 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2006Radiation induced second cancers
http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/radoncology/crr/faculty/hall/ijrobp56-83.pdf This article has been has been discussed previously on this list, but never posted in its entirety. Isn't it copyrighted?..Ron > This article has been has been discussed previously on this list, but > never posted in its entirety. Isn't it copyrighted?..Ron Well, heck if I know. That was a university site, I think. Maybe its their article. Did I post the whole thing? Or just a link? Argh! Somebody pick my brain up off the floor! >> This article has been has been discussed previously on this list, but >> never posted in its entirety. Isn't it copyrighted?..Ron > > Well, heck if I know. That was a university site, I think. Maybe its > their article. Did I post the whole thing? Or just a link? Argh! > Somebody pick my brain up off the floor! Your brain is intact, and I believe that your legal position is solid too. The link you posted is to a public web page on a Columbia University computer. You didn't publish the paper, you merely posted a link to it. Columbia University is the party responsible for publishing it on the web. Since the researchers worked at Columbia, I assume they own the copyright and they also have not done anything wrong. Alan > This article has been has been discussed previously on this list, but > never posted in its entirety. Isn't it copyrighted?..Ron Okay, the author publishes it as a link from his website http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/radoncology/crr/hall.htm. See the fifth link down under "Selected Publications Online." Oh, look at this one Brenner DJ, Curtis RE, Hall EJ and Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer 88:398-406 (2000). [abstract] [PDF 116 KB] http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/radoncology/crr/faculty/hall/cancer88-398.pdf haven't read it yet. > This article has been has been discussed previously on this list, but > never posted in its entirety. Isn't it copyrighted?..Ron I think this paper is a very good one. Rather than compare secondary cancer rates in RT patients to the secondary cancer rates in the general population (which may be very different in terms of age, smoking, etc.), they compare against secondary cancer rates in RP patients...Ron Sorry, my mistake...Ron |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.