> Hmmm, I would have to do some research. But Kevin Mitnick is the only
> one who has ever done jail time that I know of. David Smith wiggled out
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> lasted so long. I think I just read somewhere that there are now
> viruses targetting cell phones. Sheesh!!
I really thought Linux was going to take off. Mac just doesn't have what it
takes to overcome their initial marketing deficiencies. I think they'd be
better off closing and opening up under a new name. Unix was doing so well.
I don't know what happend to them. I think PeopleSoft hurt them, but now
PeopleSoft seems to be flourishing. Never heard of Inertia, so I guess
that's why.
IT decisions are not made by IT experts (if there is such a thing). They
are made by money managers, VPs, and CEOs. IT experts only like the one
system they like and the rest have idea what they like. But they all know
the name "Microsoft".

Signature
Steve Kramer
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
Begin Lupron 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .1
> I find it so incredible that most of the world's servers are running
> Windows, when it is SO flawed.
>
> Here's the latest story:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/10/16/microsoft.security.ap/index.html
> And now, "Microsoft plans Windows overhaul to fight hackers" (And it
> only took them 20 years, according to Curtis' list.):
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/10/10/microsoft.security.ap/index.html
> Why do you suppose server owners don't change to Linux, UNIX or Mac OS
> 10? Inertia? Or would the others be discovered to be just as flawed if
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > lasted so long. I think I just read somewhere that there are now
> > viruses targetting cell phones. Sheesh!!
otfiddler - 20 Oct 2003 02:54 GMT
Steve:
Yup, money people --- the ones that ought to be looking at how
much their companies lose by hiring more IT people to deal with an
inferior OS, how much they lose when the servers are down due to
applying patches or updates, or because the virus attack du jour has
brought the servers to a crawl, etc. Look at the costs associated with
viruses and hacker attacks in Curtis' original post.
I'm thinking it's either inertia (as in Newton's Law no. 2 ---
sorry for the confusion engendered by the capital letter before) or
the "Emperor's New Clothes" phenomenon.
Money people ought to be the very ones screaming about Microsoft's
seeming lack of ability to write software with great gaping security
holes built in and banging on them to do something about it. But then,
if the US Justice Dept. can't do anything with M$, I don't suppose
Money Managers, VP's and CEO's have much of a chance, do they?
IT people like M$ because Windows keeps them fully employed.
Raw nerve --- can you tell?
Larry
> I really thought Linux was going to take off. Mac just doesn't have what it
> takes to overcome their initial marketing deficiencies. I think they'd be
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> system they like and the rest have idea what they like. But they all know
> the name "Microsoft".
otfiddler - 20 Oct 2003 14:10 GMT
> I'm thinking it's either inertia (as in Newton's Law no. 2 ---
Oooops --- Newton's Number 1 law, I mean ...