>> Just came across this over on the New Scientist web site (newscientist.com), FWIW.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I beginning to take most of these links with a grain of salt.
Here's the full citation for the article:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8987-high-cholesterol-linked-to-prostate-c
ancer.html
This is one of those statistical associations that is strong
enough to be worth further scientific investigation, but weak
enough that it is clearly not the major factor in PCa.
Here's the operative paragraph:
"Researchers asked the participants if they had a history of high
cholesterol. The data revealed that 22% of the men with prostate
cancer suffered from high cholesterol, compared with 16% of the
men who did not have these tumours."
Leaving aside the question of which men even knew whether
they had high cholesterol (maybe those with cancer have had
more blood tests?) it would appear from these self reports
that 78% of PCa patients did not have it.
I can't remember what my cholesterol numbers are. I don't
recall being told they were high. How many men actually know?
Maybe this kind of scientific investigation is better than none
at all. But how can you tell?
Alan
DonC - 12 Apr 2006 17:15 GMT
<SNIP>
> Here's the full citation for the article:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I can't remember what my cholesterol numbers are. I don't
> recall being told they were high. How many men actually know?
One could exclude a significant % of men who avoid seeing doctors. And also
exclude a large % of men tested with low cholesterol so they weren't
informed by their doctors. I'd guess that these two categories amount to at
least 80% of men. Personally, I always ask for a copy of my annual
blood/urine test reports. I'd guess that fewer than 5% of men do the same.
> Maybe this kind of scientific investigation is better than none
> at all. But how can you tell?
>
> Alan
Boney Maroni - 13 Apr 2006 03:45 GMT
> >> Just came across this over on the New Scientist web site
> >> (newscientist.com), FWIW.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Alan
Actually, it is abnormally low cholesterol numbers that traditionally
have been linked with cancer.
> I beginning to take most of these links with a grain of salt.
Which, as everyone knows, causes PC, high BP, and rust.
I.P.