Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Radiotherapy after surgery best option for prostate cancer patients

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
c palmer - 17 Apr 2006 19:34 GMT
my comments - open ended articles like this are dangerous in that the
article did not list what standards they were using as a study group.
there is no consideration for gleason score, psa, or staging in the
article.

~ curtis

=====================

Publish Date : 4/17/2006 1:19:00 AM  

When cancer is confined to the prostate, removal of the organ can
successfully control the disease. However, for patients with cancer
extending beyond the prostate the risk of recurrence after surgery can
be 10-50%.

Michel Bolla (CHUA Michallon, Grenoble, France) and colleagues tested
whether immediate radiotherapy after surgical removal of the prostate
(prostatectomy) improved progression-free survival for patients at risk
of relapse. Between 1992 to 2001, the investigators recruited 1000
patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy from 37 centres in
Europe.

Half were assigned to radiotherapy after surgery and half to monitoring.
After a 5-year follow-up the researchers found that 74% of patients in
the radiotherapy group had biochemical progression-free survival
compared with 53% in the monitored group. Biochemical progression-free
survival refers to the patient's concentration of prostate-specific
antigen--a marker for prostate cancer.
They investigators also found that clinical progression-free survival
was significantly improved in the radiotherapy group.

Professor Bolla concludes: "Our results show significant improvement in
biochemical progression-free survival with immediate postoperative
irradiation…Long-term follow-up is needed to assess if postoperative
irradiation affects the occurrence of distant metastases, survival, or
both."

In an accompanying comment Stefan Hocht (Charité University Hospital,
Berlin, Germany) states: "Michel Bolla and colleagues report on a large
study from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of
Cancer (EORTC) that is likely to change patterns of care in locally
advanced prostate cancer…Although the superiority of adjuvant
radiotherapy is to be expected, we did not have direct proof of this
hypothesis. The question still to be answered is whether adjuvant
irradiation is superior to early salvage treatment as soon as
prostate-specific antigen rises."

Professor Michel Bolla, CHUA Michallon, Radiation department, BP

217X, F-38043, Grenoble Cedex, France.
T) 33-476-765-435
michel.bolla@ujf-grenoble.fr
Dr Stefan Hocht, Dept. Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy,
Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, D-12200 Berlin,
Germany
T) 49-308-445-3058
stefan.hoecht@charite.de
Contact: Joe Santangelo
j.santangelo@elsevier.com
1-212-633-3810
Lancet
http://www.thelancet.com  

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
I.P. Freely - 17 Apr 2006 21:53 GMT
> my comments - open ended articles like this are dangerous in that the
> article did not list what standards they were using as a study group.
> there is no consideration for gleason score, psa, or staging in the
> article.

Nor for adjuvant vs salvage, or several other factors. And what's this
"risk of relapse" business?  Who isn't?

I hate these stupid press releases. SURELY Bolla's study and report are
more thorough than implied.

I.P.
Bill - 18 Apr 2006 16:08 GMT
Yea, here's another one telling us we already know or can readily
deduce. The difference this time is that they are talking about
"locally advanced" disease, which I take to mean PCa confined to the
prostate bed; i.e. no evidence of systemic disease. It stands to reason
that RT that will zap out any PCa in the bed will result in at least
the appearance of freedom from progession in the short and perhaps
medium term.  If the PCa was in fact confined to the bed it may even be
curative. But, as we all know. the rub is knowing whether or not you
have local-only disease. The fact is that you cannot know - even w/ all
the scans and tests available. My personal theory is that many if not
most men w/ systemic disease also will have a local recurrence - and
that component is the one that the RT affects and results in reducing
PSA. It may well be that this study stopped short of the point where
the systemic component cranks up. Indeed, they state: "Long-term
follow-up is needed to assess if postoperative irradiation affects the
occurrence of distant metastases, survival, or both." Hey, survival is
what we are interested in - right?

Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
PSA 1.1
Memphis
I.P. Freely - 18 Apr 2006 20:21 GMT
>  Hey, survival is
> what we are interested in - right?

It's certainly part of the picture in most cancer cases.

I.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.