.
I found my surgical path report, I'm not sure what's relevant and what's not. It says, A) right obturator lymph node: two benign lymph nodes (0/2) B) left obturatoe lymph nodes two beign lymph nodes (0/2) C)apex of prostate: prostatic adenocarcinoma, gleason 9 (5+4) extensive perineural invasion apex margin free of tumor D)prostate, radical prostatectomy: prostatic adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated, gleason 9 (grades 5+4) tumor involves both lobes, occupying 80% total prostatic tissue extra prostatic extension present seminal vesicle invasion present multifocal margins positive, bladder neck and peripheral, including left anterior and left posterior peripheral margins apical margin free of tumor pathologic staging pT3b,pNO, pMX.
That's all on the prostate, the next just said the colon tumor tested negative and both sides of the resection as well.
... I asked the uro friday about it (HT). He said he gave me casodex and Zoladex. It's supposed to inhibit testosterone for 90 days. He doesn't like to start Lupron until later although considered it when the biopsy showed to Gleason 10's. The post surgery path report though, only showed a 9.
I asked about the "chemo-drugs" (from his hospital bill) and he said the nurse had administered them (true), but they had been ordered by the other doctor (the colon, hernia, re-section, surgeon guy).
He said they didn't want to operate because it was too soon after the hernia surgery. Usually not that bad, but I had been burst open internally in 1998 and this was the 4th one and very extensive for hernia repair. Scar tissue in the way, ripped abdominal wall along the old injury..etc....etc.
But they knew there was a tumor in the colon, and a psa of 36.8 and a pending biopsy that came back a nightmare and I wasn't healed. So he had me given some chemo drugs, wasnt sure which.
I haven't seen the other DR. didn't think it was important. But the uro, said it was probably a long lasting one and they gave me three. ($1000.00 a pop) that I saw! Anyhow, they knew they had to do their best to stop anymore cancer cell growth. Now, after the surgery, and no cells in lymph glands, colon negative, he wants me really healed before the radiation. He seems confidant the drugs given me will inhibit the hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first psa since surgery. (03/13/06)
From Bob - 07 May 2006 07:21 GMT The positive note in the report is that the lymph nodes are clear, important as they represent the traveling system for Pca, or any cancer for that matter. Good that he started the Casodex first, as this will prevent "flare", when the Luperon is administered. The bad part about the Chemo drugs, is that they are cyto-toxic, kill the good cells as well as the (:bad -guy's), many with nasty side effects.. With my limited knowledge these are the only comments i can make. My prayers are with both of you. ~ Bob
Steve Kramer - 07 May 2006 11:56 GMT Is this Daave481's path report?
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
> Hi, all. Hoping for some feedback here for Dave. > [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first > psa since surgery. (03/13/06) dave481 - 07 May 2006 15:20 GMT Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut, copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it. David
Steve Kramer - 07 May 2006 18:04 GMT > Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut, > copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick > well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it. Whew! I thought I was seeing your twin for a minute there.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05, 2/06 PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
J - 07 May 2006 21:29 GMT > Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut, > copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick > well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it. > David Left mouse click at the top/beginning of what you want to copy, continue holding that left mouse button, and drag the mouse to the end /bottom of what you want to copy. Let go of the mouse.
On the keyboard: Hold the CTRL button down and hit the C key once. (now it's copied - CTRL-C) to your clipboard). Then open a new message, on the newsgroup. Left mouse click once, in the message body, so the blinking cursor blinks.
Then right mouse click and select "Paste" (or CTRL-P) - voila, the text that you copied, should be in the message.(The next text that you copy or cut, forgets the previous one.) If you hi-lite (DEL button), you lose that.
Type the subject line and anything else you wish to add/insert in the message body, then post it.
Practise it by opening a Notepad or Wordpad program or email or newsgroup post (but cancel out your testing - ie don't send) or here http://www.webmasternow.com/copyandpaste.html
J
If you copy (CTRL-C) or CTRL-X (cut) you can paste (CTRL-P) the same text, as many times and as many places as you wish (during the current software session). If you turn off your computer, the clipboard (which the CTRL-C copies to) empties out.
Heather - 07 May 2006 16:35 GMT Glad you asked.....I thought I was in the Twilight Zone!! 8-))
HF
> Is this Daave481's path report? > [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] >> first >> psa since surgery. (03/13/06) juniper - 07 May 2006 18:38 GMT > Glad you asked.....I thought I was in the Twilight Zone!! 8-)) LOL. dave is the closest brother to what we're going through. diagnosis about the same time, surgery about the same time. bonding.
juniper - 07 May 2006 18:34 GMT (Standard disclaimer about not being a doctor.)
juniper pasted for Dave481:
> A) right obturator lymph node: > two benign lymph nodes (0/2) > B) left obturatoe lymph nodes > two beign lymph nodes (0/2) Nice. 4/4 negative, that's a good sign.
> C)apex of prostate: > prostatic adenocarcinoma, gleason 9 (5+4) > extensive perineural invasion The cancer travels along the nerves on its way out of the prostate, that is the perineural invasion. This is an indicator of extracapsular extension, but not important because the rest of the report says there is EE.
> apex margin free of tumor The cancer did not extend past the bottom edge of the prostate.
> D)prostate, radical prostatectomy: > prostatic adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated, gleason > 9 (grades 5+4) > tumor involves both lobes, occupying 80% total prostatic > tissue Your prostate was pretty much pure, aggressive cancer. Good thing you got it out.
> extra prostatic extension present According to Pagliano and Strum, "if the PC has spread to nerby tissues outside the scope of the urologist's scalpel, PSA recurrance after RP is virtually a certainty."
> seminal vesicle invasion present This report does not say how extensive the invasion is but if it were minimal, just at the edges, it probably would state that. (These quotes are from various websites.)
"Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle involvement indicates a poor prognosis."
"Prostatic tumours with seminal vesicle invasion have a high risk of progression after radical prostatectomy. A preoperative PSA level less than 10 ng/ml, a Gleason score of the operative specimen less than 7 and effraction of the prostatic capsule can be used to identify a subpopulation of patients with a better prognosis."
"Of 32 patients, 12 (37.5 %) had seminal vesicle involvement. Seven patients had involvement of bilateral seminal vesicles and five had unilateral involvement. Tumor cells invaded the muscle portion of seminal vesicle from the adjacent prostatic tissues in all 12 patients. Four of the seven patients with involvement of bilateral seminal vesicles developed bony metastasis 7 to 12 months after operation. No patient with unilateral involvement of seminal vesicle was found to have disease progression to bony metastasis during follow-up for as long as 39 months."
> multifocal margins positive, bladder neck and peripheral, > including left anterior and left posterior > peripheral margins Lots of cancer still left at the edges of the excised tissue.
> apical margin free of tumor Again, the bottom side.
> pathologic staging pT3b,pNO, pMX. T3b means bilateral extracapsular extension. However, they stated that seminal vesicle invasion was present. That would be stage T3c. Seminal vesicle invasion is generally a worse sign than EE. However, the degree of your EE may have made it seem more important to the pathologist. N0 means no lymph nodes. MX means that the presence of distant metastasis cannot be assessed. I suspect that with the degree of your pathology, they weren't able to say "no distant mets"--just made it a "who knows".
> That's all on the prostate, the next just said the colon tumor tested > negative and both sides of the resection as well. Well, there's good news. That tumor may have saved your life.
> ... I asked the uro friday about it (HT). He said he gave me casodex > and Zoladex. It's supposed to inhibit testosterone for 90 days. He > doesn't like to start Lupron until later although considered it when > the biopsy showed to Gleason 10's. The post surgery path report though, > only showed a 9. Its a good thing he gave you something, but I don't know much about all this. I do know the dosage is 84 days (12 weeks) and not 90. It may or may not matter to you, but if the manufacturer says "84" days then I think that extra week might matter. I am suspicious of urologists knowing a lot about HT, and prefer our situation, with an oncologist prescribing. The Zoladex causes an initial upsurge in testosterone, presumably feeding all those cancer cells that like testosterone, but the Casodex blocks the testosteron receptor sites so the cancer is surrounded by food but can't eat. When they do it with Casodex pills, they start the pills a week before the Zoladex to give the Casodex time to block all the receptors first. I don't know how long it takes with a shot. The website for the manufacturer of both is at http://zoladex.com/professionals/zoladex/. In case you want to read up on side effects or anything.
> I asked about the "chemo-drugs" (from his hospital bill) and he said > the nurse had administered them (true), but they had been ordered by > the other doctor (the colon, hernia, re-section, surgeon guy). Who knows what this is.
> He said they didn't want to operate because it was too soon after the > hernia surgery. Usually not that bad, but I had been burst open > internally in 1998 and this was the 4th one and very extensive for > hernia repair. Scar tissue in the way, ripped abdominal wall along the > old injury..etc....etc. Wow, you are a tough old cowboy. Didn't even mention all this before. Still think you got a good doctor. You're healing from the surgery fine?
> But they knew there was a tumor in the colon, and a psa of 36.8 and a > pending biopsy that came back a nightmare and I wasn't healed. So he > had me given some chemo drugs, wasnt sure which. > > I haven't seen the other DR. didn't think it was important. But the If you don't think it important to see him, you could get your records from him. They would have the information about what drugs you got. Also more information to see if any questions came up. I would want to see him for "closure", maybe to ask if he thinks you might get any more tumors or what he thinks caused it, or if it makes you more likely to get colon cancer in the future. Just to put it to rest.
> uro, said it was probably a long lasting one and they gave me three. > ($1000.00 a pop) that I saw! Anyhow, they knew they had to do their > best to stop anymore cancer cell growth. Now, after the surgery, and no > cells in lymph glands, colon negative, he wants me really healed before > the radiation. He seems confidant the drugs given me will inhibit the Yes, they like to give you plenty of time to heal, also get your continence back. It is clear beyond a doubt that RT (radiation therapy) is far more effective with concurrent ADT (hormone, androgen deprivation therapy.) So even if you don't want to be on ADT for the long haul, it would be good to bite the bullet and get another dose of it to carry you through the RT. (If you do RT.)
> hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first > psa since surgery. (03/13/06) Your PSA goal is zero, undetectable. Your goal is to (well, maybe not *your* goal) have a testosterone <20 (depending on the test). Our doctor is taking testosterone, PSA, and PAP tests every 3 weeks to watch the cancer. (She is also doing blood tests every week, but that is because of the chemo.)
The thing about ADT is that men can often do intermittant ADT. Be on it for a while then get off for months (or years, for some). The determining factor seems to be having an undetectable PSA for 12 full months before stopping it. Another important piece of information for all this is your testosterone levels. How fast they dropped, how low they dropped. So if your doctor is not testing your testosterone, then you may be missing out on information you need to make decisions in the future.
Dave, it sounds like radiation is the thing to do. Since you know there was a whole lot of cancer left in the area. With a G9, it is most likely that your cancer is spread beyond the prostate area, somewhere else in your body. To fight it aggressively, you would need to look at systemic treatments. Those would be hormone therapy of some sort and/or chemotherapy. Of course, in all of this you have to make your choices based on a lot of factors.
I'm sorry for the awful news. Just because it was expected from the pre-treatment workup doesn't make it easier, I know. Like Steve says, used to be the archer and now he's the target. What awful news is going to come next, he asks.
It will be interesting to see what you decide to do about all this. Just because radiation and hormone therapy are indicated, doesn't mean you have to do it. Plus, there are two valid sides to the hormone question. One side says to hit it fast and hard while it is weakened. The other side says to wait until your PSA rises to a certain point (various #s on that one) and then do HT. Even though your Gleason is so high, and the cancer was so prevalant, it is possible that it was a cancer with a strong territorial sense, and stuck close to home, where you can get it with radiation. There's no doubt in my mind that you have some cancer cells floating around your body, but short term ADT could get rid of them if there's no major nests. I read a study that found prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow of a large percentage of PC patients before RP, and after RP the % of patients who still had the cells in their bone marrow was way down. Maybe those 'child cells' need a parent (testosterone), while they're still looking for a place to settle.
Best wishes, don't let your self get too depressed. Its just another g'damned thing, you know? When something like this hits, you think, 'why did it have to be that? why couldn't i lose a leg, or something?' But there is that parable about the troubles tree. Everyone could hang their bag of troubles on the tree but they had to take someone else's bag of troubles. Basically, most people kept their own. Also it reminds me of that book I read, The Other Side of the Mountain. This teen "had it all"--was going to be on the olympic ski team. Then she fell while skiiing and became paraplegic. Or quad. Anyway, someone asked her how she could be happy in a wheelchair. She said, "I just remember that everyone's troubles are just as big to them as mine are to me." I didn't say this right, but it was a powerful concept for me. We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt.
my highest regard, laurel
juniper - 07 May 2006 19:51 GMT > me. We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt. Dave, I'll see your seminal vesicles and raise you a bladder neck.
;o)
dave481 - 07 May 2006 20:12 GMT Man Laurel, that was a lot of interpretion. Thank-you. My doctor told me most of that, but I'm not a good audio student. (Ask any of my old teachers....lol). I was blessed, though, with good reading and comprehension skills. If I read it, I can usually understand it. So posting, indeed the whole NG has been such a blessing.
< < The Zoladex causes an initial upsurge in testosterone, < <presumably feeding all those cancer cells that like testosterone, but
the Casodex blocks the testosteron receptor sites so the cancer is > surrounded by food but can't eat. When they do it with Casodex pills,
they start the pills a week before the Zoladex to give the Casodex time
to block all the receptors first>
That is correct, that is exactly the way they did it. I took 7 casodex pills. The last one was the morning they put the Zoladex in my stomach.
<Wow, you are a tough old cowboy. Didn't even mention all this before.
Still think you got a good doctor. You're healing from the surgery fine? >
Thank-you for the compliment, that's about as good as it gets in my ethnic group (cowboys). We call it "cowboy up". Oh, yes this last one ( Dr who has done two of the repair jobs, had two before him, one retired and one died) seems very good. He's the one that suggested the colonoscopy while I was out during the hernia surgery. Found the colon tumor that did indeed save my life. If not for that I probably would not have seen a uro at all. I saw him last on 04/27/06. He said I was a very fast healer, everything looked good and come back in two months. But, consult him when my uro had (assigned??) me my onc. He is leery of some in the community that just run people through and don't study the patient as well as the charts. He's not too worried because he and uro work together often (as in my case) and see eye to eye. Also, there was an onc (one they approved of I guess....lol) around during the RP. This onc took the samples of the lymph gland himself to the lab and consulted with yet another onc on the samples. They did this BEFORE they took the prostate out. Because, had it spread, they weren't sure they'd take the prostate out. Same with the colon tumor. Had it been malignant, they probably would have rimmed the urethra and left the prostate there. At least that's what I was told.
< But there is that parable about the troubles tree. Everyone could hang their bag of troubles on the tree but they had to take someone else's bag of troubles. Basically, most people kept their own. Also it reminds me of that book I read, The Other Side of the Mountain. This teen "had it all"--was going to be on the olympic ski team. Then she fell while skiiing and became paraplegic. Or quad. Anyway, someone asked her how she could be happy in a wheelchair. She said, "I
just remember that everyone's troubles are just as big to them as mine are to me." I didn't say this right, but it was a powerful concept for
me. We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt>
I love relevant analogy and stories about strong people who persevere. Those two were great.
David
juniper - 07 May 2006 21:07 GMT > That is correct, that is exactly the way they did it. I took 7 casodex > But, consult him when my uro had (assigned??) me my onc. He is leery of > some in the community that just run people through and don't study the > patient as well as the charts. He's not too worried because he and uro > work together often (as in my case) and see eye to eye. Also, there was > an onc (one they approved of I guess....lol) around during the RP. This That might have been a pathologist. I'll be glad when you get an oncologist. You are on ADT-I, I guess. Steve is on ADT-2. Taking Trelstar (like Zoladex) and Casodex. Then I guess he'll go on ADT-3 when the chemo and radiation is done. She'll add Proscar. Anyway, we're in it for the long haul (24 months most likely), but I would think that if you were going to do ADT at all, which you are, and especially if you were going to do it short term, you would want to hit it with all you have.
> onc took the samples of the lymph gland himself to the lab and > consulted with yet another onc on the samples. They did this BEFORE > they took the prostate out. Because, had it spread, they weren't sure > they'd take the prostate out. Same with the colon tumor. Had it been > malignant, they probably would have rimmed the urethra and left the > prostate there. At least that's what I was told. Yeah, that is one way it is done. Some people (me) think that there is a definite advantage to taking the bulk of the tumor even if you don't get it all. Actually, there are studies. Mayo Clinic in Rochester has always gone ahead and taken the prostate out even with demonstrated lymph node involvement, so they have thousands of people who have gone both ways. It is called debulking and it works. But then, if they had left it in, you would not have all the SEs of the prostatectomy. So who's to say which you would have preferred? Since its too late now.
dave481 - 07 May 2006 21:58 GMT > who's to say which you would have preferred? Since its too late now. < Laurel, I really don't think I would have left it in. Especially with what I know now about gleasons, the info you gave me this morning, there's cancer there I'm sure, albeit small. Of course most folks can look back and see what should have been done. I DIDN'T know what all was involved then. So I don't put much credence into my hindsight. I did know about the SE's of taking the whole shebang out. Indeed, even when the uro gave me biopsy report, I told him,"no problem, we'll just do a little of that minimally invasive stuff. I'll be out of your hair.-:)) " LOL.... His eyes got so big, he looked at me as if I were a Bigfoot animal tribe, strolling out of the forest and sayin,"Ok, we're tired of hiding". He said , "David you are a sick man and in a bad situation here. We CAN'T save your prostate, it's too afflicted. Only if you have more cancer, which will be worse, believe me, you prostate has to come out." I saw no reason for him to lie. And, by then I was on this NG. I posted that day and Steve Jordan, Steve Kramer, Ron B, C palmer, yourself, Heather, IP and others came back. Very sad sounding. I'll never forget Steve Jordan WROTE in a sad sounding tone. I knew then, even if I didn't understand all the nuances, that it was going to be tough. With few choices. It's one of the first times in my life, that something was happening I didn't like, and could do very little to change it. I couldn't say,"screw it" and just leave. I couldn't negotiate with it. I had to let other people fight it for me and hoped they were right. Still that way. So after all the recent and comprehensive education. I don't think keeping the prostate in was a viable alternative, then or now.
David
juniper - 08 May 2006 01:20 GMT > and hoped they were right. Still that way. So after all the recent and > comprehensive education. I don't think keeping the prostate in was a > viable alternative, then or now. yeah, steve told his uro that once he was in there, take it out no matter what.
|
|
|