Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dave's path report

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
juniper - 07 May 2006 06:06 GMT
Hi, all.  Hoping for some feedback here for Dave.

I found my surgical path report, I'm not sure what's relevant and
what's not.
It says,
A) right obturator lymph node:
          two benign lymph nodes (0/2)
B) left obturatoe lymph nodes
          two beign lymph nodes (0/2)
C)apex of prostate:
           prostatic adenocarcinoma, gleason 9 (5+4)
           extensive perineural invasion
           apex margin free of tumor
D)prostate, radical prostatectomy:
             prostatic adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated, gleason
9 (grades 5+4)
             tumor involves both lobes, occupying 80% total prostatic
tissue
             extra prostatic extension present
             seminal vesicle invasion present
             multifocal margins positive, bladder neck and peripheral,
including left anterior and left posterior
            peripheral margins
             apical margin free of tumor
             pathologic staging pT3b,pNO, pMX.

That's all on the prostate, the next just said the colon tumor tested
negative and both sides of the resection as well.

... I asked the uro friday about it (HT). He said he gave me casodex
and Zoladex.  It's  supposed to inhibit testosterone for 90 days. He
doesn't like to start Lupron until later although considered it when
the biopsy showed to Gleason 10's. The post surgery path report though,
only showed a 9.

I asked about the "chemo-drugs" (from his hospital bill) and he said
the nurse had administered them (true), but they had been ordered by
the other doctor (the colon, hernia, re-section, surgeon guy).

He said they didn't want to operate because it was too soon after the
hernia surgery. Usually not that bad, but I had been burst open
internally in 1998 and this was the 4th one and very extensive for
hernia repair. Scar tissue in the way, ripped abdominal wall along the
old injury..etc....etc.

But they knew there was a tumor in the colon, and a psa of 36.8 and a
pending biopsy that came back a nightmare and I wasn't healed. So he
had me given some chemo drugs, wasnt sure which.

I haven't seen the other DR. didn't think it was important. But the
uro, said it was probably a long lasting one and they gave me three.
($1000.00 a pop) that I saw! Anyhow, they knew they had to do their
best to stop anymore cancer cell growth. Now, after the surgery, and no
cells in lymph glands, colon negative, he wants me really healed before
the radiation. He seems confidant the drugs given me will inhibit the
hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first
psa since surgery. (03/13/06)
From Bob - 07 May 2006 07:21 GMT
The positive note in the report is that the lymph nodes are clear,
important as they represent the traveling system for Pca, or any cancer
for that matter. Good that he started the Casodex first, as this will
prevent "flare", when the Luperon is administered. The bad part about
the Chemo drugs, is that they are cyto-toxic, kill the good cells as
well as the (:bad -guy's), many with nasty side effects..
With my limited knowledge these are the only comments i can make. My
prayers are with both of you. ~ Bob
Steve Kramer - 07 May 2006 11:56 GMT
Is this Daave481's path report?

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

> Hi, all.  Hoping for some feedback here for Dave.
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first
> psa since surgery. (03/13/06)
dave481 - 07 May 2006 15:20 GMT
Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut,
copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick
well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it.
David
Steve Kramer - 07 May 2006 18:04 GMT
> Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut,
> copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick
> well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it.

Whew!  I thought I was seeing your twin for a minute there.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05,
2/06
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

J - 07 May 2006 21:29 GMT
> Yes, that one is mine Steve, I had sent it to Laurel and she cut,
> copied, and posted it for me. I'm haven't learned that puter trick
> well. I can forward on e-mail, but didn't want to retype it.
> David

Left mouse click at the top/beginning of what you want to copy, continue
holding that left mouse button, and drag the mouse to the end /bottom of
what you want to copy. Let go of the mouse.

On the keyboard:
Hold the CTRL button down and hit the C key once. (now it's copied -
CTRL-C) to your clipboard).
Then open a new message, on the newsgroup.
Left mouse click once, in the message body, so the blinking cursor blinks.

Then right mouse click and select "Paste" (or CTRL-P)  - voila, the text
that you copied, should be in the message.(The next text that you copy or
cut, forgets the previous one.)  If you hi-lite (DEL button), you lose
that.

Type the subject line and anything else you wish to add/insert in the
message body, then post it.

Practise it by opening a Notepad or Wordpad program  or email or newsgroup
post (but cancel out your testing - ie don't send) or here
http://www.webmasternow.com/copyandpaste.html

J

If you copy (CTRL-C)  or CTRL-X (cut)  you can paste (CTRL-P) the same
text, as many times and as many places as you wish (during the current
software session). If you turn off your computer, the clipboard (which the
CTRL-C copies to) empties out.
Heather - 07 May 2006 16:35 GMT
Glad you asked.....I thought I was in the Twilight Zone!!  8-))

HF
> Is this Daave481's path report?
>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>> first
>> psa since surgery. (03/13/06)
juniper - 07 May 2006 18:38 GMT
> Glad you asked.....I thought I was in the Twilight Zone!!  8-))

LOL.
dave is the closest brother to what we're going through.  diagnosis
about the same time, surgery about the same time.  bonding.
juniper - 07 May 2006 18:34 GMT
(Standard disclaimer about not being a doctor.)

juniper pasted for Dave481:
>  A) right obturator lymph node:
>            two benign lymph nodes (0/2)
>  B) left obturatoe lymph nodes
>            two beign lymph nodes (0/2)

Nice.  4/4 negative, that's a good sign.

>  C)apex of prostate:
>             prostatic adenocarcinoma, gleason 9 (5+4)
>             extensive perineural invasion

The cancer travels along the nerves on its way out of the prostate,
that is the perineural invasion.  This is an indicator of extracapsular
extension, but not important because the rest of the report says there
is EE.

>             apex margin free of tumor

The cancer did not extend past the bottom edge of the prostate.

>  D)prostate, radical prostatectomy:
>               prostatic adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated, gleason
> 9 (grades 5+4)
>               tumor involves both lobes, occupying 80% total prostatic
> tissue

Your prostate was pretty much pure, aggressive cancer.  Good thing you
got it out.

>               extra prostatic extension present

According to Pagliano and Strum, "if the PC has spread to nerby tissues
outside the scope of the urologist's scalpel, PSA recurrance after RP
is virtually a certainty."

>               seminal vesicle invasion present

This report does not say how extensive the invasion is but if it were
minimal, just at the edges, it probably would state that.  (These
quotes are from various websites.)

"Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle involvement
indicates a poor prognosis."

"Prostatic tumours with seminal vesicle invasion have a high risk of
progression after radical prostatectomy. A preoperative PSA level less
than 10 ng/ml, a Gleason score of the operative specimen less than 7
and effraction of the prostatic capsule can be used to identify a
subpopulation of patients with a better prognosis."

"Of 32 patients, 12 (37.5 %) had seminal vesicle involvement. Seven
patients had involvement of bilateral seminal vesicles and five had
unilateral involvement. Tumor cells invaded the muscle portion of
seminal vesicle from the adjacent prostatic tissues in all 12 patients.
Four of the seven patients with involvement of bilateral seminal
vesicles developed bony metastasis 7 to 12 months after operation. No
patient with unilateral involvement of seminal vesicle was found to
have disease progression to bony metastasis during follow-up for as
long as 39 months."

>               multifocal margins positive, bladder neck and peripheral,
> including left anterior and left posterior
>              peripheral margins

Lots of cancer still left at the edges of the excised tissue.

>               apical margin free of tumor

Again, the bottom side.

>               pathologic staging pT3b,pNO, pMX.

T3b means bilateral extracapsular extension.  However, they stated that
seminal vesicle invasion was present.  That would be stage T3c. Seminal
vesicle invasion is generally a worse sign than EE.  However, the
degree of your EE may have made it seem more important to the
pathologist.  N0 means no lymph nodes. MX means that the presence of
distant metastasis cannot be assessed.  I suspect that with the degree
of your pathology, they weren't able to say "no distant mets"--just
made it a "who knows".

> That's all on the prostate, the next just said the colon tumor tested
> negative and both sides of the resection as well.

Well, there's good news.  That tumor may have saved your life.

> ... I asked the uro friday about it (HT). He said he gave me casodex
> and Zoladex.  It's  supposed to inhibit testosterone for 90 days. He
> doesn't like to start Lupron until later although considered it when
> the biopsy showed to Gleason 10's. The post surgery path report though,
> only showed a 9.

Its a good thing he gave you something, but I don't know much about all
this.  I do know the dosage is 84 days (12 weeks) and not 90.  It may
or may not matter to you, but if the manufacturer says "84" days then I
think that extra week might matter. I am suspicious of urologists
knowing a lot about HT, and prefer our situation, with an oncologist
prescribing.  The Zoladex causes an initial upsurge in testosterone,
presumably feeding all those cancer cells that like testosterone, but
the Casodex blocks the testosteron receptor sites so the cancer is
surrounded by food but can't eat.  When they do it with Casodex pills,
they start the pills a week before the Zoladex to give the Casodex time
to block all the receptors first.  I don't know how long it takes with
a shot.  The website for the manufacturer of both is at
http://zoladex.com/professionals/zoladex/.  In case you want to read up
on side effects or anything.

> I asked about the "chemo-drugs" (from his hospital bill) and he said
> the nurse had administered them (true), but they had been ordered by
> the other doctor (the colon, hernia, re-section, surgeon guy).

Who knows what this is.

> He said they didn't want to operate because it was too soon after the
> hernia surgery. Usually not that bad, but I had been burst open
> internally in 1998 and this was the 4th one and very extensive for
> hernia repair. Scar tissue in the way, ripped abdominal wall along the
> old injury..etc....etc.

Wow, you are a tough old cowboy.  Didn't even mention all this before.
Still think you got a good doctor.  You're healing from the surgery
fine?

> But they knew there was a tumor in the colon, and a psa of 36.8 and a
> pending biopsy that came back a nightmare and I wasn't healed. So he
> had me given some chemo drugs, wasnt sure which.
>
> I haven't seen the other DR. didn't think it was important. But the

If you don't think it important to see him, you could get your records
from him.  They would have the information about what drugs you got.
Also more information to see if any questions came up.  I would want to
see him for "closure", maybe to ask if he thinks you might get any more
tumors or what he thinks caused it, or if it makes you more likely to
get colon cancer in the future.  Just to put it to rest.

> uro, said it was probably a long lasting one and they gave me three.
> ($1000.00 a pop) that I saw! Anyhow, they knew they had to do their
> best to stop anymore cancer cell growth. Now, after the surgery, and no
> cells in lymph glands, colon negative, he wants me really healed before
> the radiation. He seems confidant the drugs given me will inhibit the

Yes, they like to give you plenty of time to heal, also get your
continence back.  It is clear beyond a doubt that RT (radiation
therapy) is far more effective with concurrent ADT (hormone, androgen
deprivation therapy.)  So even if you don't want to be on ADT for the
long haul, it would be good to bite the bullet and get another dose of
it to carry you through the RT.  (If you do RT.)

> hormones or cell growth until then. He took blood friday for the first
> psa since surgery. (03/13/06)

Your PSA goal is zero, undetectable.  Your goal is to (well, maybe not
*your* goal) have a testosterone <20 (depending on the test).   Our
doctor is taking testosterone, PSA, and PAP tests every 3 weeks to
watch the cancer.  (She is also doing blood tests every week, but that
is because of the chemo.)

The thing about ADT is that men can often do intermittant ADT.  Be on
it for a while then get off for months (or years, for some).  The
determining factor seems to be having an undetectable PSA for 12 full
months before stopping it.  Another important piece of information for
all this is your testosterone levels.  How fast they dropped, how low
they dropped.  So if your doctor is not testing your testosterone, then
you may be missing out on information you need to make decisions in the
future.

Dave, it sounds like radiation is the thing to do.  Since you know
there was a whole lot of cancer left in the area.  With a G9, it is
most likely that your cancer is spread beyond the prostate area,
somewhere else in your body.  To fight it aggressively, you would need
to look at systemic treatments.  Those would be hormone therapy of some
sort and/or chemotherapy.  Of course, in all of this you have to make
your choices based on a lot of factors.

I'm sorry for the awful news.  Just because it was expected from the
pre-treatment workup doesn't make it easier, I know.  Like Steve says,
used to be the archer and now he's the target.  What awful news is
going to come next, he asks.

It will be interesting to see what you decide to do about all this.
Just because radiation and hormone therapy are indicated, doesn't mean
you have to do it.  Plus, there are two valid sides to the hormone
question.  One side says to hit it fast and hard while it is weakened.
The other side says to wait until your PSA rises to a certain point
(various #s on that one) and then do HT.  Even though your Gleason is
so high, and the cancer was so prevalant, it is possible that it was a
cancer with a strong territorial sense, and stuck close to home, where
you can get it with radiation.  There's no doubt in my mind that you
have some cancer cells floating around your body, but short term ADT
could get rid of them if there's no major nests.  I read a study that
found prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow of a large percentage of
PC patients before RP, and after RP the % of patients who still had the
cells in their bone marrow was way down.  Maybe those 'child cells'
need a parent (testosterone), while they're still looking for a place
to settle.

Best wishes, don't let your self get too depressed.  Its just another
g'damned thing, you know?  When something like this hits, you think,
'why did it have to be that?  why couldn't i lose a leg, or something?'
 But there is that parable about the troubles tree.  Everyone could
hang their bag of troubles on the tree but they had to take someone
else's bag of troubles.  Basically, most people kept their own.   Also
it reminds me of that book I read, The Other Side of the Mountain.
This teen "had it all"--was going to be on the olympic ski team.  Then
she fell while skiiing and became paraplegic.  Or quad.  Anyway,
someone asked her how she could be happy in a wheelchair.  She said, "I
just remember that everyone's troubles are just as big to them as mine
are to me."  I didn't say this right, but it was a powerful concept for
me.  We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt.

my highest regard,
laurel
juniper - 07 May 2006 19:51 GMT
> me.  We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt.

Dave, I'll see your seminal vesicles and raise you a bladder neck.

;o)
dave481 - 07 May 2006 20:12 GMT
Man Laurel, that was a lot of interpretion. Thank-you. My doctor told
me most of that, but I'm not a good audio student. (Ask any of my old
teachers....lol). I was blessed, though, with good reading and
comprehension skills. If I read it, I can usually understand it. So
posting, indeed the whole NG has been such a blessing.

<
<   The Zoladex causes an initial upsurge in testosterone,
<
<presumably feeding all those cancer cells that like testosterone, but

the Casodex blocks the testosteron receptor sites so the cancer is >
surrounded by food but can't eat.  When they do it with Casodex pills,

they start the pills a week before the Zoladex to give the Casodex time

to block all the receptors first>

That is correct, that is exactly the way they did it. I took 7 casodex
pills. The last one was the morning they put the Zoladex in my stomach.

<Wow, you are a tough old cowboy.  Didn't even mention all this before.

Still think you got a good doctor.  You're healing from the surgery
fine? >

Thank-you for the compliment, that's about as good as it gets in my
ethnic group (cowboys). We call it "cowboy up". Oh, yes this last one (
Dr who has done two of the repair jobs, had two before him, one retired
and one died) seems very good. He's the one that suggested the
colonoscopy while I was out during the hernia surgery. Found the colon
tumor that did indeed save my life. If not for that I probably would
not have seen a uro at all. I saw him last on 04/27/06. He said I was a
very fast healer, everything looked good and come back in two months.
But, consult him when my uro had (assigned??) me my onc. He is leery of
some in the community that just run people through and don't study the
patient as well as the charts. He's not too worried because he and uro
work together often (as in my case) and see eye to eye. Also, there was
an onc (one they approved of I guess....lol) around during the RP. This
onc took the samples of the lymph gland himself to the lab and
consulted with yet another onc on the samples. They did this BEFORE
they took the prostate out. Because, had it spread, they weren't sure
they'd take the prostate out. Same with the colon tumor. Had it been
malignant, they probably would have rimmed the urethra and left the
prostate there. At least that's what I was told.

<  But there is that parable about the troubles tree.  Everyone could
hang their bag of troubles on the tree but they had to take someone
else's bag of troubles.  Basically, most people kept their own.   Also
it reminds me of that book I read, The Other Side of the Mountain.
This teen "had it all"--was going to be on the olympic ski team.  Then
she fell while skiiing and became paraplegic.  Or quad.  Anyway,
someone asked her how she could be happy in a wheelchair.  She said, "I

just remember that everyone's troubles are just as big to them as mine
are to me."  I didn't say this right, but it was a powerful concept for

me.  We are all just doing what we can with the hand we're dealt>

I love relevant analogy and stories about strong people who persevere.
Those two were great.

David
juniper - 07 May 2006 21:07 GMT
> That is correct, that is exactly the way they did it. I took 7 casodex
> But, consult him when my uro had (assigned??) me my onc. He is leery of
> some in the community that just run people through and don't study the
> patient as well as the charts. He's not too worried because he and uro
> work together often (as in my case) and see eye to eye. Also, there was
> an onc (one they approved of I guess....lol) around during the RP. This

That might have been a pathologist.   I'll be glad when you get an
oncologist.  You are on ADT-I, I guess.  Steve is on ADT-2.  Taking
Trelstar (like Zoladex)  and Casodex.  Then I guess he'll go on ADT-3
when the chemo and radiation is done.  She'll add Proscar.  Anyway,
we're in it for the long haul (24 months most likely), but I would
think that if you were going to do ADT at all, which you are, and
especially if you were going to do it short term, you would want to hit
it with all you have.

> onc took the samples of the lymph gland himself to the lab and
> consulted with yet another onc on the samples. They did this BEFORE
> they took the prostate out. Because, had it spread, they weren't sure
> they'd take the prostate out. Same with the colon tumor. Had it been
> malignant, they probably would have rimmed the urethra and left the
> prostate there. At least that's what I was told.

Yeah, that is one way it is done.  Some people (me) think that there is
a definite advantage to taking the bulk of the tumor even if you don't
get it all.  Actually, there are studies.  Mayo Clinic in Rochester has
always gone ahead and taken the prostate out even with demonstrated
lymph node involvement, so they have thousands of people who have gone
both ways.  It is called debulking and it works.  But then, if they had
left it in, you would not have all the SEs of the prostatectomy.  So
who's to say which you would have preferred?  Since its too late now.
dave481 - 07 May 2006 21:58 GMT
>  who's to say which you would have preferred?  Since its too late now. <

Laurel, I really don't think I would have left it in. Especially with
what I know now about gleasons, the info you gave me this morning,
there's cancer there I'm sure, albeit small. Of course most folks can
look back and see what should have been done. I DIDN'T know what all
was involved then. So I don't put much credence into my hindsight. I
did know about the SE's of taking the whole shebang out. Indeed, even
when the uro gave me biopsy report, I told him,"no problem, we'll just
do a little of that minimally invasive stuff. I'll be out of your
hair.-:)) "  LOL.... His eyes got so big, he looked at me as if I were
a Bigfoot animal tribe, strolling out of the forest and sayin,"Ok,
we're tired of hiding".  He said , "David you are a sick man and in a
bad situation here. We CAN'T save your prostate, it's too afflicted.
Only if you have more cancer, which will be worse, believe me, you
prostate has to come out." I saw no reason for him to lie. And, by then
I was on this NG. I posted that day and Steve Jordan, Steve Kramer, Ron
B, C palmer, yourself, Heather, IP and others came back. Very sad
sounding. I'll never forget Steve Jordan WROTE in a sad sounding tone.
I knew then, even if I didn't understand all the nuances, that it was
going to be tough. With few choices. It's one of the first times in my
life, that something was happening I didn't like, and could do very
little to change it. I couldn't say,"screw it" and just leave. I
couldn't negotiate with it. I had to let other people fight it for me
and hoped they were right. Still that way. So after all the recent and
comprehensive education. I don't think keeping the prostate in was a
viable alternative, then or now.

David
juniper - 08 May 2006 01:20 GMT
> and hoped they were right. Still that way. So after all the recent and
> comprehensive education. I don't think keeping the prostate in was a
> viable alternative, then or now.

yeah, steve told his uro that once he was in there, take it out no
matter what.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.