Hi Clarence, fellow g.p.!
><snip a lot of stuff>
>
>Mike
>
>You realise you're the Pioneer of HIFU in this ng. We should all be
>interested in your outcome and any Side Effects you may encounter.
Hail fellow g.p! I promise I will keep outcome/s.e's posted so others
can benefit as i have benefited in past from lurking behind you and
other informed posters. Give me a day or two and I will add to my
first report. I'm feeling fine, but not mentally focussed. My
immediate post-op recovery was a bit long-winded.
>I am one of the few here that's had HDR Temporary Brachytherapy with
>additional EBRT and Hormones over 18 months.
Blimey, is that all? You're a tougher gp than me - wouldn't have had
the nerve to agree to it all. I'm a) sorry and b) very much hoping to
find a simpler solution - hence i was very happy to have a go at HIFU.
Why go complicated and have s/e's, I thought, when I can go simple to
get them??? But then, maybe something positive?
>My PCA is undetectable 4 mths out from end of Hormones, but expected
>to bounce a tad within another 6-8 mths.
Excellent. Very much hope the 'tad' is microscopic. I will know the
results/fate in three months time with PSA, and biopsy' if necessary'.
My surgeon - Mr Calleury, nice bloke, in the Mark Emberton HIFU team,
seemed happy with his targeting. But only time will tell - only saw
him for for few minutes after op.-that's how this NHS works. Have to
wait for detailed report.
>I DO have quite a number of "collateral damage" SEs, which I'm working
>on with my GP (PCP)
Not only s/e's but 'a number'. That's really lousy for you. I frankly
also thought/hoped HIFU would be a good bet in that regard. Well,
we'll see now.
>As far as I know, HDR Brachytherapy is also relatively new, there
>hasn't been enough time to produce any cyclic datasets such as the
>Sloan Kettering Nomograms used in conjunction with the "Gold Standard"
>RP histories.
>
>So we are guinea pigs.
You're ng gp1 I'm ng gp2. We can add it to all the acronyms!
my very kind regards
MikeHi
>-- Reader to complete...
>-- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
>
>-- Regards
>
>-- CC
rosbif - 13 Apr 2006 16:01 GMT
>Hi Clarence, fellow g.p.!
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>my very kind regards
>MikeHi
You seem to have sailed through your treatment Mike - fingers crossed
for you.
Clarence Crow - 14 Apr 2006 00:29 GMT
>Hi Clarence, fellow g.p.!
>
>><snip a lot of stuff>
>>
>>Mike
<snip>
>>As far as I know, HDR Brachytherapy is also relatively new, there
>>hasn't been enough time to produce any cyclic datasets such as the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>You're ng gp1 I'm ng gp2. We can add it to all the acronyms!
<snip>
Acronyms are certainly empowering to some here, but there are a
spattering of subscribers here which would put me down the "gp"
pecking order as far as having HDRB as a treatment option .
Maybe, just maybe, I'm the first one to categorically suggest there
are not enough Data on it to produce a 10 yr Nomogram (as they have
with RP.) IMHO Nomograms using Data that are 10yrs old don't reflect
any advances in modern techniques or really demonstrate that nothing's
changed.
Someone else said it's all a "crap-shoot".
Spit on the dice and talk to them :)
-- Reader to complete...
-- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
-- Regards
-- CC